1
|
Grombirikova H, Bily V, Soucek P, Kramarek M, Hakl R, Ballonova L, Ravcukova B, Ricna D, Kozena K, Kratochvilova L, Sobotkova M, Zachova R, Kuklinek P, Kralickova P, Krcmova I, Hanzlikova J, Vachova M, Krystufkova O, Dankova E, Jesenak M, Novackova M, Svoboda M, Litzman J, Freiberger T. Systematic Approach Revealed SERPING1 Splicing-Affecting Variants to be Highly Represented in the Czech National HAE Cohort. J Clin Immunol 2023; 43:1974-1991. [PMID: 37620742 PMCID: PMC10661775 DOI: 10.1007/s10875-023-01565-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2023] [Accepted: 08/02/2023] [Indexed: 08/26/2023]
Abstract
Hereditary angioedema due to C1 inhibitor deficiency (C1-INH-HAE) is a rare and life-threatening condition characterized by recurrent localized edema. We conducted a systematic screening of SERPING1 defects in a cohort of 207 Czech patients from 85 families with C1-INH-HAE. Our workflow involved a combined strategy of sequencing extended to UTR and deep intronic regions, advanced in silico prediction tools, and mRNA-based functional assays. This approach allowed us to detect a causal variant in all families except one and to identify a total of 56 different variants, including 5 novel variants that are likely to be causal. We further investigated the functional impact of two splicing variants, namely c.550 + 3A > C and c.686-7C > G using minigene assays and RT-PCR mRNA analysis. Notably, our cohort showed a considerably higher proportion of detected splicing variants compared to other central European populations and the LOVD database. Moreover, our findings revealed a significant association between HAE type 1 missense variants and a delayed HAE onset when compared to null variants. We also observed a significant correlation between the presence of the SERPING1 variant c.-21 T > C in the trans position to causal variants and the frequency of attacks per year, disease onset, as well as Clinical severity score. Overall, our study provides new insights into the genetic landscape of C1-INH-HAE in the Czech population, including the identification of novel variants and a better understanding of genotype-phenotype correlations. Our findings also highlight the importance of comprehensive screening strategies and functional analyses in improving the C1-INH-HAE diagnosis and management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hana Grombirikova
- Centre for Cardiovascular Surgery and Transplantation, Brno, Czech Republic
- Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Viktor Bily
- Centre for Cardiovascular Surgery and Transplantation, Brno, Czech Republic
- Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Premysl Soucek
- Centre for Cardiovascular Surgery and Transplantation, Brno, Czech Republic
- Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Michal Kramarek
- Centre for Cardiovascular Surgery and Transplantation, Brno, Czech Republic
- Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
- Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Roman Hakl
- Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
- Department of Allergology and Clinical Immunology, St. Anne's University Hospital in Brno, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Lucie Ballonova
- Centre for Cardiovascular Surgery and Transplantation, Brno, Czech Republic
- Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Barbora Ravcukova
- Centre for Cardiovascular Surgery and Transplantation, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Dita Ricna
- Centre for Cardiovascular Surgery and Transplantation, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Karolina Kozena
- Centre for Cardiovascular Surgery and Transplantation, Brno, Czech Republic
- Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| | | | - Marta Sobotkova
- Department of Immunology, 2nd Medical School, Charles University and University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Radana Zachova
- Department of Immunology, 2nd Medical School, Charles University and University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Pavel Kuklinek
- Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Pavlina Kralickova
- Institute of Clinical Immunology and Allergy, University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Kralove, Charles University, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
| | - Irena Krcmova
- Institute of Clinical Immunology and Allergy, University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Kralove, Charles University, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
| | - Jana Hanzlikova
- Department of Immunology and Allergology, University Hospital Pilsen, Pilsen, Czech Republic
| | - Martina Vachova
- Department of Immunology and Allergology, University Hospital Pilsen, Pilsen, Czech Republic
- Department of Immunology and Allergology, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Pilsen, Czech Republic
| | - Olga Krystufkova
- Institute of Rheumatology and Department of Rheumatology, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | | | - Milos Jesenak
- National Centre for Hereditary Angioedema, Department of Pediatrics, Department of Pulmonology and Pathophysiology, Department of Clinical Immunology and Allergology, Comenius University in Bratislava, Jessenius Faculty of Medicine, University Teaching Hospital in Martin, Martin, Slovakia
| | | | - Michal Svoboda
- Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Ltd., Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Jiri Litzman
- Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
- Department of Allergology and Clinical Immunology, St. Anne's University Hospital in Brno, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Tomas Freiberger
- Centre for Cardiovascular Surgery and Transplantation, Brno, Czech Republic.
- Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Branny M, Osmancik P, Kala P, Poloczek M, Herman D, Neuzil P, Hala P, Taborsky M, Stasek J, Haman L, Chovancik J, Cervinka P, Holy J, Kovarnik T, Zemanek D, Havranek S, Vancura V, Peichl P, Tousek P, Hozman M, Lekesova V, Jarkovsky J, Novackova M, Benesova K, Widimsky P, Reddy VY. Nonprocedural bleeding after left atrial appendage closure versus direct oral anticoagulants: A subanalysis of the randomized PRAGUE-17 trial. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2023; 34:1885-1895. [PMID: 37529864 DOI: 10.1111/jce.16029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2022] [Revised: 05/07/2023] [Accepted: 07/24/2023] [Indexed: 08/03/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Observational studies have shown low bleeding rates in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) treated by left atrial appendage closure (LAAC); however, data from randomized studies are lacking. This study compared bleeding events among patients with AF treated by LAAC and nonvitamin K anticoagulants (NOAC). METHODS The Prague-17 trial was a prospective, multicenter, randomized trial that compared LAAC to NOAC in high-risk AF patients. The primary endpoint was a composite of a cardioembolic event, cardiovascular death, and major and clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding (CRNMB) defined according to the International Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis (ISTH). RESULTS The trial enrolled 402 patients (201 per arm), and the median follow-up was 3.5 (IQR 2.6-4.2) years. Bleeding occurred in 24 patients (29 events) and 32 patients (40 events) in the LAAC and NOAC groups, respectively. Six of the LAAC bleeding events were procedure/device-related. In the primary intention-to-treat analysis, LAAC was associated with similar rates of ISTH major or CRNMB (sHR 0.75, 95% CI 0.44-1.27, p = 0.28), but with a reduction in nonprocedural major or CRNMB (sHR 0.55, 95% CI 0.31-0.97, p = 0.039). This reduction for nonprocedural bleeding with LAAC was mainly driven by a reduced rate of CRNMB (sHR for major bleeding 0.69, 95% CI 0.34-1.39, p = .30; sHR for CRNMB 0.43, 95% CI 0.18-1.03, p = 0.059). History of bleeding was a predictor of bleeding during follow-up. Gastrointestinal bleeding was the most common bleeding site in both groups. CONCLUSION During the 4-year follow-up, LAAC was associated with less nonprocedural bleeding. The reduction is mainly driven by a decrease in CRNMB.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marian Branny
- Department of Cardiology, Cardiocenter, Hospital Podlesí a.s., Trinec, Czech Republic
- Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Faculty of Medicin, University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic
| | - Pavel Osmancik
- Department of Cardiology, Third Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Petr Kala
- Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, University Hospital Brno and Medical Faculty of Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Martin Poloczek
- Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, University Hospital Brno and Medical Faculty of Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Dalibor Herman
- Department of Cardiology, Third Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Petr Neuzil
- Department of Cardiology, Cardiocenter, Na Homolce Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Pavel Hala
- Department of Cardiology, Cardiocenter, Na Homolce Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Milos Taborsky
- Department of Cardiology, Cardiocenter, University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic
| | - Josef Stasek
- 1st Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Charles University Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Ludek Haman
- 1st Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Charles University Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Jan Chovancik
- Department of Cardiology, Cardiocenter, Hospital Podlesí a.s., Trinec, Czech Republic
| | - Pavel Cervinka
- Department of Cardiology, Krajská zdravotni a.s., Masaryk Hospital and UJEP, Usti nad Labem, Czech Republic
| | - Jiri Holy
- Department of Cardiology, Krajská zdravotni a.s., Masaryk Hospital and UJEP, Usti nad Labem, Czech Republic
| | - Tomas Kovarnik
