Opportunistic upper endoscopy during colonoscopy as a screening strategy for countries with intermediate gastric cancer risk

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Screening upper endoscopy can detect esophagogastric (OG) cancers early with improved outcomes. Recent cost-utility studies suggest that opportunistic upper endoscopy at the same setting of colonoscopy might be a useful strategy for screening of OG cancers, and it may be more acceptable to the patients due to cost-saving and convenience. We aim to study the diagnostic performance of this screening strategy in a country with intermediate gastric cancer risk.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study using a prospective endoscopy database from 2015 to 2017 was performed. Patients included were individuals age > 40 who underwent opportunistic upper endoscopy at the same setting of colonoscopy without any OG symptoms. Neoplastic OG lesions are defined as cancer and high-grade dysplasia. Pre-neoplastic lesions include Barrett's esophagus (BE), intestinal metaplasia (IM), and atrophic gastritis (AG).

RESULTS

The study population involved 1414 patients. Neoplastic OG lesions were detected in five patients (0.35%). Pre-neoplastic lesions were identified in 174 (12.3%) patients. IM was found in 146 (10.3%) patients with 21 (1.4%) having extensive IM. The number needed to scope to detect a neoplastic OG lesion is 282.8 with an estimated cost of USD$141 400 per lesion detected. On multivariate regression, age ≥ 60 (RR: 1.84, 95% CI: 1.29-2.63) and first-degree relatives with gastric cancer (RR: 1.64, 95% CI: 1.06-2.55) were independent risk factors for neoplastic or pre-neoplastic OG lesion.

CONCLUSION

For countries with intermediate gastric cancer risk, opportunistic upper endoscopy may be an alternative screening strategy in a selected patient population. Prospective trials are warranted to validate its performance.

Management of postreconstructive head and neck salivary fistulae: A review of current practices

BACKGROUND

Salivary fistulas are common complications after reconstructive head and neck surgery with significant morbidity. Yet, there are no established guidelines for their management.

METHOD

A comprehensive search of PubMed was performed from 01/01/2000 to 06/31/2019 to evaluate all treatment options in postreconstructive head and neck fistulas.

RESULTS

Nineteen articles with 132 patients were included. Thirty-nine of 132(30%) patients were treated with conventional wound care. All fistulas closed after 51.6±54.0 days with no refistulations. Thirty-eight of 132(29%) patients were treated with negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT). Thirty-eight of 40(95%) fistula closed after 14.7±12.0 days with no refistulations. The reduced healing time was statistically significant as compared to patients on conventional wound care (p < 0.001). Fifty-three of 132(40%) patients received surgical management. Forty-four of 53(83%) patients had complete fistula closure without postoperative complications. A pedicled flap was used in 60% of cases (n = 32).

CONCLUSION

Most salivary fistulas close with conservative management. NPWT potentially shortens fistula healing time while it achieves similar closure rates as conventional wound care. In the absence of contraindications, NPWT should be trialed on all salivary fistulas. Surgical management should be reserved for large, chronic, high-risk fistulas or those not responding to a trial of conservative treatment. Secondary reconstruction should be kept as simple as possible.