Hypothermia in patients with cardiac arrest prior to ECMO-VA: Insight from the HYPO-ECMO trial

AIM

Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) has become a common intervention for patients with cardiogenic shock (CS), often complicated by cardiac arrest (CA). Moderate hypothermia (MH) has shown promise in mitigating ischemia-reperfusion injury following CA. The HYPO-ECMO trial aimed to compare the effect of MH versus normothermia in refractory CS rescued by VA-ECMO. The primary aim of this non-predefined post hoc study was to assess the treatment effect of MH in the subgroup of patients with cardiac arrest (CA) within the HYPO-ECMO trial. Additionally, we will evaluate the prognostic significance of CA in these patients.

METHODS

This post hoc analysis utilized data from the randomized HYPO-ECMO trial conducted across 20 French cardiac shock care centers between October 2016 and July 2019. Participants included intubated patients receiving VA-ECMO for CS for less than 6 hours, with 334 patients completing the trial. Patients were randomized to early MH (33-34°C) or normothermia (36-37°C) for 24 hours.

RESULTS

Of the 334 patients, 159 (48%) experienced preceding CA. Mortality in the CA group was 50.9% at 30 days and 59.1% at 180 days, compared to 42.3% and 51.4% in the no-CA group, respectively (adjusted risk difference [RD] at 30 days, 8.1% [-0.8 to 17.1%], p=0.074 and RD at 180 days 7.0% [-3.0 to 16.9%], p=0.17). MH was associated with a significant reduction in primary (RD -13.3% [-16.3 to -0.3%], p=0.031) and secondary outcomes in the CA group only (p<0.025 for all), with a significant interaction between MH and CA status for 180-day mortality [p=0.03].

CONCLUSIONS

This post hoc analysis suggests that MH shows potential for reducing mortality and composite endpoints in patients with cardiac arrest and refractory CS treated with VA-ECMO without an increased risk of severe bleeding or infection. Further research is needed to validate these findings and elucidate underlying mechanisms.

Profile of adverse drug reactions reported via the Continuum+ platform: Results from three-year regional follow-up

In 2017, the Continuum+ platform was launched to provide a monitoring solution to home-based cancer care patients: AKO@dom monitoring. This platform also offers the follow-up of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) via direct notification to regional centers of pharmacovigilance (RCPVs). According to previous studies, the AKO@dom monitoring has successfully maintained treatment at the maximum effective dosage, managing ADRs and patient satisfaction. However, on the pharmacovigilance side, opinions are more divided. Due to the launch of the AKO@dom-PICTO experimentation in December 2021, in which our RCPV takes part, and to provide more data on pharmacovigilance, we decided to conduct a descriptive analysis of cases reported to our RCPV via the Continuum+ platform between 2019 and 2022. During these three years, we analyzed 1070 events, corresponding to 37 patients. Patients were primarily women (74.8%) aged around seventy with breast cancer. The most used drugs were tyrosine kinase inhibitors: palbociclib (29.7%), axitinib (16.2%), and cabozantinib (13.2%). Patients had an average of 8 ADRs, including one serious and/or unexpected ADR. Although the Continuum+ platform makes it possible to considerably limit under-reporting in pharmacovigilance, it has shortcomings. The lack of medical elements and context in notifications is a massive problem for analyzing pharmacovigilance reports. Improved access to the platform's medical information for RCPVs and pharmacovigilance training for healthcare professionals would make Continuum+ a helpful tool in pharmacovigilance.