- Cardiocenter, 2nd Internal Clinic-Cardiology and Angiology, General Faculty Hospital, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - David Zemanek
- Cardiocenter, 2nd Internal Clinic-Cardiology and Angiology, General Faculty Hospital, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Stepan Havranek
- Cardiocenter, 2nd Internal Clinic-Cardiology and Angiology, General Faculty Hospital, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Vlastimil Vancura
- Department of Cardiology, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine Pilsen, Pilsen, Czech Republic
| | - Petr Peichl
- Cardiocenter, Institute of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Petr Tousek
- Department of Cardiology, Third Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Marek Hozman
- Department of Cardiology, Third Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Veronika Lekesova
- Department of Cardiology, Cardiocenter, Na Homolce Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Jiri Jarkovsky
- Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Martina Novackova
- Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Klara Benesova
- Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Petr Widimsky
- Department of Cardiology, Third Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Vivek Y Reddy
- Department of Cardiology, Cardiocenter, Na Homolce Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Helmsley Electrophysiology Center, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Osmancik P, Herman D, Neuzil P, Hala P, Taborsky M, Kala P, Poloczek M, Stasek J, Haman L, Branny M, Chovancik J, Cervinka P, Holy J, Kovarnik T, Zemanek D, Havranek S, Vancura V, Peichl P, Tousek P, Lekesova V, Jarkovsky J, Novackova M, Benesova K, Widimsky P, Reddy VY. Left Atrial Appendage Closure versus Non-Warfarin Oral Anticoagulation in Atrial Fibrillation: 4-Year Outcomes of PRAGUE-17. J Am Coll Cardiol 2021; 79:1-14. [PMID: 34748929 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.10.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 94] [Impact Index Per Article: 31.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2021] [Revised: 10/05/2021] [Accepted: 10/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The PRAGUE-17 trial demonstrated that left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) was non-inferior to non-warfarin oral anticoagulants (NOAC) for preventing major neurological, cardiovascular or bleeding events in high-risk patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). OBJECTIVE To assess the pre-specified long-term (4-year) outcomes in PRAGUE-17. METHODS PRAGUE-17 was a randomized non-inferiority trial comparing percutaneous LAAC (Watchman or Amulet) with NOACs (95% apixaban) in non-valvular AF patients with a history of cardioembolism, clinically-relevant bleeding, or both CHA2DS2-VASc > 3 and HASBLED > 2. The primary endpoint was a composite of cardioembolic events (stroke, transient ischemic attack, or systemic embolism), cardiovascular death, clinically-relevant bleeding, or procedure/device-related complications (LAAC group only). The primary analysis was modified intention-to-treat (mITT). RESULTS We randomized 402 AF patients (201 per group, age 73.3±7.0 years, 65.7% male, CHA2DS2-VASc 4.7+1.5, HASBLED 3.1+0.9). After 3.5 years median follow-up (1,354 patients-years), LAAC was non-inferior to NOAC for the primary endpoint by mITT (subdistribution hazard ratio[sHR] 0.81, 95% CI 0.56-1.18; p=0.27; p for non-inferiority=0.006). For the components of the composite endpoint, the corresponding sHRs (and 95% CIs) were 0.68 (0.39-1.20; p=0.19) for cardiovascular death, 1.14 (0.56-2.30; p=0.72) for all-stroke/TIA, 0.75 (0.44-1.27; p=0.28) for clinically-relevant bleeding, and 0.55 (0.31-0.97; p=0.039) for non-procedural clinically-relevant bleeding. The primary endpoint outcomes were similar in the per-protocol [sHR 0.80 (95% CI 0.54-1.18), p=0.25] and on-treatment [sHR 0.82 (95% CI 0.56-1.20), p=0.30] analyses. CONCLUSION In long-term follow-up of PRAGUE-17, LAAC remains non-inferior to NOACs for preventing major cardiovascular, neurological or bleeding events. Furthermore, non-procedural bleeding was significantly reduced with LAAC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pavel Osmancik
- Cardiocenter, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Prague and University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague, Czech Republic.
