1
|
van Stein RM, Sikorska K, van der Aa MA, Sonke GS, van Driel WJ, van Gent MDJM, van Ham MAPC, Hermans RHM, de Hingh IHJT, Schreuder HWR. Evaluation of external validity of the OVHIPEC-1 trial in a real-world population. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2022; 161:640-648. [PMID: 36495280 DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.14618] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2022] [Revised: 10/31/2022] [Accepted: 12/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The OVHIPEC-1 trial (Phase III randomised clinical trial for stage III ovarian carcinoma randomising between interval cytoreductive surgery with or without hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy) showed improved survival when interval cytoreductive surgery (CRS) was combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in patients with stage III epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). The authors compared the control arm of the trial with a real-world population treated in the Netherlands during the same period to explore generalizability of the trial results. METHODS For this nationwide comparative cohort study, all patients with EOC undergoing interval CRS between 2007 and 2016 were identified from the Netherlands Cancer Registry if they fulfilled the eligibility criteria of OVHIPEC-1 (n = 1376). Patient and treatment characteristics, and overall survival (OS) were compared between trial and real-world populations. RESULTS Age, comorbidity, BRCA status, histologic subtype, and residual disease were similar in trial and real-world patients. Trial patients had a better performance status, higher socioeconomic status, and underwent bowel surgery more often. In a real-world setting, patients more often received more than six cycles. The difference in OS between the trial and the real-world populations was not statistically significant (unadjusted hazard ratio, 1.09 [95% confidence interval, 0.87-1.37]; P = 0.44). CONCLUSION Despite differences in patient characteristics, OS of patients treated in the control arm of OVHIPEC-1 was similar to patients treated outside the trial. The trial population accurately represents real-world patients with stage III EOC undergoing interval CRS in terms of outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruby M van Stein
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Karolina Sikorska
- Department of Biometrics, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maaike A van der Aa
- Department of Research & Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization (IKNL), Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Gabe S Sonke
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Willemien J van Driel
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Koole SN, Kieffer JM, K Sikorska, Schagen van Leeuwen JH, Schreuder HWR, Hermans RH, de Hingh IH, van der Velden J, Arts HJ, van Ham MAPC, Aalbers AG, Verwaal VJ, Van de Vijver KK, Sonke GS, van Driel WJ, Aaronson NK. Health-related quality of life after interval cytoreductive surgery with or without hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in patients with stage III ovarian cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 2019; 47:101-107. [PMID: 31128948 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2019.05.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2019] [Accepted: 05/08/2019] [Indexed: 01/23/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The addition of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) to interval cytoreductive surgery (CRS) improves recurrence-free (RFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with FIGO stage III ovarian cancer. We evaluated the effect of HIPEC on patient's health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in the OVHIPEC trial. MATERIALS AND METHODS OVHIPEC was a multicentre, open-label, randomized phase III trial for patients with stage III ovarian cancer. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive interval CRS with or without HIPEC with cisplatin. HRQoL was assessed using the EORTC QLQ-C30, and the ovarian (QLQ-OV28) and colorectal cancer (QLQ-CR38) modules. HRQoL questionnaires were administered at baseline, after surgery, after end of treatment, and every three months thereafter. HRQoL was a secondary endpoint, with the prespecified focus on the QLQ-C30 summary score and symptom scores on fatigue, neuropathy and gastro-intestinal symptoms. HRQoL was analysed using linear and non-linear mixed effect models. RESULTS In total, 245 patients were randomized. One-hundred-ninety-seven patients (80%) completed at least one questionnaire. No significant difference over time in the QLQ-C30 summary scores was observed between the study arms (p-values for linear and non-linear growth: p > 0.133). The pattern over time for fatigue, neuropathy and gastro-intestinal symptoms did not significantly differ between treatment arms. CONCLUSION The addition of HIPEC to interval CRS does not negatively impact HRQoL in patients with stage III ovarian cancer who are treated with interval CRS due to the extent of disease. These HRQoL results, together with the improvement in RFS and OS, support the viability of HIPEC as an important treatment option in this patient population. CLINICALTRIALS. GOV NUMBER NCT00426257. EUDRACT NUMBER 2006-003466-34.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S N Koole
