1
|
Rummelt C, Grishina O, Schmoor C, Crysandt M, Heuser M, Götze KS, Schlenk RF, Döhner K, Salih HR, Heil G, Müller-Tidow C, Brugger W, Kündgen A, De Wit M, Giagounidis A, Scholl S, Neubauer A, Krauter J, Bug G, Al-Ali HK, Wäsch R, Becker H, May AM, Duyster J, Hackanson B, Ganser A, Döhner H, Lübbert M. Activity of decitabine combined with all-trans retinoic acid in oligoblastic AML: Results from a randomized 2x2 phase II trial (DECIDER). Haematologica 2023. [PMID: 36601981 PMCID: PMC10388266 DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2022.282258] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2022] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Not available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christoph Rummelt
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Stem Cell Transplantation, University Medical Center Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg
| | - Olga Grishina
- Clinical Trials Unit, University Medical Center Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg
| | - Claudia Schmoor
- Clinical Trials Unit, University Medical Center Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg
| | - Martina Crysandt
- Department of Hematology, Oncology, Hemostaseology and Stem Cell Transplantation, University Hospital RWTH Aachen University, Aachen
| | - Michael Heuser
- Department of Hematology, Hemostasis, Oncology and Stem Cell Transplantation, Hannover Medical School, Hannover
| | - Katharina S Götze
- Department of Medicine III, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Partner Site Munich, München
| | - Richard F Schlenk
- Department of Internal Medicine III, University Hospital of Ulm, Ulm, Germany; Department of Internal Medicine V, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; National Center of Tumor Diseases, NCT-Trial Center, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg
| | - Konstanze Döhner
- Department of Internal Medicine III, University Hospital of Ulm, Ulm
| | - Helmut R Salih
- Clinical Collaboration Unit Translational Immunology, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Partner Site Tübingen, Tuebingen
| | - Gerhard Heil
- Department of Hematology/Oncology, Klinikum Luedenscheid, Luedenscheid
| | - Carsten Müller-Tidow
- Department of Internal Medicine V, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Partner Site Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Medicine A, University Hospital of Münster, Münster
| | - Wolfram Brugger
- Department of Hematology, Hospital Villingen-Schwenningen, Villingen-Schwenningen
| | - Andrea Kündgen
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Clinical Immunology, Heinrich- Heine-University, Faculty of Medicine, Düsseldorf, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Partner Site Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf
| | - Maike De Wit
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Vivantes Klinikum Neukölln, Berlin
| | - Aristoteles Giagounidis
- Clinic for Oncology, Hematology and Palliative Medicine, Marien-Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf
| | - Sebastian Scholl
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Klinik für Innere Medizin II, Jena
| | - Andreas Neubauer
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, University Clinic Gießen/Marburg, Marburg
| | - Jürgen Krauter
- Department of Internal Medicine III, Städtisches Klinikum Braunschweig, Braunschweig
| | - Gesine Bug
- Department of Medicine II, Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Partner Site Frankfurt, Frankfurt
| | | | - Ralph Wäsch
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Stem Cell Transplantation, University Medical Center Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg
| | - Heiko Becker
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Stem Cell Transplantation, University Medical Center Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg
| | - Annette M May
- Institute for Surgical Pathology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg
| | - Justus Duyster
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Stem Cell Transplantation, University Medical Center Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg
| | - Björn Hackanson
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Stem Cell Transplantation, University Medical Center Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany; Department of Hematology/Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Augsburg, Augsburg
| | - Arnold Ganser
- Department of Hematology, Hemostasis, Oncology and Stem Cell Transplantation, Hannover Medical School, Hannover
| | - Hartmut Döhner
- Department of Internal Medicine V, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg
| | - Michael Lübbert
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Stem Cell Transplantation, University Medical Center Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kayser S, Schlenk RF, Lebon D, Carre M, Götze KS, Stölzel F, Berceanu A, Schäfer-Eckart K, Peterlin P, Hicheri Y, Rahme R, Raffoux E, Chermat F, Krause SW, Aulitzky WE, Rigaudeau S, Noppeney R, Berthon C, Görner M, Jost E, Carassou P, Keller U, Orvain C, Braun T, Saillard C, Arar A, Kunzmann V, Wemeau M, De Wit M, Niemann D, Bonmati C, Schwänen C, Abraham J, Aljijakli A, Haiat S, Krämer A, Reichle A, Gnadler M, Willekens C, Spiekermann K, Hiddemann W, Müller-Tidow C, Thiede C, Röllig C, Serve H, Bornhäuser M, Baldus CD, Lengfelder E, Fenaux P, Platzbecker U, Adès L. Characteristics and outcome of patients with low-/intermediate-risk acute promyelocytic leukemia treated with arsenic trioxide - an international collaborative study. Haematologica 2021; 106:3100-3106. [PMID: 34047178 PMCID: PMC8634174 DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2021.278722] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
The aim of this study was to characterize a large series of 154 patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia (median age, 53 years; range, 18-90 years) and evaluate real-life outcome after up-front treatment with arsenic trioxide and all-trans retinoic acid. All patients were included in the prospective NAPOLEON registry (NCT02192619) between 2013 and 2019. The acute promyelocytic leukemia was de novo in 91% (n=140) and therapy-related in 9% (n=14); 13% (n=20) of the patients were older than 70 years. At diagnosis bleeding/hemorrhage was present in 38% and thrombosis in 3%. Complete remission was achieved in 152 patients (99%), whereas two patients (1%) experienced induction death within 18 days after starting therapy. With a median follow-up of 1.99 years (95% confidence interval: 1.61-2.30 years) 1-year and 2-year overall survival rates were 97% (95% confidence interval: 94-100%) and 95% (95% confidence interval: 91-99%), respectively. Age above 70 years was associated with a significantly shorter overall survival (P<0.001) compared to that of younger patients. So far no relapses have been observed. Six patients (4%) died in complete remission at a median of 0.95 years after diagnosis (range, 0.18-2.38 years). Our data confirm the efficiency and durability of arsenic trioxide and all-trans retinoic acid therapy in the primary management of adults with low-/intermediate-risk acute promyelocytic leukemia in the real-life setting, irrespective of age.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabine Kayser
- Medical Clinic and Policlinic I, Hematology and Cellular Therapy, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany; NCT Trial Center, National Center of Tumor Diseases, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg.
