Loh L, Prem-Senthil M, Constable PA. Visual acuity and reading print size requirements in children with vision impairment.
Clin Exp Optom 2023:1-7. [PMID:
37952256 DOI:
10.1080/08164622.2023.2279190]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2022] [Accepted: 10/30/2023] [Indexed: 11/14/2023] Open
Abstract
CLINICAL RELEVANCE
The support of students with a vision impairment throughout education could be enhanced by assessing the functional reading ability of the individual. This visual assessment could inform educators of individualised student needs and potentially improve the academic achievement for these students.
BACKGROUND
Support for children with a vision impairment within a classroom is typically based on clinical findings of distance visual acuity and visual fields. Therefore, determining optimal print size for reading is essential to ensure best academic outcomes. Secondary aims were to investigate the possible impact of underlying pathology on reading ability.
METHODS
Forty-seven participants were recruited from a state-wide support service for children with a vision impairment in South Australia. Three visual acuity groups were formed based on World Health Organisation definitions of mild, moderate, and severe vision impairment. Correlation between clinical measures of distance visual acuity using the Freiburg Visual Acuity Test, were compared with reading acuity and critical print size (smallest font before reading speed reduced) using Minnesota low vision reading chart (MNREAD).
RESULTS
No significant correlations were found for mild (0.20-0.49 logMAR) and severe (1.00-1.52 logMAR) vision impairment groups between distance visual acuity and reading acuity read (p = .64, CI [-.585, .395]/p = .82, CI [-.48, .58]) or critical print size (p = .78, CI [-.57, .45]/p = .43, CI [-.34, .68]. A significant correlation was found for the moderate vision impairment group: 0.50-0.99 logMAR for minimum reading acuity (p < .001, CI [.44, .91]) and critical print size (p = .03, CI [.05, .80]).
CONCLUSIONS
Standard clinical measures of distance visual acuity are an unpredictable estimate of reading ability in children with mild and severe vision impairment. Additional measures of functional near reading ability could provide a more meaningful indicator of reading ability and help provide optimum support to students through education.
Collapse