Regenerative Endodontic Procedures Posttrauma: Immunohistologic Analysis of a Retrospective Series of Failed Cases

INTRODUCTION

Regenerative endodontic procedures (REP) are a novel treatment modality to restore the function of necrotic pulp tissue via stimulation or transplantation of stem cells into the root canal. This study aimed to investigate the immunohistologic outcome of 3 extracted teeth because of sequelae of trauma and unsatisfactory REP outcomes.

METHODS

Three immature permanent maxillary central incisors of 3 female patients (6-9 years) were extracted 5.5-22 months after REP. Additionally, 1 sound permanent immature central maxillary incisor of 1 of the included patients was extracted for orthodontic reasons. The teeth were immunohistologically stained with Masson's trichrome, neurofilament (NF), pan cytokeratin, dentin sialophosphoprotein, and Gram+/-.

RESULTS

The REP-teeth presented intracanalar vascularized connective/mineralized reparative tissue (RT), which was less organized than the pulp tissue of the sound tooth. Moderate to considerable calcification was observed below the Portland cement used during REP. In 1 case, the RT was NF+; in the 2 other cases, the periodontal ligament and apical granuloma/papilla were NF+. All teeth were Gram+/- negative; nevertheless, inflammatory cells were present in 2 cases. The pan cytokeratin and dentin sialophosphoprotein stainings were not specific enough for 2 cases.

CONCLUSIONS

This immunohistologic study of failed REP cases resulted in bacteria-free intracanalar RT and biomaterial-induced calcification. Nevertheless, the presence of inflammatory cells revealed a persistent inflammation. Hence, the clinical and radiographic signs were decisive for tooth survival and multidisciplinary outcome determination.

A retrospective intercenter comparison of two surgical protocols through the dental arch relationship of 5- to 6-year-old unilateral cleft patients

OBJECTIVES

The objectives of this retrospective equivalence trial were to assess the dental arch relationship of 5- to 6-year-old patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) treated in two specialized cleft centers with a different surgical protocol using the 5-Year-Olds' Index and the modified Huddart/Bodenham scoring system, and to determine the correlation between these two scoring indices.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The dental arch relationship of seventy-three 5- to 6-year-old patients with complete UCLP was evaluated on plaster casts using the 5-Year-Olds' Index and the modified Huddart/Bodenham scoring system. The sagittal occlusion, overbite, and overjet were also recorded. Inter- and intra-examiner agreement was determined using Intraclass Correlation Coefficients.

RESULTS

A good to very good inter- and intra-examiner agreement was found. No significant mean difference in outcome based on the 5-Year-Olds' Index, the modified Huddart/Bodenham scoring system, overjet, or overbite was detected. For mean difference in sagittal occlusion, the hypothesis that both centers are clinically equivalent was confirmed. A strong negative correlation (r_s = - 0.832) between the 5-Year-Olds' Index and the modified Huddart/Bodenham scoring system was found.

CONCLUSIONS

The dental arch relationship of 5- to 6-year-old unilateral cleft patients treated in two Belgian cleft centers is clinically equivalent based on sagittal occlusion, despite substantial differences in their treatment protocol. Clinical equivalence for other parameters was not confirmed. There is a strong correlation between the 5-Year-Olds' Index and the modified Huddart/Bodenham scoring system.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

A well-implemented treatment protocol for cleft patients is of the utmost importance, but case load and skill of the surgeon are also important factors for the quality of the results.