Improving strategic noise mapping of railway noise in Europe: Refining CNOSSOS-EU calculations using TWINS

The Environmental Noise Directive (2002/49/EC) requires all European Union Member States to produce strategic noise maps using a common assessment methodology: CNOSSOS-EU. The reliability of CNOSSOS-EU railway noise evaluation is dependent on the input vehicle and track transfer functions. The CNOSSOS-EU default database contains the currently available choices for these transfer functions. However, these available transfer functions are limited and of insufficient quality, resulting in large errors in noise level calculations. An approach is presented, introducing an established analytical railway rolling noise calculation technique (TWINS), to extract more reliable and specific transfer functions. A case study consisting of railway rolling noise mitigation measures is defined and used as the basis for extracting and testing these transfer functions. The extracted transfer functions reduce the average deviation between CNOSSOS-EU and reference calculations using TWINS from 6.1 dB(A) to 0.8 dB(A) in absolute sound power levels, and from 1.2 db(A) to 0.3 dB(A) in estimates of noise reduction potential for the defined mitigation measures. Application of this approach shows potential to improve the quality and depth of the existing CNOSSOS-EU default database. This may lead to more reliable estimations of railway noise in the strategic noise maps and the subsequent assessment of its harmful effects.

1458 Compliance of Abdominal X-ray Requesting with iRefer Guidelines in CDDFT

Aim

100% of Abdominal x-ray (AXR) requests in the trust should be compliant with iRefer guidelines. Therefore, with this audit we hope to evaluate the compliance of our hospitals with said guidelines.

Method

This audit was retrospective with AXRs taken between 23 – 29th of November 2020 being analysed for compliance creating our first loop. On the 1st of December we placed our intervention. This came in the form of educational posters in the four areas that request the majority of AXRs. Following this, a further weeks’ worth of AXRs were assessed for compliance between 2nd – 8th of December 2020.

Results

Between 23-29/11/20 there were 67 AXRs requested. Eight of these were excluded according to our exclusion criteria, leaving a total of 59 AXRs to be assessed. After reviewing the request cards for these AXRs, 17 were non-compliant (28.8%). Following the intervention, AXR requests were re-audited. Between 2-8/12/20 there were 69 AXRs requested. Six were excluded leaving a total of 63 AXRs to be assessed. After review, 22 were non-compliant (34.9%)

Conclusions

In both loops of this audit, the standard of 100% compliance with iRefer guidelines was not met. There was a high percentage of non-compliance in both loops with a rate of 28.8% and 34.9% respectively – a decrease in compliance. One possible reason to account for this was due the changeover of Junior Doctors within the trust on 2/12/20. Our interventional posters were placed in only half of the Trusts hospitals which may also account for the decrease in compliance.

Is the infant car seat challenge useful? A pilot study in a simulated moving vehicle

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends that preterm infants complete a predischarge 'car seat challenge' observation for cardiorespiratory compromise while in a car seat. This static challenge does not consider the more upright position in a car or the vibration of the seat when the car is moving. This pilot study was designed to assess the cardiorespiratory effects of vibration, mimicking the effect of being in a moving car, on preterm and term infants.

METHODS

A simulator was designed to reproduce vertical vibration similar to that in a rear-facing car seat at 30 mph. 19 healthy newborn term and 21 preterm infants, ready for hospital discharge, underwent cardiorespiratory measurements while lying flat in a cot (baseline), static in the seat (30°), simulator (40°) and during motion (vibration 40°).

RESULTS

Median test age was 13 days (range 1-65 days) and median weight was 2.5 kg (IQR: 2.1-3.1 kg).Compared with baseline observations, only the total number of desaturations was significantly increased when infants were placed at 30° (p=0.03). At 40°, or with vibration, respiratory and heart rates increased and oxygen saturation decreased significantly. Profound desaturations <85% significantly increased during motion, regardless of gestational age.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study to assess the effect of motion on infants seated in a car safety seat. Term and preterm infants showed significant signs of potentially adverse cardiorespiratory effects in the upright position at 40°, particularly with simulated motion, not identified in the standard challenge. A larger study is required to investigate the significance of these results.

Primary care referral practice, variability and socio-economic deprivation in colorectal cancer

AIM

The reasons for pre-hospital delay of the diagnosis of cancer are multifactorial, but include a physician-related component. Urgent cancer pathways and direct-to-test approaches have been implemented, but the emergency presentation of colorectal cancer (CRC) remains little changed over recent years. We examined the variability between primary care providers in referral patterns and its effect on outcome.

METHOD

A retrospective analysis was performed of a prospectively maintained database for 2009-2014 in a UK district hospital providing bowel cancer screening and tertiary rectal cancer services.

RESULTS

Of 1145 CRC patients, 937 (81.8%) were diagnosed with a symptomatic cancer; 229/937 (24.4%) initially presented as an emergency. Between 44 primary care providers, emergency presentation varied between 8.3% and 57.1%. Patients of providers with high levels of emergency presentations (HV) had more advanced cancers than those of providers with medium (MV) or low levels (LV) [103/253 (40.7%), 154/461 (33.4%), 65/223 (29.1%); P = 0.025] and a lower 3-year overall survival (50.2%, 57.8%, 65.6%; P = 0.013), but with no difference in case-mix or deprivation levels. In adjusted analysis, this difference remained significant (advanced disease, OR 1.663, P = 0.011; 3-year hazard ratio 1.479, P = 0.010; comparing HV with LV). Conversely, elective suspected cancer referrals were less often used amongst diagnosed cancers [LV 136/223 (61.0%), MV 228/461 (49.5%), HV 114/253 (45.1%), P < 0.001] with limited evidence for a more selective approach in the use of the 2-week rule amongst all 2-week rule referrals [LV 136/2508 (5.4%); MV 228/4239 (5.4%); HV 115/1526 (7.8%); positive cancer diagnosis, P = 0.005].

CONCLUSION

Significant variability in emergency presentation of CRC requires local audit and examination of the reasons for delay in diagnosis and targeted measures to improve performance in non-emergency referral pathways.