Kangaroo mother care in the neonatal intensive care unit: staff attitudes and beliefs and opportunities for parents

AIM

To compare attitudes towards Kangaroo mother care (KMC) among staff in two high-tech neonatal intensive care units, which provided parents with different opportunities to get involved in their infants' care.

METHOD

Questionnaires were completed by healthcare staff in Unit A, which provided parents with unrestricted access so that they could provide continuous KMC, and Unit B, where parents could only practice KMC intermittently.

RESULTS

Unit A staff were more positive about the benefits and use of KMC, including its use in unstable infants, and rated their knowledge and practical skills more highly than staff in the other unit. Unit B staff also appreciated the method, but expressed more hesitation in using it with unstable infants. In particular, they stressed the need to adapt the physical environment of the NICU to enable parents to stay with their infants and practice the method.

CONCLUSION

Staff working in the NICU that gave parents unrestricted access were more positive about KMC than staff in the NICU that offered limited opportunities for parents to stay with their children. This finding suggests that it is important to eliminate unjustifiable obstacles to the presence of parents in the NICU, so that they can provide KMC.

Need for a reliable pain evaluation scale in the newborn in Sweden

BACKGROUND

A major problem in pain treatment in the newborn is the ability to assess the degree of experienced pain. Several different methods for estimating pain in the newborn have been introduced in recent years. The objectives of this study were to see whether pain scoring was used in Swedish neonatal units, and by which method, and furthermore to observe whether any changes had occurred between 1993 and 1998.

METHOD

A questionnaire was distributed to all Swedish neonatal units in 1993 and 1998.

RESULTS

In both 1993 and 1998, 86% of all clinics answered the questionnaire. Two-thirds of these clinics used some method for estimating pain in the newborn at both times. Eight clinics used a structured method in the latter period compared to one in the earlier period. A higher proportion of units having full intensive care measured pain compared to other units.

CONCLUSION

The study shows that an unchanging low proportion of neonatal units in Sweden attempt to assess pain. There is a minor increase in the number of departments that use a structured method for pain scoring. Documentation of pain intensity is still inadequate and should be improved.

Oral glucose and venepuncture reduce blood sampling pain in newborns

The objectives of this study were to measure pain symptoms in healthy fullterm newborns undergoing routine blood sampling with different methods. The 120 study subjects were randomly allocated to one of four groups with 30 babies in each, namely venepuncture or heel stick, with or without oral glucose administration. Pain was assessed from the duration of crying within the first 3 min, the Premature Infant Pain Profile (PIPP) and changes in heart rate. When the babies received 1 ml 30% glucose prior to skin puncture there was no significant difference between the heel stick and venepuncture group either in mean crying time (12.9 and 11.6 s, respectively) or in PIPP score (3.9 and 3.3). When no glucose was given crying time was 57.3 s in the heel stick group and 26.8 s in the venepuncture group (P = 0.0041) and the mean PIPP scores were 8.4 and 6.0, respectively (P = 0.0458). This study suggests that if oral glucose is given prior to skin puncture the choice of blood sampling method has no impact on the pain symptoms.