1
|
Kuznetsova V, Dominguez-Martin MA, Bao H, Gupta S, Sutter M, Kloz M, Rebarz M, Přeček M, Chen Y, Petzold CJ, Ralston CY, Kerfeld CA, Polívka T. Comparative ultrafast spectroscopy and structural analysis of OCP1 and OCP2 from Tolypothrix. Biochim Biophys Acta Bioenerg 2020; 1861:148120. [PMID: 31734194 PMCID: PMC6943196 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbabio.2019.148120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2019] [Revised: 10/09/2019] [Accepted: 11/04/2019] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
The orange carotenoid protein (OCP) is a structurally and functionally modular photoactive protein involved in cyanobacterial photoprotection. Recently, based on bioinformatic analysis and phylogenetic relationships, new families of OCP have been described, OCP2 and OCPx. The first characterization of the OCP2 showed both faster photoconversion and back-conversion, and lower fluorescence quenching of phycobilisomes relative to the well-characterized OCP1. Moreover, OCP2 is not regulated by the fluorescence recovery protein (FRP). In this work, we present a comprehensive study combining ultrafast spectroscopy and structural analysis to compare the photoactivation mechanisms of OCP1 and OCP2 from Tolypothrix PCC 7601. We show that despite significant differences in their functional characteristics, the spectroscopic properties of OCP1 and OCP2 are comparable. This indicates that the OCP functionality is not directly related to the spectroscopic properties of the bound carotenoid. In addition, the structural analysis by X-ray footprinting reveals that, overall, OCP1 and OCP2 have grossly the same photoactivation mechanism. However, the OCP2 is less reactive to radiolytic labeling, suggesting that the protein is less flexible than OCP1. This observation could explain fast photoconversion of OCP2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valentyna Kuznetsova
- Institute of Physics, Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, Branišovská 1760, 370 05 České Budějovice, Czech Republic
| | | | - Han Bao
- MSU-DOE Plant Research Laboratory, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA
| | - Sayan Gupta
- Molecular Biophysics and Integrated Bioimaging Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
| | - Markus Sutter
- MSU-DOE Plant Research Laboratory, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA; Molecular Biophysics and Integrated Bioimaging Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA; Environmental Genomics and Systems Biology Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
| | - Miroslav Kloz
- ELI Beamlines, Institute of Physics, Czech Academy of Sciences, Za Radnicí 835, 252 41 Dolní Břežany, Czech Republic
| | - Mateusz Rebarz
- ELI Beamlines, Institute of Physics, Czech Academy of Sciences, Za Radnicí 835, 252 41 Dolní Břežany, Czech Republic
| | - Martin Přeček
- ELI Beamlines, Institute of Physics, Czech Academy of Sciences, Za Radnicí 835, 252 41 Dolní Břežany, Czech Republic
| | - Yan Chen
- Environmental Genomics and Systems Biology Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
| | - Christopher J Petzold
- Environmental Genomics and Systems Biology Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
| | - Corie Y Ralston
- Molecular Biophysics and Integrated Bioimaging Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
| | - Cheryl A Kerfeld
- MSU-DOE Plant Research Laboratory, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA; Molecular Biophysics and Integrated Bioimaging Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA; Environmental Genomics and Systems Biology Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA; Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA
| | - Tomáš Polívka
- Institute of Physics, Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, Branišovská 1760, 370 05 České Budějovice, Czech Republic.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Šebelík V, Kloz M, Rebarz M, Přeček M, Kang EH, Choi TL, Christensen RL, Polívka T. Spectroscopy and excited state dynamics of nearly infinite polyenes. Phys Chem Chem Phys 2020; 22:17867-17879. [PMID: 32766621 DOI: 10.1039/d0cp02465a] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
Steady-state and transient absorption spectra with <50 fs time resolution were obtained for two conjugated polymers, both with ≈200 conjugated double bonds (N), constrained in planar, stable, polyene frameworks. Solutions of the polymers exhibit the same S2 → S1 → S* → S0 decay pathway observed for the N = 11-19 polyene oligomers and for zeaxanthin homologues with N = 11-23. Comparisons with the excited state dynamics of polydiactylene and a much longer, more disordered polyene polymer (poly(DEDPM)) show that the S2, S1, and S* lifetimes of the four polymers are almost identical. The S* signals in the polymers are assigned to absorption from vibrationally excited ground states. In spite of significant heterogeneities and variations in conjugation lengths in these long polyenes, their S0 → S2 absorptions are vibronically-resolved in room temperature solutions with electronic origins at ≈600 nm. The limiting wavelength for the S0 → S2 transitions is consistent with the persistence of bond length alternation in the electronic ground states and a HOMO-LUMO band gap in polyenes with N ≈ 200. The coincidence of the well-resolved S0 → S2 electronic origins and the convergence of the excited state lifetimes in the four polymers point to a common, "nearly infinite" polyene limit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Václav Šebelík
- Institute of Physics, Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, České Budjovice, Czech Republic.
| | - Miroslav Kloz
- ELI Beamlines, Institute of Physics, Czech Academy of Sciences, Za Radnicí 835, 252 41 Dolní BřeŽany, Czech Republic
| | - Mateusz Rebarz
- ELI Beamlines, Institute of Physics, Czech Academy of Sciences, Za Radnicí 835, 252 41 Dolní BřeŽany, Czech Republic
| | - Martin Přeček
- ELI Beamlines, Institute of Physics, Czech Academy of Sciences, Za Radnicí 835, 252 41 Dolní BřeŽany, Czech Republic
| | - Eun-Hye Kang
- Department of Chemistry, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea
| | - Tae-Lim Choi
- Department of Chemistry, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea
| | | | - Tomáš Polívka
- Institute of Physics, Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, České Budjovice, Czech Republic.
| |
Collapse
|