1
|
Ueland T, Gullestad L, Kou L, Aukrust P, Anand IS, Broughton MN, McMurray JJ, van Veldhuisen DJ, Warren DJ, Bolstad N. Pro-gastrin-releasing peptide and outcome in patients with heart failure and anaemia: results from the RED-HF study. ESC Heart Fail 2018; 5:1052-1059. [PMID: 30145817 PMCID: PMC6300802 DOI: 10.1002/ehf2.12312] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2017] [Revised: 04/08/2018] [Accepted: 05/28/2018] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Aims Neuroendocrine activation is associated with poor outcome in heart failure (HF). The neuropeptide gastrin‐releasing peptide (GRP), derived from the precursor proGRP1‐125 (proGRP), has recently been implicated in inflammation and wound repair. We investigated the predictive value of proGRP on clinical outcomes in HF patients with reduced ejection fraction. Methods and results The association between plasma proGRP (time‐resolved immunofluorometric assay) and the primary endpoint of death from any cause or first hospitalization for worsening of HF was evaluated using multivariable Cox proportional hazard models in 1541 patients with systolic HF and mild to moderate anaemia, enrolled in the Reduction of Events by Darbepoetin alfa in Heart Failure (RED‐HF) trial. Median proGRP levels in the RED‐HF cohort were markedly increased [95 ng/L (25th, 75th percentile, 69–129 ng/L)] with 64% patients above the 80 ng/L reference limit. Baseline proGRP correlated with estimated glomerular filtration rate (r = 0.52), N terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide (r = 0.33), troponin T (r = 0.34), and haemoglobin (r = 0.16) (all P < 0.001). The incidence outcome increased with increasing tertiles of baseline proGRP (primary endpoint third tertile vs. the lowest tertile; hazard ratio 1.91; 95% confidence interval 1.60–2.28, P < 0.001). However, these associations were markedly attenuated and non‐significant in adjusted models. No interaction between baseline proGRP and the effect of darbepoetin alfa treatment was detected. Moreover, no significant association between changes in proGRP during 6 month follow‐up and outcome was observed. Conclusions Pro‐gastrin‐releasing peptide is increased in patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction and anaemia, in particular in patients with poor renal function. However, proGRP adds little as a prognostic marker on top of conventional HF risk factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thor Ueland
- Research Institute of Internal Medicine, Oslo University Hospital Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,K. G. Jebsen Thrombosis Research and Expertise Center, University of Tromsø, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Lars Gullestad
- Department of Cardiology, Oslo University Hospital Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.,Center for Heart Failure Research, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Lei Kou
- Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Pål Aukrust
- Research Institute of Internal Medicine, Oslo University Hospital Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.,Section of Clinical Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Oslo University Hospital Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.,K. G. Jebsen Inflammation Research Center, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,K. G. Jebsen Thrombosis Research and Expertise Center, University of Tromsø, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Inderjit S Anand
- VA Medical Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | | | - John J McMurray
- BHF Glasgow Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Dirk J van Veldhuisen
- University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - David J Warren
- Department of Medical Biochemistry, Oslo University Hospital Radiumhospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| | - Nils Bolstad
- Department of Medical Biochemistry, Oslo University Hospital Radiumhospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Broughton MN, Westgaard A, Paus E, Øijordsbakken M, Henanger KJ, Naume B, Bjøro T. Specific antibodies and sensitive immunoassays for the human epidermal growth factor receptors (HER2, HER3, and HER4). Tumour Biol 2017; 39:1010428317707436. [PMID: 28653892 DOI: 10.1177/1010428317707436] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
The use of trastuzumab in patients with breast cancer that overexpresses human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 has significantly improved treatment outcomes. However, a substantial proportion of this patient group still experiences progression of the disease after receiving the drug. Evaluation of the changes in expression of the human epidermal growth factor receptors could be of interest. Monoclonal antibodies against the extracellular domain of the human growth factor receptors, 2, 3, and 4, have been raised, and specific and sensitive immunoassays have been established. Sera from healthy individuals (Nordic Reference Interval Project and Database) were analyzed in the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 assay (N = 805) and the human epidermal growth factor receptor 3 and 4 assays (N = 114), and reference limits were calculated. In addition, sera from 208 individual patients with breast cancer were tested in all three assays. Finally, the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 assay was compared with a chemiluminescent immunoassay for serum human epidermal growth factor receptor 2/neu. Reference values were as follows: human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, <2.5 µg/L; human epidermal growth factor receptor 3, <2.8 µg/L; and human epidermal growth factor receptor 4, <1.8 µg/L. There were significant differences in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 and human epidermal growth factor receptor 3 serum levels between the patients with tissue human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive and tissue human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative ( p = 0.0026, p = 0.000011) tumors, but not in the serum levels of human epidermal growth factor receptor 4 ( p = 0.054). There was good agreement between the in-house human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 assay and the chemiluminescent immunoassay. Our new specific antibodies for all the three human epidermal growth factor receptors may prove valuable in the development of novel anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor targeted therapies with sensitive immunoassays for measuring serum levels of the respective targets and in monitoring established treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Arne Westgaard
- 2 Department of Oncology, Radiumhospitalet, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Elisabeth Paus
- 1 Department of Medical Biochemistry, Radiumhospitalet, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Miriam Øijordsbakken
- 1 Department of Medical Biochemistry, Radiumhospitalet, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Karoline J Henanger
- 1 Department of Medical Biochemistry, Radiumhospitalet, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Bjørn Naume
- 2 Department of Oncology, Radiumhospitalet, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,3 Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Trine Bjøro
- 1 Department of Medical Biochemistry, Radiumhospitalet, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,3 Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|