[Management of infectious complications associated with coronavirus infection in severe patients admitted to ICU]

Infections have become one of the main complications of patients with severe SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia admitted in ICU. Poor immune status, frequent development of organic failure requiring invasive supportive treatments, and prolonged ICU length of stay in saturated structural areas of patients are risk factors for infection development. The Working Group on Infectious Diseases and Sepsis GTEIS of the Spanish Society of Intensive Medicine and Coronary Units SEMICYUC emphasizes the importance of infection prevention measures related to health care, the detection and early treatment of major infections in the patient with SARS-CoV-2 infections. Bacterial co-infection, respiratory infections related to mechanical ventilation, catheter-related bacteremia, device-associated urinary tract infection and opportunistic infections are review in the document.

Management of infectious complications associated with coronavirus infection in severe patients admitted to ICU

Infections have become one of the main complications of patients with severe SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia admitted in ICU. Poor immune status, frequent development of organic failure requiring invasive supportive treatments, and prolonged ICU length of stay in saturated structural areas of patients are risk factors for infection development. The Working Group on Infectious Diseases and Sepsis GTEIS of the Spanish Society of Intensive Medicine and Coronary Units SEMICYUC emphasizes the importance of infection prevention measures related to health care, the detection and early treatment of major infections in the patient with SARS-CoV-2 infections. Bacterial co-infection, respiratory infections related to mechanical ventilation, catheter-related bacteremia, device-associated urinary tract infection and opportunistic infections are review in the document.

Active humidification in mechanical ventilation is not associated to an increase in respiratory infectious complications in a quasi-experimental pre-post intervention study

OBJECTIVE

There is controversy regarding the influence of humidification systems upon the incidence of respiratory infections associated to invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV). An evaluation was made of the differences in the incidence of pneumonia and tracheobronchitis associated to mechanical ventilation (VAP and VAT, respectively) with passive and active humidification.

DESIGN

A retrospective pre-post quasi-experimental study was carried out.

SETTING

A polyvalent ICU with 14 beds.

PATIENTS

All patients connected to IMV for >48h during 2014 and 2016 were included.

INTERVENTIONS

During 2014, passive humidification with an hygroscopic heat and moisture exchanger (HME) was used, while during 2016 active humidification with a heated humidifier (HH) and an inspiratory heated wire was used. Identical measures for the prevention of VAP were established (Zero Pneumonia Project).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The incidence of VAP and VAT was estimated for 1000 days of IMV in both groups, and statistically significant differences were assessed using Poisson regression analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 287 patients were included (116 with HME and 171 with HH). The incidence density of VAP per 1000 days of IMV was 5.68 in the HME group and 5.80 in the HH group (p=ns). The incidence density of VAT was 3.41 and 3.26 cases per 1000 days of VMI with HME and HH respectively (p=ns). The duration of IMV was identified as a risk factor for VAP.

CONCLUSIONS

In our population, active humidification in patients ventilated for >48h was not associated to an increase in respiratory infectious complications.

Active humidification in mechanical ventilation is not associated to an increase in respiratory infectious complications in a quasi-experimental pre-post intervention study

OBJECTIVE

There is controversy regarding the influence of humidification systems upon the incidence of respiratory infections associated to invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV). An evaluation was made of the differences in the incidence of pneumonia and tracheobronchitis associated to mechanical ventilation (VAP and VAT, respectively) with passive and active humidification.

DESIGN

A retrospective pre-post quasi-experimental study was carried out.

SETTING

A polyvalent ICU with 14 beds.

PATIENTS

All patients connected to IMV for>48hours during 2014 and 2016 were included.

INTERVENTIONS

During 2014, passive humidification with an hygroscopic heat and moisture exchanger (HME) was used, while during 2016 active humidification with a heated humidifier (HH) and an inspiratory heated wire was used. Identical measures for the prevention of VAP were established (Zero Pneumonia Project).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The incidence of VAP and VAT was estimated for 1000 days of IMV in both groups, and statistically significant differences were assessed using Poisson regression analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 287 patients were included (116 with HME and 171 with HH). The incidence density of VAP per 1000 days of IMV was 5.68 in the HME group and 5.80 in the HH group (p=ns). The incidence density of VAT was 3.41 and 3.26 cases per 1000 days of VMI with HME and HH respectively (p=ns). The duration of IMV was identified as a risk factor for VAP.

