MRI compatibility study of a prototype radiofrequency penetrable oval PET insert at 3 T

PURPOSE

To perform an MRI compatibility study of an RF field-penetrable oval-shaped PET insert that implements an MRI built-in body RF coil both as a transmitter and a receiver.

METHODS

Twelve electrically floating RF shielded PET detector modules were used to construct the prototype oval PET insert with a major axis of 440 mm, a minor axis of 350 mm, and an axial length of 225 mm. The electric floating of the PET detector modules was accomplished by isolating the cable shield from the detector shield using plastic tape. Studies were conducted on the transmit (B1) RF field, the image signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and the RF pulse amplitude for a homogeneous cylindrical (diameter: 160 mm and length: 260 mm) phantom (NaCl + NiSO4 solution) in a 3 T clinical MRI system (Verio, Siemens, Erlangen, Germany).

RESULTS

The B1 maps for the oval insert were similar to the MRI-only field responses. Compared to the MRI-only values, SNR reductions of 51%, 45%, and 59% were seen, respectively, for the spin echo (SE), gradient echo (GE), and echo planar (EPI) images for the case of oval PET insert. Moreover, the required RF pulse amplitudes for the SE, GE, and EPI sequences were, respectively, 1.93, 1.85, and 1.36 times larger. However, a 30% reduction in the average RF reception sensitivity was observed for the oval insert.

CONCLUSIONS

The prototype floating PET insert was a safety concern for the clinical MRI system, and this compatibility study provided clearance for developing a large body size floating PET insert for the existing MRI system. Because of the RF shield of the insert, relatively large RF powers compared to the MRI-only case were required. Because of this and also due to low RF sensitivity of the body coil, the SNRs reduced largely.

Study on the radiofrequency transparency of partial-ring oval-shaped prototype PET inserts in a 3 T clinical MRI system

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the RF field responses of partial-ring RF-shielded oval-shaped positron emission tomography (PET) inserts that are used in combination with an MRI body RF coil. Partial-ring PET insert is particularly suitable for interventional investigation (e.g., trimodal PET/MRI/ultrasound imaging) and intraoperative (e.g., robotic surgery) PET/MRI studies. In this study, we used electrically floating Faraday RF shield cages to construct different partial-ring configurations of oval and cylindrical PET inserts and performed experiments on the RF field, spin echo and gradient echo images for a homogeneous phantom in a 3 T clinical MRI system. For each geometry, partial-ring configurations were studied by removing an opposing pair or a single shield cage from different positions of the PET ring. Compared to the MRI-only case, reduction in mean RF homogeneity, flip angle, and SNR for the detector opening in the first and third quadrants was approximately 13%, 15%, and 43%, respectively, whereas the values were 8%, 23%, and 48%, respectively, for the detector openings in the second and fourth quadrants. The RF field distribution also varied for different partial-ring configurations. It can be concluded that the field penetration was high for the detector openings in the first and third quadrants of both the inserts.

Study on the RF transparency of electrically floating and ground PET inserts in a 3T clinical MRI system

PURPOSE

The positron emission tomography (PET) insert for a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) system that implements the radiofrequency (RF) built-in body coil of the MRI system as a transmitter is designed to be RF-transparent, as the coil resides outside the RF-shielded PET ring. This approach reduces the design complexities (e.g., large PET ring diameter) related to implementing a transmit coil inside the PET ring. However, achieving the required field transmission into the imaging region of interest (ROI) becomes challenging because of the RF shield of the PET insert. In this study, a modularly RF-shielded PET insert is used to investigate the RF transparency considering two electrical configurations of the RF shield, namely the electrical floating and ground configurations. The purpose is to find the differences, advantages and disadvantages of these two configurations.

METHODS

Eight copper-shielded PET detector modules (intermodular gap: 3 mm) were oriented cylindrically with an inner-diameter of 234 mm. Each PET module included four-layer LYSO scintillation crystal blocks and front-end readout electronics. RF-shielded twisted-pair cables were used to connect the front-end electronics with the power sources and PET data acquisition systems located outside the MRI room. In the ground configuration, both the detector and cable shields were connected to the RF ground of the MRI system. In the floating configuration, only the RF shields of the PET modules were isolated from the RF ground. Experiments were conducted using two cylindrical homogeneous phantoms in a 3T clinical MRI system, in which the built-in body RF coil (a cylindrical volume coil of diameter 700 mm and length 540 mm) was implemented as a transceiver.