| | - Richard F Schlenk
- NCT Trial Center, National Center of Tumor Diseases, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg; Department of Internal Medicine V, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg
| | | | - Martin Carre
- 5HCE Grenoble, Service d'Oncologie et Hématologie Pédiatrique, Grenoble
| | | | - Friedrich Stölzel
- Department of Medicine I, University Hospital Carl-Gustav-Carus, Dresden, TU Dresden
| | - Ana Berceanu
- Service d'Hématologie du Pr. Cahn Hopital Jean Minjoz, Besancon
| | | | | | - Yosr Hicheri
- Département d'Hématologie Clinique du Chu Saint Eloi Montpellier
| | - Ramy Rahme
- Hôpital Saint Louis, Université Paris Diderot, Paris
| | | | | | - Stefan W Krause
- Department of Internal Medicine 5 - Hematology/Oncology, University Hospital of Erlangen
| | | | - Sophie Rigaudeau
- Service d'Hémato-Oncologie du Pr. Castaigne Hopital Andre Mignot le Chesnay
| | | | - Celine Berthon
- Service des Maladies du Sang Chru, Hopital Claude Huriez, Lille
| | - Martin Görner
- Klinik für Hämatologie, Onkologie und Palliativmedizin, Klinikum Bielefeld Mitte
| | | | - Philippe Carassou
- Service de Médecine interne, Hématologie du Pr. Christian Chr Metz Thionville, Hopital de Marcy, Metz
| | - Ulrich Keller
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Tumor Immunology, Charité-University Medical Center, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin
| | - Corentin Orvain
- Angers University Hospital, Maladies du Sang, Angers; Fédération Hospitalo-Universitaire Grand-Ouest Acute Leukemia, FHU-GOAL, France; Université d'Angers, Inserm, CRCINA, Angers
| | - Thorsten Braun
- Hôpital Avicenne, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Université Paris
| | | | - Ali Arar
- Service d' Oncologie Médicale Hopital de la Source, Orleans
| | | | | | | | - Dirk Niemann
- Gemeinschaftsklinikum Mittelrhein gGmbH, Koblenz
| | - Caroline Bonmati
- Division of Hematology, Hôpital de Brabois, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nancy, Nancy
| | | | - Julie Abraham
- Service d' Hématologie, Thérapie Cellulaire du Pr. Bordessoule, Hopital Universitaire Dupuytren, Limoges
| | - Ahmad Aljijakli
- Service d'Hématologie du Dr. Sutton Centre Hospitalier v. Dupouy, Argenteuil
| | - Stephanie Haiat
- Service d'Hematologie Clinique, CH Sud Francilien, Corbeil Essonnes
| | - Alwin Krämer
- Department of Internal Medicine V, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and Department of Internal Medicine V, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg
| | - Albrecht Reichle
- Department of Medicine III - Hematology and Internal Oncology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg
| | - Martina Gnadler
- St. Vincentius Kliniken, Abteilung für Hämatologie, Onkologie, Immunologie und Palliativmedizin, Karlsruhe
| | - Christophe Willekens
- Département d'Hématologie, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif; INSERM Unit 1170, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Paris-Saclay University, Villejuif
| | - Karsten Spiekermann
- Department of Medicine III, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians University (LMU) Munich, Munich
| | - Wolfgang Hiddemann
- Department of Medicine III, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians University (LMU) Munich, Munich
| | - Carsten Müller-Tidow
- Department of Internal Medicine V, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg
| | - Christian Thiede
- Department of Medicine I, University Hospital Carl-Gustav-Carus, Dresden, TU Dresden
| | - Christoph Röllig
- Department of Medicine I, University Hospital Carl-Gustav-Carus, Dresden, TU Dresden
| | - Hubert Serve
- Department of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital of Frankfurt Main
| | - Martin Bornhäuser
- Department of Medicine I, University Hospital Carl-Gustav-Carus, Dresden, TU Dresden
| | | | - Eva Lengfelder
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Mannheim, Mannheim
| | - Pierre Fenaux
- Hôpital Saint Louis, Université Paris Diderot, Paris
| | - Uwe Platzbecker
- Medical Clinic and Policlinic I, Hematology and Cellular Therapy, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig
| | - Lionel Adès
- Hôpital Saint Louis, Université Paris Diderot, Paris
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lübbert M, Grishina O, Schmoor C, Schlenk RF, Jost E, Crysandt M, Heuser M, Thol F, Salih HR, Schittenhelm MM, Germing U, Kuendgen A, Götze KS, Lindemann HW, Müller-Tidow C, Heil G, Scholl S, Bug G, Schwaenen C, Giagounidis A, Neubauer A, Krauter J, Brugger W, De Wit M, Wäsch R, Becker H, May AM, Duyster J, Döhner K, Ganser A, Hackanson B, Döhner H. Valproate and Retinoic Acid in Combination With Decitabine in Elderly Nonfit Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Results of a Multicenter, Randomized, 2 × 2, Phase II Trial. J Clin Oncol 2019; 38:257-270. [PMID: 31794324 DOI: 10.1200/jco.19.01053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE DNA-hypomethylating agents are studied in combination with other epigenetic drugs, such as histone deacetylase inhibitors or differentiation inducers (eg, retinoids), in myeloid neoplasias. A randomized, phase II trial with a 2 × 2 factorial design was conducted to investigate the effects of the histone deacetylase