1
|
Baldacchini F, Bucchi L, Giuliani O, Mancini S, Ravaioli A, Vattiato R, Zamagni F, Giorgi Rossi P, Mangone L, Campari C, Sassatelli R, Trande P, Esposito P, Rossi F, Carrozzi G, Triossi O, Fabbri C, Strocchi E, Giovanardi M, Canuti D, Sassoli de Bianchi P, Ferretti S, Falcini F. Effects of Attendance to an Organized Fecal Immunochemical Test Screening Program on the Risk of Colorectal Cancer: An Observational Cohort Study. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2022; 20:2373-2382. [PMID: 35144023 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2022.01.053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2021] [Revised: 01/26/2022] [Accepted: 01/26/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS This cohort study compared colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence and mortality between people who participated in an Italian regional biennial fecal immunochemical test (FIT) screening program and people who did not. METHODS The program started in 2005. The target population included over 1,000,000 people aged 50 to 69 years. The FIT was a one-sample OC-Sensor (Eiken Chemical Co, Tokyo, Japan) (cutoff, ≥20 μg hemoglobin/g feces). The average annual response rate to invitation was 51.4%. The records of people invited up to June 2016 were extracted from the screening data warehouse. Attenders were subjects who responded to the first 2 invitations or to the single invitation sent them before they became ineligible. Non-attenders were subjects who did not respond to any of these invitations. The records were linked with the regional CRC registry. People registered up to December 2016 were identified. Self-selection-adjusted incidence rate ratios (IRRs) and incidence-based CRC mortality rate ratios (MRRs) for attenders to non-attenders, with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), were calculated. RESULTS The cohort generated 2,622,131 man-years and 2,887,845 woman-years at risk with 4490 and 3309 CRC cases, respectively. The cohort of attenders was associated with an IRR of 0.65 (95% CI, 0.61-0.69) for men, 0.75 (95% CI, 0.70-0.80) for women and 0.69 (95% CI, 0.66-0.72) for both sexes combined. The self-selection-adjusted IRR was 0.67 (95% CI, 0.62-0.72) for men and 0.79 (95% CI, 0.72-0.88) for women. The IRR for stage I, II, III, and IV CRC was 1.35 (95% CI, 1.20-1.50), 0.61 (95% CI, 0.53-0.69), 0.60 (95% CI, 0.53-0.68) and 0.28 (95% CI, 0.24-0.32) for men and 1.64 (95% CI, 1.43-1.89), 0.60 (95% CI, 0.52-0.69), 0.73 (95% CI, 0.63-0.85) and 0.35 (95% CI, 0.30-0.42) for women. The overall incidence-based CRC MRR was 0.32 (95% CI, 0.28-0.37) for men, 0.40 (95% CI, 0.34-0.47) for women and 0.35 (95% CI, 0.31-0.39) for both sexes combined. The adjusted MRR was 0.35 (95% CI, 0.29-0.41) for men and 0.46 (95% CI, 0.37-0.58) for women. CONCLUSIONS Attendance to a FIT screening program is associated with a CRC incidence reduction of 33% among men and 21% among women, and a CRC mortality reduction of 65% and 54%, respectively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Flavia Baldacchini
- Romagna Cancer Registry, Romagna Cancer Institute, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) "Dino Amadori", Meldola, Forlì, Italy
| | - Lauro Bucchi
- Romagna Cancer Registry, Romagna Cancer Institute, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) "Dino Amadori", Meldola, Forlì, Italy.
| | - Orietta Giuliani
- Romagna Cancer Registry, Romagna Cancer Institute, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) "Dino Amadori", Meldola, Forlì, Italy
| | - Silvia Mancini
- Romagna Cancer Registry, Romagna Cancer Institute, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) "Dino Amadori", Meldola, Forlì, Italy
| | - Alessandra Ravaioli
- Romagna Cancer Registry, Romagna Cancer Institute, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) "Dino Amadori", Meldola, Forlì, Italy
| | - Rosa Vattiato
- Romagna Cancer Registry, Romagna Cancer Institute, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) "Dino Amadori", Meldola, Forlì, Italy
| | - Federica Zamagni
- Romagna Cancer Registry, Romagna Cancer Institute, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) "Dino Amadori", Meldola, Forlì, Italy
| | - Paolo Giorgi Rossi
- Epidemiology Unit, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale - IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Lucia Mangone
- Epidemiology Unit, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale - IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Cinzia Campari
- Screening Coordinating Centre, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale - IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Romano Sassatelli
- Unit of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale - IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Paolo Trande
- Struttura Semplice Dipartimentale Screening del Colon-Retto, AUSL di Modena, Modena, Italy
| | | | - Federica Rossi
- Cancer Screening Unit, Public Health Department, AUSL Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Giuliano Carrozzi
- Modena Cancer Registry, Public Health Department, AUSL Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Omero Triossi
- Gastroenterology Unit, Local Health Authority, Santa Maria delle Croci Hospital, Ravenna, Italy
| | - Carlo Fabbri
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Forlì and Cesena Hospitals, AUSL Romagna, Forlì, Italy
| | - Enrico Strocchi
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Local Health Authority, Cesena, Italy
| | - Mauro Giovanardi
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Local Health Authority, Rimini, Italy
| | - Debora Canuti
- Department of Health, Regional Administration, Emilia-Romagna Region, Bologna, Italy
| | | | - Stefano Ferretti
- University of Ferrara and Local Health Authority, Ferrara, Italy
| | - Fabio Falcini
