Top Ten Tips Palliative Care Clinicians Should Know About Dignity-Conserving Practice

The acknowledgment and promotion of dignity is commonly viewed as the cornerstone of person-centered care. Although the preservation of dignity is often highlighted as a key tenet of palliative care provision, the concept of dignity and its implications for practice remain nebulous to many clinicians. Dignity in care encompasses a series of theories describing different forms of dignity, the factors that impact them, and strategies to encourage dignity-conserving care. Different modalities and validated instruments of dignity in care have been shown to lessen existential distress at the end of life and promote patient-clinician understanding. It is essential that palliative care clinicians be aware of the impacts of dignity-related distress, how it manifests, and common solutions that can easily be adapted, applied, and integrated into practice settings. Dignity-based constructs can be learned as a component of postgraduate or continuing education. Implemented as a routine component of palliative care, they can provide a means of enhancing patient-clinician relationships, reducing bias, and reinforcing patient agency across the span of serious illness. Palliative care clinicians-often engaging patients, families, and communities in times of serious illness and end of life-wield significant influence on whether dignity is intentionally integrated into the experience of health care delivery. Thus, dignity can be a tangible, actionable, and measurable palliative care goal and outcome. This article, written by a team of palliative care specialists and dignity researchers, offers 10 tips to facilitate the implementation of dignity-centered care in serious illness.

The Impact of Comprehensive Fetal Care on Mortality of Children With Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia when Delivery is Co-located in a Pediatric Hospital

BACKGROUND

We evaluated the impact of delivery at a comprehensive fetal care center co-located in a pediatric hospital on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) exposure and survivorship of children with CDH.

METHODS

This retrospective study includes maternal-fetal dyads with a prenatal diagnosis of isolated CDH who received any prenatal care at a single fetal center between February 2006 and March 2021. The principal variables included: (1) delivery setting (children born in the pediatric hospital ["inborn"] vs. children who were delivered elsewhere ["outborn"]), (2) exposure to ECMO (yes vs. no), and (3) survival-at-discharge from birth hospitalization (yes vs. no). Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate the association between delivery setting and ECMO cannulation, and whether delivery setting moderates the association between exposure to ECMO and survival-at-discharge.

RESULTS

Among 418 maternal-fetal dyads, 77.0% of children were inborn and 32.0% of children were exposed to ECMO during their index hospitalization. Inborn children had more severe prenatal prognostic indicators but had a 57% lower odds of extracorporeal than outborn children. In multivariable logistic regression, delivery setting moderated the association between exposure to ECMO and survival-at-discharge. Although there was no statistically significant difference in mortality between inborn and outborn children who were not exposed to ECMO, inborn children exposed to ECMO had a 6.86 (1.98, 23.74) increased odds of death and outborn children exposed to ECMO had a 17.71 (4.69, 66.87) increased odds of death when both were compared to non-cannulated outborn children.

CONCLUSIONS

Comprehensive fetal care with delivery co-located in a pediatric hospital was associated with decreased exposure to ECMO and a survivorship advantage among children with CDH who required extracorporeal support.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Addressing health equity in pediatric surgical care in the United States- Progress and challenges

There are notable inequities in health outcomes for children based on their social determinants of health (SDOH), including where they are born and live, their primary language, their race and ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and more. These health inequities are not restricted to resource limited settings; here we highlight three broad topics that are relevant to pediatric surgeons in the United States (US): access to care and disparities, and examples of inequities in firearm-related injuries and appendicitis. Most of our patients will at some point require operative interventions, yet there can be significant challenges in accessing this care and navigating our health systems, particularly around complex perioperative care. There are significant opportunities to improve equitable care by helping patients navigate our health systems and connecting them with additional resources, including screening for primary care services. Firearm-related injuries are now the leading cause of death in children in the US, with significant associated morbidity for non-fatal injuries. There are notable inequities in the risk of injury and types of injuries experienced by children based on their SDOH. Appendicitis is one of the most common pathologies managed by pediatric surgeons, with similar inequities in the rates of perforated appendicitis based on a child's SDOH. For both issues, addressing the inequities our patients experience requires moving upstream and working towards prevention. Key opportunities include better research and data to understand the drivers for observed inequities, multidisciplinary collaboration, community engagement, and public health advocacy among others. As a profession, we have a responsibility to work to address the health inequities our patients experience.