RESULTS

For both PET configurations, the RF and MR imaging performances were lower than those for the MRI-only case, and the MRI-system provided SAR values that were almost double. The RF homogeneity and field strength, and the SNR of the MR images were mostly higher for the floating PET configuration than they were for the ground PET configuration. However, for a shorter axial FOV of 125 mm, both configurations offered almost the same performance with high RF homogeneities (e.g., 76 ± 10%). Moreover, for both PET configurations, 56 ± 6% larger RF pulse amplitudes were required for MR imaging purposes. The increased power is mostly absorbed in the conductive shields in the form of shielding RF eddy currents; as a result, the SAR values only in the phantoms were estimated to be close to the MRI-only values.

CONCLUSIONS

The floating PET configuration showed higher RF transparency under all experimental setups. For a relatively short axial FOV of 125 mm, the ground configuration also performed well which indicated that an RF-penetrable PET insert with the conventional design (e.g., the ground configuration) might also become possible. However, some design modifications (e.g., a wider intermodular gap and using the RF receiver coil inside the PET insert) should improve the RF performance to the level of the MRI-only case. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Microstrip Transmission Line RF Coil for a PET/MRI Insert

Purpose:

We proposed and developed a new microstrip transmission line radiofrequency (RF) coil for a positron emission tomography (PET) insert for MRI, which has low electrical interactions with PET shield boxes. We performed imaging experiments using a single-channel and a four-channel proposed RF coils for proof-of-concept.

Methods:

A conventional microstrip coil consists of a microstrip conductor, a ground conductor, and a dielectric between the two conductors. We proposed a microstrip coil for the PET insert that replaced the conventional single-layer ground conductor with the RF shield of the PET insert. A dielectric material, which could otherwise attenuate gamma photons radiated from the PET imaging tracer, was not used. As proof-of-concept, we compared conventional and the proposed single-channel coils. To study multichannel performance, we further developed a four-channel proposed RF coil. Since the MRI system had a single-channel transmission port, an interfacing four-way RF power division circuit was designed. The coils were implemented as both RF transmitters and receivers in a cylindrical frame of diameter 150 mm. Coil bench performances were tested with a network analyzer (Rohde & Schwarz, Germany), and a homogeneous phantom study was conducted for gradient echo imaging and RF field (B₁) mapping in a 3T clinical MRI system (Verio, Siemens, Erlangen, Germany).

Results:

For all coils, the power reflection coefficient was below −30 dB, and the transmission coefficients in the four-channel configuration were near or below −20 dB. The comparative single-channel coil study showed good similarity between the conventional and proposed coils. The gradient echo image of the four-channel coil showed expected flashing image intensity near the coils and no phase distortion was visible. Transmit B₁ field map resembled the image performance.

Conclusion:

The proposed PET-microstrip coil performed similarly to the conventional microstrip transmission line coil and is promising for the development of a compact coil-PET system capable of simultaneous PET/MRI analysis with an existing MRI system.

Geometry optimization of electrically floating PET inserts for improved RF penetration for a 3 T MRI system

PURPOSE

An electrically floating radio frequency (RF) shielded PET insert with individual PET detectors shielded by separate Faraday cages enables the MRI built-in body RF coil to be used at least as an RF transmitter, in which the RF field penetrates the imaging region inside the PET ring through the narrow gaps between the shielded PET detector modules. Because the shielded PET ring blocks more than 90% of the imaging region for the transmit field from the body RF coil, it is very challenging to obtain the required RF field inside a full-ring floating PET insert. In this study, experiments were performed on the dependence of RF penetrability on different geometric aspects of the shielded PET modules and PET rings to optimize the design parameters to obtain the required RF field inside the PET ring.

METHODS

We developed several prototype cylindrical full-ring PET inserts using completely enclosed empty RF shield boxes (considered as dummy PET modules). Considering the RF shield box, we conducted studies for different axial lengths (240 and 120 mm) and heights (30 and 45 mm) of the shield boxes. On the other hand, considering the PET ring geometry, we also performed studies on three different categories of PET rings: a long-ring insert (longer than the MRI phantom), a short-ring insert (shorter than the MRI phantom), and a two-ring insert that combined two short-rings. In each ring category, two different inter-shield box gaps (1 and 3 mm) were considered. In the case of the two-ring insert, three different ring-gaps (5, 10, and 20 mm) were studied. In total, 21 PET inserts were studied with an inner diameter (i.d.) of 210 mm. To study the effect of ring diameter, another long-ring insert was studied for the 270 mm i.d. Experiments were conducted for the transmit RF (B₁ ) fields and signal-to-noise ratios of spin-echo and gradient-echo images using a homogeneous phantom in a 700 mm bore-diameter 3 T clinical MRI system. RF pulse amplitudes generated automatically by the MRI system were recorded for comparison.

