Type B aortic dissection: new perspectives

Background

Stanford type B aortic dissection is one of the aortic catastrophes with a high mortality and morbidity that needs immediate or delayed treatment, either surgically or endovascularly. This comprehensive review article addresses the current status of open, endovascular and hybrid treatment options for type B aortic dissections with the focus on new therapeutic perspectives.

Methods

Evaluation of currently available evidence based on randomized and registry data and personal experience.

Results

All type B dissections require prompt medical treatment to prevent aortic rupture. Acute complicated dissections are nowadays treated by endografting to reroute blood flow into the true lumen and promote false lumen thrombosis and future aortic remodeling. In acute uncomplicated situations the position of endografting is less clear and should be further delineated; however, on the long run also in these situations endografting might be protective for future aortic catastrophes in certain patient categories. In the chronic dissection with aneurysm formation of the descending thoracic and/or thoracoabdominal aorta, especially in connective tissue disorders, open surgery offers nowadays the best immediate results with long durability. Thoracic endografting plays only a minor role in these circumstances but branched and fenestrated endografting are very promising techniques. Hybrid techniques can offer the solution for high risk patients that are not suitable for open surgery.

Conclusions

Emergent thoracic endografting is the golden standard for all complicated type B dissections while uncomplicated patients with high-risk features might benefit from endovascular repair. Open surgery is limited for chronic post dissection aneurysms. Aortic surveillance is of paramount importance in all situations.

Left heart bypass for thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair: technical aspects

There are different surgical techniques for providing circulatory support during the repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. They all aim at reducing the afterload of the heart and the preservation of distal organ perfusion. Partial or total extracorporeal circulation with or without cooling and left heart bypass (LHB) are actually the most used surgical approaches. The objective of this study was to describe and comment on the technical aspects of the LHB. We briefly describe our results and put them into perspective based on the current literature.

Early and late outcome after aortic root replacement with a mechanical valve prosthesis in a series of 528 patients

BACKGROUND

Aortic root replacement with a mechanical valve prosthesis is a widely accepted surgical technique. This study aims to evaluate short-term and long-term outcomes of this approach and to identify predictors of 30-day mortality.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed a consecutive series of 528 patients (mean age, 54±13 years) who underwent aortic root replacement for aneurysm (83%), acute type A dissection (15%), or endocarditis (2%) in the period between 1974 and 2008. The mean time of follow-up was 9.0±7.0 years (range, 0 to 36 years). Concomitant aortic surgery was performed in 71%, coronary revascularization in 18%, and mitral valve surgery in 3%. Selective antegrade cerebral perfusion was applied in 25% and deep hypothermic circulatory arrest in 28% of patients.

RESULTS

Overall 30-day mortality was 3.2% to 2.5% for elective surgery and 6.5% for urgent surgery. Morbidity included resternotomy for bleeding or tamponade (19%), pacemaker implantation (3.6%), myocardial infarction (4.0%), and neurologic damage (4.2%). Multivariate analysis revealed myocardial infarction (p<0.001) and the lack of glue use (p=0.018) as independent predictors of 30-day mortality. Subanalysis of the selective antegrade cerebral perfusion patients and the deep hypothermic circulatory arrest patients revealed infarction (p=0.005) and coronary artery disease (p=0.45) for selective antegrade cerebral perfusion and wrapping (p=0.035) for deep hypothermic circulatory arrest as independent risk factors. The survival rate was 87%, 73%, and 29% after 5, 10, and 25 years, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Aortic root replacement with a mechanical valve prosthesis can be performed safely with low mortality and acceptable morbidity. Perioperative myocardial infarction is the strongest independent risk factor of 30-day mortality.

Aortic reoperation after freestanding homograft and pulmonary autograft root replacement

BACKGROUND

Human allografts and pulmonary autografts offer many advantages as an aortic valve and root substitute. The progressive degeneration of the aortic allograft and the pulmonary autograft has been seen as an important disadvantage, and the need for a reoperation has been perceived as challenging and risky for the patients.

METHODS

Between March 1992 and October 2009, 53 consecutive patients (mean age 50 ± 13 years; 38 male), who had a previous aortic root replacement, underwent redo surgery for failure of the aortic homograft (n = 42) or the pulmonary autograft (n = 11). The median follow-up (available for 47 of 51 patients) was 44 months.