Non-English Primary Language: A Growing Population's Access to Cholecystectomy

OBJECTIVE

To examine access to cholecystectomy and postoperative outcomes among non-English primary-speaking patients.

BACKGROUND

The population of U.S. residents with limited English proficiency is growing. Language affects health literacy and is a well-recognized barrier to health care in the United States of America. Historically marginalized communities are at greater risk of requiring emergent gallbladder operations. However, little is known about how primary language affects surgical access and outcomes of common surgical procedures, such as cholecystectomy.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adult patients after receipt of cholecystectomy in Michigan, Maryland, and New Jersey utilizing the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project State Inpatient Database and State Ambulatory Surgery and Services Database (2016-2018). Patients were classified by primary spoken language: English or non-English. The primary outcome was admission type. Secondary outcomes included operative setting, operative approach, in-hospital mortality, postoperative complications, and length of stay. Multivariable logistics and Poisson regression were used to examine outcomes.

RESULTS

Among 122,013 patients who underwent cholecystectomy, 91.6% were primarily English speaking and 8.4% were non-English primary language speaking. Primary non-English speaking patients had a higher likelihood of emergent/urgent admissions (odds ratio: 1.22, 95% CI: 1.04-1.44, P = 0.015) and a lower likelihood of having an outpatient operation (odds ratio: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.70-0.91, P = 0.0008). There was no difference in the use of a minimally invasive approach or postoperative outcomes based on the primary language spoken.

CONCLUSIONS

Non-English primary language speakers were more likely to access cholecystectomy through the emergency department and less likely to receive outpatient cholecystectomy. Barriers to elective surgical presentation for this growing patient population need to be further studied.

Birth Admission Length-of-Stay and Hospital Readmission in Children With Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to identify factors associated with prolonged birth admission length of stay (LOS) and to evaluate the association between these characteristics and readmission in the year following discharge for children with congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH).

METHODS

This was a single-center retrospective cohort study of children with isolated CDH born in the Special Delivery Unit and admitted to the Newborn/Infant Intensive Care Unit at Children's Hospital of Philadelphia from April 2008 to August 2019. Birth admission hospitalization was categorized into 3 groups (≤35, 36-75, and >76 days) based on the data distribution. Participant factors included gestational age (days), side of CDH (right/left), liver position (up/down), CDH repair technique (open/minimally invasive), exposure to extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, lung-to-head circumference ratio, and feeding tube at discharge. Chi-squared, t-tests and analysis of variance were used to examine bivariable associations between participant characteristics, birth admission LOS and readmission in the year following initial hospital discharge. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate factors associated with readmission.

RESULTS

Children hospitalized ≥76 days at birth had 4.33 (95% CI: 1.2, 15.2) higher odds of readmission than those admitted for ≤35 days. Children with a non-operative feeding tube at discharge had 4.12 (895% CI: 1.6, 10.5) higher odds of readmission when compared to those with no feeding tube at discharge.

CONCLUSIONS

Longer birth hospitalization and non-operative feeding tube are associated with increased readmissions in the year after discharge.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Incorporation and Utilization of an Additional Needs Screener by Surgical Trainees for Comprehensive Care of Underserved and Underinsured Surgical Patients

OBJECTIVE

Comprehensive, socially-minded healthcare has historically been delivered in the primary care setting. For underserved patient populations, however, a surgical care episode may serve as the health care access point. To maximize patient wellbeing during the perioperative period, our surgical center developed the Additional Needs Screener (ANS). Operationalized into practice by GME and UME trainees, this tool screens surgical patients across 3 domains (social, emotional, and immigration needs) and connects patients to partner organizations if appropriate. This study describes the pilot utilization of the ANS among underserved and underinsured surgical patients.