inhibitor valproate and all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) in treatment-naive elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). PATIENTS AND METHODS Two hundred patients (median age, 76 years; range, 61-92 years) ineligible for induction chemotherapy received decitabine (20 mg/m2 intravenously, days 1 to 5) alone (n = 47) or in combination with valproate (n = 57), ATRA (n = 46), or valproate + ATRA (n = 50). The primary endpoint was objective response, defined as complete and partial remission, tested at a one-sided significance level of α = .10. Key secondary endpoints were overall survival, event-free survival, and progression-free survival and safety. RESULTS The addition of ATRA resulted in a higher remission rate (21.9% with ATRA v 13.5% without ATRA; odds ratio, 1.80; 95% CI, 0.86 to 3.79; one-sided P = .06). For valproate, no effect was observed (17.8% with valproate v 17.2% without valproate; odds ratio, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.51 to 2.21; one-sided P = .44). Median overall survival was 8.2 months with ATRA v 5.1 months without ATRA (hazard ratio, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.48 to 0.89; two-sided P = .006). Improved survival was observed across risk groups, including patients with adverse cytogenetics, and was associated with longer response duration. With valproate, no survival difference was observed. Toxicities were predominantly hematologic, without relevant differences between the 4 arms. CONCLUSION The addition of ATRA to decitabine resulted in a higher remission rate and a clinically meaningful survival extension in these patients with difficult-to-treat disease, without added toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Lübbert
- Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Freiburg, Germany
| | - Olga Grishina
- Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Claudia Schmoor
- Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Richard F Schlenk
- University Hospital of Ulm, Ulm, Germany.,Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Edgar Jost
- University Hospital Rheinisch-Westfälische Technische Hochschule Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
| | - Martina Crysandt
- University Hospital Rheinisch-Westfälische Technische Hochschule Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
| | | | | | - Helmut R Salih
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Tübingen, Germany
| | | | - Ulrich Germing
- Faculty of Medicine, Heinrich-Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Andrea Kuendgen
- Faculty of Medicine, Heinrich-Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Katharina S Götze
- Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Munich, Germany
| | | | - Carsten Müller-Tidow
- Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,University Hospital of Münster, Münster, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | | | - Gesine Bug
- University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Carsten Schwaenen
- Hospital Esslingen, Esslingen, Germany.,Offenburg Hospital, Offenburg, Germany
| | | | | | - Jürgen Krauter
- Städtisches Klinikum Braunschweig, Braunschweig, Germany
| | - Wolfram Brugger
- Hospital Villingen-Schwenningen, Villingen-Schwenningen, Germany
| | | | - Ralph Wäsch
- Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Heiko Becker
- Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Freiburg, Germany
| | - Annette M May
- Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Justus Duyster
- Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Freiburg, Germany
| | | | | | - Björn Hackanson
- Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,Universitätsklinikum Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Planchard D, Cho BC, Gray JE, Paz-Ares LG, Ozguroglu M, Villegas AE, Daniel DB, Vicente D, Murakami S, Hui R, Kurata T, Chiappori A, Lee KH, De Wit M, Gu Y, Wadsworth C, Dennis PA, Antonia SJ. First subsequent treatment after discontinuation of durvalumab in unresectable, stage III NSCLC patients from PACIFIC. J Clin Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2019.37.15_suppl.9054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
9054 Background: In the phase 3 PACIFIC trial of unresectable, stage III NSCLC patients (pts) without progression after concurrent chemoradiotherapy (cCRT), durvalumab (durva) significantly improved PFS and OS with similar safety compared to placebo (pbo). We performed exploratory analyses to characterize first subsequent treatment (Tx) after discontinuation of durva. Methods: Pts with WHO PS 0/1 and any tumor PD-L1 status were randomized (2:1) 1–42 days after ≥2 cycles of platinum-based cCRT to durva 10 mg/kg IV or pbo Q2W up to 12 months, stratified by age, sex and smoking history. Pts were classified by the use or not of first subsequent Tx and category of first systemic Tx (platinum doublet CT [PDCT], single-agent CT [SCT], immunotherapy [IT] or targeted therapy [TT]). Results: As of Mar 22, 2018, 216/476 (45.4%) and 153/237 (64.6%) in the durva and pbo arms, respectively, had a RECIST-based PFS event per BICR (5.7% and 8.4% due to death). 