1
|
Lai Polo SH, Saravia-Butler AM, Boyko V, Dinh MT, Chen YC, Fogle H, Reinsch SS, Ray S, Chakravarty K, Marcu O, Chen RB, Costes SV, Galazka JM. RNAseq Analysis of Rodent Spaceflight Experiments Is Confounded by Sample Collection Techniques. iScience 2020; 23:101733. [PMID: 33376967 PMCID: PMC7756143 DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2020.101733] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2020] [Revised: 10/04/2020] [Accepted: 10/22/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
To understand the physiological changes that occur in response to spaceflight, mice are transported to the International Space Station (ISS) and housed for variable periods of time before euthanasia on-orbit or return to Earth. Sample collection under such difficult conditions introduces confounding factors that need to be identified and addressed. We found large changes in the transcriptome of mouse tissues dissected and preserved on-orbit compared with tissues from mice euthanized on-orbit, preserved, and dissected after return to Earth. Changes due to preservation method eclipsed those between flight and ground samples, making it difficult to identify spaceflight-specific changes. Follow-on experiments to interrogate the roles of euthanasia methods, tissue and carcass preservation protocols, and library preparation methods suggested that differences due to preservation protocols are exacerbated when coupled with polyA selection. This has important implications for the interpretation of existing datasets and the design of future experiments. Experimentation is necessary to understand how organisms respond to space Specialized protocols are used for preserving biological samples on the ISS RNAseq datasets are impacted by preservation protocols used on the ISS Impacts can be alleviated with improved carcass preservation protocols
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- San-Huei Lai Polo
- KBR, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 94035, USA.,NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 94035, USA
| | - Amanda M Saravia-Butler
- NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 94035, USA.,Logyx, LLC, Mountain View, CA 94043, USA
| | - Valery Boyko
- NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 94035, USA.,The Bionetics Corporation, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 94035, USA
| | - Marie T Dinh
- NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 94035, USA.,Logyx, LLC, Mountain View, CA 94043, USA
| | - Yi-Chun Chen
- KBR, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 94035, USA.,NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 94035, USA
| | - Homer Fogle
- NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 94035, USA.,The Bionetics Corporation, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 94035, USA
| | | | - Shayoni Ray
- NGM Biopharmaceuticals, South San Francisco, CA 94080, USA
| | | | - Oana Marcu
- Carl Sagan Center, SETI Institute, Mountain View, CA 94043, USA
| | - Rick B Chen
- KBR, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 94035, USA.,NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 94035, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Scott RT, Talburt ED, French AJ, Lopez D, Polo SHL, Boyko V, Dinh MT, Rask JC, Chakravarty K, Stewart H, Del Alto ME. Temporal RNA Integrity Analysis of Archived Spaceflight Biological Samples. FASEB J 2020. [DOI: 10.1096/fasebj.2020.34.s1.04628] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
|
3
|
Byker GL, Dinh MT, Gunaratnam NT, Robinson EA, Shehab TM, Malani AN. Management of Clostridium difficile Infection: Survey of Practices and Compliance with National Guidelines Among Primary Care Physicians. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2015; 30:397-9. [DOI: 10.1086/596200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
|
4
|
Dinh MT, Abad CL, Safdar N. Diagnostic accuracy of the physical examination and imaging tests for osteomyelitis underlying diabetic foot ulcers: meta-analysis. Clin Infect Dis 2008; 47:519-27. [PMID: 18611152 DOI: 10.1086/590011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 163] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Accurate diagnosis of osteomyelitis underlying diabetic foot ulcers is essential to optimize outcomes. We undertook a meta-analysis of the accuracy of diagnostic tests for osteomyelitis in diabetic patients with foot ulcers. Pooled sensitivity and specificity, the summary measure of accuracy (Q*), and diagnostic odds ratio were calculated. Exposed bone or probe-to-bone test had a sensitivity of 0.60 and a specificity of 0.91. Plain radiography had a sensitivity of 0.54 and a specificity of 0.68. MRI had a sensitivity of 0.90 and a specificity of 0.79. Bone scan was found to have a sensitivity of 0.81 and a specificity of 0.28. Leukocyte scan was found to have a sensitivity of 0.74 and a specificity of 0.68. The diagnostic odds ratios for clinical examination, radiography, MRI, bone scan, and leukocyte scan were 49.45, 2.84, 24.36, 2.10, and 10.07, respectively. The presence of exposed bone or a positive probe-to-bone test result is moderately predictive of osteomyelitis. MRI is the most accurate imaging test for diagnosis of osteomyelitis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie T Dinh
- Section of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison
| | | | | |
Collapse
|