|
1
|
Reibel I, Hauguel-Moreau M, Guedeney P, Hage G, Hammoudi N, Duthoit G, Zeitouni M, Lattuca B, Kernéis M, Collet JP, Silvain J, Montalescot G. Comparison of three echo-guidance techniques in percutaneous patent foramen ovale closure for stroke prevention: Conventional transoesophageal, microprobe transoesophageal and intracardiac echocardiography. Arch Cardiovasc Dis 2023:S1875-2136(23)00171-7. [PMID: 37838576 DOI: 10.1016/j.acvd.2023.08.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2023] [Revised: 08/22/2023] [Accepted: 08/23/2023] [Indexed: 10/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recent randomized trials have demonstrated a consistent reduction in recurrent stroke after percutaneous transcatheter patent foramen ovale closure versus medical therapy in patients with recent cryptogenic stroke. AIM To compare the safety and efficacy of intracardiac echocardiography-guided and microprobe transoesophageal echocardiography-guided patent foramen ovale closure under local anaesthesia with transoesophageal echocardiography-guided patent foramen ovale closure under general anaesthesia. METHODS This prospective observational single-centre study included 194 consecutive patients scheduled for patent foramen ovale closure for secondary prevention of stroke from February 2018 to December 2019. Patients were asked to choose between an intracardiac echocardiography-guided, microprobe transoesophageal echocardiography-guided or transoesophageal echocardiography-guided procedure. The primary endpoint was the rate of successful closure at 6 months, defined as correct positioning of the device without severe shunt on 6-month contrast echocardiography. RESULTS Successful closure was high and did not differ between groups: 97.8% (95% confidence interval 88.5-99.9%) in the intracardiac echocardiography-guided group versus 96.9% (95% confidence interval 83.8-99.9%) in the microprobe transoesophageal echocardiography-guided group and 99.1% (95% confidence interval 95.3-99.9%) in the transoesophageal echocardiography-guided group (P=0.63). Adverse events related to patent foramen ovale closure were low and did not differ between groups. CONCLUSION Our preliminary real-world experience suggests good efficacy and safety with intracardiac echocardiography and microprobe transoesophageal echocardiography guidance compared with conventional transoesophageal echocardiography guidance for percutaneous transcatheter patent foramen ovale closure in recurrent stroke prevention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iphigénie Reibel
- Institut de Cardiologie, ACTION Study Group, hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, AP-HP, Sorbonne université, Inserm UMRS_1166, 47-83, boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France
| | - Marie Hauguel-Moreau
- Institut de Cardiologie, ACTION Study Group, hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, AP-HP, Sorbonne université, Inserm UMRS_1166, 47-83, boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France
| | - Paul Guedeney
- Institut de Cardiologie, ACTION Study Group, hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, AP-HP, Sorbonne université, Inserm UMRS_1166, 47-83, boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France
| | - Georges Hage
- Institut de Cardiologie, ACTION Study Group, hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, AP-HP, Sorbonne université, Inserm UMRS_1166, 47-83, boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France
| | - Nadjib Hammoudi
- Institut de Cardiologie, ACTION Study Group, hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, AP-HP, Sorbonne université, Inserm UMRS_1166, 47-83, boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France
| | - Guillaume Duthoit
- Institut de Cardiologie, ACTION Study Group, hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, AP-HP, Sorbonne université, Inserm UMRS_1166, 47-83, boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France
| | - Michel Zeitouni
- Institut de Cardiologie, ACTION Study Group, hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, AP-HP, Sorbonne université, Inserm UMRS_1166, 47-83, boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France
| | - Benoit Lattuca
- Institut de Cardiologie, ACTION Study Group, hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, AP-HP, Sorbonne université, Inserm UMRS_1166, 47-83, boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France
| | - Mathieu Kernéis
- Institut de Cardiologie, ACTION Study Group, hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, AP-HP, Sorbonne université, Inserm UMRS_1166, 47-83, boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France
| | - Jean-Philippe Collet
- Institut de Cardiologie, ACTION Study Group, hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, AP-HP, Sorbonne université, Inserm UMRS_1166, 47-83, boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France
| | - Johanne Silvain
- Institut de Cardiologie, ACTION Study Group, hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, AP-HP, Sorbonne université, Inserm UMRS_1166, 47-83, boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France
| | - Gilles Montalescot
- Institut de Cardiologie, ACTION Study Group, hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, AP-HP, Sorbonne université, Inserm UMRS_1166, 47-83, boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|