DESIGN

Clinical quality improvement and retrospective cohort study of patients completing the ANS from implementation in September 2021 to September 2022.

SETTING

The Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, PA-a tertiary care center.

PARTICIPANTS

One hundred and 10 underinsured and/or underserved patients completed at least 1 ANS domain.

RESULTS

Patients were majority female (55F, 53M, 2 other) and Hispanic/Latinx (72%) with a median age of 38 (IQR = 34-48). Most patients spoke a primary language other than English (77%), and nearly all were either uninsured (82%) or received emergency medical assistance or Medicaid (14%) at referral. Patients demonstrated significant needs; 39% endorsed difficulty affording housing, 32% endorsed difficulty paying for food, 29% endorsed experiencing current life-interfering distress, and 75% had undocumented immigration status. Ultimately, 57% of screened patients accepted referrals to our needs response teams.

CONCLUSIONS

Underserved and underinsured patients presenting for surgical care face significant challenges relating to social, emotional, and immigration needs. Through adoption of the ANS, trainees gained competency identifying and addressing these barriers in the perioperative period. Future works will focus on categorizing referral outcomes, developing interventions to increase patient trust, and improving screener dissemination.

Introducing Surgical Equity into Contemporary Medical Education: Results From Operation Equity, a Pilot Curriculum

OBJECTIVE

To date, education about health equity for early-stage healthcare trainees is largely situated outside of surgical disciplines. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a surgical equity curriculum offered to a voluntary group of medical and graduate students.

DESIGN

Mixed-methods cohort study from January to June 2021. Pre- and post-course surveys measured domains of attitudes, self-reported confidence, and knowledge via 5-point Likert scale and multiple-choice questions. Paired t tests were used to analyze quantitative responses. Qualitative responses were studied via iterative thematic analysis.

SETTING

At the University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia, PA which provides tertiary level, institutional care, 10, interdisciplinary 1.5-hour sessions were held over 1 semester, teaching surgical equity topics that spanned the peri-operative continuum.

PARTICIPANTS

Twenty-four medical and graduate students from across the University of Pennsylvania enrolled. Twenty completed both surveys.

RESULTS

From pre- to post-course, students improved across all domains. Students improved in their self-rated ability to identify strategies to talk about sensitive health topics with patients (pre: 20%, post: 90%) and identify strategies to address healthcare disparities in surgery (pre: 10%, post: 90%). Qualitatively, from pre- to post-course, more students could articulate the role of bias and identify opportunities for surgeons to engage in surgical equity. The course strengthened any pre-existing interest in surgical equity, and for 1 student, created interest in a surgical career where it had not previously existed. Many also expressed greater resolve to provide patient-centric care.

CONCLUSIONS

Formal curricula can improve students' ability to advocate for surgical equity. A similar framework may fill a need for medical students interested in health equity and surgical careers at other institutions.

"What do I need to know about you?": the Patient Dignity Question, age, and proximity to death among patients with cancer

PURPOSE

The Patient Dignity Question (PDQ), "What do I need to know about you as a person to give you the best care possible?" is a validated instrument designed to assess patient priorities and stressors. Administration of the PDQ has been demonstrated to improve patient-provider relationships. The PDQ has been evaluated in multiple settings, but never as a standard component of palliative care consultation. The primary objectives of this study were to determine the feasibility of PDQ screening in palliative care consultation and to characterize responses. The secondary objective was to determine patient and disease factors associated with PDQ response among patients diagnosed with cancer.

METHODS

PDQ responses were collected from 2015 to 2017, and patient survival data collected through 2018. A codebook was developed to categorize responses using literature review and template analysis; coding was performed until thematic saturation was achieved. We descriptively analyzed thematic distribution among responders and performed multivariable multinomial regression to determine the association between patient characteristics and PDQ response.