RESULTS

Structural valve deterioration was the main indication for reoperation on the homograft (86%), with an earlier presentation in patients who received homografts from donors more than 55 years old. Failure of the pulmonary autograft occurred primarily because of severe aortic regurgitation predominantly due to dilation of the autograft (n = 5) and autograft valve prolapse (n = 5). The total in-hospital mortality was 3.8% (n = 2). No deaths occurred among patients who previously underwent a Ross procedure. The course was complicated in 25 cases (48%). The cumulative 1-year, 5-year, and 8-year survival rates were 92%, 90%, and 77%, respectively. No late deaths were encountered after reoperation on the pulmonary autograft (maximum follow-up 218 months). Freedom from reoperation (excluding early in-hospital operation) for recurrent aortic valve or root pathology was 97% at 8 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Reoperation after freestanding homograft and pulmonary autograft root replacement can be accomplished safely. The total postoperative morbidity rate is still high.

Reoperations for aortic false aneurysms after cardiac surgery

BACKGROUND

Aortic false aneurysm is a rare complication after cardiac surgery. Aortic dissection, infection, arterial wall degeneration, and poor surgical technique are recognized as risk factors for the occurrence of postsurgical false aneurysm. Despite some recent reports about percutaneous false aneurysm exclusion, a complex surgical reoperation is needed in most of the cases.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed our experience in 43 patients who received a reoperation for postsurgical aortic false aneurysm in the last 14 years. Thirty-three patients were male. The mean age was 60 ± 12 years. Most of the patients received prior aortic surgery on the aortic root, the ascending aorta, the aortic arch, and the descending thoracic aorta (38 patients). False aneurysm was diagnosed during follow-up evaluation in the absence of any symptoms in 23 cases. Univariate and multivariate analyses on 18 perioperative variables were performed.

RESULTS

In-hospital mortality was 6.9% (3 patients). The postoperative course was complicated in 17 cases (39%). At multivariate analysis, a preoperative history of coronary artery disease and postoperative sepsis were independent risk factors for hospital mortality. Survival rates at 1, 5, and 10 years were 94%, 79%, and 68%, respectively. Freedom from reoperation was 86% at 1 year and 72% at 5 and 10 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite a high postoperative complication rate, a reoperation for postsurgical aortic false aneurysm can be performed with acceptable mortality and good mid-term and long-term outcomes.

Revascularization strategy in patients with severe concurrent severe carotid and coronary artery disease: ''failure to move forward is reason to regress''

In the absence of randomized trials, the optimal management of patients with concomitant carotid and coronary artery disease remains disputable. The initial studies of combined or staged carotid endarterectomy in these patients were conceived in an attempt to reduce perioperative mortality. Although encouraging results have been reported with combined carotid endarterectomy and cardiac surgery, this combination requires long operative times and remains a surgical challenge. Recent studies have shown that carotid angioplasty and stenting prior to cardiac surgery is a feasible and effective minimal invasive technique. However, the effect of carotid stenting on the incidence of death and stroke after cardiac surgery is indistinct. Carotid stenting followed by cardiac surgery may provide a valuable treatment for patients with combined carotid and cardiac disease. The high rate of freedom from death and stroke during follow-up supports the long-term durability of this strategy. In the present review, we highlight the available data on carotid stenting and cardiac surgery.

Long-Term Follow-Up After Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair

BACKGROUND

Early mortality and morbidity after thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) repair has been analyzed extensively; however, very few studies have examined the risk factors for late death.

METHODS

We analyzed 500 consecutive TAAA repairs performed at St. Antonius Hospital between 1981 and March 30, 2006. Survival and freedom from aortic reoperation were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the effects of preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative risk factors were evaluated using Cox proportional hazard analysis. Survival was compared with a Dutch population matched for age, sex, and date of operation.

