Household deprivation, comorbidities and COVID-19 hospitalization in 690,115 children/adolescents

Background

Studies document that adults in disadvantaged socio-economic positions have elevated risks of a severe course of COVID-19, but it is unclear if this holds true for children. We investigate in this population-based study whether young people from socio-economically disadvantaged households in Germany had a higher risk of COVID-19 hospitalization compared with more affluent counterparts. We also examined if differences were related to comorbidities that predict severe courses in children.

Methods

We included data from all 690,115 children and adolescents (0-18 years) enrolled in a statutory health insurance carrier. Daily hospital diagnoses of COVID-19 were recorded from 1.1.2020 to 13.7.2021. Logistic regressions were used to compare children from households with an indication of poverty (e.g. long- or short-term unemployed) with children from households with insurance holders in regular employment. We also assessed socio-economic characteristics of the area of residence. We controlled for age, sex, days under observation, nationality, and comorbidities (e.g. obesity).

Findings

A COVID-19 hospital diagnosis was a rare event (n = 1637). Children of long-term unemployed parents had a 1·36 times (95% CI 1·21-1·51) higher adjusted odds of hospitalization compared with those of employed parents. Elevated odds were also found for short-term unemployed or low-wage employment. Those living in poor areas had a 3·02 (1·81-5·22) higher odds of hospitalization than those in less deprived areas. Comorbidities were strongly related to hospitalization, but their adjustment did not change main estimates for household deprivation.

Discussion

Results suggest that children from poor households are at higher risk of severe courses of COVID-19 than their affluent counterparts. This underlies the need to implement effective Public Health strategies to protect deprived children from COVID-19 and other infectious disease even in high income countries such as Germany.

Key messages

• Children and adolescents from poor families seem to be at higer risk for sever courses of COVID-19.

• Comorbidities were no key mediating factor in this study.

Short-chain fatty acid enemas: a cost-effective alternative in the treatment of nonspecific proctosigmoiditis

The purpose of this study was to perform a randomized, prospective comparison of corticosteroid enemas (CS--100 mg of hydrocortisone/60 cc P.R. q.h.s.; n = 12), mesalamine enemas (5-ASA--4 g/60 cc P.R. q.h.s.; n = 19), and short-chain fatty acid enemas (SCFA--60 cc P.R. b.i.d.; n = 14) for the treatment of proctosigmoiditis. Patients presenting to the Ferguson Clinic with the diagnosis of idiopathic proctosigmoiditis were evaluated for age, sex, prior history of proctitis, duration of symptoms prior to presentation, endoscopic scoring, and mucosal biopsies. Clinical evaluation was performed at two-week intervals for six weeks, with repeat biopsies taken at six weeks. There was no significant difference with respect to age, male/female ratio, past history of proctosigmoiditis, length of colorectum involved at the time of initial presentation, symptom resolution, and endoscopic and histologic improvement among the three treatment groups. Recovery occurred in a similar proportion in each of the three groups: CS, 10/12; 5-ASA, 17/19; and SCFA, 12/14. The cost of six weeks of treatment was: CS, $71.82; 5-ASA, $347.28; and SCFA, $31.50. This study indicates that SCFA enemas are equally efficacious to CS or 5-ASA enemas for the treatment of proctosigmoiditis at a significant cost savings.