- Department of Gynecology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Center for Gynecologic Oncology Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - J M Kieffer
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - K Sikorska
- Department of Biometrics, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - H W R Schreuder
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - R H Hermans
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - I H de Hingh
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands; The Dutch Peritoneal Oncology Group, the Netherlands
| | - J van der Velden
- Center for Gynecologic Oncology Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - H J Arts
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - M A P C van Ham
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - A G Aalbers
- The Dutch Peritoneal Oncology Group, the Netherlands; Department of Surgical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - V J Verwaal
- Department of Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | - G S Sonke
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Center for Gynecologic Oncology Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - W J van Driel
- Department of Gynecology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Center for Gynecologic Oncology Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Dutch Gynecological Oncology Group, the Netherlands
| | - N K Aaronson
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
van de Nieuwenhof HP, Massuger LFAG, de Hullu JA, van Ham MAPC, van Dijck JAAM, Siebers AG, Bekkers RLM. Significant decrease of adenocarcinoma in situ not reflected in cervical adenocarcinoma incidence in the Netherlands 1989-2003. Br J Cancer 2008; 98:165-7. [PMID: 18182979 PMCID: PMC2359688 DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Over the period 1989–2003, the incidence of cervical adenocarcinoma (n=1615) was stable whereas that of cervical adenocarcinoma in situ (n=1884) significantly decreased (P=0.008), mainly caused by adenocarcinoma in situ lesions with a concurrent squamous dysplasia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H P van de Nieuwenhof
- Department of Gynaecology/Obstetrics, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
van Hamont D, van Ham MAPC, Struik-van der Zanden PHTH, Keijser KGG, Bulten J, Melchers WJG, Massuger LFAG. Long-term follow-up after large-loop excision of the transformation zone: evaluation of 22 years treatment of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2006; 16:615-9. [PMID: 16681735 DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1438.2006.00404.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Early treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) significantly reduces the risk of invasive cancerous progression. Residual and recurrent high-grade CIN should be detected and retreated in an early phase. Therefore, a postsurgery cytologic follow-up protocol was introduced at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months and yearly thereafter for 5 years. The aim of this study is to evaluate the long-term experience in treating high-grade CIN using large-loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ). Additionally, the long-term follow-up in this study gains the opportunity to document the pattern of disease recurrence beyond 5 years. The average follow-up of the 1696 women included in this study was 6.5 years. Overall, 8.5% of the patients who underwent LLETZ showed a high-grade repetitive CIN and three patients had invasive carcinoma. Eighty percent of those lesions were probably residual, whereas 20% of all high-grade repetitive lesions appeared more than 2 years after initial surgery and were considered recurrent lesions. Half of the recurrent lesions occurred more than 5 years after LLETZ.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D van Hamont
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Nijmegen University Centre for Infectious Diseases, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
van Ham MAPC, Melchers WJG, Hanselaar AGJM, Bekkers RLM, Boonstra H, Massuger LFAG. Fluctuations in prevalence of cervical human papillomavirus in women frequently sampled during a single menstrual cycle. Br J Cancer 2002; 87:373-6. [PMID: 12177771 PMCID: PMC2376132 DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6600485] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2002] [Revised: 05/30/2002] [Accepted: 06/06/2002] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
In the last few years much attention has been focused on the implementation of human papillomavirus detection in population based screening programmes to identify women at risk for cervical cancer. Short-term fluctuations in prevalence of human papillomavirus were investigated within a single menstrual cycle. The highest prevalence was found at the follicular phase (55%), whereas the cumulative prevalence was 75%.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M A P C van Ham
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Medical Centre Nijmegen, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|