RESULTS

Patient survival with 95% confidence intervals (CI) was 83% (80% to 86%), 63% (58% to 67%), 34% (29% to 40%), 16% (9% to 20%), and 6% (2% to 11%) after 1, 5, 10, 15, and 20 years, respectively, compared with 100%, 99%, 85%, 36%, and 15% for the matched Dutch population. Hazard analysis showed an early phase of high hazard falling to low levels 9 months postoperatively and a late phase in which the hazard of death gradually increased. Incremental risk factors for late death were depressed left ventricular function (p < 0.001), increased age (p < 0.001), urgency (p = 0.007), postoperative dialysis (p < 0.001), and postoperative neurologic deficit (p = 0.016). Freedom from reoperation on the aorta with 95% CI was 98% (97% to 99%), 92% (89% to 94%), 86% (82% to 90%), 83% (78% to 87%), and 83% (78% to 87%) after 1, 5, 10, 15, and 20 years, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Survival remains suboptimal, especially in the early years after TAAA repair, compared with a matched population. Avoidance of postoperative problems such as dialysis and neurologic deficits and performing elective surgery on relative young patients with unimpaired ventricular function will increase the likelihood of late survival.

[Diagnostic image (307). A man with dysphagia]

A 51-year-old man suffered from longstanding dysphagia due to a large aneurysm of the thoracoabdominal aorta.

Aortic arch replacement: the conventional 'elephant trunk' technique

Pathology of the aorta starting into the ascending aorta or aortic arch and extending downstream into the descending thoracic or thoracoabdominal aorta requiring surgical therapy, can be treated in two steps. At the first stage, via median sternotomy, the ascending aorta and arch are repaired, if necessary in combination with the aortic root or other cardiac interventions (such as bypass grafting or mitral valve repair). During this stage a free-floating extension of the arch prosthesis, the so-called elephant trunk, is left behind in the proximal descending aorta. Later, at the second stage via left thoracotomy, thoracophrenolaparatomy or endovascular repair, the descending aorta or thoracoabdominal aorta can be replaced. The most important advantage of leaving behind an elephant trunk is the avoidance of a difficult and hazardous dissection in the region of the distal aortic arch where arterial, venous, nervous, bronchial, gastro-intestinal and lymphatic structures cross. Doing so, the risk of damage to one of these structures can be completely avoided.

[Trachea compression due to a Kommerell diverticulum in a patient with a right-sided aorta]

A 64-year-old man who was evaluated for a long history of a discontinuous barking cough with difficulty in coughing up sputum was found to have 90% stenosis of the trachea. Further imaging studies revealed a right-sided descending aorta with an aberrant left subclavian artery arising from a Kommerell diverticulum. This caused the compression of the trachea. The compression was relieved by transposition of the aberrant left subclavian artery to the ascending aorta and replacement of the aneurysmatic part of the aorta by an endoprosthesis.

Long-Term Results After 27 Years of Surgical Treatment of Acute Type A Aortic Dissection

BACKGROUND

This study investigates the determinants of long-term outcome and modalities of late death after surgical treatment of acute type A dissection.

METHODS

Between 1974 and 2001, 315 consecutive patients were operated on for acute type A aortic dissection. Operative mortality was 22.9%. A series of 243 survivors of surgical treatment were followed up for as long as 27 years. Endpoints were death, cardiovascular reoperation, and neurologic events. Median follow-up was 4.5 years. Follow-up was 99.6% complete.

RESULTS

Cumulative survival of discharged patients was 96.4% +/- 1.3%, 67.7% +/- 4.7%, and 39.4% +/- 12.0% at 1, 10, and 20 years, respectively. During follow-up, 47 patients died. Cause of death was cardiac failure in 7, hemorrhage due to rupture of the distal aorta in 7, stroke in 4, respiratory insufficiency in 4, sepsis in 3, malignancy in 2, and unknown in 20 patients. Multivariate analysis revealed advanced patient age and postoperative hemodialysis as perioperative indicators of late death (p < 0.05). Freedom from cardiovascular reoperation was 90.7% +/- 2.0% at 1 year, 60.9% +/- 5.1% at 10 years and 41.9% +/- 15.0% at 20 years. A total of 58 patients required 86 cardiovascular reoperations; aortic root or ascending aorta replacement was performed in 20, distal ascending aorta and arch replacement in 13, descending aorta replacement in 6, thoracoabdominal aorta replacement in 7, abdominal aorta replacement in 7, and miscellaneous reoperations in 6 patients. Multivariate analysis revealed male sex and left coronary artery dissection as significant determinants for late cardiovascular reintervention (p < 0.05). Cumulative incidence of stroke after 20 years was 3.8%.