195 (41.0%) and 128 (54.0%) received first subsequent Tx, most of which were systemic Tx (158 [33.2%] and 109 [46.0%]): PDCT (16.4% and 19.0%), SCT (8.6% and 8.4%), IT (4.2% and 13.5%) or TT (3.8% and 5.1%); 7.8% and 8.0% received RT only. Time to first subsequent therapy or death (TFST) was longer with durva vs pbo (HR 0.58; 95% CI 0.47–0.72; median 21.0 vs 10.4 months). Baseline characteristics of pts with or without first subsequent Tx were similar, and similar across durva or pbo arms. Among pts with systemic Tx, baseline characteristics (including pre-cCRT PD-L1 status) were generally similar, except pts on TT, more of whom were EGFR+ (70.0% vs 0–6.6% of other systemic Tx groups) with commonly associated phenotypes (more females, Asians, non-smokers and non-squamous pts). Best overall response to first systemic Tx will be presented. Conclusions: Due to longer PFS and fewer progression events with durva vs pbo, fewer pts on durva required subsequent Tx and, per TFST, much later. With the exception of IT, use of each subsequent Tx was similar between the durva and pbo arms with PDCT the most common. Baseline characteristics were similar for pts with or without first subsequent Tx and pts who received first systemic Tx, except for pts who received TT, as expected due to their molecular profile.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Byoung Chul Cho
- Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | | | - Luis G. Paz-Ares
- Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, CiberOnc, Universidad Complutense and CNIO, Madrid, Spain
| | - Mustafa Ozguroglu
- Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Cerrahpaşa School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | | | | | - David Vicente
- Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena, Seville, Spain
| | | | - Rina Hui
- Westmead Hospital and the University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Takayasu Kurata
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, Kansai Medical University Hospital, Hirakata, Japan
| | | | - Ki Hyeong Lee
- Chungbuk National University Hospital, Chungbuk National University College of Medicine, Cheongju, South Korea
| | | | - Yu Gu
- MedImmune, Gaithersburg, MD
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Robak T, Jin J, Pylypenko H, Verhoef G, Siritanaratkul N, Drach J, Raderer M, Mayer J, Pereira J, Tumyan G, Okamoto R, Nakahara S, Hu P, Appiani C, Nemat S, Cavalli F, Van Hoof A, Sheliga A, Teixeira A, Tomita A, Rocafiguera AO, Suvorov A, Kuzmin A, Khojasteh A, Mezlini A, Golenkov A, Bosly A, Belch A, Van De Velde A, Illes Á, Mukhopadhyay A, Meddeb B, De Prijck B, Garichochea B, Undar B, Gabarrón C, Cao C, Souza C, Farber C, Won Suh C, Burcoveanu CI, Cebotaru CL, Truica CL, Maruyama D, Belada D, Ben Yehuda D, Udovitsa D, Dolores, Morra E, Späth-Schwalbe E, Gonzalez-Barca E, Osmanov E, Capote FJ, Offner F, Cardenas G, Heß G, Manikhas G, Babu G, Rekhtman G, Rossi G, Marques H, Bumbea H, Wang H, Huang H, Choi I, Bulavina I, Lysenko I, Avivi I, Kryachok I, Zaucha JM, Novak J, Díaz J, Demeter J, Alexeeva J, Zhu J, Vilchevskaya K, Ishizawa K, Mauricio K, Tobinai K, Ando K, Abdulkadryrov K, Shih LY, Kuzina L, Gumus M, De Wit M, Capra M, Marques M, Golubeva M, Ojeda-Uribe M, Kyselyova M, Taniwaki M, Federico M, Crump M, Baccarani M, Ogura M, Egyed M, Udvardy M, Kurosawa M, Uike N, Khuageva N, Shpilberg O, Gladkov O, Samoilova O, Serduk O, Santi P, Zachee P, Kaplan P, Stoia R, Gressin R, Arranz R, Greil R, Grosicki S, Cancelado S, Nair S, Le Gouill S, Van Steenweghen S, Yoon SS, Chuncharune S, Scheider T, Shimoyama T, Liu T, Kinoshita T, Uchida T, Bunworasate U, Vitolo U, Pavlov V, Phooshkooru VR, Lima V, Merkulov V, Nawarawong W, Hong X, Ke X, Terui Y, Tee Goh Y, Maeda Y, Shi Y, Dunaev Y, Lorie Y, Wang Z, Shen Z, Borbenyi Z, Gasztonyi Z, Masliak Z. Frontline bortezomib, rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and prednisone (VR-CAP) versus rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) in transplantation-ineligible patients with newly diagnosed mantle cell lymphoma: final overall survival results of a randomised, open-label, phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol 2018; 19:1449-1458. [DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(18)30685-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 82] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2018] [Revised: 09/06/2018] [Accepted: 09/07/2018] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
|
6
|
Braess J, Amler S, Kreuzer KA, Spiekermann K, Lindemann HW, Lengfelder E, Graeven U, Staib P, Ludwig WD, Biersack H, Ko YD, Uppenkamp MJ, De Wit M, Korsten S, Peceny R, Gaska T, Schiel X, Behringer DM, Kiehl MG, Zinngrebe B, Meckenstock G, Roemer E, Medgenberg D, Spaeth-Schwalbe E, Massenkeil G, Hindahl H, Schwerdtfeger R, Trenn G, Sauerland C, Koch R, Lablans M, Faldum A, Görlich D, Bohlander SK, Schneider S, Dufour A, Buske C, Fiegl M, Subklewe M, Braess B, Unterhalt M, Baumgartner A, Wörmann B, Beelen D, Hiddemann W. Sequential high-dose cytarabine and mitoxantrone (S-HAM) versus standard double induction in acute myeloid leukemia-a phase 3 study. Leukemia 2018; 32:2558-2571. [PMID: 30275528 PMCID: PMC6286323 DOI: 10.1038/s41375-018-0268-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2018] [Revised: 07/26/2018] [Accepted: 08/09/2018] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
