Incremental value of compression ultrasound sonography in the emergency department

The quick evaluation of venous thromboembolism is a key point of modern medicine since the delayed diagnosis is associated with a worse prognosis. Venous ultrasound (VU) is a sensitive and rapidly performed test in cases of suspected deep venous thrombosis. Various protocols have been proposed for its execution, such as the study of the whole deep venous circulation of the lower limb or the analysis of the femoral-popliteal area. The aim is to detect a vessel thrombus and the most sensitive element is the non-compressibility with the probe. Initially, the thrombus is hypoechogenic and adherent to the vessel; later, it tends to organize and recanalize. Usually, in the early stages, the risk of embolism is higher. The role of studying the iliac axis and calf veins is still uncertain. VU is not useful for assessing response to anticoagulation therapy and it is unclear whether the persistence of thrombotic abnormalities can guide on a possible prolongation of therapy.

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and coronary artery disease

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is defined as a chronic fibrosing interstitial disease of unknown cause, limited to the lungs, and associated with the histopathologic and/or radiologic pattern of usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP); it generally progresses into respiratory failure and death. Although progression of the disease is the most common cause of death, there are increasing reports of its association with other pathologies has been reported: e.g., IPF patients seem more susceptible to cardiovascular diseases. Therefore, other pathologies might also influence the natural course. In this paper, we describe a case of IPF and coronary artery disease (CAD). We emphasize the importance of cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) as a useful procedure to monitor disease progression in IPF patients. We also stress the importance of a careful analysis of variables measured for an accurate interpretation of the clinical picture and an improvement of the clinical management of patients. Moreover, we suggest that a careful assessment of CPET parameters may additionally help in the early detection of high cardiovascular ischemic risk.

[The effectiveness and tolerability of losartan and effect on left ventricular mass in patients with essential hypertension]

The purpose of our study was to evaluate the antihypertensive efficacy, tolerability and effects on left ventricular mass of losartan over 10 months in patients with essential hypertension. Losartan is a selective angiotensin II receptor-antagonist. The whole study comprised 89 hypertensive patients who were randomized, at baseline, to 10 months of double-blind once daily treatment with losartan 50 mg (L Group, n = 49, mean age 55 +/- 13 years) or hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg (HCTZ Group, n = 40, mean age 56 +/- 10 years). Routine hematology, blood chemistry and urinalysis were performed before and after 5 and 10 months; standard electrocardiography, ambulatory non invasive 24-hours blood pressure monitoring, M-mode echocardiography, psychometric test and quality of life evaluation were obtained from all the patients before and after 10 months. In patients non responding after 4 weeks, hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg or losartan 50 mg was added in the L Group and in the HCTZ Group, respectively (L-HCTZ Group). The results showed good tolerability and a significant mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure reduction in all groups (L Group from 157/96 +/- 9/7 to 137/85 +/- 9/5 mmHg, p < 0.001; HCTZ Group from 158/97 +/- 11/8 to 150/91 +/- 9/7 mmHg, p < 0.003; L-HCTZ Group from 159/98 +/- 9/5 to 141/88 +/- 6/4 mmHg, p < 0.001), although L and L-HCTZ treatment were more effective during 24 hours than HCTZ. Moreover, a remarkable reduction in left ventricular mass index was obtained after 10 months only in the L Group (from 138.4 +/- 26.2 to 127.2 +/- 23.1 g/m2, p < 0.04) and in the L-HCTZ Group (from 140 +/- 20.3 to 125.5 +/- 20.1 g/m2, p = 0.126). Finally, in patients treated with losartan the results of psychometric test significantly improved (L Group: p < 0.05; L-HCTZ Group: p < 0.05) and a positive remarkable change in the quality of life was observed (L Group: p < 0.05; L-HCTZ Group: p = 0.083). In conclusion, losartan in monotherapy or in association with hydrochlorothiazide, was well tolerated, respected the quality of life, and produced a significant and remarkable reduction in blood pressure and left ventricular mass in hypertensive patients.