Catheter based intracoronary brachytherapy leads to increased platelet activation

BACKGROUND

Vascular brachytherapy (VBT) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is associated with a higher risk of stent thrombosis than conventional treatment.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate in vivo periprocedural platelet activation with and without VBT, and to assess a possible direct effect of radiation on platelet activation.

DESIGN

Of 50 patients with stable angina, 23 received VBT after PCI, while 27 had PCI only. The 23 patients who received VBT after PCI were pretreated for one month with aspirin and clopidogrel. Platelet activation was assessed by flow cytometry.

RESULTS

The two patient groups did not differ in their platelet activation before the intervention. There was a significant increase in activation immediately after VBT, with 21.2% (interquartile range 13.0% to 37.6%) thrombospondin positive and 54.0% (42.3% to 63.6%) CD 63 positive platelets compared with 12.7% (9.8% to 14.9%) thrombospondin positive and 37.9% (33.2% to 45.2%) CD 63 positive platelets before the intervention (p < 0.001 and p < 0.01, respectively). Patients without VBT had no periprocedural difference in platelet activation immediately after PCI. No increase in platelet activation was found after ex vivo irradiation of blood samples obtained from healthy controls.

CONCLUSIONS

Catheter based intracoronary VBT carried out according to current standards is highly thrombogenic. The current antithrombotic treatment with aspirin and clopidogrel is not sufficient to suppress platelet activation during the procedure. From in vitro experiments, it appears that platelet activation during brachytherapy is not caused by irradiation but by the procedure of catheter based VBT.

[Increased thrombocyte activation in dilated cardiomyopathy: a risk factor for development of ventricular thrombosis despite anticoagulant therapy?]

HISTORY AND CLINICAL FINDINGS

A 48-year-old patient with dilated cardiomyopathy complained of dyspnea at rest, severe sleeplessness and a slight pain in the stomach. The clinical examination was normal except for a murmur at the apex of the heart. There was no evidence of edema or congestion of the jugular veins.

INVESTIGATION

The echocardiography demonstrated a dilated left ventricle with severely compromised function. No ventricular thrombi were present at this time. Coronary artery disease was excluded by coronary angiography. Endomyocardial biopsies were obtained from the right ventricular septum. The immunohistological analysis of the endomyocardial biopsy specimens revealed pathologically increased lymphocytic infiltrates and increased expression of interstitial and endothelial MHC I and II antigens. Flow cytometric analysis of platelets surface antigens (P-selectin, GP53, thrombospondin) was performed as a measure for intravasal platelet activation. Our patient compared to a healthy control group (> 4 SD) and to other patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (> 2 SD). A high grade increase of platelet activation was found.

TREATMENT AND COURSE

ACE inhibitor, diuretics, spironolactone and digitalis were used to treat the heart insufficiency. Due to the severe left ventricular dysfunction phenprocoumone and aspirin were also prescribed. A follow-up echocardiography was performed 6 months later. Comparable to the first examination left ventricular contractility was found to be severely reduced. In addition, a marginal thrombus was now present in the left ventricle despite antithrombotic therapy.

DISCUSSION

An increased platelet activation was found in the peripheral circulation of our patient with dilated cardiomyopathy. After 6 months, ventricular thrombi were found in the dilated ventricle, although aspirin and phenprocoumone had been administred. We speculate that an additional thrombotic treatment with clopidogrel is necessary in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy and increased platelet activation.