A Systematic Review on the Effects of Different Types of Probiotics in Animal Alzheimer's Disease Studies

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a global public health priority as with aging populations, its prevalence is expected to rise even further in the future. The brain and gut are in close communication through immunological, nervous and hormonal routes, and therefore, probiotics are examined as an option to influence AD hallmarks, such as plaques, tangles, and low grade inflammation. This study aimed to provide an overview of the available animal evidence on the effect of different probiotics on gut microbiota composition, short chain fatty acids (SCFAs), inflammatory markers, Amyloid-β (Aβ), and cognitive functioning in AD animal models. A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, SCOPUS, and APA PsychInfo. Articles were included up to May 2021. Inclusion criteria included a controlled animal study on probiotic supplementation and at least one of the abovementioned outcome variables. Of the eighteen studies, most were conducted in AD male mice models (n = 9). Probiotics of the genera Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium were used most frequently. Probiotic administration increased species richness and/or bacterial richness in the gut microbiota, increased SCFAs levels, reduced inflammatory markers, and improved cognitive functioning in AD models in multiple studies. The effect of probiotic administration on Aβ remains ambiguous. B. longum (NK46), C. butyricum, and the mixture SLAB51 are the most promising probiotics, as positive improvements were found on almost all outcomes. The results of this animal review underline the potential of probiotic therapy as a treatment option in AD.

A spatiotemporal simulation study on the transmission of harmful microorganisms through connected healthcare workers in a hospital ward setting

Background

Hand transmission of harmful microorganisms may lead to infections and poses a major threat to patients and healthcare workers in healthcare settings. The most effective countermeasure against these transmissions is the adherence to spatiotemporal hand hygiene policies, but adherence rates are relatively low and vary over space and time. The spatiotemporal effects on hand transmission and spread of these microorganisms for varying hand hygiene compliance levels are unknown. This study aims to (1) identify a healthcare worker occupancy group of potential super-spreaders and (2) quantify spatiotemporal effects on the hand transmission and spread of harmful microorganisms for varying levels of hand hygiene compliance caused by this group.

Methods

Spatiotemporal data were collected in a hospital ward of an academic hospital using radio frequency identification technology for 7 days. A potential super-spreader healthcare worker occupation group was identified using the frequency identification sensors’ contact data. The effects of five probability distributions of hand hygiene compliance and three harmful microorganism transmission rates were simulated using a dynamic agent-based simulation model. The effects of initial simulation assumptions on the simulation results were quantified using five risk outcomes.

Results

Nurses, doctors and patients are together responsible for 81.13% of all contacts. Nurses made up 70.68% of all contacts, which is more than five times that of doctors (10.44%). This identifies nurses as the potential super-spreader healthcare worker occupation group. For initial simulation conditions of extreme lack of hand hygiene compliance (5%) and high transmission rates (5% per contact moment), a colonised nurse can transfer microbes to three of the 17 healthcare worker or patients encountered during the 98.4 min of visiting 23 rooms while colonised. The harmful microorganism transmission potential for nurses is higher during weeknights (5 pm – 7 am) and weekends as compared to weekdays (7 am – 5 pm).

Conclusion

Spatiotemporal behaviour and social mixing patterns of healthcare can change the expected number of hand transmissions and spread of harmful microorganisms by super-spreaders in a closed healthcare setting. These insights can be used to evaluate spatiotemporal safety behaviours and develop infection prevention and control strategies.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12879-021-05954-7.

Immediate dynamic lymphoscintigraphy delivers no additional value to lymphoscintigraphy 3 hr after tracer injection in sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer patients

OBJECTIVE

Immediate dynamic imaging enables accurate definition of sentinel lymph nodes, whereas imaging 3 hr after tracer injection may lead to overestimation of the number of sentinel lymph nodes. A study was performed to define the value of lymphoscintigraphy immediately versus 3 hr after tracer injection in sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer management.

METHODS

In 165 sentinel lymph node biopsy procedures preoperative immediate and 3 hr post-injection lymphoscintigraphy was performed after intraparenchymal tracer administration.

