The Anatomic Position of the Sciatic Nerve During Percutaneous Retrograde Posterior Column Fixation Is Determined by Hip Position

OBJECTIVES

There are multiple established patient positions for placement of a percutaneous retrograde posterior column screw for fixation of acetabulum fractures. The sciatic nerve is at risk of injury during this procedure because it lies adjacent to the start point at the ischial tuberosity. The purpose of this study was to define how the position of the sciatic nerve, relative to the ischial tuberosity, changes regarding the patient's hip position.

METHODS

In a cohort of 11 healthy volunteers, ultrasound was used to measure the absolute distance between the ischial tuberosity and the sciatic nerve. Measurements were made with the hip and knee flexed to 90 degrees to simulate supine and lateral positioning and with the hip extended to simulate prone positioning. In both positions, the hip was kept in neutral abduction and neutral rotation.

RESULTS

The distance from the lateral border of the ischial tuberosity to the medial border of the sciatic nerve was greater in all subjects in the hip-flexed position versus the extended position. The mean distance was 17 mm (range, 14-27 mm) in the hip-extended position and 39 mm (range, 26-56 mm) in the hip-flexed position ( P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The sciatic nerve demonstrates marked excursion away from the ischial tuberosity when the hip is flexed compared with when it is extended. The safest patient position for percutaneous placement of a retrograde posterior column screw is lateral or supine with the hip flexed to 90 degrees.

Radiographic Outcomes of Titanium Augment vs Bone Graft in Lateral Column Lengthening for Adult-Acquired Flatfoot Deformity

Background

Lateral column lengthening (LCL) is a surgical procedure used to manage forefoot abduction and, in theory, also increases the longitudinal arch by plantarflexion of the first ray through tensioning the peroneus longus for patients with stage IIB adult acquired flatfoot deformity (AAFD). This procedure utilizes an opening wedge osteotomy of the calcaneus, which is then filled with autograft, allograft, or a porous metal wedge. The primary aim of this study was to compare the radiographic outcomes of these different bone substitutes following LCL for stage IIB AAFD.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective review of all patients who underwent LCL from October 2008 until October 2018. Preoperative weightbearing radiographs, initial postoperative radiographs, and 1-year weightbearing radiographs were reviewed. The following radiographic measurements were recorded: incongruency angle, talonavicular coverage angle (TNCA), talar-first metatarsal angle (T-1MT), and calcaneal pitch.

Results

A total of 44 patients were included in our study. The mean age of the cohort was 54 (range, 18-74). The study cohort was divided into 2 groups. There were 17 (38.7%) patients who received a titanium metal wedge and 27 (61.5%) that received autograft or allograft. Patients that underwent LCL with the autograft/allograft group were significantly older (59 vs 47 years old, P = .006). Patients who underwent LCL with a titanium wedge had a significantly higher preoperative talonavicular angle (32 vs 27 degrees, P = .013). There were no significant differences in postoperative TNCA, incongruency angle, or calcaneal pitch at 6 months or 1 year.

Conclusion

At 6 months and 1 year, no radiographic differences were found between autograft/allograft bone substitutes vs titanium wedge in LCL.

Level of Evidence

Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Patient Satisfaction Scores Are a Poor Metric of Orthopedic Care

Patient satisfaction scores are a popular metric used to evaluate orthopedic care. There is little consistency with how satisfaction is described in the orthopedic literature. Online physician reviews are a growing trend that directly and indirectly affect a surgeon's reputation. There is little correlation of higher satisfaction with improved surgical outcomes, so rating surgical care may be misguided and possibly dangerous. Patient satisfaction is an important part of the patient-centered care model, so rating systems should directly reflect quality. More research is needed to determine the relationship between patient satisfaction and the delivery of quality care. [Orthopedics. 2022;45(3):e127-e133.].

Venous thromboprophylaxis after total hip arthroplasty: aspirin, warfarin, enoxaparin, or factor Xa inhibitors?

INTRODUCTION

Debate over the ideal agent for venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis after total hip arthroplasty (THA) has led to changes in prescribing trends of commonly used agents. We investigate variation in utilisation and the differences in VTE incidence and bleeding risk in primary THA after administration of aspirin, warfarin, enoxaparin, or factor Xa inhibitors.

METHODS

8829 patients were age/sex matched from a large database of primary THAs performed between 2007 and 2016. Utilisation was calculated using compound annual growth rate. Incidence of postoperative deep venous thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE), bleeding-related complications, postoperative anaemia, and transfusion were identified at 2 weeks, 30 days, 6 weeks, and 90 days.

RESULTS

Aspirin use increased by 33%, enoxaparin by 7%, and factor Xa inhibitors by 31%. Warfarin use decreased by 1%. Factor Xa inhibitors (1.7%) and aspirin (1.7%) had the lowest incidence of DVT followed by enoxaparin (2.6%), and warfarin (3.7%) at 90 days. Factor Xa inhibitors (12%) and aspirin (12%) had the lowest incidence of blood transfusion followed by warfarin (15%) and enoxaparin (17%) at 90 days. There was no difference in incidence of blood transfusion or bleeding-related complications nor any detectable difference in symptomatic PE incidence.

CONCLUSIONS

The utilisation of aspirin and factor Xa inhibitors increased over time. Aspirin and factor Xa inhibitors provided improved DVT prophylaxis with lower rates of postoperative anaemia compared to enoxaparin and warfarin.

Financial Distress and Discussing the Cost of Total Joint Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Total joint arthroplasty is expensive. Out-of-pocket cost to patients undergoing elective total joint arthroplasty varies considerably depending on their insurance coverage but can range into the tens of thousands of dollars. The goal of this study is to evaluate the association between patient financial stress and interest in discussing costs associated with surgery.

METHODS

One hundred forty-one patients undergoing elective total hip and knee arthroplasty at a suburban academic medical center were enrolled and completed questionnaires about cost prior to surgery. Questions regarding if and when doctors should discuss the cost of healthcare with patients, evaluating if patients were affected by the cost of healthcare and to what extent, and financial security scores to assess current financial situation were included. The primary outcome was the answer to the question of whether a doctor should discuss cost with patients.

RESULTS

Financial stress was found to be associated with patient experience of hardship due to cost of care [P = .004], likelihood to turn down a test or treatment due to copayment [P = .029], to decline a test or treatment due to other costs [P = .003], to experience difficulty affording basic necessities [P = .008], and to have used up all or most of their savings to pay for surgery [P = .011]. In total, 84% of patients reported that they wanted to discuss surgical costs with their doctors, but 90% did not want to do so at every visit.

CONCLUSION

Total joint arthroplasty creates considerable out-of-pocket costs that may affect patient decisions. These findings help elucidate important patient concerns that orthopedic surgeons should account for when discussing elective arthroplasty with patients.