Dosimetric Impact of Radiolucent Carbon Fiber Hardware for Post-Operative Spine Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

The spine is the most common site of osseous metastases. In the non-operative setting, there is growing support for stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) over conventional radiation therapy for improved pain relief and local control. Hybrid therapy consisting of separation surgery and post-operative SBRT is considered in patients with biomechanical instability and epidural cord compression. Surgery traditionally requires titanium (Ti) implants, which introduce artifacts on post-operative imaging in addition to increased uncertainty and beam attenuation. Use of radiolucent carbon fiber reinforced polyetheretherketone (CFR-PEEK) hardware has been shown to provide safe and comparable surgical outcomes as compared to Ti. Our primary objective is to assess the dosimetric impact of Ti versus carbon fiber implants in spine SBRT.

MATERIALS/METHODS

Single institution retrospective series of post-operative spine SBRT from 2019-2020. Re-irradiation cases were excluded. The electronic medical record and treatment planning systems (TPS) were queried. Dosimetric analyses compared original Ti plans with reoptimized plans, replacing Ti hardware electronic density with carbon fiber. Maintaining clinical goals, dose calculations were performed in a treatment planning system using a collapsed cone algorithm. All treatments used step and shoot intensity modulated radiation therapy to avoid beam angles with significant metal along the beam path. Metallic artifacts were contoured and assigned the appropriate tissue density. A D'Agostino-Pearson test was used to assess data for normality. We used paired Student's t-tests to compare three dosimetric outcomes in the setting of Ti and carbon fiber implants. Planning target volume (PTV) coverage was represented by the volume receiving at least the prescribed dose (%), the maximum point dose (dmax, cGy) to the spinal cord planning risk volume (PRV, 2 mm margin), and the overall hot spot intensity (plan dmax).

RESULTS

A series of 14 consecutive SBRT cases were evaluated (dose 27-30 Gy in 3-5 fractions). All dosimetric outcomes were normally distributed (p>0.05). We found a statistically significant difference in PTV coverage between the original SBRT treatment plans with Ti hardware (mean 85.1 ± 7.9%) and reoptimized carbon fiber hardware (87.3 ± 6.6%; p = 0.002). There was no significant difference in mean spinal cord PRV dmax between Ti and carbon fiber plans (1846 ± 483 cGy vs. 1842 ± 495 cGy; p>0.05). We observed a nonsignificant increase in mean overall dmax from 3932 ± 416 cGy in the Ti cohort to 4111 ± 906 cGy in the carbon fiber cohort (p>0.05).

CONCLUSION

Carbon fiber implants provide a significant increase in SBRT target coverage, without impacting the overall plan and spinal cord PRV dmax in this retrospective series. In addition to improved post-operative imaging and reduced uncertainty, carbon fiber hardware may offer dosimetric advantages as compared to traditional Ti spinal implants, and warrants further investigation in a larger cohort.