1
|
Claeys C, Zaman K, Dbaibo G, Li P, Izu A, Kosalaraksa P, Rivera L, Acosta B, Arroba Basanta ML, Aziz A, Cabanero MA, Chandrashekaran V, Corsaro B, Cousin L, Diaz A, Diez-Domingo J, Dinleyici EC, Faust SN, Friel D, Garcia-Sicilia J, Gomez-Go GD, Antoinette Gonzales ML, Hughes SM, Jackowska T, Kant S, Lucero M, Malvaux L, Mares Bermudez J, Martinon-Torres F, Miranda M, Montellano M, Peix Sambola MA, Prymula R, Puthanakit T, Ruzkova R, Sadowska-Krawczenko I, Salamanca de la Cueva I, Sokal E, Soni J, Szymanski H, Ulied A, Schuind A, Jain VK, Innis BL. Prevention of vaccine-matched and mismatched influenza in children aged 6-35 months: a multinational randomised trial across five influenza seasons. Lancet Child Adolesc Health 2018; 2:338-349. [PMID: 30169267 DOI: 10.1016/s2352-4642(18)30062-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2017] [Revised: 02/07/2018] [Accepted: 02/07/2018] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite the importance of vaccinating children younger than 5 years, few studies evaluating vaccine prevention of influenza have been reported in this age group. We evaluated efficacy of an inactivated quadrivalent influenza vaccine (IIV4) in children aged 6-35 months. METHODS In this phase 3, observer-blinded, multinational trial, healthy children from 13 countries in Europe, Central America, and Asia were recruited in five independent cohorts, each in a different influenza season. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to either IIV4 (15 μg haemagglutinin antigen per strain per 0·5 mL dose; a single dose on day 0 for vaccine-primed children, and two doses, on days 0 and 28, for vaccine-unprimed children) or to one or two doses of a non-influenza control vaccine. Primary endpoints were moderate-to-severe influenza or all influenza (irrespective of disease severity) confirmed by RT-PCR on nasal swabs. Cultured isolates were further characterised as antigenically matched or mismatched to vaccine strains. Efficacy was assessed in the per-protocol cohort and total vaccinated cohort (time-to-event analysis), and safety was assessed in the total vaccinated cohort. FINDINGS Between Oct 1, 2011, and Dec 31, 2014, 12 018 children were recruited into the total vaccinated cohort (6006 children in the IIV4 group and 6012 children in the control group). 356 (6%) children in the IIV4 group and 693 (12%) children in the control group had at least one case of RT-PCR-confirmed influenza. Of these 1049 influenza strains, 138 (13%) were A/H1N1, 529 (50%) were A/H3N2, 69 (7%) were B/Victoria, and 316 (30%) were B/Yamagata. Overall, 539 (64%) of 848 antigenically characterised isolates were vaccine-mismatched (16 [15%] of 105 for A/H1N1; 368 [97%] of 378 for A/H3N2; 54 [86%] of 63 for B/Victoria; 101 [33%] of 302 for B/Yamagata). Vaccine efficacy was 63% (97·5% CI 52-72) against moderate-to-severe influenza and 50% (42-57) against all influenza in the per-protocol cohort, and 64% (53-73) against moderate-to-severe influenza and 50% (42-57) against all influenza in the total vaccinated cohort. There were no clinically meaningful safety differences between IIV4 and control. INTERPRETATION IIV4 prevented influenza A and B in children aged 6-35 months despite high levels of vaccine mismatch. Vaccine efficacy was highest against moderate-to-severe disease, which is the most clinically important endpoint associated with greatest burden. FUNDING GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Ping Li
- GSK, King of Prussia, PA, USA
| | | | | | - Luis Rivera
- National Autonomous University of Santo Domingo, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic
| | - Beatriz Acosta
- Dr Castroviejo Primary Health Care Center, Madrid, Spain
| | | | | | - Miguel Angel Cabanero
- Jaume I University and Illes Columbretes Health Center of Castellón, Castellón de la Plana, Spain
| | | | | | - Luis Cousin
- Tecnologia en Investigacion, San Pedro Sula, Honduras
| | - Adolfo Diaz
- National Autonomous University of Honduras, Tegucigalpa, Honduras
| | | | | | - Saul N Faust
- University of Southampton, Southampton, UK; University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Shashi Kant
- Centre for Community Medicine, All India institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Marilla Lucero
- Research Institute for Tropical Medicine, Manila, Philippines
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Roman Prymula
- University of Hradec Kralove, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
| | | | | | - Iwona Sadowska-Krawczenko
- Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, Collegium Medicum, Bydgoszcz, Poland; University Hospital No 2, Bydgoszcz, Poland
| | | | - Etienne Sokal
- Catholic University of Louvain, Cliniques Universitaires St Luc, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lopez AL, Gonzales MLA, Aldaba JG, Nair GB. Killed oral cholera vaccines: history, development and implementation challenges. Ther Adv Vaccines 2014; 2:123-36. [PMID: 25177492 DOI: 10.1177/2051013614537819] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
Cholera is still a major global health problem, affecting mainly people living in unsanitary conditions and who are at risk for outbreaks of cholera. During the past decade, outbreaks are increasingly reported from more countries. From the early killed oral cholera vaccine, rapid improvements in vaccine development occurred as a result of a better understanding of the epidemiology of the disease, pathogenesis of cholera infection and immunity. The newer-generation oral killed cholera vaccines have been shown to be safe and effective in field trials conducted in cholera endemic areas. Likewise, they have been shown to be protective when used during outbreak settings. Aside from providing direct protection to vaccinated individuals, recent studies have demonstrated that these killed oral vaccines also confer indirect protection through herd immunity. Although new-generation oral cholera vaccines should not be considered in isolation from other preventive approaches in countries where they are most needed, especially improved water quality and sanitation, these vaccines serve as immediately available public health tools for preventing further morbidity and mortality from cholera. However, despite its availability for more than two decades, use of these vaccines has not been optimized. Although there are limitations of the currently available oral cholera vaccines, recent data show that the vaccines are safe, feasible to use even in difficult circumstances and able to provide protection in various settings. Clear identification of the areas and target population groups who will benefit from the use of the cholera vaccines will be required and strategies to facilitate accessibility and usage of these vaccines in these areas and population groups will need to be developed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Lena Lopez
- Institute of Child Health and Human Development, University of the Philippines Manila-National Institutes of Health, 623 P. Gil St., Manila 1000, Philippines
| | | | - Josephine G Aldaba
- Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, University of the Philippines Manila, Manila, Philippines
| | - G Balakrish Nair
- Translational Health Science and Technology Institute, Haryana, India
| |
Collapse
|