POS0680 PHYSICIANS’ REASONS FOR PRESCRIBING JANUS KINASE INHIBITORS (JAKi) IN PATIENTS WITH RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS (RA), AND ASSOCIATED ALIGNMENT BETWEEN PHYSICIANS AND PATIENTS IN A REAL-WORLD CLINICAL SETTING

Background

Shared decision making, a cornerstone of RA management1, allows physicians and their patients to make informed decisions about their treatment goals and choice of care. As new treatments become available, it is important to understand rheumatologists’ reasons for choosing JAKi.

Objectives

This survey evaluated rheumatologists’ clinical and patient centric reasons for choosing JAKi, in addition to exploring alignment between rheumatologists and RA patients in terms of treatment choice and satisfaction.

Methods

The Adelphi RA Disease Specific Programme™2 is a large, multinational, point-in-time survey conducted amongst rheumatologists and their consulting patients with RA in Europe (Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, UK) between January and October 2020. Physicians completed record forms for up to 10 consecutive RA patients, collecting demographic, clinical and treatment data, and reasons for current treatment choice. Patients were invited to complete a patient questionnaire to assess their satisfaction with ongoing treatment (5-point scale), and perceptions of shared decision making for the current treatment.

Results

316 rheumatologists provided data for 3121 patients, of whom 1130 (36.2%) completed patient reported questionnaires. Overall, 67% were female, mean age was 53 years (SD 14), 23% had moderate-high disease activity score (DAS28: >3.2). 68% of patients were currently receiving either a biologic or targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD; defined here as advanced therapy, AT), 72% were on first line AT. Overall, physicians and their patients were aligned that a conversation took place about a treatment decision (n=855, 79% net alignment), and this was a shared treatment decision (n=814, 75% net alignment). 15% of patients not taking an AT were reported to have a clinical condition warranting one; reasons for not taking AT included patients’ concerns about infection (24%), conventional synthetic DMARDs were tolerable and safe in the patient (18%), and patient dislike of infusions/injections (17%). Of 2143 patients receiving AT, 19% were prescribed JAKi; 57% as monotherapy, 43% as combination therapy. For physician stated reasons for choice of JAKi, factors were driven by both perceptions of clinical efficacy and onset of action, as well as factors relating to patient acceptability such as method of delivery and ease of use (Table 1). With respect to JAKi treatment (n=135 patient-physician pairs), 62% of physicians and their patients were aligned on satisfaction, however 30% of patients reported less satisfaction than their consulting physician (Figure 1).

Table 1.

Physician stated clinical and patient centric reasons for prescribing a JAKi in their patients with RA (data are percentage of patients; n=397)

Reasons for prescribing JAKiPatients (%)Top 5 clinical reasonsStrong overall efficacy74Fast onset of action49Inhibition of disease progression42Strong efficacy as monotherapy39Achievement of clinical remission37Top 5 patient centric reasonsAcceptability of method of delivery for the patient39Enabling patient to perform everyday tasks/activities36Ease of product use (for the patient)33Improvement or maintenance of quality of life30Improving patient’s mood/state of mind14

Conclusion

Communicating the choice of pharmacological therapy to patients with RA has become increasingly complex for physicians with expansion of approved treatments. In this subgroup of patients on JAKi, the drug attributes considered as reasons for prescribing were driven by clinical factors as well as by patient centric attributes. Although communications between patients and physicians were largely aligned, better understanding of patient expectations might serve to improve messaging about treatment options and resulting satisfaction.

References

[1]Smolen JS et al. Ann Rheum Dis 2017;76.

[2]Anderson P et al. Curr Med Res Opin 2008;24(11):3063–72.

Acknowledgements

The study was funded by Galapagos NV (Mechelen, Belgium). We thank the physicians and patients who participated in this survey. Medical writing support was provided by Gary Sidgwick, PhD (Adelphi Real World, Bollington, UK) and publications management was provided by Aspire Scientific Ltd, (Bollington, UK), funded by Galapagos NV.