CONCLUSIONS

Acute type A dissection represents an emergency situation with acceptable long-term results for discharged survivors of surgical treatment.

Surgery for acute type A aortic dissection: the effect of antegrade selective cerebral perfusion on the early outcome of elderly patients

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate early results and to determine predictive risk factors associated with an adverse outcome in elderly patients after acute type A aortic dissection repair using antegrade selective cerebral perfusion (ASCP). Adverse outcome was defined as the occurrence of death or permanent neurologic dysfunction.

METHODS

From October 1995 to March 2002, 178 patients (group A < 75 years, n = 156, 87.6%; group B > 75 years, n = 22, 12.4%) underwent surgery for acute type A aortic dissection using ASCP and moderate hypothermia. An ascending aorta/hemiarch replacement was performed in 128/178 (71.9%) patients (group A 71.2%, group B 77.3%, p = NS), an ascending aorta and arch replacement in 50/178 (28.1%) patients (group A 28.8%, group B 22.7%, p = NS). Associated procedures were performed in 55/178 (20.9%) patients (group A 31.4%, group B 27.3%, p = NS), the arch vessels were reimplanted using the separated graft technique in 32/50 (64.0%) patients (group A 62.2%, group B 80.0%, p = NS). The mean ASCP time was 59 +/- 27 min.

RESULTS

The overall adverse outcome rate was 20.8% (group A 21.2%, group B 18.2%, p = NS). The transient neurologic dysfunction rate was 9.5% (group A 9.5%, group B 5.6%, p = NS). A logistic regression analysis revealed cardiopulmonary bypass time (p = 0.045, odds ratio 1.03/min) to be the only independent predictor of adverse outcome in group A.

CONCLUSIONS

During type A aortic dissection repair the implementation of ASCP resulted in an acceptable hospital mortality and neurologic outcome. If ASCP is used, the risk of hospital mortality and postoperative morbidity is similar in patients younger and older than 75 years. Duration of cardiopulmonary bypass still remains an important risk factor for hospital mortality and neurologic outcome in elderly patients.

[Diagnostic image (200). A woman with acute pain between the scapulae]

A 71-year-old woman presented with an acute onset of interscapular pain due to an intramural haematoma of the ascending part of the aorta. She was treated with an emergency ascending aorta graft replacement.

Separate grafts or en bloc anastomosis for arch vessels reimplantation to the aortic arch

BACKGROUND

This study compares the results of the separated graft technique and the en bloc technique as a method of arch vessels reimplantation during surgery of the aortic arch and determines the predictive risk factors associated with hospital mortality and adverse neurologic outcome during aortic arch repair.

METHODS

Between October 1995 and March 2002, 352 patients (mean age 64.9 +/- 11.3 years; urgent status: 49/352 [13.9%]) underwent surgery of the aortic arch using the separated graft technique (group A: n = 230 [65.3%]) and the en bloc technique (group B: n = 122 [34.7%]) to reimplant the arch vessels. An aortic arch replacement was performed in 32 patients (9.1%), an ascending aorta and arch replacement in 222 patients (53.1%), an aortic arch and descending aorta replacement in 16 patients (4.5%), and a complete replacement of the thoracic aorta in 82 patients (23.3%). Brain protection was achieved by means of antegrade selective cerebral perfusion in all patients. The mean cardiopulmonary bypass time was 204.8 +/- 61.9 minutes (group A: 199.7 +/- 57.0 minutes; group B: 214.5 +/- 69.4 minutes; p = 0.033), the mean myocardial ischemic time was 121.5 +/- 43.2 minutes (group A: 116.7 +/- 38.9 minutes; group B: 130.80 +/- 49.4 minutes; p = 0.003), and the mean antegrade selective cerebral perfusion time was 84.5 +/- 36.4 (group A: separated graft technique 91.3 +/- 36.3 minutes; group B: 70.6 +/- 32.7 minutes; p = 0.000).