| | - Dalibor Herman
- Cardiocenter, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Prague and University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Petr Neuzil
- Cardiocenter, Department of Cardiology, Na Homolce Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Pavel Hala
- Cardiocenter, Department of Cardiology, Na Homolce Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Milos Taborsky
- Cardiocenter, Dept. of Cardiology, University Hospital Olomouc, Czech Republic
| | - Petr Kala
- Clinic of Cardiology, Masaryk University and University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Martin Poloczek
- Clinic of Cardiology, Masaryk University and University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Josef Stasek
- 1(st) Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Charles University Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Ludek Haman
- 1(st) Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Charles University Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Marian Branny
- Department of Cardiology, Cardiocenter, Hospital Podlesí a.s., Trinec, Czech Republic
| | - Jan Chovancik
- Department of Cardiology, Cardiocenter, Hospital Podlesí a.s., Trinec, Czech Republic
| | - Pavel Cervinka
- Department of Cardiology, Krajská zdravotni a.s., Masaryk hospital and UJEP, Usti nad Labem, Czech Republic
| | - Jiri Holy
- Department of Cardiology, Krajská zdravotni a.s., Masaryk hospital and UJEP, Usti nad Labem, Czech Republic
| | - Tomas Kovarnik
- Cardiocenter, 2nd internal clinic - Cardiology and Angiology, Charles University, General Faculty Hospital, Prague Czech Republic
| | - David Zemanek
- Cardiocenter, 2nd internal clinic - Cardiology and Angiology, Charles University, General Faculty Hospital, Prague Czech Republic
| | - Stepan Havranek
- Cardiocenter, 2nd internal clinic - Cardiology and Angiology, Charles University, General Faculty Hospital, Prague Czech Republic
| | - Vlastimil Vancura
- Department of Cardiology, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine Pilsen, Pilsen, Czech Republic
| | - Petr Peichl
- Cardiocenter, Institute of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Petr Tousek
- Cardiocenter, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Prague and University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Veronika Lekesova
- Cardiocenter, Department of Cardiology, Na Homolce Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Jiri Jarkovsky
- Institute of Biostatistics and Analysis, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Martina Novackova
- Institute of Biostatistics and Analysis, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Klara Benesova
- Institute of Biostatistics and Analysis, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Petr Widimsky
- Cardiocenter, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Prague and University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Vivek Y Reddy
- Cardiocenter, Department of Cardiology, Na Homolce Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic; Helmsley Electrophysiology Center, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Herman D, Osmancik P, Neuzil P, Hala P, Lekesova V, Benesova K, Hozman M, Jarkovsky J, Novackova M, Widimsky P, Reddy VY. The effect of left atrial appendage closure on heart failure biomarkers: A PRAGUE-17 trial subanalysis. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2021; 32:2645-2654. [PMID: 34402135 DOI: 10.1111/jce.15206] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2021] [Revised: 05/27/2021] [Accepted: 07/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The randomized PRAGUE-17 trial demonstrated noninferiority of left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) to non-vitamin K anticoagulants (NOACs) for the prevention of major cardiovascular or cerebrovascular events. However, the left atrial appendage is an important source of natriuretic peptides and plays a role in left atrial reservoir function. Changes of heart failure (HF) biomarkers after LAAC compared to NOAC has not been studied. The aim of the study was to compare the changes in concentrations of HF biomarkers between LAAC and NOAC patients. METHODS Of 402 patients randomized in the PRAGUE-17 trial, biomarkers were analyzed in 144 patients (73 in the NOAC and 71 in the LAAC group). Both groups had similar baseline characteristics. Serum concentration of NT-proBNP, NT-proANP, Galectin-3, and GDF-15 were measured at baseline (before the procedure in the LAAC group), at the 6-month (and at 24-month for NT-proBNP) follow-up timepoint. RESULTS There were no significant differences in baseline, 6 month, and delta (δ = baseline - 6 month) concentrations of NT-proANP between the groups (NOAC: baseline 2.6 [0.5; 4.9], 6-month 3.1 [1.8; 4.8], p = .068; LAAC: baseline 3.3 [1.1; 4.6], 6-month 2.6 [0.9; 5.3], p = .51; p value for δ in concentrations between groups = 0.42). Similarly, there were no significant differences in baseline, 6, 24 months, and delta concentrations of NT-proBNP between the groups (NOAC: baseline 461.0 [113.5; 1342.0], 6 month 440.0 [120.5; 1291.5], 24 month 798 [274; 2236], p = .39; LAAC: baseline 421.0 [100.0; 1320.0], 6 month 601.0 [145.0; 1230.0], 24 month 855 [410; 1367], p = .28; p value for δ in concentrations between groups = 0.73 at 6 months, and 0.58 at 24 months). Finally, no significant differences were present in baseline, 6 month, and δ concentrations of Galectin-3 and GDF-15 between the two groups. CONCLUSION LAAC did not significantly influence the levels of HF biomarkers 6 months after the procedure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dalibor Herman
