Sleeping Safe and Sound: A Multidisciplinary Hospital-wide Infant Safe Sleep Quality Improvement Initiative

INTRODUCTION

Promoting safe sleep to decrease sudden unexpected infant death is challenging in the hospital setting.

LOCAL PROBLEM

Concern for adherence to safe sleep practice across inpatient units at a large pediatric hospital.

METHODS

Used quality improvement methodologies to promote safe sleep across all units.

INTERVENTIONS

Development of a multidisciplinary expert group, hospital-wide guidelines, targeted interventions, and bedside audits to track progress.

RESULTS

Adherence to safe sleep practices improved from 9% to 53%. Objects in the crib were a major barrier to maintaining a safe sleep environment. Safe sleep practices were less likely to be observed in infants with increased medical complexity (p = .027).

CONCLUSIONS

Quality improvement methodology improved adherence to infant safe sleep guidelines across multiple units. Medically complex infants continue to be a challenge to safe sleep. Therefore, ongoing education for staff and further research into best practices for the most complex infant populations are necessary.

Factors Associated With Underutilization of Genetic Testing in Autism Spectrum Disorders

BACKGROUND

We sought to identify patient and provider factors associated with low completion of genetic testing, specifically chromosomal microarray (CMA), for autism spectrum disorder (ASD).

METHODS

Medical record review was conducted of children newly diagnosed with ASD without prior genetic testing at a single academic medical center from February 2015 through January 2016.

RESULTS

Only 41.9% of individuals with ASD completed CMA testing over at least 18 months from diagnosis (n = 140 of 334). Time to CMA completion varied, with a median of 86.5 days (interquartile range 2 to 214.5 days). Provider recommendation of genetic testing at the diagnostic visit and greater number of follow-up visits were associated with CMA completion. On multivariate regression, CMA completion was inversely associated with age (odds ratio [OR] = 0.8 for each year older, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.7, 0.9; P = 0.001) and directly associated with intellectual disability or global developmental delay (OR = 2.2, 95% CI 1.3, 3.8; P = 0.004), first-degree relative with ASD (OR = 2.5, 95% CI 1.0, 6.0; P = 0.044), and public insurance (OR = 1.7, 95% CI 1.0, 2.9; P = 0.037). Parental concern and cost/insurance coverage were the most frequently documented barriers.

CONCLUSIONS

Workflows to support early genetic testing recommendation and ordering soon after diagnosis may increase utilization, incorporating both family and provider perspectives. Genetic counseling highlighting the utility of genetic testing across the life span, phenotypic variability of genetic disorders, and possibility of de novo variants in ASD may also improve utilization.

Autism Spectrum Disorder Parent Report for Outcome Monitoring: A Preliminary Report of Development and Clinical Utility

OBJECTIVE

Children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) face challenges across many functional domains. A tool that gathers relevant clinical information before visits, emphasizing symptoms that are likely to change over development and inform clinical interventions, could improve health care quality, allowing for more patient-centered and efficient care. This study evaluated the clinical utility and preliminary psychometrics of the ASD Parent Report for Outcome Monitoring (ASD-PROM), a web-based measure assessing competence in core features of ASD, along with the breadth of concerns and comorbidities that frequently co-occur with ASD.

METHODS

An interdisciplinary team drafted the ASD-PROM and made iterative revisions based on parent feedback. Parents of 62 children completed the ASD-PROM before their autism-specialty clinical visit, 53 completed the ASD-PROM twice, and 48 completed the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales, Second Edition (Vineland-II) concurrently. Parents (n = 25) and clinicians (n = 13) completed postvisit surveys to assess utility (phase 1). The ASD-PROM was then released for general clinical use (phase 2).

RESULTS

On a Likert scale (1 = very poorly, 10 = very well), parents found that ASD-PROM items described their child's abilities well (median = 8.0; interquartile range [IQR]: 7.0-9.5) and had a positive effect on care (median = 8.0; IQR: 7.0-10.0). Clinicians found the ASD-PROM effective in assessing parent-reported patient abilities (median = 9.0, IQR: 7.0-9.0) and felt the ASD-PROM helped make their care more patient-centered and efficient (both median = 8.0, IQR: 6.0-9.0). Two-week test-retest reliability was acceptable (0.95). ASD-PROM scores correlated positively with scores from similar domains on the Vineland-II (Pearson r 0.30-0.50, medium to large effects).

CONCLUSION

The ASD-PROM is a freely available tool to gather information on developmental and behavioral functioning in children with ASD before autism-specialty clinical visits. Clinical utility and preliminary psychometrics are promising, although limitations (including a low response rate during clinical use and a need for additional in-depth assessments and potential resulting modifications to the tool) remain to be addressed. Ultimately, the ASD-PROM may help promote patient-centered and efficient care for children across a wide range of ages and developmental levels.

Characteristics of Future Models of Integrated Outpatient Care

Replacement of fee-for-service with capitation arrangements, forces physicians and institutions to minimize health care costs, while maintaining high-quality care. In this report we described how patients and their families (or caregivers) can work with members of the medical care team to achieve these twin goals of maintaining-and perhaps improving-high-quality care and minimizing costs. We described how increased self-management enables patients and their families/caregivers to provide electronic patient-reported outcomes (i.e., symptoms, events) (ePROs), as frequently as the patient or the medical care team consider appropriate. These capabilities also allow ongoing assessments of physiological measurements/phenomena (mHealth). Remote surveillance of these communications allows longer intervals between (fewer) patient visits to the medical-care team, when this is appropriate, or earlier interventions, when it is appropriate. Systems are now available that alert medical care providers to situations when interventions might be needed.

Caring electronically for young outpatients who have epilepsy

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to review electronic tools that might improve the delivery of epilepsy care, reduce medical care costs, and empower families to improve self-management capability.

METHOD

We reviewed the epilepsy-specific literature about self-management, electronic patient-reported or provider-reported outcomes, on-going remote surveillance, and alerting/warning systems.

CONCLUSIONS

The improved care delivery system that we envision includes self-management, electronic patient (or provider)-reported outcomes, on-going remote surveillance, and alerting/warning systems. This system and variants have the potential to reduce seizure burden through improved management, keep children out of the emergency department and hospital, and even reduce the number of outpatient visits.