Fine mapping of LrSV2, a race-specific adult plant leaf rust resistance gene on wheat chromosome 3BS

Fine mapping permits the precise positioning of genes within chromosomes, prerequisite for positional cloning that will allow its rational use and the study of the underlying molecular action mechanism. Three leaf rust resistance genes were identified in the durable leaf rust resistant Argentinean wheat variety Sinvalocho MA: the seedling resistance gene Lr3 on distal 6BL and two adult plant resistance genes, LrSV1 and LrSV2, on chromosomes 2DS and 3BS, respectively. To develop a high-resolution genetic map for LrSV2, 10 markers were genotyped on 343 F2 individuals from a cross between Sinvalocho MA and Gama6. The closest co-dominant markers on both sides of the gene (3 microsatellites and 2 STMs) were analyzed on 965 additional F2s from the same cross. Microsatellite marker cfb5010 cosegregated with LrSV2 whereas flanking markers were found at 1 cM distal and at 0.3 cM proximal to the gene. SSR markers designed from the sequences of cv Chinese Spring BAC clones spanning the LrSV2 genetic interval were tested on the recombinants, allowing the identification of microsatellite swm13 at 0.15 cM distal to LrSV2. This delimited an interval of 0.45 cM around the gene flanked by the SSR markers swm13 and gwm533 at the subtelomeric end of chromosome 3BS.

Genetic analysis of leaf rust resistance genes and associated markers in the durable resistant wheat cultivar Sinvalocho MA

In the cross of the durable leaf rust resistant wheat Sinvalocho MA and the susceptible line Gama6, four specific genes were identified: the seedling resistance gene Lr3, the adult plant resistance (APR) genes LrSV1 and LrSV2 coming from Sinvalocho MA, and the seedling resistance gene LrG6 coming from Gama6. Lr3 was previously mapped on 6BL in the same cross. LrSV1 was mapped on chromosome 2DS where resistance genes Lr22a and Lr22b have been reported. Results from rust reaction have shown that LrSV1 from Sinvalocho is not the same allele as Lr22b and an allelism test with Lr22a showed that they could be alleles or closely linked genes. LrSV1 was mapped in an 8.5-cM interval delimited by markers gwm296 distal and gwm261 proximal. Adult gene LrSV2 was mapped on chromosome 3BS, cosegregating with gwm533 in a 7.2-cM interval encompassed by markers gwm389 and gwm493, where other disease resistance genes are located, such as seedling gene Lr27 for leaf rust, Sr2 for stem rust, QTL Qfhs.ndsu-3BS for resistance to Fusarium gramineum and wheat powdery mildew resistance. The gene LrG6 was mapped on chromosome 2BL, with the closest marker gwm382 at 0.6 cM. Lines carrying LrSV1, LrSV2 and LrG6 tested under field natural infection conditions, showed low disease infection type and severity, suggesting that this kind of resistance can be explained by additive effects of APR and seedling resistance genes. The identification of new sources of resistance from South American land races and old varieties, supported by modern DNA technology, contributes to sustainability of agriculture through plant breeding.

Physical and genetic mapping of amplified fragment length polymorphisms and the leaf rust resistance Lr3 gene on chromosome 6BL of wheat

The Argentinian wheat cultivar Sinvalocho MA carries the Lr3 gene for leaf rust resistance on distal chromosome 6BL. In this cultivar, 33 spontaneous susceptible lines were isolated and cytogenetically characterized by C-banding. The analysis revealed deletions on chromosome 6BL in most lines. One line was nulli-6B, two lines were ditelo 6BS, two, three, and ten lines had long terminal deletions of 40, 30, and 20%, respectively, three lines showed very small terminal deletions, and one line had an intercalary deletion of 11%. Physical mapping of 55 amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) markers detected differences between deletions and led to the division of 6BL into seven bins delimited by deletion breakpoints. The most distal bin, with a length smaller than 5% of 6BL, contained 22 AFLP markers and the Lr3 gene. Polymorphism for nine AFLPs between Sinvalocho MA and the rust leaf susceptible cultivar Gamma 6 was used to construct a linkage map of Lr3. This gene is at a genetic distance of 0.9 cM from a group of seven closely linked AFLPs. The location of the gene in a high recombinogenic region indicated a physical distance of approximately 1 Mb to the markers.

Cytosine methylation at CG and CNG sites is not a prerequisite for the initiation of transcriptional gene silencing in plants, but it is required for its maintenance

Transgenes integrated into plant chromosomes, and/or endogenous plant genes, may be subjected to epigenetic silencing at the transcriptional or post-transcriptional level. Transcriptional inactivation is correlated with hypermethylation of CG/CNG sites at the silent loci. It is not known whether local hypermethylation is part of the inactivation process, or just an outcome of the silent state. To address this issue, we generated transgenic tobacco lines containing a selectable marker gene controlled by a derivative of the 35S promoter of the cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV) devoid of CG and CNG methylation acceptor sites. Silencing was triggered by crossing to the silencer locus of tobacco line 271. This line contains inactive and methylated copies of the 35S promoter and is able to silence homologous promoter copies at ectopic chromosomal positions. The mutated promoter lacking CG/CNG methylation acceptor sites was as susceptible to Trans-silencing as the unmodified 35S promoter control. Thus, methylation at CG and CNG sites is not a prerequisite for the initiation of epigenetic gene inactivation. Interestingly, while methylation of the remaining cytosines is usually only slightly affected by silencing, it was significantly increased in the absence of CG/CNG sequences. Since this sequence preference is the same as that of known methyltransferases, this may imply that silencing is accompanied or directly followed by recruitment of methyltransferase, which, in the absence of cytosines in the optimal sequence context, modifies other C residues in the affected area. However, silencing without CG/CNG methylation was immediately relieved in the absence of the silencer. Thus, CG/CNG methylation is probably essential for the maintenance of previously established epigenetic states.

Methylation of cytosines in nonconventional methylation acceptor sites can contribute to reduced gene expression

Epigenetic silencing of gene expression is often correlated with extensive DNA methylation at cytosine residues in the promoter and the coding region of silenced genes. Increasing evidence indicates that, in such cases, DNA methylation can also occur in sequence contexts other than CG and CNG, resulting in genomic regions with almost complete modification of cytosines. Whether this nonconventional methylation at CNN sites also contributes to gene repression is not known. We constructed genes with a promoter and a coding region devoid of the conventional methylation acceptor sites CG and CNG in addition to constructs with the corresponding wild-type sequences containing these sites. We generated unmethylated and completely methylated DNA by the polymerase chain reaction and performed expression assays in plant protoplasts. Quantification of transcript levels by RNase protection assay demonstrated that DNA methylation at positions other than CG or CNG sites contributes to the reduction in gene expression.