1
|
Eldredge TA, Bills M, Ting YY, Dimitri M, Watson MM, Harris MC, Myers JC, Bartholomeusz DL, Kiroff GK, Shenfine J. Once in a Bile — the Incidence of Bile Reflux Post-Bariatric Surgery. Obes Surg 2022; 32:1428-1438. [PMID: 35226339 PMCID: PMC8883020 DOI: 10.1007/s11695-022-05977-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2021] [Revised: 02/08/2022] [Accepted: 02/17/2022] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Purpose Excellent metabolic improvement following one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) remains compromised by the risk of esophageal bile reflux and theoretical carcinogenic potential. No ‘gold standard’ investigation exists for esophageal bile reflux, with diverse methods employed in the few studies evaluating it post-obesity surgery. As such, data on the incidence and severity of esophageal bile reflux is limited, with comparative studies lacking. This study aims to use specifically tailored biliary scintigraphy and upper gastrointestinal endoscopy protocols to evaluate esophageal bile reflux after OAGB, sleeve gastrectomy (SG) and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). Methods Fifty-eight participants underwent OAGB (20), SG (15) or RYGB (23) between November 2018 and July 2020. Pre-operative reflux symptom assessment and gastroscopy were performed and repeated post-operatively at 6 months along with biliary scintigraphy. Results Gastric reflux of bile was identified by biliary scintigraphy in 14 OAGB (70%), one RYGB (5%) and four SG participants (31%), with a mean of 2.9% (SD 1.5) reflux (% of total radioactivity). One participant (OAGB) demonstrated esophageal bile reflux. De novo macro- or microscopic gastroesophagitis occurred in 11 OAGB (58%), 8 SG (57%) and 7 RYGB (30%) participants. Thirteen participants had worsened reflux symptoms post-operatively (OAGB, 4; SG, 7; RYGB, 2). Scintigraphic esophageal bile reflux bore no statistical association with de novo gastroesophagitis or reflux symptoms. Conclusion Despite high incidence of gastric bile reflux post-OAGB, esophageal bile reflux is rare. With scarce literature of tumour development post-OAGB, frequent low-volume gastric bile reflux likely bears little clinical consequence; however, longer-term studies are needed. Clinical Trial Registry Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry number ACTRN12618000806268. Graphical abstract ![]()
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas A Eldredge
- Discipline of Surgery, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
- Department of Surgery, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, 28 Woodville Road, Woodville South, Adelaide, South Australia, 5011, Australia.
| | - Madison Bills
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, PET and Bone Densitometry, Royal Adelaide Hospital and SA Medical Imaging, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Ying Yang Ting
- Discipline of Surgery, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Department of Surgery, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, 28 Woodville Road, Woodville South, Adelaide, South Australia, 5011, Australia
| | - Mikayla Dimitri
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, PET and Bone Densitometry, Royal Adelaide Hospital and SA Medical Imaging, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Matthew M Watson
- Department of Surgery, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, 28 Woodville Road, Woodville South, Adelaide, South Australia, 5011, Australia
| | - Mark C Harris
- Department of Surgery, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, 28 Woodville Road, Woodville South, Adelaide, South Australia, 5011, Australia
| | - Jennifer C Myers
- Discipline of Surgery, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Department of Surgery, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, 28 Woodville Road, Woodville South, Adelaide, South Australia, 5011, Australia
| | - Dylan L Bartholomeusz
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, PET and Bone Densitometry, Royal Adelaide Hospital and SA Medical Imaging, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - George K Kiroff
- Discipline of Surgery, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Department of Surgery, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, 28 Woodville Road, Woodville South, Adelaide, South Australia, 5011, Australia
| | - Jonathan Shenfine
- Discipline of Surgery, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Chapple LAS, Summers MJ, Weinel LM, Abdelhamid YA, Kar P, Hatzinikolas S, Calnan D, Bills M, Lange K, Poole A, O'Connor SN, Horowitz M, Jones KL, Deane AM, Chapman MJ. Effects of Standard vs Energy-Dense Formulae on Gastric Retention, Energy Delivery, and Glycemia in Critically Ill Patients. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 2021; 45:710-719. [PMID: 33543797 DOI: 10.1002/jpen.2065] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2020] [Revised: 11/20/2020] [Accepted: 12/14/2020] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Energy-dense formulae are often provided to critically ill patients with enteral feed intolerance with the aim of increasing energy delivery, yet the effect on gastric emptying is unknown. The rate of gastric emptying of a standard compared with an energy-dense formula was quantified in critically ill patients. METHODS Mechanically ventilated adults were randomized to receive radiolabeled intragastric infusions of 200 mL standard (1 kcal/mL) or 100 mL energy-dense (2 kcal/mL) enteral formulae on consecutive days in this noninferiority, blinded, crossover trial. The primary outcome was scintigraphic measurement of gastric retention (percentage at 120 