Bayly J, Fettes L, Douglas E, Teixiera MJ, Peat N, Tunnard I, Patel V, Gao W, Wilcock A, Higginson IJ, Maddocks M. Short-term integrated rehabilitation for people with newly diagnosed thoracic cancer: a multi-centre randomized controlled feasibility trial.
Clin Rehabil 2019;
34:205-219. [PMID:
31786963 DOI:
10.1177/0269215519888794]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES
The main objective of this study is to determine the feasibility of recruiting and retaining patients recently diagnosed with thoracic cancer to a trial of short-term integrated rehabilitation; evaluate uptake of theoretically informed components targeting physical function, symptom self-management and participation; estimate sample size requirements for an efficacy trial.
DESIGN
Parallel group randomized controlled feasibility trial.
SETTING
Three U.K. hospitals.
PARTICIPANTS
Patients ⩽eight weeks of thoracic cancer diagnosis, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status 0-3, any cancer stage and treatment plan.
INTERVENTIONS
Participants randomly allocated (1:1) to short-term integrated rehabilitation and standard care or standard care alone over 30 days.
MAIN MEASURES
Primary: participant recruitment and retention, targeting ⩾30% of eligible patients enrolling and ⩾50% of participants reporting outcomes at 30 days. Secondary: intervention fidelity; missing data and performance of outcome measures for self-efficacy, symptoms, physical activity and health-related quality of life.
RESULTS
Of 159 eligible patients approached, 54 (34%) were recruited. A total of 44 (82%) and 39 (72%) participants reported outcomes at 30 and 60 days, respectively. Intervention fidelity was high. Rehabilitation was delivered across 3 (1-3) sessions over 32 (22-45) days (median (range)). Changes in clinical outcomes were modest but most apparent at 60 days for health-related quality of life: Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Lung Cancer score median (interquartile range) change 9.7 (-12.0 to 16.0) rehabilitation versus 2.3 (-15.0 to 14.5) standard care.
CONCLUSION
A trial to examine efficacy of short-term integrated rehabilitation for people newly diagnosed with thoracic cancer is feasible. A sample of 336 participants could detect a meaningful effect on health-related quality of life as the primary outcome.
Collapse