RESULTS

Lymph node visualization occurred in 63 immediate procedures (38%) versus in 163 procedures 3 hr post-injection (99%). In 17 procedures (10%) in which immediate lymphoscintigraphy had visualized sentinel lymph nodes, additional nodes had been seen on 3 hr post-injection lymphoscintigraphy. In eight of these procedures (5%) all nodes were detected in the same draining lymph node basin. Non-axillary sentinel lymph nodes were identified by preoperative lymphoscintigraphy in 28 procedures (17%) and improved staging in three patients (5%).

CONCLUSION

The only impact of immediate lymphoscintigraphy was the possible omission of removal of 1-2 sec-echelon nodes per patient in 5% of patients. We consider this yield too low to continue immediate lymphoscintigraphy in breast cancer patients.

Axillary recurrence after sentinel lymph node biopsy

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) without further axillary dissection in patients with sentinel node-negative breast carcinoma appears to be a safe procedure to ensure locoregional control. During a median follow-up of 35 months the false-negative rate was 1% in our study population of 185 patients.

BACKGROUND

The objective of this prospective study is to provide data on follow-up of patients with primary operable breast carcinoma staged with SLNB without axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) if the sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) were tumour-negative.

METHODS

One hundred and eighty-five patients were enrolled. Preoperative dynamic and static lymphoscintigraphy were performed; both a vital blue dye and a gamma detection probe were used intraoperatively. Patients with tumour-positive SLNs received completion ALND or if no SLNs could be identified. All patients were monitored according to regional follow-up protocols.

RESULTS

The SLNs were identified in 179 out of the 185 patients. In 73 patients the SLNs were tumour-positive and in 106 patients tumour-negative. The median follow-up was 35 months (range 17-59). In one SLN-negative patient an axillary recurrence occurred 26 months after the SLNB (false-negative rate: 1%).

CONCLUSIONS

SLNB without ALND appears to be a safe procedure to ensure locoregional control in SLN-negative breast carcinoma, if carried out by an experienced team.

Is sentinel node biopsy beneficial in melanoma patients? A report on 200 patients with cutaneous melanoma

AIM

The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability and clinical impact of sentinel node biopsy, including preoperative lymphoscintigraphy and intraoperative lymphatic mapping in patients with cutaneous melanoma of the head, neck, trunk or extremities.

METHODS

Two hundred patients (103 women, 97 men), median age 57 (range 21-86) years with cutaneous melanoma > or =1.0mm Breslow thickness and clinically negative lymph nodes participated in a single institutional prospective study from May 1995 to January 2000. Primary melanoma sites included: 22 head and neck (11%), 67 trunk (34%), 29 upper extremity (14%) and 82 lower extremity (41%). The median Breslow thickness was 2.5 (range 1.0-20.0)mm. Preoperative dynamic and static lymphoscintigraphy, intraoperative blue dye and a gamma detection probe were used. If histological examination with HE or IHC showed metastases, therapeutic lymph node dissection (TLND) was performed.

RESULTS

Sentinel node(s) could be identified in 197 patients (99%); 393 sentinel nodes (mean: 2.0 per patient, range 1-7) were removed from 241 basins. Three procedures failed in the head and neck region. In 167 patients, the sentinel nodes were both blue and radioactive (85%); in 26 patients, they were only radioactive (13%) and in four patients only blue (2%). In total, 150 patients had tumour-negative sentinel nodes (76%). During a median follow-up of 47 (range 24-79) months, nodal recurrence in a negative mapped basin was documented in six patients of which isolated recurrence was in two patients and recurrence together with locoregional recurrence in four patients (false negative rate 6/54=11%). Estimated three-year recurrence-free survival in the node-negative patients and node-positive patients was 83 and 66% respectively (P<0.05). The overall survival at three years was 92 and 73% respectively (P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Sentinel node biopsy provides accurate staging and important prognostic information. The final place of sentinel node biopsy is still undefined, and therefore sentinel node biopsy is still considered as an experimental surgical staging procedure.