- Department of Cardiology, Third Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Charles University Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Pavel Osmancik
- Department of Cardiology, Third Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Charles University Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Petr Neuzil
- Cardiocenter, Department of Cardiology, Na Homolce Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Pavel Hala
- Cardiocenter, Department of Cardiology, Na Homolce Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Veronika Lekesova
- Cardiocenter, Department of Cardiology, Na Homolce Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Klara Benesova
- Department of Data Analysis, Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Marek Hozman
- Cardiocenter, Karlovy Vary Regional Hospital, Karlovy Vary, Czech Republic
| | - Jiri Jarkovsky
- Department of Data Analysis, Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Martina Novackova
- Department of Data Analysis, Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Petr Widimsky
- Department of Cardiology, Third Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Charles University Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Vivek Y Reddy
- Cardiocenter, Department of Cardiology, Na Homolce Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.,Department of Electrophysiology, Helmsley Electrophysiology Center, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Polednikova K, Tousek P, Kocka V, Kroupa J, Kozel M, Novackova M. P814Analysis of patients with tako-tsubo syndrome in terms of the triggering mechanism. Eur Heart J 2019. [DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz747.0413] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction
Tako-tsubo syndrome (TTS) might be caused by two different trigger mechanisms. There is very little data available on patient characteristics and prognosis regarding the trigger mechanisms.
Purpose
Comparison of patients with TTS in terms of different trigger factor – emotional stress vs. psychical stress caused by severe non-cardiac condition.
Method
Data were obtained from the Tako-tsubo registry of patients hospitalized in Cardiocenter University Hospital from 2013 to 2018, in total 86 patients were diagnosed with TTS. The patients were divided into 2 groups according to the triggering cause, that we thoroughly examined in each case. In the first group, there were patients with TTS triggered by emotional stress (such as death in the family or anxiety disorders) and in the second group there were patients whose TTS was caused primarily by non-cardiac conditions of various etiology, such as neurological, infectious or postoperative issues.
Results
Out of 86 patients, there were 20 (23,3%) patients excluded, for we weren't able to establish the triggering cause. In 26 (30,2%) patients, the trigger was psychological and 40 (46,5%) patients suffered from non-cardiac condition. According to the collected data there were no significant differences amongst basic demographic facts. Women represented the majority in both groups – 92% vs 95%, age of 70,6±0,8 vs 71,9±0,7 years (p=0,650). There were no significant differences in the hs-TnT 624ng/l ± 49,9 vs 610,2±17,3ng/l (p=0,959). There were significant differences discovered in the average NT-proBNP level – 2691±220,5pg/ml vs 10610±599pg/ml (p<0,05). The patients with non-cardiac conditions developed acute complications more frequently, especially a respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation 20% vs 3,8% (p<0,05). In total, 8 (9,3%) patients with TTS died, of whom all had a physical stress factor of p<0,05.
Conclusion
Physical stress in patients with severe non-cardiac conditions is a more frequent trigger for TTS than emotional stress. Patients with TTS induced by physical stress have a significantly worse prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Polednikova
- Faculty Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague, Czechia
| | - P Tousek
- Faculty Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague, Czechia
| | - V Kocka
- Faculty Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague, Czechia
| | - J Kroupa
- Faculty Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague, Czechia
| | - M Kozel
- Faculty Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague, Czechia
| | - M Novackova
- Faculty Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague, Czechia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Pastor Z, Chmel R, Novackova M, Krejcova L. PS-03-003 Surgical treatment of clitoral phimosis and its effects on female sexual functions. J Sex Med 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2019.03.058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
7
|
Jackova A, Novackova M, Pelletier C, Audeval C, Gueneau E, Haffar A, Petit E, Rehby L, Vilcek S. The extended genetic diversity of BVDV-1: typing of BVDV isolates from France. Vet Res Commun 2007; 32:7-11. [PMID: 17657577 DOI: 10.1007/s11259-007-9012-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2007] [Accepted: 06/27/2007] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- A Jackova
- University of Veterinary Medicine, Kosice, Slovakia
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|