Anticoagulation against portal vein thrombosis reduces mortality and liver cirrhosis-related complications: A propensity score-matched study

AIM

Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is one of the common complications of liver cirrhosis. Although anticoagulation contributes to thrombus resolution and is considered the first-choice treatment, its impact on patients' prognosis is still controversial. This study aimed to clarify the benefit of anticoagulation on mortality, liver function, and the incidence of liver cirrhosis-related complications in cirrhotic PVT patients.

METHODS

We conducted a multicenter retrospective review in which we included 78 eligible patients with PVT out of 439. After propensity score matching, 21 cirrhotic PVT patients were included in each one of the untreated control and anticoagulation groups.

RESULTS

Overall survival was significantly improved in the anticoagulation group compared with the control group (p = 0.041), along with PVT size reduction (53.3% vs. 108.2%, p = 0.009). At the time of CT follow-up, the anticoagulation group showed a lower ALBI score (p = 0.037) and its prevalence of massive ascites was significantly lower (p = 0.043) compared with the control group. The incidence of overt encephalopathy was also lower in the anticoagulation group (p = 0.041). The cumulative incidence of bleeding events did not differ significantly between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Anticoagulation improves the survival of patients with cirrhotic PVT. Preserved liver function and reduced risks of cirrhosis-related complications under the treatment may have contributed to a better prognosis. Given its efficacy and safety, anticoagulation is worth initiating in patients with PVT.

A case of refractory immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced colitis with Clostridioides difficile infection

The clinical symptoms of an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)‐induced colitis are similar to those of ulcerative colitis. ICI‐induced colitis, like ulcerative colitis, may be complicated by other colitis, such as Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI). A 72‐year‐old man was admitted because of watery and bloody stools 10 times a day after three courses of nivolumab (antibodies against programmed death 1) and ipilimumab (cytotoxic T‐lymphocyte‐associated antigen‐4) for stage IV renal cell carcinoma. Colonoscopy revealed erythema and multiple erosions in the colon. Histopathological examination of colonic mucosa revealed diffuse inflammatory cell infiltration and apoptosis. The initial cytomegalovirus antigen test and C. difficile detection assay results were negative. Based on these findings, we diagnosed the patient with ICI‐induced colitis and discontinued ICI therapy. The symptoms did not improve despite the administration of Prednisolone and infliximab. A repeat colonoscopy revealed a new appearance of pseudomembranes from the sigmoid colon to the rectum one month after the start of these treatments. At this point, the patient tested positive for C. difficile. With treatment with vancomycin for CDI, the abdominal symptoms gradually decreased. Nivolumab alone was cautiously restarted. However, no colitis recurrence and further tumor reduction were observed. Here, we report our experience of a case of refractory ICI‐induced colitis complicated by CDI. ICI‐induced colitis may be complicated by CDI and should be carefully treated with repeated CDI testing if refractory to treatment. We believe that our observation will provide helpful information for determining an appropriate treatment strategy for ICI‐induced colitis.

Experience of disruption of capsule endoscopy after prolonged retention

Capsule endoscopy is an effective tool for evaluating small bowel diseases. Capsule retention is a complication of capsule endoscopy, but capsule disruption after retention has not been thoroughly studied. Only a few cases of capsule disruption have been reported. We report a case of capsule disruption after prolonged retention. A 73-year-old woman underwent capsule endoscopy for the evaluation of anemia. One week later, capsule retention was observed on radiography. Capsule removal was advised, but she refused because she did not have any symptoms. After 20 months, computed tomography revealed disrupted capsule fragments. Capsule removal was strongly recommended, and the patient agreed. All disrupted capsule fragments were removed using double-balloon endoscopy without complications. Intestinal perforation had been prevented by removing the disrupted capsule before the battery fluid leaked into the intestinal tract. Capsule retention, documented by imaging, should be addressed by removing the retained capsule immediately before capsule disruption occurs.

Endoscopic Closure of an Acute Duodenal Perforation Occurring during Endoscopic Ultrasound Using Endoclips and Polyglycolic Acid Sheets with Fibrin Glue

Acute duodenal perforation during endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is a serious complication. The conventional endoscopic treatment for duodenal perforations such as endoscopic clipping is unsatisfactory; recently, the effectiveness of over-the-scope clipping (OTSC) has been reported. A 91-year-old woman was referred to our hospital with the chief complaint of jaundice. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography showed a 2-cm mass in the pancreatic head; we planned EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration. During exploration for a puncture route from the duodenal bulb using a linear echoendoscope under carbon dioxide insufflation, the duodenal lumen was suddenly filled with blood. A perforation <15 mm was identified in the superior duodenal horn. We attempted an endoscopic closure with multiple endoclips but could not completely close the perforation site. Strips of bioabsorbable polyglycolic acid (PGA) sheets were placed over the gaps between the endoclips with biopsy forceps and fixed in place with fibrin glue, completely covering the perforation site. Two days after the procedure, the perforation site had closed. Nine days later, endoscopic biliary stenting was performed. The patient was diagnosed with pancreatic cancer through bile cytology, and the optimal supportive care for her age was selected. Endoscopic tissue shielding with PGA sheets and fibrin glue is increasingly being reported for use during gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures. In this case, surgery was avoided due to successful endoscopic treatment using endoclips and PGA sheets with fibrin glue without OTSC. This method may be useful for repairing acute duodenal perforations during EUS and should therefore be known to pancreatobiliary endoscopists.

A case of cytomegalovirus esophagitis during topical steroid therapy for eosinophilic esophagitis

Systemic immune deficiency is a major cause of cytomegalovirus (CMV) esophagitis. We report a case of CMV esophagitis during topical steroid therapy of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) in a non-immunodeficient patient. An 85-year-old man with dysphagia was on a 6-year regimen of oral budesonide (1200 mcg daily) for EoE. He underwent right upper lobectomy and postoperative radiotherapy 25 years ago for lung squamous cell carcinoma. Esophageal cicatricial stenosis due to EoE or previous radiation therapy persisted. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy revealed ulcerating mucosa with a thick white coat originating from the fixed stenotic lesion to the oral side. Histopathological examinations revealed CMV esophagitis. All signs of CMV esophagitis rapidly disappeared after reducing the budesonide dose and initiating anti-viral treatment with ganciclovir and valganciclovir for 12 and 2 days, respectively. The patient continued topical budesonide 400 mcg daily after anti-viral therapy. The clinical course was uneventful and without CMV esophagitis recurrence. This suggests that topical steroid therapy, particularly the local stasis of steroids at stenotic lesions, may induce CMV esophagitis. This is the first report of CMV esophagitis complicating the local steroid therapy of EoE with a stenotic lesion. When EoE patients' clinical symptoms worsen with topical steroid therapy, CMV esophagitis should be considered.