Dose-dense induction with the S-HAM regimen was compared to standard double induction therapy in adult patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia. Patients were centrally randomized (1:1) between S-HAM (2nd chemotherapy cycle starting on day 8 = “dose-dense”) and double induction with TAD-HAM or HAM(-HAM) (2nd cycle starting on day 21 = “standard”). 387 evaluable patients were randomly assigned to S-HAM (N = 203) and to standard double induction (N = 184). The primary endpoint overall response rate (ORR) consisting of complete remission (CR) and incomplete remission (CRi) was not significantly different (P = 0.202) between S-HAM (77%) and double induction (72%). The median overall survival was 35 months after S-HAM and 25 months after double induction (P = 0.323). Duration of critical leukopenia was significantly reduced after S-HAM (median 29 days) versus double induction (median 44 days)—P < 0.001. This translated into a significantly shortened duration of hospitalization after S-HAM (median 37 days) as compared to standard induction (median 49 days)—P < 0.001. In conclusion, dose-dense induction therapy with the S-HAM regimen shows favorable trends but no significant differences in ORR and OS compared to standard double induction. S-HAM significantly shortens critical leukopenia and the duration of hospitalization by 2 weeks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan Braess
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, Hospital Barmherzige Brüder, Regensburg, Germany. .,Department of Medicine III, University Hospital LMU Campus Grosshadern, Munich, Germany.
| | - Susanne Amler
- Insitute for Biostatistics and Clinical Research, University Hospital, Münster, Germany.,Friedrich Löffler Institute, Federal Research Centre, Greifswald-Insel Riems, Germany
| | - Karl-Anton Kreuzer
- Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital, Cologne, Germany
| | - Karsten Spiekermann
- Department of Medicine III, University Hospital LMU Campus Grosshadern, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Eva Lengfelder
- Department of Medicine III, University Hospital, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Ullrich Graeven
- Department of Medicine I, Hospital Maria Hilf, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | - Peter Staib
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, St. Antonius Hospital, Eschweiler, Germany
| | - Wolf-Dieter Ludwig
- Department of Hematology and Oncology and Tumor Immunology, Helios Hospital, Berlin-Buch, Germany
| | - Harald Biersack
- Department of Medicine I, University Hospital, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Yon-Dschun Ko
- Department of Medicine I, Johanniter Hospital, Bonn, Germany
| | | | - Maike De Wit
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Care, Vivantes Klinikum Neukölln, Berlin, Germany
| | - Stefan Korsten
- Department of Medicine, Vinzenz Pallotti Hospital, Bergisch-Gladbach, Germany
| | - Rudolf Peceny
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Klinikum Osnabrück, Osnabrück, Germany
| | - Tobias Gaska
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, St. Josef Hospital, Paderborn, Germany
| | - Xaver Schiel
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Klinikum Harlaching, Munich, Germany
| | - Dirk M Behringer
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Care, Augusta Hospital, Bochum, Germany
| | - Michael G Kiehl
- Department of Medicine I, Klinikum Frankfurt/Oder, Frankfurt/Oder, Germany
| | - Bettina Zinngrebe
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Care, Evangelisches Krankenhaus, Bielefeld, Germany
| | - Gerald Meckenstock
- Department of Medical Oncology, Radiooncology, Hematology and Palliative Care, St. Josef Hospital, Gelsenkirchen, Germany
| | - Eva Roemer
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Klinikum Idar-Oberstein, Idar-Oberstein, Germany
| | - Dirk Medgenberg
- Department of Medicine III, Klinikum Leverkusen, Leverkusen, Germany
| | | | - Gero Massenkeil
- Department of Medicine II, Klinikum Gütersloh, Gütersloh, Germany
| | - Heidrun Hindahl
- Department of Medicine I, St. Johannes Hospital, Dortmund, Germany
| | - Rainer Schwerdtfeger
- Department for Bone Marrow and Blood Stem Cell Transplantation, DKD Deutsche Klinik für Diagnostik, Wiesbaden, Germany
| | - Guido Trenn
- Department of Medicine I, Knappschaftskrankenhaus, Bottrop, Germany
| | - Cristina Sauerland
- Insitute for Biostatistics and Clinical Research, University Hospital, Münster, Germany
| | - Raphael Koch
- Insitute for Biostatistics and Clinical Research, University Hospital, Münster, Germany
| | - Martin Lablans
- Insitute for Biostatistics and Clinical Research, University Hospital, Münster, Germany.,Division of Medical Informatics in Translational Oncology, DKFZ German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Andreas Faldum
- Insitute for Biostatistics and Clinical Research, University Hospital, Münster, Germany
| | - Dennis Görlich
- Insitute for Biostatistics and Clinical Research, University Hospital, Münster, Germany
| | - Stefan K Bohlander
- Department of Medicine III, University Hospital LMU Campus Grosshadern, Munich, Germany.,Department of Molecular Medicine and Pathology, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Stephanie Schneider