Disclosure of Interests

Peter C. Taylor Consultant of: AbbVie, Biogen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Fresenius, Galapagos, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Lilly, Nordic Pharma, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, and UCB, Grant/research support from: Celgene and Galapagos, Bruno Fautrel Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Biogen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Celltrion, Fresenius Kabi, Gilead, Janssen, Lilly, Medac, MSD, Mylan, NORDIC Pharma, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sandoz, Sanofi-Genzyme, Sobi, and UCB, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Lilly, MSD, and Pfizer, Yves Piette Consultant of: AbbVie, Galapagos, Grünenthal, Novartis, Janssen, and Sandoz, Susana Romero-Yuste Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Grunenthal, Janssen, Kern Pharma, Lilly, Roche, Sandoz, Sanofi, and UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, Bristol, Biogen, Fresenius, Galapagos, Gebro, Janssen, and Lilly, Grant/research support from: Bristol Myers Squibb, MSD, Novartis, and Pfizer, Jasper Broen Consultant of: Galapagos, Gilead, UCB, and Novartis, Martin Welcker Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Aescu, Amgen, Biogen, BMS, Berlin Chemie, GSK, Hexal, Janssen, Medac, MSD, Mundipharma, Mylan, Novartis, Pfizer, Riemser, Sanofi, and UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, Boehringer, BMS, Celgene, Galapagos, Gilead, GSK, Medac, Mylan, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, and UCB, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Actelion, Boehringer, Galapagos, Gilead, GSK, Hexal, Novartis, and UCB, Elizabeth Holdsworth Employee of: Adelphi Real World, Monia Zignani Employee of: Galapagos NV, Katrien Van Beneden Shareholder of: Galapagos NV, Employee of: Galapagos NV, Roberto Caporali Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celltrion, Fresenius Kabi, Galapagos, Gilead, Lilly, MSD, Pfizer, Roche, Samsung Bioepis, Sanofi, and UCB, Consultant of: Galapagos, Gilead, Janssen, Lilly, and MSD, Rieke Alten Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Biogen, BMS, Celltrion, Galapagos, Gilead, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, and Roche

Improved biocompatibility of a viscous bioerodible poly(ortho ester) by controlling the environmental pH during degradation

The poly(ortho ester), POE, used in this investigation, is a viscous bioerodible polymer (8 kDa), which rapidly degrades into a triol and an acidic by-product, acetic acid. In order to improve biocompatibility, we have evaluated the addition of various basic excipients, such as sodium acetate, hydroxyapatite, calcium carbonate and magnesium hydroxide, which buffered and neutralized the acidic degradation product and prolonged the polymer lifetime and drug release. This decrease of POE degradation rate results in a decreased rate of formation of the acidic by-product. Similarly, a POE of higher molecular weight (14 kDa) has been tested. Sodium acetate was too hydrophilic to affect the drug release and the biocompatibility of the polymer, whereas the presence of magnesium hydroxide markedly prolonged the drug release and improved the acceptability of the polymer. The increased molecular weight POE did not improve biocompatibility and a similar but delayed, inflammatory reaction was observed.

A poly(ortho ester) designed for combined ocular delivery of dexamethasone sodium phosphate and 5-fluorouracil: subconjunctival tolerance and in vitro release

A viscous hydrophobic poly(ortho ester) (POE) has been developed as a biocompatible, biodegradable sustained release system for selected cases of glaucoma filtering surgery. Dexamethasone and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) are frequently administered together post-operatively, for their anti-fibroblastic and anti-inflammatory properties, respectively. A combined sustained release of both drugs could be advantageously used. Drug release kinetics were studied using specially designed thermostated cells. Subconjunctival tolerance was evaluated on New Zealand albino rabbits by clinical evaluation. Due to its basicity, the addition of dexamethasone sodium phosphate (DEX-P) stabilized the polymer and prolonged 5-FU in vitro release from 2 to 4 days. Both therapeutic agents were released concomitantly, according to a linear profile. The presence of 5-FU only slightly affected the overall subconjunctival tolerance of POE in rabbits, whereas the addition of DEX-P markedly improved POE tolerance by reducing the hyperemia of the conjunctiva to a minimal grade.

In vitro characterization of a novel polymeric-based pH-sensitive liposome system

This study demonstrates rapid and pH-sensitive release of a highly water-soluble fluorescent aqueous content marker, pyranine, from egg phosphatidylcholine liposomes following incorporation of N-isopropylacrylamide (NIPA) copolymers in liposomal membranes. The pH-sensitivity of this system correlates with the precipitation of the copolymers at acidic pH. In vitro release can be significantly improved by increasing the percentage of anchor in the copolymer and thus favoring its binding to the liposomal bilayer. In the case of liposomes containing a poly(ethylene glycol)-phospholipid conjugate, the insertion of the pH-sensitive copolymer in the liposomal membrane appears to be sterically inhibited. Dye release from these formulations at acidic pH can still be achieved by varying the anchor molar ratio and/or molecular mass of the polymers or by including the latter during the liposome preparation procedure. Removal of unbound polymer results in decreased leakage only when the copolymer is inserted by incubation with preformed liposomes, but can be overcome by preparing liposomes in the presence of polymer. Aqueous content and lipid mixing assays suggest contents release can occur without membrane fusion. The results of this study indicate that the addition of pH-sensitive copolymers of NIPA represents promising strategy for improving liposomal drug delivery.

