Perceptions of antibiotic stewardship programmes and determinants of antibiotic prescribing patterns among physicians in tertiary hospitals in Bangladesh: implications for future policy and practice

BACKGROUND

The concerning growth of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) renders common infections life-threatening due to irrational antibiotic use and a lack of effective antimicrobial stewardship programmes (ASPs).

AIM

To investigate the awareness, perceptions and practices of physicians regarding ASPs, AMR and antibiotic prescribing in tertiary care hospitals in Bangladesh.

METHODS

This hospital-based cross-sectional survey was conducted in 11 tertiary care hospitals across Bangladesh between September 2020 and January 2021. A semi-structured questionnaire was administered through face-to-face interviews for data collection. Descriptive and multi-variate analyses were performed using STATA Version 13.

RESULTS

In total, 559 physicians were enrolled in this survey. Overall, 40.6% [95% confidence interval (CI) 36.5-44.8] of physicians reported being aware of ASPs, and this figure was higher in public hospitals compared with private hospitals (43.8% vs 27.1%). None of the study hospitals had any ASP initiatives. More than half (55.1%) of the participants were willing to receive feedback from an ASP on their antibiotic selection. Only 30.9% of respondents stated that they wait for the findings of microbiological tests before prescribing antibiotics, although challenges included empiric use of broad-spectrum antibiotics, delayed laboratory results and the existence of drug-resistant patients. In contrast, physicians aware of ASPs were 33% (adjusted odds ratio 0.67, 95% CI 0.45-0.98; P=0.033) less likely to wait for laboratory results before prescribing antibiotics. However, 42.5% of physicians considered patient affordability of purchasing antibiotics when prescribing.

CONCLUSIONS

Physicians' fundamental knowledge of ASPs and rational antibiotic prescription were found to fall short of the standard. Context-specific and integrated ASP activities, availability and use of guidelines, and improved laboratory facilities are required to battle AMR in Bangladesh.

Hand hygiene compliance and associated factors among healthcare workers in selected tertiary-care hospitals in Bangladesh

BACKGROUND

Hand hygiene (HH) is a fundamental element of patient safety. Adherence to HH among healthcare workers (HCWs) varies greatly depending on a range of factors, including risk perceptions, institutional culture, auditing mechanisms, and availability of HH supplies.

AIMS

This study aimed to evaluate HH compliance and associated factors among HCWs in selected tertiary-care hospitals in Bangladesh.

METHODS

During September 2020 to May 2021, we conducted non-participatory observations at 10 tertiary-care hospitals using the WHO's '5-moments for hand hygiene tool' to record HH compliance among physicians, nurses and cleaning staff. We also performed semi-structured interviews to determine the key barriers to complying with HH.

RESULTS

We observed 14,668 hand hygiene opportunities. The overall HH compliance was 25.3%, the highest among nurses (28.5%), and the lowest among cleaning staff (9.9%). HCWs in public hospitals had significantly higher odds of complying with HH practices than those in private hospitals (adjusted odds ratio: 1.73, 95% CI: 1.55-1.93). The odds of performing HH after touching a patient were 3.36 times higher compared with before touching a patient (95% CI: 2.90-3.90). The reported key barriers to performing HH were insufficient supplies (57.9%), skin reactions (26.3%), workload (26.3%) and lack of facilities (22.7%). Overall, observed HH supplies were available in 81.7% of wards for physicians and 95.1% of wards for nurses, however, no designated HH facilities were found for the cleaning staff.

CONCLUSIONS

HH compliance among HCWs fell significantly short of the standard for safe patient care. Inadequate HH supplies demonstrate a lack of prioritizing, promoting and investing in infection prevention and control.