- Department of Medicine III, University Hospital LMU Campus Grosshadern, Munich, Germany
| | - Annika Dufour
- Department of Medicine III, University Hospital LMU Campus Grosshadern, Munich, Germany
| | - Christian Buske
- Department of Medicine III, University Hospital LMU Campus Grosshadern, Munich, Germany.,Institute of Experimental Cancer Research, University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | - Michael Fiegl
- Department of Medicine III, University Hospital LMU Campus Grosshadern, Munich, Germany
| | - Marion Subklewe
- Department of Medicine III, University Hospital LMU Campus Grosshadern, Munich, Germany
| | - Birgit Braess
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, Hospital Barmherzige Brüder, Regensburg, Germany.,Department of Medicine III, University Hospital LMU Campus Grosshadern, Munich, Germany
| | - Michael Unterhalt
- Department of Medicine III, University Hospital LMU Campus Grosshadern, Munich, Germany
| | - Anja Baumgartner
- Department of Medicine III, University Hospital LMU Campus Grosshadern, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Dietrich Beelen
- Department of Bone Marrow Transplantation, University Hospital, Essen, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Hiddemann
- Department of Medicine III, University Hospital LMU Campus Grosshadern, Munich, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Seidel CA, Lorch A, Dieing A, Hentrich M, Hornig M, Grünwald V, Cathomas R, Meiler J, De Wit M, Bokemeyer C, Oechsle K. Efficacy and safety of gemcitabine, oxaliplatin and paclitaxel (GOP) in cisplatin-refractory germ cell tumors in routine care: Registry data from an outcomes research project. J Clin Oncol 2015. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2015.33.15_suppl.e15570] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | - Anja Lorch
- Department of Urology, Heinrich-Heine-University, Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - Annette Dieing
- Vivantes Klinikum Am Urban; Onkologisches Zentrum Mitte, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Mareike Hornig
- Department of Hematology, Hemostasis, Oncology and Stem cell transplantation, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Viktor Grünwald
- Department of Hematology, Hemostasis, Oncology and Stem cell transplantation, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | | | - Johannes Meiler
- Department of Medical Oncology, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | | | | | - Karin Oechsle
- University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Oechsle K, Berger LA, Lorch A, Hentrich M, Kopp HG, Gauler TC, Beyer J, De Wit M, Honecker F, Bokemeyer C. First-salvage treatment in patients with recurrent or refractory advanced germ-cell cancer after cisplatin-based chemotherapy: A database of the German Testicular Cancer Study Group. J Clin Oncol 2013. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2013.31.15_suppl.4559] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
4559 Background: About 20-30% of patients (pts) with advanced germ-cell cancer (GCC) relapse after cisplatin-based chemotherapy. This database evaluates first salvage treatment and the prognostic categories at first relapse according to the International Prognostic Factors Study Group (= IPFSG; JCO 2010). Methods: A total of 144 pts (78% nonseminoma) with relapsed or refractory GCC undergoing 1st salvage treatment with either conventional (CD-CX) or high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell support (HD-CX) from 16 German centers were retrospectively analysed. Results: Subgroups according to the IPFSG prognostic categories, were: very low risk in 9/144 (6%), low risk in 26/144 (18%), intermediate risk in 78/144 (54%), high risk in 27/144 (19%), and very high risk in 4/144 pts (3%). 1st salvage treatment consisted of HD-CX in 96 (67%) and CD-CX in 48 pts (33%). Treatment response was CR/PR- in 60%, PR+/SD in 33%, and PD in 7%. After a median follow-up (mFU) of 21 months (mos) (range, 0 – 193), 53% of all pts had relapsed and 30% had died resulting in a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 7 mos (95%CI 0-16) and overall survival (OS) of 47 mos (95%CI 21-73). At subsequent relapses, 25/48 pts (52%) received HD-CX as > 2nd-salvage treatment. For the total cohort, PFS rate after 2 years was 35%, and OS rate after 5 years was 53%. Stratification according to IPFSG prognostic categories significantly correlated with PFS (p=0.001) and OS (p=0.004) after 1st salvage treatment. Even among high-risk and very high risk (n=31, mFU 12 mos) a PFS of 37 % at 2 years and an OS of 60 % at 2 years was observed, after 1st or 2nd salvage treatment, which might be due to patient selection and short follow-up. Conclusions: IPFSG prognostic categories highly correlated with observed PFS and OS after first salvage treatment in this cohort of pts with refractory or relapsed GCC. First salvage treatment with CD- or HD-CX resulted in overall 5 year-OS rates of about 50% across all prognostic categories. Even pts with high and very high risk achieved 2 year-OS rates of about 60% with salvage HD-CX at first or subsequent relapses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karin Oechsle