minutes). Other measures included area under the curve (AUC) for gastric retention and intestinal energy delivery (calculated from gastric retention of formulae over time), blood glucose (peak and AUC), and intestinal glucose absorption (using 3-O-methyl-D-gluco-pyranose [3-OMG] concentrations). Comparisons were undertaken using paired mixed-effects models. Data presented are mean ± SE. RESULTS Eighteen patients were studied (male/female, 14:4; age, 55.2 ± 5.3 years). Gastric retention at 120 minutes was greater with the energy-dense formula (standard, 17.0 ± 5.9 vs energy-dense, 32.5 ± 7.1; difference, 12.7% [90% confidence interval, 0.8%-30.1%]). Energy delivery (AUC120 , 13,038 ± 1119 vs 9763 ± 1346 kcal/120 minutes; P = 0.057), glucose control (peak glucose, 10.1 ± 0.3 vs 9.7 ± 0.3 mmol/L, P = 0.362; and glucose AUC120 8.7 ± 0.3 vs 8.5 ± 0.3 mmol/L.120 minutes, P = 0.661), and absorption (3-OMG AUC120 , 38.5 ± 4.0 vs 35.7 ± 4.0 mmol/L.120 minutes; P = .508) were not improved with the energy-dense formula. CONCLUSION In critical illness, administration of an energy-dense formula does not reduce gastric retention, increase energy delivery to the small intestine, or improve glucose absorption or glucose control; instead, there is a signal for delayed gastric emptying.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lee-Anne S Chapple
- Intensive Care Unit, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Discipline of Acute Care Medicine, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Centre of Research Excellence in Translating Nutritional Science to Good Health, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Matthew J Summers
- Intensive Care Unit, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Discipline of Acute Care Medicine, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Luke M Weinel
- Intensive Care Unit, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Yasmine Ali Abdelhamid
- Discipline of Acute Care Medicine, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Department of Medicine and Radiology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne Medical School,Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Australia
| | - Palash Kar
- Intensive Care Unit, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Discipline of Acute Care Medicine, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Seva Hatzinikolas
- Centre of Research Excellence in Translating Nutritional Science to Good Health, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Deborah Calnan
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, PET and Bone Densitometry, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Madison Bills
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, PET and Bone Densitometry, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Kylie Lange
- Centre of Research Excellence in Translating Nutritional Science to Good Health, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Alexis Poole
- Intensive Care Unit, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Discipline of Acute Care Medicine, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Stephanie N O'Connor
- Intensive Care Unit, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Discipline of Acute Care Medicine, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Michael Horowitz
- Centre of Research Excellence in Translating Nutritional Science to Good Health, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Karen L Jones
- Centre of Research Excellence in Translating Nutritional Science to Good Health, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Adam M Deane
- Department of Medicine and Radiology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne Medical School,Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Australia
| | - Marianne J Chapman
- Intensive Care Unit, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Discipline of Acute Care Medicine, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Centre of Research Excellence in Translating Nutritional Science to Good Health, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Zhang C, Bills M, Quigley A, Maxwell RJ, Linnane AW, Nagley P. Varied prevalence of age-associated mitochondrial DNA deletions in different species and tissues: a comparison between human and rat. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1997; 230:630-5. [PMID: 9015375 DOI: 10.1006/bbrc.1996.6020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
The prevalence in tissues of mtDNA deletions was compared by PCR between humans and rats of similar "biological ages". Pairs of species-specific primers were used which spanned similar portions of the human and rat mtDNA genomes. There were much fewer PCR products amplified from rat mtDNA than from human mtDNA in each of the three tissues initially analysed: heart, liver and skeletal muscle. By contrast, many more PCR products were amplified from rat kidney than from human kidney. Therefore, while there were far more deletions in heart, liver and skeletal muscle of humans than in corresponding rat tissues, the prevalence of mtDNA deletions was markedly less in human kidney than in rat kidney. The data also indicate that human kidney contains less mtDNA deletions than heart, liver and skeletal muscle in humans; whereas in rat kidney there are more mtDNA deletions than in those three tissues of rat. It is further suggested that, when utilising rodents as experimental models for human ageing, the appropriate tissues should be considered, since not all tissues of rats accumulate mtDNA mutations in the same manner as those of humans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Zhang
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|