In hospital outcomes of orbital/rotational coronary atherectomy in diabetic vs non-diabetic population: insights from the nationwide inpatient sample

Background

Atherectomy (AT) using an orbital/rotational system is useful in altering calcified plaque thereby facilitating stent placement and optimal stent expansion. Patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) are known to have a higher rate of complications after percutaneous coronary intervention. We aimed to assess the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events after atherectomy in the diabetic population using a nationwide inpatient sample (NIS).

Methods

NIS-HCUP database from 2015–2017 was used to identify patients who underwent atherectomy. A cohort of patients with and without diabetes was identified. Demographics, in-hospital outcomes, complications in both groups were compared. Statistical significance was assigned at p<0.05.

Results

Out of 6184 patients who underwent AT, 3134 (50.6%) patients had DM. Baseline characteristics have been outlined in the table below. Complications were comparable between the two groups except for higher incidence of post-procedure VTE in Diabetic patients. In-hospital mortality was lower among patients with DM (2.24% vs 3.29%, p-0.27), while the mean length of stay (5.92 vs 4.91 days, p-0.002) and the hospitalization charges ($165118.4 vs 151226, p-0.04) were higher, but this difference in length of stay and hospitalization charges were nullified on multivariate regression.

Conclusion

Our study suggests that an AT for severely calcified plaque in the coronary artery is a safe option in patients with DM with comparable in-hospital complications and outcomes to non-DM patients.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: None. Demographics and Outcomes of Atherectomy

Multi-institutional report on toxicities of concurrent nivolumab and radiation therapy

PURPOSE

Radiation therapy (RT) and nivolumab are standard therapies for a wide range of advanced and metastatic cancers, yet little is known about the toxicity profile of their combined treatment. The rate of grade ≥3 toxicities from nivolumab monotherapy and radiation-only palliative treatments has been reported at 10% to 18% and 0% to 26%, respectively. We reviewed our experience to assess the acute toxicity profile of concurrent RT-nivolumab.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A retrospective review of all consecutive patients from January 2015 to May 2017 who received concurrent RT-nivolumab was conducted at 4 separate centers. Concurrent RT-nivolumab was defined as RT completed between 3 days prior to initial nivolumab infusion and 28 days after the last nivolumab infusion.

RESULTS

Of the 261 patients who received nivolumab, 46 (17.6%) had concurrent RT to 67 treatment sites. The median follow-up was 3.3 months (interquartile range, 1.7-6.1 months) and the 1-year overall survival rate was 22%. For the 11 of 46 patients (24%) who were alive at last analysis, the median follow-up was 12.8 months (interquartile range, 8.3-14.9 months). The most common histology, RT prescription, and treatment site were non-small cell lung cancer (23 of 46 patients; 50%), 30 Gy in 10 fractions (24 of 67 patients; 35.8%), and abdomen/pelvis (16 of 67 patients; 24%), respectively. Four patients with melanoma had concurrent ipilimumab and were removed from the final toxicity analysis of RT-nivolumab. Within 3 months of treatment with RT-nivolumab, 4 of 42 patients (9.5%) experienced grade 3 toxicity and 2 of these patients' toxicities were attributed specifically to the addition of RT: grade 3 hearing loss after whole brain RT and grade 3 pancreatitis after stereotactic body RT to the left adrenal gland. One death from transaminitis was attributed to nivolumab alone because the RT field did not encompass the liver.

CONCLUSIONS

Concurrent RT-nivolumab did not appear to increase the toxicity profile from the previously reported toxicity rates from nivolumab or radiation alone.

Multi-institutional report on toxicities from combined radiation and nivolumab

39

Background: Indications for Nivolumab (NIVO), a checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy drug, in treating a variety of metastatic malignancies has markedly increased. Radiation therapy (RT) is also commonly used in this patient population, however, there are limited data on the safety profile of combined RT-NIVO. We reviewed our experience to assess the acute toxicity profile of concurrent RT-NIVO. Methods: All consecutive patients who received NIVO from 1/2015 to 5/2017 at 4 centers across 2 institutions were retrospectively reviewed. Those patients who completed a course of RT from 1 day prior to initial NIVO infusion through 1 month after last NIVO infusion were considered to have received concurrent therapy and included in the subsequent analysis. Descriptive statistics are reported for patient/tumor/treatment characteristics and observed acute toxicities within 3 months of RT completion. Results: Among 261 patients who received NIVO, 46 (17.6%) received concurrent RT to 67 different sites. The median f/u was 3.3 (.1-19.8) months and 11/46 (24%) were still alive at last analysis. The most common histology, RT prescription, and treatment site included non-small cell lung cancer (23/46, 50%), 30 Gy in 10 fractions (16/67, 24%), and central thorax/abdomen (26/67, 39%), respectively. 79% (53/67) of irradiated sites were treated with 3D-conformal technique and palliative dose-fractionation. Grade 3, 4, and 5 toxicities were experienced by 11, 1, and 2 patients, respectively. However all grade 4 and 5 toxicities were outside of the irradiated area and attributed to the NIVO alone, and only 4/11 (36%) of the grade 3 toxicities were attributed to the RT-NIVO. The irradiated site in these cases included the brain [2/10 (20%)] and central thorax/abdomen [2/19 (10.5%)], including one unexpected grade 3 pancreatitis following stereotactic body RT to the left adrenal gland. Conclusions: Concurrent RT-NIVO is generally well tolerated, though with potentially increased rates of severe toxicity when irradiating the lung, abdomen, or brain. Pending more definitive data, we recommend counseling patients on the potentially increased rates of side effects from combined immunotherapy and radiotherapy to these locations.