- University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Department of Oncology, Hematology and BMT with section of Pneumology, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Lars Arne Berger
- University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Department of Oncology, Hematology and BMT with section of Pneumology, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Anja Lorch
- University Hospital Düsseldorf, Department of Urology, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Marcus Hentrich
- Harlaching Hospital, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Care, Munich, Germany
| | - Hans-Georg Kopp
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Immunology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | | | - Joerg Beyer
- Vivantes Klinikum Am Urban, Department of Internal Medicine, Hematology and Oncology, Berlin, Germany
| | - Maike De Wit
- Vivantes Klinikum Neukölln, Department of Internal Medicine, Oncology and Hematology, Berlin, Germany
| | - Friedemann Honecker
- University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Department of Oncology, Hematology and BMT with section of Pneumology, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Carsten Bokemeyer
- University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Department of Oncology, Hematology and BMT with section of Pneumology, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Henke CC, Cabri J, Fricke L, Pankow W, Kandilakis G, Feyer PC, De Wit M. Strength and endurance training in the treatment of lung cancer patients staged IIIA/IIIB/IV. J Clin Oncol 2012. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2012.30.15_suppl.9033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
9033 Background: This RCT tested the effect of a specially designed strength and endurance training on the independence in activities of daily living and quality of life in lung cancer patients staged IIIA/IIIB/IV while receiving palliative chemotherapy. The aim was to break the vicious circle created through the connection of physical inactivity and the worsening of symptoms and side effects. Methods: Between August 2010 and December 2011 lung cancer patients staged IIIA/IIIB/IV with a good performance status receiving an inpatient palliative chemotherapy treatment at the Vivantes Hospital Neukölln/Berlin, were randomized into an intervention and control group. The Barthel Index and the EORTC QLQ-C30/ LC13 questionnaire were used for evaluation. The Six-Minute-Walk-Test and stair walking in combination with the Modified Borg Scale have been used to test the patient’s endurance capacity. Furthermore muscle strength was examined. Non-parametrical data were statistically analyzed with the Wilcoxon and Mann-Whitney-U test. For parametric data student t- tests were used. A significance level of p< .05 was accepted. Results: Out of 46 patients, who signed the informed consent, 29 patients completed the trial (18= Intervention group, 11= Control group). Significant differences between the groups were detectable in the Barthel Index (IGmean(SD)=92.08 (15.15); CGmean=81.67 (14.98); p=.041), and in single scores of the EORTC QLQ C-30/LC-13 questionnaire (Physical Functioning p=.025; Haemoptysis p=.019, Pain in Arms or Shoulder p=.048, Peripheral Neuropathy p=.050, Cognitive functioning p=.050). Significant differences were found between the groups concerning the 6MWT, stair walking and strength capacity (IG>CG). Additionally the level of dyspnoea decreased significantly in the IG while performing submaximal walking activities. Conclusions: The training program has a positive impact on the patient’s independence in carrying out activities of daily living. Although it does not have a significant impact on the patient’s quality of life, single factors can be significantly improved. Moreover it has a positive effect on the patient’s endurance and strength capacity. The dyspnoea perception is improved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Corinna C. Henke
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, Vivantes Klinikum Neukölln, Berlin, Germany
| | - Jan Cabri
- Department of Physical Performance, Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, Oslo, Norway
| | - Lothar Fricke
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, Vivantes Klinikum Neukölln, Berlin, Germany
| | - Wulf Pankow
- Department of Pneumology and Infectiology, Vivantes Klinikum Neukölln, Berlin, Germany
| | - Giannis Kandilakis
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, Vivantes Klinikum Neukölln, Berlin, Germany
| | - Petra C. Feyer
- Clinic of Radiooncology and Nuclear Medicine, Vivantes Klinikum Neukölln, Berlin, Germany
| | - Maike De Wit
