P1000Aetiology and efficacy of atrial fibrillation ablation in young adults

Introduction

Little is known regarding the aetiology or outcome of atrial fibrillation (AF) occurring in young adults. This retrospective analysis was performed to explore the demographics and efficacy of AF ablation in this population.

Methods

Patients were included who had undergone ≥1 AF ablation under the age of 40 between 2006-2018. Recurrence was defined as return of either documented AF or previous symptoms for >30s following a 3-month blanking period. Initial exploratory co-variates were included in a univariate analysis and those terms with P-value of <0.1 were then used to generate a Cox proportional-hazards multivariate model.

Results

124 patients (33.6 ± 4.7 yrs, 77% men), initially presenting with paroxysmal AF (pAF; n = 97) or persistent AF (n = 27), underwent 175 AF ablation procedures. 22.6% (n = 28) also had atrial flutter. Time from symptom onset to first ablation was 50.7 ± 46.2 months. Relevant cardiovascular-related demographics were analysed: hypertension in 8.9% (n = 11); diabetes in 1.6% (n = 2); positive family history of AF in 12.9% (n = 16); and family history of sudden cardiac death in 2.4% (n = 3). Mean CHA2DS2-VASc score was 0.35. Of those patients with documented echocardiogram imaging (n = 91), 26.4% (n = 24) had LA dilatation and 6.6% (n = 6) had LV dysfunction. Patients with LA dilatation underwent more ablations (2.3 ± 0.3) compared to controls (1.5 ± 0.1; p < 0.001).

Ablation strategy was pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) only in 67.2% (n = 119), with additional ablation in the remaining: roof line in 18.9% (n = 33); cavotricuspid isthmus line in 13.1% (n = 23); mitral isthmus line in 2.3% (n = 4); superior vena cava isolation in 2.3% (n = 4); complex fractionated atrial electrograms in 14.9% (n = 26). Mean procedure time was 155 ± 41 min, mean ablation time was 1657 ± 991 s and mean fluoroscopy time was 32.6 ± 23.4 min. General anaesthesia was used in 43.4% (n = 76). Complications included femoral haematoma (n = 2), tamponade (n = 1) and pulmonary vein stenosis (n = 2).

90 days of follow-up was available for 137 procedures performed for pAF (n = 105) and persistent AF (n = 32). For pAF, overall recurrence was 61.9% for first ablations and 62.9% overall. Recurrence was 56.3% for persistent AF.

Factors significantly associated with increased AF recurrence in univariate analysis were

male gender (hazard ratio (HR) 2.3, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.2-4.4, p = 0.011), hypertension (HR 0.5, CI: 0.2-1.1, p = 0.067), family history of sudden cardiac death (HR 6.8, CI: 1.6-29.0 , p = 0.010) and enlarged LA size (HR 2.2, CI: 1.3-3.6, p = 0.003). In multivariate analysis, the only significant predictor of poor outcome was enlarged LA size (HR 2.0, 95% CI: 1.2-3.5, p = 0.011).

Conclusions

Young patients with AF may have structurally abnormal hearts, and therefore do not only present with lone AF. LA size may be used as a predictor for success. Surveillance imaging may be useful to detect future structural change, which will be the subject of future prospective studies.

Abstract Figure. AF ablation recurrence in young adults

P1381Improved outcome in ablation of ventricular tachycardia in patients with structural heart disease under general anaesthetic

Background

Catheter ablation is an important adjunct to device implantation for secondary prevention of ventricular tachycardia (VT). However, several factors may influence the success of ablations in terms of long-term freedom from VT recurrence. A thus far little examined factor is the use of general anaesthetic (GA) versus conscious sedation during the procedure, which has been shown to improve outcomes in persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation.

Methods

Patients with structural heart disease VT undergoing ablations from January 2015 to March 2019 were retrospectively followed up at a single centre. End points were recurrent VT or device therapy (shock or anti-tachycardia pacing) at one year. Hazard ratios (HR) were generated using a multivariate Cox-regression proportional hazards model including variables of age at ablation, sex, amiodarone use at time of ablation, scar age, left ventricular ejection fraction, use of GA, and diagnosis of: diabetes mellitus (DM), hypertension (HTN), renal impairment or AF.

