GABA treatment does not induce neogenesis of new endocrine cells from pancreatic ductal cells

Previous studies indicated that ductal cells can contribute to endocrine neogenesis in adult rodents after alpha cells convert into beta cells. This can occur through Pax4 mis-expression in alpha cells or through long-term administration of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) to healthy mice. GABA has also been reported to increase the number of beta cells through direct effects on their proliferation, but only in specific genetic mouse backgrounds. To test whether GABA induces neogenesis of beta cells from ductal cells or affects pancreatic cell proliferation, we administered GABA or saline over 2 or 6 months to Sox9CreER;R26R^YFP mice in which 60-80% of large or small ducts were efficiently lineage labeled. We did not observe any increases in islet neogenesis from ductal cells between 1 and 2 months of age in saline treated mice, nor between 2 and 6 months of saline treatment, supporting previous studies indicating that adult ductal cells do not give rise to new endocrine cells during homeostasis. Unlike previous reports, we did not observe an increase in beta cell neogenesis after 2 or 6 months of GABA administration. Nor did we observe a significant increase in the pancreatic islet area, the number of insulin and glucagon double positive cells, or cell proliferation in the pancreas. This indicates that the effect of long term GABA administration on the pancreas is minimal or highly context dependent.

Development and pilot testing of the 2019 Canadian Abortion Provider Survey

BACKGROUND

Substantial changes in abortion care regulations, available medications and national clinical practice guidelines have occurred since a 2012 national Canadian Abortion Provider Survey (CAPS). We developed and piloted the CAPS 2019 survey instrument to explore changes of the abortion provider workforce, their clinical care as well as experiences with stigma and harassment.

METHODS

We undertook development and piloting in three phases: (1) development of the preliminary survey sections and questions based on the 2012 survey instrument, (2) content validation and feasibility of including certain content aspects via a modified Delphi Method with panels of clinical and research experts, and (3) pilot testing of the draft survey for face validity and clarity of language; assessing usability of the web-based Research Electronic Data Capture platform including the feasibility of complex skip pattern functionality. We performed content analysis of phase 2 results and used a general inductive approach to identify necessary survey modifications.

RESULTS

In phase 1, we generated a survey draft that reflected the changes in Canadian abortion care regulations and guidelines and included questions for clinicians and administrators providing first and second trimester surgical and medical abortion. In phase 2, we held 6 expert panel meetings of 5-8 participants each representing clinicians, administrators and researchers to provide feedback on the initial survey draft. Due to the complexity of certain identified aspects, such as interdisciplinary collaboration and interprovincial care delivery differences, we revised the survey sections through an iterative process of meetings and revisions until we reached consensus on constructs and questions to include versus exclude for not being feasible. In phase 3, we made minor revisions based on pilot testing of the bilingual, web-based survey among additional experts chosen to be widely representative of the study population. Demonstrating its feasibility, we included complex branching and skip pattern logic so each respondent only viewed applicable questions based on their prior responses.

CONCLUSIONS

We developed and piloted the CAPS 2019 survey instrument suitable to explore characteristics of a complex multidisciplinary workforce, their care and experience with stigma on a national level, and that can be adapted to other countries.