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, Vivantes Klinikum Neukölln, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Dieckmann KP, Albers P, Classen J, De Wit M, Pichlmeier U, Rick O, Müllerleile U, Kuczyk M. LATE RELAPSE OF TESTICULAR GERM CELL NEOPLASMS: A DESCRIPTIVE ANALYSIS OF 122 CASES. J Urol 2005; 173:824-9. [PMID: 15711278 DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000154013.96349.36] [Citation(s) in RCA: 102] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The problem of late relapse of testicular germ cell tumor (GCT) is poorly understood. No more than approximately 300 cases have been reported to date. It appears that late relapse (L/R) of GCT involves a more aggressive biology than virginal GCT. In the present study we increased the understanding of L/R by analyzing these events in a large patient sample. MATERIALS AND METHODS Late relapse was defined as recurrence of disease more than 2 years after completion of primary treatment. A total of 122 patients (50 with pure seminoma and 72 with nonseminoma) were retrospectively studied. Several parameters were analyzed including age, clinical stage, treatment at primary presentation, occurrence of prior early relapse, interval to L/R, tumor markers, site of relapse, and mode and outcome of L/R treatment. Possible effects of various clinical parameters on treatment results were studied by multivariate statistical analysis. RESULTS Median age at first presentation was 34 years and 26.5 years in patients with seminoma and nonseminoma, respectively. The intervals to L/R were 42 months (range 25 to 276) in seminoma and 64.5 months (range 28 to 216) in nonseminoma. A total of 75% of nonseminomas but only 20% of seminomas had disseminated disease at first presentation, while 51 patients with nonseminoma had initially received chemotherapy. alpha-Fetoprotein was increased in 45 patients (of 59 eligible) with nonseminoma at L/R, human chorionic gonadotropin in 12 cases. alpha-Fetoprotein levels greater than 100 U/l indicated poor prognosis. Topographically relapses were mainly confined to lymph nodes of the abdomen, chest and neck. Of 72 patients with nonseminoma cure failed in 37 in contrast to only 6 patients with seminoma (of 48 eligible). Inclusion of surgery increased the chance of cure (RR 4.0, 95% confidence interval 0.9-18.5). CONCLUSIONS Late relapses of GCT are biologically and clinically distinct from virginal GCT. These events occur in nonseminoma and seminoma, but clinical features are quite different in the 2 groups. Increase of alpha-fetoprotein is typical in late relapsing nonseminoma and levels of more than 100 U/l appear to indicate poor prognosis. Anatomically L/R presents as lymphadenopathy of abdomen, chest or neck. Treatment should include surgery in nonseminoma. Seminomas and otherwise chemotherapy naive cases might respond to chemotherapy only. Particular risk groups for late relapse are nonseminoma with prior early relapse, patients receiving chemotherapy for disseminated disease at first presentation and those with pure teratoma. These latter subgroups should be followed with annual health examinations for at least 10 years.
Collapse
|
11
|
Engert A, Schiller P, Josting A, Herrmann R, Koch P, Sieber M, Boissevain F, De Wit M, Mezger J, Duhmke E, Willich N, Muller RP, Schmidt BF, Renner H, Muller-Hermelink HK, Pfistner B, Wolf J, Hasenclever D, Loffler M, Diehl V. Involved-field radiotherapy is equally effective and less toxic compared with extended-field radiotherapy after four cycles of chemotherapy in patients with early-stage unfavorable Hodgkin's lymphoma: results of the HD8 trial of the German Hodgkin's Lymphoma Study Group. J Clin Oncol 2003; 21:3601-8. [PMID: 12913100 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2003.03.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 301] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate whether radiotherapy can be reduced without loss of efficacy from extended field (EF) to involved field (IF) after four cycles of chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS Between 1993 and 1998, patients with newly diagnosed early-stage unfavorable HD were enrolled onto this multicenter study. Patients were randomly assigned to receive cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone (COPP) + doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD) for two cycles followed by radiotherapy of 30 Gy EF + 10 Gy to bulky disease (arm A) or 30 Gy IF + 10 Gy to bulky disease (arm B). RESULTS Of 1,204 patients randomly assigned to treatment, 1,064 patients were informative and eligible for the arm comparison (532 patients in arm A; 532 patients in arm B). The median observation time was 54 months. Five years after random assignment, the overall survival (OSran) for all eligible patients was 91% and freedom from treatment failure (FFTFran) was 83%. Survival rates at 5 years after start of radiotherapy revealed no differences for arms A and B, respectively, in terms of FFTF (85.8% and 84.2%) and OS at 5 years (90.8% and 92.4%). There also were no differences between arms A and B, respectively, in terms of complete remission (98.5% and 97.2%), progressive disease (0.8% and 1.9%), relapse (6.4% and 7.7%), death (8.1% and 6.4%), and secondary neoplasia (4.5% and 2.8%). In contrast, acute side effects including leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, nausea, gastrointestinal toxicity, and pharyngeal toxicity were more frequent in the EF arm. CONCLUSION Radiotherapy volume size reduction from EF to IF after COPP + ABVD chemotherapy for two cycles produces similar results and less toxicity in patients with early-stage unfavorable HD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andreas Engert
- Department I of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne 50924, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|