RESULTS

Overall hospital mortality was 6.8% (group A: 6.5%; group B: 7.4%; p = not significant [NS]). The permanent neurologic dysfunction rate was 3.5% (group A: 4.0%; group B: 2.5%; p = NS). The transient neurologic dysfunction rate was 5.4% (group A: 5.5%; group B: 5.2%, p = NS). Postoperative systemic morbidity was similar in the two groups. A logistic regression analysis revealed preoperative cardiac tamponade (p = 0.011; odds ratio [OR] = 5.9) and cardiopulmonary bypass time (p = 0.010; OR = 1.01/min) to be independent predictors of hospital mortality. None of the analyzed preoperative variables were associated with an increased risk of permanent neurologic dysfunction. Age more than 70 years old (p = 0.029, OR = 5.7), myocardial revascularization (p = 0.001, OR = 2.9), and pump time (p = 0.013, OR = 1.01/min) were indicated as independent predictors of transient neurologic dysfunction by logistic regression.

CONCLUSIONS

Antegrade selective cerebral perfusion was confirmed to be a safe method of cerebral protection allowing complex aortic arch operations to be performed with acceptable results in terms of hospital mortality and neurologic outcome. The separated graft technique had no adverse impact on hospital mortality and morbidity.

Is extended arch replacement for acute type a aortic dissection an additional risk factor for mortality?

BACKGROUND

We report our experience with surgery for acute type A aortic dissection with involvement of the aortic arch.

METHODS

From January 1986 to December 2001, 277 patients underwent surgery for acute type A aortic dissection. In 70 patients (25.3%), surgery was extended into the aortic arch: hemiarch and total arch replacement in 53 (75.7%) and 17 (24.3%) patients, respectively. Deep hypothermic circulatory arrest was used in 19 patients, antegrade selective cerebral perfusion in 38, and combined deep hypothermic circulatory arrest with antegrade selective cerebral perfusion in 13.

RESULTS

Operative mortality was 18.6% (13/70) after extended replacement into the arch versus 21.7% (45/207) after surgery limited to the ascending aorta (p = 0.62). Multivariate analysis did not reveal significant risk factors for operative mortality. Postoperatively, 5 patients (8.1%) had a new postoperative cerebral vascular accident (CVA). Multivariate analysis showed an earlier date of operation as the only independent determinant for a new postoperative CVA (p = 0.0162, RR = 0.80/year, 95% CI = 0.67 to 0.96). None of the patients, operated on with antegrade selective cerebral perfusion, had a new cerebral deficit. Comparing the different methods of cerebral protection, multivariate risk analysis revealed antegrade selective cerebral perfusion as a significant protective factor against new postoperative CVA (p = 0.0110, OR = 0.12, 95% CI = 0.02 to 0.61). Survival at 5 and 10 years was 66.6.5% and 40.0%, respectively, after replacement of the aortic arch versus 68.7% and 57.7%, respectively, after replacement of the ascending aorta (p = 0.96). Freedom from aortic arch reoperation was 96.3% at 5 and 77.0% at 10 years versus 86.6% and 75.1% in both groups, respectively (p = 0.21).

CONCLUSIONS

Extended replacement into the aortic arch during surgery for acute type A dissection does not influence early and late results. The best cerebral protection seems to be obtained with antegrade selective cerebral perfusion.

Brain protection using antegrade selective cerebral perfusion: a multicenter study

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the results of antegrade selective cerebral perfusion as a method of brain protection during surgery of the thoracic aorta and to determine predictors of hospital mortality and adverse neurologic outcome.

METHODS

Between October 1995 and March 2002, 588 patients underwent aortic surgery with the aid of antegrade selective cerebral perfusion. There were 334 men (56.8%); the mean age was 63.7 +/- 11.8 years. One hundred sixty-two patients (27.6%) underwent urgent operation. The separated graft technique was employed to reimplant the arch vessels in 230 patients (65.3%) of the 352 requiring aortic arch replacement. Associated procedures were performed in 254 patients (43.2%). One hundred twelve patients underwent elephant trunk procedure. The mean cerebral perfusion time was 67 +/- 37 minutes.