Concomitant and controlled release of dexamethasone and 5-fluorouracil from poly(ortho ester)

A viscous bioerodible and hydrophobic poly(ortho ester) has been developed as a biocompatible, sustained drug release system for an ophthalmic application in intraocular proliferative disorders. The combination of wound healing modulators such as 5-fluorouracil and dexamethasone is a major advantage since these drugs act at different stages of these diseases. Since 5-fluorouracil is an acidic, water-soluble compound and dexamethasone exists in three chemical forms, i.e. the water-insoluble base, the highly hydrophobic acetate ester or the basic phosphate salt, it was of interest to investigate whether the physicochemical properties of the drugs have an influence on their release rates, and whether a concomitant and sustained release of both 5-fluorouracil and dexamethasone could be achieved. It has been found that lipophilicity and acidobasicity play a major role in controlling drug release rates and polymer degradation. The combination of 5-fluorouracil and dexamethasone phosphate allows a sustained and concomitant release of both drugs, due to the basic characteristics of the corticosteroid which stabilize the polymer. This system appears to be promising for concomitant and controlled drug delivery aimed at the pharmacological treatment of intraocular proliferative disorders.

Serum IgG antibodies to human herpesvirus-6 (HHV-6) do not predict the progression of HIV disease to AIDS. Italian Seroconversion Study group

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate if different levels of human herpesvirus 6 (HHV-6) antibodies can predict HIV disease progression.

DESIGN

Longitudinal study of individuals with a documented date of HIV seroconversion.

SETTING

Clinical centers located throughout Italy.

PATIENTS

Individuals who serconverted for HIV between 1983 and 1995 in Italy.

METHODS

Sera were tested for IgG antibodies to HHV-6 using a commercial enzyme immunoassay. A serum sample with an optical density (OD) > or =242 (i.e. the mean value of 10 negative controls +4x standard deviation) was considered as HHV-6 positive; the progression of HIV disease was evaluated estimating the relative hazards (RH) of AIDS (by Cox models) for individuals with higher levels vs. lower levels of HHV-6 antibodies or considering levels of antibodies based on 10% increase of the distribution (deciles). Rates of CD4 decline fitting linear regression were also estimated.

RESULTS

A total of 381 persons were followed for a median time of 4 years (range: 0.15-9 years) following the date of collection of the serum sample. The median OD value of HHV-6 antibodies was 306, with an interquartile range of 241-440 and a range of 48-2330. A slight inverse correlation was found between HHV-6 antibody levels and age of the individual at the time of serum collection (Spearman rank correlation coefficient, -0.16; p = 0.0013). No association was found between HHV-6 and CD4 level or between HHV-6 and CD8 level at the date of serum collection. The unadjusted RH of progression to AIDS was 0.63 (95% CI: 0.42-0.96) for HHV-6 positive individuals vs. HHV-6 negative; when adjusting for possible confounders (CD4, age, pre-AIDS HIV-related pathologies at the date of sera collection, and previous anti-herpes treatment), the RH of AIDS increased to 0.80 (95% CI: 0.51-1.23). No particular association with HIV disease progression was found when using the deciles of the distribution of HHV-6 antibodies. The median CD4 cell loss was 5.0x10(6) cells/l per month among HHV-6 positive individuals and 5.7x10(6) cells/l per month among the others.

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of high levels of HHV-6 antibodies does not seem to predict the clinical or immunologic progression of HIV disease.

Subconjunctival biocompatibility of a viscous bioerodable poly(ortho ester)

The biocompatibility of a viscous poly(ortho ester) (POE) intended for prolonged intraocular drug delivery was studied. This hydrophobic and bioerodable carrier was subconjunctivally injected in rabbits and evaluated both clinically and histologically. To assess the cause of the triggered transient acute inflammatory reaction, the two monomers, the intermediate and final degradation products, and the local toxicity of different solvents used during the polymer preparation were tested. Since the two initial monomers and the intermediate degradation products induced only moderate inflammation, the main acute inflammatory reaction is attributed to the formation of an acidic by-product which has been monitored in vitro by measuring the progressive decrease of the environmental pH. The influence of the sterilization procedure on tissue biocompatibility was established by comparing two polymers of similar molecular weight: one after gamma-sterilization, and an aseptically synthesized one. The biocompatibility was significantly improved by avoiding irradiation of the polymer.

n-Hexane metabolism in occupationally exposed workers

Lung uptake and excretion of n-hexane were studied in ten workers in a shoe factory. Simultaneous samples of inhaled and alveolar air were collected with the aid of a Rhan-Otis valve, personal samplers, and charcoal tubes. Alveolar excretion was monitored during a six hour postexposure period. Uptake was calculated from lung ventilation, the retention coefficient, and environmental concentrations. The amount of exhaled n-hexane was calculated from the decay curve. According to the experimental data, alveolar retention was about 25% of the inhaled n-hexane, corresponding to a lung uptake of about 17%. The postexposure alveolar excretion was about 10% of the total uptake. The main metabolites of n-hexane were identified and measured by capillary GC/MS in spot urine samples collected before, at the end, and 15 hours after the same working shift. Urinary concentrations were low, though related to n-hexane in the air. 2,5-Hexanedione in the end of shift samples gave the best estimate of overall exposure. About 3 mg/g creatinine of 2,5-hexanedione would correspond to about 50 ppm of n-hexane in the air (mean daily exposure).