CONCLUSIONS

In our population, active humidification in patients ventilated for>48hours was not associated to an increase in respiratory infectious complications.

Ceftolozane-tazobactam for the treatment of ventilator-associated infections by colistin-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa

The use of colistin for the treatment of multiresistant bacteria has led to the emergence of colistin-resistant strains of Gram-negative bacilli. Treatment of infections caused by these pan-drug-resistant bacteria is difficult owing to the paucity of effective antibiotics. We report two cases of ventilator-associated respiratory infection caused by pan-drug-resistant, colistin-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa that were successfully treated with ceftolozane-tazobactam.

[Levofloxacin in the treatment of nosocomial infection in critically ill patients]

INTRODUCTION

Levofloxacin (LVX) is one of the most frequently used antibiotics in critical patients admitted to Spanish Intensive Care Units (ICU). Their use in community-acquired infections has been widely documented, while it is less frequent and known in nosocomial infections (NI).

OBJECTIVE

To describe the indications and utilization patterns of LVX in the treatment of NI in patients admitted to Spanish ICU.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Open-label, retrospective, observational and multicenter study. All patients admitted to ICU and who were being treated for NI with LVX in the years 2004-2005 were included. A case report form (CRF) was drawn up and included demographic, infection, treatment, infectious process and patient development variables. NI-dependent LVX usage was described. A logistical regression analysis was carried out in order to identify the variables associated with a satisfactory response. Results are expressed by means of the odds ratio and a 95% confidence interval.

RESULTS

A total of 949 patients who were given LVX for the treatment of 1,103 NI were recruited in 87 ICU: 460 (41.7%) with non-mechanical ventilation associated pneumonia, 256 (23.2 %) mechanical-ventilation associated pneumonia, 107 (9.7 %) with primary or vascular catheter-related bacteremia, 47 (4.3 %) with urethral catheter-related urinary infections, 42 (3.8%) with organspace or deep surgical infections and 191 (17.3%) who had other types of infection. An APACHE II upon admission of 19.6 (SD: 8) and severe sepsis or septic shock systemic response in 50.4% of all cases. On 776 (82.7%) occasions treatment was initiated on an empirical basis and in 589 (62.1%) cases the dose of choice was of 0.5 g/ 12 h, with a mean duration of 9 days. In 738 (77.8 %) patients, LVX was used in association with other antibiotics. The clinical response by treatment end was rated as satisfactory in 67.4 % of all NI. Factors related to a non-satisfactory response were as follows: APACHE II (OR: 1.05; 95% CI: 1.028-1.078); septic shock (OR: 2.62; 95 % CI: 1.623-4.219); the requirement for changes in treatment due to poor clinical progress (OR: 66.67; 95% CI: 15.384-250), the presence of non-covered microorganisms (OR: 6.58; 95% CI: 3.663-11.765), the appearance of new resistant pathogens (OR: 6.94; 95 % CI: 2.445- 19.608) or the diagnosis of a new infection (OR: 3.68; 95% CI: 1.504-8.929); solid neoplasm (OR: 1.98; 95% CI: 1.156-3.899); chronic liver disease (OR: 3.11; 95 % CI: 1.429-8.475) and the absence of etiology confirmation (OR: 2.39; 95 % CI: 1.624-3.510). One or more adverse events which were possibly or probably related to the use of LVX were detected in 104 (11.0%) patients. Total intra-ICU mortality amounted to 26.1%, while the accumulated in-hospital mortality was 33.8%.

CONCLUSIONS

LVX is a common therapeutic option in the treatment of nosocomial infections in critical patients. It is predominantly used in an empirical manner, at a dose of 0.5 g every 12 hours and in combination with other antibiotics.