Experiences of foreign medical graduates (FMGs), international medical graduates (IMGs) and overseas trained graduates (OTGs) on entering developing or middle-income countries like South Africa: a scoping review

BACKGROUND

Foreign medical graduates (FMGs) have continued to render effective health care services to underserved communities in many high- and middle-income countries. In rural and disadvantaged areas of South Africa, FMGs have alleviated the critical shortage of doctors. FMGs experience challenges to adjust to new working environments as they have studied and obtained their medical qualifications in a country that differs from the one where they eventually choose to practise.

OBJECTIVES

This scoping review synthesises literature about the experiences of FMGs upon entering a host country and the factors that facilitate their adjustment to the new context.

METHODS

The systematic review was performed to analyse articles from an initial scoping of published literature on the experiences and adjustment of FMGs between 2000 and 2016. Searches were conducted through MEDLINE and PUBMED on keywords that included "foreign medical graduates", "experiences" "adjustment", "adaptation" and "assimilation". The database searches yielded 268 articles and a further 3 were identified through other sources. The number of articles was reduced to 20 after the removal of duplicates and the application of the exclusion criteria. A qualitative thematic analysis was performed.

RESULTS

The searches revealed an overall lack of studies on the experiences and adjustment of FMGs from the African continent. FMGs faced professional barriers, lacked country-specific knowledge and experienced stress when practising in a new location. They attributed their successful adjustment to innate personal characteristics including a persistent attitude and the use of various coping strategies. Other facilitating factors included early orientation and professional and personal support.

CONCLUSION

The review highlighted the need for research from developing and middle-income countries and for an increased awareness of the challenges and enablers to help FMGs adjust to new clinical settings.

The risk of sympathetic ophthalmia following evisceration for penetrating eye injuries at Groote Schuur Hospital

BACKGROUND/AIMS

The aim of this study was to assess the incidence of sympathetic ophthalmia following evisceration for penetrating eye injuries and to assess whether evisceration is safe in this setting.

METHODS

Data were obtained retrospectively from patients who were admitted to a tertiary hospital following penetrating ocular trauma over a 10-year period.

RESULTS

A total of 1392 patients were included in the study. Of these, 1283 (99.4%) underwent surgery on admission (primary repair or primary removal of the globe). Of the surgical group 889 (64.3%) underwent primary repair, 491(35.5%) had primary eviscerations and three (0.2%) had primary enucleations. Secondary eviscerations were performed on 11 patients who had undergone primary repair. Two cases of sympathetic ophthalmia were identified in the non-surgical group and none in the surgical group. The incidence of sympathetic ophthalmia following penetrating trauma was 0.14%.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of sympathetic ophthalmia was low, as found in previous studies. The lack of follow-up, as well as the statistically insufficient number of patients, did not provide conclusive proof that sympathetic ophthalmia does not occur after evisceration. It would appear, however, that evisceration after severe ocular trauma is an acceptable option with a low risk of sympathetic ophthalmia.