Results

79 patients (74 male, mean age 68.2+/- 10.3 years) were included. A substrate-based strategy of late potential ablation was employed. 69 had ischaemic and 10 had non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy. Mean scar age was 13.8 +/- 9.8 years; EF was 40-50% in 27 patients, 30-40% in 26 and < 30% in 26. 37 patients had implantable cardioverter defibrillators and 30 had cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) defibrillator devices, 1 had a CRT- pacemaker device and 4 had dual chamber pacemakers. Comorbidities were: DM (16), HTN (31), renal impairment (13), AF (31). 62 patients (79.5%) were on amiodarone at the time of ablation. Mean procedure duration was 234.8 +/- 44.5 min and mean radiofrequency energy application time was 2247 +/- 862 s. 61 were first procedures and 18 were repeat procedures. One patient suffered a complication of groin haematoma. 62 patients (78.5%) underwent VT ablation under GA and 17 (21.5%) under sedation of midazolam and fentanyl. Patient characteristics did not differ between groups. Significant factors which increased freedom from VT recurrence or device therapy were HTN (88.9% vs 59.4%, HR 0.72, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.007-0.75, p= 0.028), amiodarone treatment (50.0% vs 76.3%, HR 0.036, 95% CI: 0.003-0.404, p = 0.036) and ablation under GA rather than sedation (50.0% vs 75.0%, HR 0.055, 95% CI: 0.006-0.495, p = 0.01) (Fig 1).

Conclusions

In patients with structural heart disease undergoing VT ablation, outcomes are improved with the use of GA over conscious sedation.

Abstract Figure 1

P1451Catheter ablation in adults with Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome: a "real-life" experience

Introduction. Radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFA) is 1st line treatment in symptomatic adult patients with Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome (WPW). Patients with WPW are often quoted a high success rate for RFA but does this reflect reality? There is a paucity of recent literature and ongoing service developments in the UK may have a negative impact on success by reducing individual operator experience of adult WPW cases (i.e. increasing numbers of cardiac electrophysiologists in each department, patients more likely to undergo RFA as children). In contrast, technological developments (e.g. 3D mapping, steerable sheaths) may have a positive impact on success of RFA in WPW.

Methods. We collected data on all patients with WPW scheduled for 1st time ablation between Jan 2006 and Dec 2018. All patients undergoing re-do RFA during this time were excluded. For comparison, we divided this timeframe into three periods: 2006-9, 2010-13 and 2014-18.

Results. The number of patients scheduled for RFA and the outcome is listed in the Table. The overall success rate was 86.5% and this figure remained constant throughout the 13 year time-frame. Significant complications occurred in 1.17% of cases. 19.9% of patients scheduled for an ablation had no ablation attempted for various reasons (‘safe’ pathway, proximity to AV node etc).

Conclusion. In our centre, the number of adult cases of WPW scheduled for RFA year-on-year remains constant. The complication rate is in line with published literature. The RFA success rate is lower than the published data. As expected, success rate of RFA for WPW varies according to accessory pathway location. 1 in 5 cases scheduled for ablation did not proceed to ablation. This highlights an area where more effective resource planning from the outset can be undertaken.

Table 2006-9 2010-13 2014-18 Patients scheduled for RFA, n 181 152 179 Patients who underwent RFA, n 162 121 127 Overall RFA success rate, % (n) 85.6 (160) 86.6 (119) 87.4 (127) Success rate by AP location, % (n) Free wall Left 91.5 (71) 91.8 (49) 95.3 (64) Right 76.9 (13) 77.8 (9) 60.0 (5) Septal Anterior 77.8 (9) 88.9 (9) 100.0 (4) Mid 75.0 (8) 90.0 (10) 66.7 (3) Posterior 86.0 (57) 82.9 (41) 79.6 (49) RFA success rate in patients with Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome. AP = accessory pathway, RFA = radiofrequency catheter ablation