RESULTS

The overall hospital mortality rate was 8.7%. A logistic regression analysis revealed urgent operation, recent central neurologic event, tamponade, unplanned coronary artery revascularization and pump time to be independent predictors of hospital mortality (p < 0.05). The permanent neurologic dysfunction rate was 3.8%. A logistic regression analysis showed tamponade to be independent predictor of permanent neurologic dysfunction (p < 0.05). The transient neurologic dysfunction rate was 5.6%. Recent central neurologic event, tamponade, coronary disease, and aortic valve replacement were indicated as independent predictors of transient neurologic dysfunction by logistic regression (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

In our experience the utilization of antegrade selective cerebral perfusion resulted in encouraging results in terms of hospital mortality and brain complications. Neither the extent of the replacement nor the duration of the cerebral perfusion had an impact on hospital mortality and neurologic outcome.

Operative risk factors of type A aortic dissection: analysis of 252 consecutive patients

OBJECTIVE

We examined operative risk factors for postoperative death after surgery for acute type A aortic dissection.

METHODS

Between 1974 and 1999, 252 patients, 163 men and 89 women (mean+/-SD age, 58+/-12 years) underwent surgery for acute type A aortic dissection. Fifty-eight (23.0%) were in cardiogenic shock at time of surgery. Most patients underwent ascending aorta replacement which was combined with aortic valve replacement by means of a composite graft in 30 (11.9%) patients and an isolated aortic valve replacement in 16 (6.3%) patients.

RESULTS

The overall operative mortality rate was 25.0% (n=63); 27.0% for patients operated upon with aortic cross-clamping, 23.7% after deep hypotherm circulatory arrest and 23.3% after antegrade selective cerebral perfusion (ASCP) (p=0.73). Multivariate analysis revealed iatrogenic dissection (p=0.0096, odds ratio=5.7), preoperative cardiopulmonary resuscitation (p=0.0095, odds ratio=5.5) and every quarter of an hour longer extracorporeal circulation (p=0.049, odds ratio=1.1) as independent risk factors for operative mortality. Aortic valve replacement or Bentall procedure (p=0.0185, odds ratio=0.3) were protective factors. There were 44 new postoperative strokes: 4.7% in the group operated upon with and 20.1% in the group without ASCP (p=0.01).

CONCLUSION

In order to avoid cardiogenic shock and preoperative cardiopulmonary resuscitation, patients with acute type A aortic dissection should be treated promptly. The choice to use an aortic valve prosthesis or Bentall procedure when applicable seems to benefit the postoperative early survival. The risk of new postoperative neurological events might be reduced by avoiding the appliance of an aortic cross-clamp and by using ASCP.

Deep hypothermic circulatory arrest and antegrade selective cerebral perfusion during ascending aorta-hemiarch replacement: a retrospective comparative study

OBJECTIVE

We sought to compare the results of ascending aorta-hemiarch replacement by using 2 different methods of cerebral protection in terms of hospital mortality, neurologic outcome, and systemic morbidity and to determine predictive risk factors associated with hospital mortality and neurologic outcome after ascending aorta-hemiarch replacement.

METHODS

Between January 1995 and September 2001, 289 patients (mean age, 62.2 +/- 13.2 years; urgent status, 122/289 [42.2%]) underwent ascending aorta-hemiarch replacement with the aid of antegrade selective cerebral perfusion (161 patients) or deep hypothermic circulatory arrest (128 patients).

RESULTS

Overall hospital mortality was 11.4% (deep hypothermic circulatory arrest group, 13.3%; antegrade selective cerebral perfusion group, 9.9%; P =.375). A logistic regression analysis revealed acute type A dissection (P =.001; odds ratio, 4.3) and age of greater than 70 years (P =.019; odds ratio, 2.5) to be independent predictors of hospital mortality. The permanent neurologic dysfunction rate was 9.3% (deep hypothermic circulatory arrest group, 12.5%; antegrade selective cerebral perfusion group, 7.6%; P =.075). Logistic regression analysis revealed acute type A dissection (P =.001; odds ratio, 6.7) and history of cerebral infarction-transient ischemic attack (P =.038; odds ratio, 3.4) to be independent predictors of permanent neurologic dysfunction. The transient neurologic dysfunction rate was 8.0% (deep hypothermic circulatory arrest group, 7.1%; antegrade selective cerebral perfusion group, 8.7%; P =.530). Acute type A dissection (P =.001; odds ratio, 5.1) was indicated as an independent predictor of transient neurologic dysfunction by means of logistic regression. Renal dysfunction (postoperative creatinine level of >250 micromol/L; deep hypothermic circulatory arrest, 10 [7.8%]; antegrade selective cerebral perfusion, 6 [3.7%]; P =.030), as well as prolonged intubation time (deep hypothermic circulatory arrest, 3.8 +/- 6.3 days; antegrade selective cerebral perfusion, 2.2 +/- 2.5 days; P =.005) were more common in the deep hypothermic circulatory arrest group.