RESULTS

Response to the PDQ was documented in 2053/5002 consultations (41.1%); 1877 patient responses were included in final analysis. A total of 544 (29.5%) patients referenced illness-related concerns, 879 (46.8%) shared personal insights, and 283 (15.1%) cited interpersonal relationships. Younger patients frequently reported illness-related concerns; older respondents (age > 65) often responded with insights into their identity. Patients' responses evaluated less than 1 year before death were more likely to focus upon identity and interpersonal relationships than illness-related concerns.

CONCLUSION

The PDQ can be used as a means of eliciting values among patients with cancer. Variations in response pattern suggest that approaches to distress may be tailored to age and proximity to death.

The Center for Surgical Health: A Compassion-Driven Urban Surgical Mission

We are the Center for Surgical Health (CSH), an academic community partnership that supports, educates, and advocates for vulnerable Philadelphians with surgical diseases, founded in 2016 by Dr. Jon B. Morris, a leader in surgical education and a general surgeon at the University of Pennsylvania, and Dr. Alan Herbst, a current third-year Penn general surgery resident. At the time, Dr. Morris, raised in a Reform Jewish household, had been participating in an RCIA Program to convert to Catholicism. The mission of providing surgery to uninsured patients, primarily undocumented individuals, by helping them obtain insurance and see Penn providers was seen by Dr. Morris as a form of Catholic charity, which he has continued to remain dedicated to as his faith in Jesus Christ has deepened. Dr. Herbst, now Associate Director of Clinics for the CSH, recalls working with Dr. Morris as a sub-intern during his conversion, beginning with passion and a neon poster board inviting people to "See the Surgeon." Since that time, the CSH has grown from an organization with 10 volunteers, called "personal patient navigators," who provide insurance support and advocacy at every step of the perioperative continuum, to one with over 50, who have now seen 156 patients and assisted in providing 49 needed procedures. Much of this growth has been brought about through the dedication and vision of Dr. Matthew Goldshore, the Deputy Director of the CSH and a fifth-year Penn general surgery resident, as well as Dr. Carrie Z. Morales, Associate Deputy Director of the CSH and a recent Perelman School of Medicine graduate. Through their leadership, and the talent and commitment of other members of the CSH board, overseen by Director Dr. Morris, the CSH now has policy and research divisions, a surgical equity curriculum, and continues to develop new ways of providing better care.

Adverse respiratory symptoms and environmental exposures among children and adolescents following Hurricane Katrina

OBJECTIVES

Children and adolescents are especially vulnerable to environmental exposures and their respiratory effects. Following Hurricane Katrina in 2005, residents experienced multiple adverse environmental exposures. We characterized the association between upper respiratory symptoms (URS) and lower respiratory symptoms (LRS) and environmental exposures among children and adolescents affected by Hurricane Katrina.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional study following the return of the population to New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina (October 2005 and February 2006) among a convenience sample of children and adolescents attending New Orleans health facilities. We used uni-, bi-, and multivariable analyses to describe participants, exposures, and associations with URS/LRS.

RESULTS

Of 1,243 participants, 47% were Caucasian, 50% were male, and 72% were younger than 11 years of age. Multiple environmental exposures were identified during and after the storm and at current residences: roof/glass/storm damage (50%), outside mold (22%), dust (18%), and flood damage (15%). Self-reported URS and LRS (76% and 36%, respectively) were higher after the hurricane than before the hurricane (22% and 9%, respectively, p<0.0001). Roof/glass/storm damage at home was associated with URS (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 1.59, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.15, 2.21) and LRS (AOR=1.35, 95% CI 1.01, 1.80), while mold growth at home was associated with LRS (AOR=1.47, 95% CI 1.02, 2.12).

CONCLUSIONS

Children and adolescents affected by Hurricane Katrina experienced environmental exposures associated with increased prevalence of reported URS and LRS. Additional research is needed to investigate the long-term health impacts of Hurricane Katrina.