Results of meniscal injuries repair using different arthroscopic techniques

AIM

Evaluation of clinical and radiological outcomes following meniscal repair using different arthroscopic techniques for all meniscal tears amenable for repair.

METHODS

Sixty-one patients were involved in a prospective study; all cases presented with meniscal tears underwent arthroscopic meniscal repair from December 2016 to December 2017. Outcomes involved the site of tear, the repair technique, and associated injuries. The International Knee Documentation Committee Score (IKDC) and Tegner Lysholm Knee Score were used to analyze the clinical and functional outcomes postoperatively.

RESULTS

Of the 61 patients, 50 patients (81.9%) had meniscal tear associated with isolated ligamentous ACL injury, 6 cases had corrective osteotomy with ACL reconstruction to correct concomitant genu varus, 2 cases (3.3%) had meniscal tear associated with isolated ligamentous PCL injury, and 9 patients (14.8%) presented with isolated meniscal tear; IKDC was preoperatively (44.52 ± 8.79), postoperatively at 6 months (90.97 ± 6.75) and at 12 months (92.27 ± 2.68) with P-value (0.001). Tegner Lysholm score was preoperatively (52.16 ± 12.22), postoperatively at 6 months (88.03 ± 6.84) and at 12 months (93.26 ± 2.95) with P-value (0.001). Fifty eight patients (95.1%) had no postoperative symptoms at 6 and 12 months' follow-up. The remaining 3 cases (4.9%) underwent partial meniscectomy due to persistent postoperative clinical symptoms with no signs of healing in MRI.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study concluded that arthroscopic meniscal repair is an effective way in the management of meniscal tears regarding clinical and functional outcomes.

Outcomes of hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement: The effect of morphological type and chondrolabral damage

Introduction: Hip arthroscopy for treatment of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) has shown significant pain and functional improvement. However, the differential outcome of each of the FAI morphological types in contrast to one another remains largely unknown. This study was conducted to detect a possible difference in outcome among different FAI types treated using hip arthroscopy.

Methods: In this prospective non randomized comparative study, after exclusion of non-FAI cases and cases with advanced arthritic changes, 90 hips in 85 patients that had hip arthroscopy for the treatment of FAI between 2011 and 2015 in our center were analyzed. The collected patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) included visual analog scale (VAS) of pain, the modified Harris hip score (mHHS), and the non arthritic hip score (NAHS) both preoperatively and at final follow-up. Patient satisfaction was collected at final follow-up. Postoperative PROMs were subjected to three main comparisons based on each of FAI type, labral procedure, and extent of cartilage damage. Repeat comparison based on FAI type after matching of exact chondrolabral condition was also attempted.

Results: Mean follow-up was 32.8 months (five patients lost from follow-up). There was a significant improvement in the overall PROMs. This improvement was significantly higher in the cam group in contrast to the mixed group. After matching for chondrolabral condition, this difference was consistent and more evident.

Discussion: The outcome of arthroscopic treatment of pure cam FAI is significantly better than that of mixed FAI. Matching of the same chondrolabral condition and repeating the comparison yields similar results.

Arabic translation and validation of three knee scores, Lysholm Knee Score (LKS), Oxford Knee Score (OKS), and International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form (IKDC)

Aim of the work: Translation and validation of three commonly used knee scores to Arabic language: the Lysholm Knee Score (LKS), the Oxford Knee Score (OKS), and IKDC Subjective Knee Form.

Methods: Our work focused on translation and validation of the LKS, OKS and IKDC. Construct validity was assessed by comparing the LKS, OKS, and IKDC Subjective Knee Form and previous Arabic translated version of Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS). Test−retest reliability, internal consistency, and construct validity were assessed, using Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC), Cronbach's alpha, and Pearson correlation coefficient (r).

Results: Reliability was excellent for the Arabic IKDC subjective form (0.95), while the Arabic LKS and the Arabic OKS were good: 0.8 and 0.85, respectively. The Cronbach's ά was excellent for the Arabic LKS and Arabic OKS: 0.9 and 0.90, respectively, while the Arabic IKDC subjective form was good (0.89). Construct validity was high for the Arabic LKS and the Arabic OKS: 0.7 and 0.913, respectively, while the Arabic IKDC was moderate (0.4) in cases of ACL and meniscus injuries and mild (0.18) in cases of osteoarthritis.

Conclusion: Arabic LKS and Arabic OKS were reliable and valid scores for patients complaining of ligamentous injuries, meniscus injuries, and osteoarthritis to be used for Arabic-speaking people, while the Arabic IKDC had excellent reliability and mild validity in cases of osteoarthritis and moderate validity in cases of ACL and meniscus injuries.