CONCLUSION

The use of antegrade selective cerebral perfusion and deep hypothermic circulatory arrest during ascending aorta-hemiarch replacement resulted in acceptable hospital mortality and neurologic outcome. Reduced postoperative intubation time and better renal function preservation were observed in the antegrade selective cerebral perfusion group.

Surgery for acute type A dissection using antegrade selective cerebral perfusion: experience with 122 patients

BACKGROUND

Antegrade selective cerebral perfusion (ASCP) has proved to be a reliable method of brain protection during surgery of the thoracic aorta, but its use during aortic dissection surgery still remains controversial. In this study, we present our results after the operative repair of acute type A aortic dissections using ASCP and moderate hypothermic circulatory arrest.

METHODS

Between October 1995 and August 2001, 122 patients (76 men, 46 women) underwent repair of acute type A aortic dissection with the aid of ASCP and open distal anastomosis. The average age of the patients was 61 +/- 12 (mean +/- standard deviation). Preoperative complications included cardiac tamponade (n = 34; 27.0%), aortic regurgitation (n = 27; 22.1%), and new neurological deficits (n = 11; 9%).

RESULTS

Stepwise logistic regression revealed preoperative cardiac tamponade (p = 0.018) and new neurological deficits (p = 0.017) to be independent determinants for hospital mortality (19.7%). Permanent neurological complications occurred in 7% of the patients. Independent risk factors for temporary neurological dysfunction (11.2%) included cardiac tamponade (p = 0.019) and preoperative neurological deficits (p = 0.000).

CONCLUSIONS

In our experience, the surgical treatment of acute type A aortic dissection with the aid of ASCP was associated with acceptable hospital mortality and neurologic morbidity rates.

Antegrade selective cerebral perfusion during operations on the thoracic aorta: factors influencing survival and neurologic outcome in 413 patients

OBJECTIVE

We retrospectively analyzed hospital mortality and neurologic outcome after operations on the thoracic aorta with the aid of antegrade selective cerebral perfusion to determine a predictive risk model.

METHODS

Between October 1995 and May 2001, 413 patients (mean age, 63.0 +/- 11.5 years) underwent operations on the thoracic aorta with antegrade selective cerebral perfusion. Indications for surgical intervention were acute type A dissection in 116 (28.1%) patients, degenerative aneurysm in 227 (55.0%) patients, and postdissection aneurysm in 70 (16.9%) patients. One hundred twenty-five (30.3%) patients were operated on urgently; concomitant procedures were performed in 171 (41.4%) patients. Mean cerebral perfusion time was 63.0 +/- 38.7 minutes (range, 16-220 minutes). Preoperative and intraoperative factors were evaluated by means of univariate and multivariate analysis to identify predictors of hospital mortality and neurologic outcome.

RESULTS

The hospital mortality was 9.4%. Stepwise logistic regression revealed urgency status (P =.000; odds ratio, 19.9) and recent history of a recent central neurologic event (P =.004; odds ratio, 8.0) to be independent determinants for hospital mortality. Temporary neurologic dysfunction occurred in 20 (5.1%) patients. Urgency status (P =.005; odds ratio, 7.5), history of a central neurologic event (P =.003; odds ratio, 8.6), and coronary artery bypass grafting (P =.019; odds ratio, 6.0) were independent determinants of temporary neurologic dysfunction. Urgency status (P =.003; odds ratio, 8.6) was the only independent determinant for permanent neurologic dysfunction, and it occurred in 15 (3.7%) patients.

CONCLUSION

Antegrade selective cerebral perfusion is an effective method of brain protection. Cerebral perfusion times of longer than 90 minutes were not associated with an increased risk of hospital mortality or poorer neurologic outcome. Urgency status and recent history of central neurologic events were retained as important risk factors for hospital mortality and neurologic outcome.