- Romagna Cancer Registry, Romagna Cancer Institute, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) "Dino Amadori", Meldola, Forlì, Italy; Cancer Prevention Unit, Local Health Authority, Forlì, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mancini S, Bucchi L, Giuliani O, Ravaioli A, Vattiato R, Baldacchini F, Ferretti S, Sassoli de Bianchi P, Mezzetti F, Triossi O, Serafini M, Ricci E, Palazzi M, Imolesi C, Giovanardi M, Canuti D, Voci C, Altini M, Falcini F. Proportional incidence of interval colorectal cancer in a large population-based faecal immunochemical test screening programme. Dig Liver Dis 2020; 52:452-456. [PMID: 32165075 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2020.02.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2019] [Revised: 01/23/2020] [Accepted: 02/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening recommend that interval cancer rate be expressed as a proportion of background incidence rate. AIM To determine the crude and adjusted proportional incidence of interval CRC in an Italian regional two-yearly faecal immunochemical test (FIT) screening programme. METHODS The programme (year of implementation, 2005) is targeted at over 1,000,000 people aged 50-69 years. The test is a one-sample OC-Sensor (Eiken Chemical Co., Tokyo, Japan). The study covered one-third of the regional area. Excerpts of 434,295 eligible negative FIT records dated 2005-2012 from 193,193 subjects were retrieved from the regional CRC screening data warehouse. By 31 December 2013, the cohort accumulated 198,302 man-years and 235,370 woman-years. Interval CRCs were identified by record-linkage with the local population-based cancer registry. Their number was divided by the expected number, estimated with age-period-cohort models, to obtain the proportional incidence. RESULTS The proportional incidence of interval CRC for men and women was, respectively, 0.06 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.04-0.09) and 0.17 (95% CI, 0.13-0.23) in the first interval year, and 0.21 (95% CI, 0.16-0.26) and 0.28 (95% CI, 0.22-0.36) in the second year. CONCLUSIONS The results were acceptable and in line with previous studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Silvia Mancini
- Romagna Cancer Registry, Romagna Cancer Institute, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori, IRST, IRCCS, Meldola, Italy
| | - Lauro Bucchi
- Romagna Cancer Registry, Romagna Cancer Institute, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori, IRST, IRCCS, Meldola, Italy.
| | - Orietta Giuliani
- Romagna Cancer Registry, Romagna Cancer Institute, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori, IRST, IRCCS, Meldola, Italy
| | - Alessandra Ravaioli
- Romagna Cancer Registry, Romagna Cancer Institute, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori, IRST, IRCCS, Meldola, Italy
| | - Rosa Vattiato
- Romagna Cancer Registry, Romagna Cancer Institute, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori, IRST, IRCCS, Meldola, Italy
| | - Flavia Baldacchini
- Romagna Cancer Registry, Romagna Cancer Institute, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori, IRST, IRCCS, Meldola, Italy
| | - Stefano Ferretti
- University of Ferrara and Local Health Authority, Ferrara, Italy
| | | | - Francesca Mezzetti
- Department of Health, Emilia-Romagna Regional Administration, Bologna, Italy
| | - Omero Triossi
- Cancer Screening Unit, Local Health Authority, Ravenna, Italy
| | - Monica Serafini
- Cancer Screening Unit, Local Health Authority, Ravenna, Italy
| | - Enrico Ricci
- Department of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, Local Health Authority, Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, Forlì, Italy
| | - Mauro Palazzi
- Cancer Screening Unit, Local Health Authority, Cesena, Italy
| | - Claudia Imolesi
- Cancer Screening Unit, Local Health Authority, Cesena, Italy
| | | | - Debora Canuti
- Cancer Screening Unit, Local Health Authority, Rimini, Italy
| | - Claudio Voci
- Servizio ICT, Tecnologie e Strutture Sanitarie, Department of Health, Emilia-Romagna Regional Administration, Bologna, Italy
| | - Mattia Altini
- Healthcare Administration, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori, IRST, IRCCS, Meldola, Italy
| | - Fabio Falcini
- Romagna Cancer Registry, Romagna Cancer Institute, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori, IRST, IRCCS, Meldola, Italy; Cancer Prevention Unit, Local Health Authority, Forlì, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Carretta A, Ciriaco P, Melloni G, Bandiera A, Libretti L, Puglisi A, Giovanardi M, Zannini P. Surgical treatment of multiple primary adenocarcinomas of the lung. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2009; 57:30-4. [PMID: 19169994 DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1038989] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The incidence of lung adenocarcinomas has steadily increased over the last decades. The aim of this study was to assess the results of surgical treatment of multiple primary adenocarcinomas of the lung (MPAL) analyzing the radiological and histological features. METHODS From 1988 to 2005, 26 patients underwent surgical treatment for MPAL at our department, for a total of 52 tumors. Three patients had synchronous and 23 had metachronous tumors. RESULTS Thirty-seven tumors were classified as solid, two as ground-glass opacities (GGO) and 13 as mixed solid/GGO tumors on the basis of CT scan evaluation. Histology revealed 26 adenocarcinomas, five adenocarcinomas with a bronchioloalveolar (BAC) pattern and 21 BAC. There was no postoperative mortality. Five-year survival of patients with synchronous tumors was 66 %. Survival of patients with metachronous tumors was 95 % and 70 % from the first and second operation. Patients with stage II and III a tumors had significantly reduced survival rates ( P < 0.05). Survival was 60 % after lobectomy and 78 % after wedge resection. CONCLUSIONS Surgical treatment of MPAL is associated with favorable results. Sublobar resections, when technically feasible, provide adequate oncological management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Carretta
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|