RESULTS

A PET insert with a 3 mm inter-box gap was found to perform the best, at a level which is acceptable for PET imaging. In the case of an insert of multiple short-rings instead of one long-ring insert, the 5 and 10 mm ring-gaps provided higher RF field penetration. Increasing the inter-box gap improved the RF field penetration, whereas a ring-gap that was too wide concentrated the field near the ring-gap region. Relatively reduced RF power was required for wider inter-box gap or ring-gap or larger shield box height. Moreover, the rectangular shield box outperformed the trapezoidal shield box. On the other hand, when we changed the inner or outer diameter of the PET ring by keeping the same transaxial width of the shield boxes, we did not see any noticeable variation.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study results provide comprehensive guidance on the geometrical design aspects of RF-penetrable PET inserts for efficient RF penetration inside the PET ring. By choosing proper geometric design parameters, we could get the RF field that was similar to the MRI-only case.

MRI compatibility study of an integrated PET/RF-coil prototype system at 3T

We have been working on the development of a PET insert for existing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) systems for simultaneous PET/MR imaging, which integrates radiofrequency (RF)-shielded PET detector modules with an RF head coil. In order to avoid interferences between the PET detector circuits and the different MRI-generated electromagnetic fields, PET detector circuits were installed inside eight Cu-shielded fiber-reinforced plastic boxes, and these eight shielded PET modules were integrated in between the eight elements of a 270-mm-diameter and 280-mm-axial-length cylindrical birdcage RF coil, which was designed to be used with a 3-T clinical MRI system. The diameter of the PET scintillators with a 12-mm axial field-of-view became 255mm, which was very close to the imaging region. In this study, we have investigated the effects of this PET/RF-coil integrated system on the performance of MRI, which include the evaluation of static field (B_o) inhomogeneity, RF field (B₁) distribution, local specific absorption rate (SAR) distribution, average SAR, and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). For the central 170-mm-diameter and 80-mm-axial-length of a homogenous cylindrical phantom (with the total diameter of 200mm and axial-length of 100mm), an increase of about a maximum of 3μT in the B_o inhomogeneity was found, both in the central and 40-mm off-centered transverse planes, and a 5 percentage point increase of B₁ field inhomogeneity was observed in the central transverse plane (from 84% without PET to 79% with PET), while B₁ homogeneity along the coronal plane was almost unchanged (77%) following the integration of PET with the RF head coil. The average SAR and maximum local SAR were increased by 1.21 and 1.62 times, respectively. However, the SNR study for both spin-echo and gradient-echo sequences showed a reduction of about 70% and 60%, respectively, because of the shielded PET modules. The overall results prove the feasibility of this integrated PET/RF-coil system for using with the existing MRI system.

Coupled circuit numerical analysis of eddy currents in an open MRI system

We performed a new coupled circuit numerical simulation of eddy currents in an open compact magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) system. Following the coupled circuit approach, the conducting structures were divided into subdomains along the length (or width) and the thickness, and by implementing coupled circuit concepts we have simulated transient responses of eddy currents for subdomains in different locations. We implemented the Eigen matrix technique to solve the network of coupled differential equations to speed up our simulation program. On the other hand, to compute the coupling relations between the biplanar gradient coil and any other conducting structure, we implemented the solid angle form of Ampere's law. We have also calculated the solid angle for three dimensions to compute inductive couplings in any subdomain of the conducting structures. Details of the temporal and spatial distribution of the eddy currents were then implemented in the secondary magnetic field calculation by the Biot-Savart law. In a desktop computer (Programming platform: Wolfram Mathematica 8.0®, Processor: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo E7500 @ 2.93GHz; OS: Windows 7 Professional; Memory (RAM): 4.00GB), it took less than 3min to simulate the entire calculation of eddy currents and fields, and approximately 6min for X-gradient coil. The results are given in the time-space domain for both the direct and the cross-terms of the eddy current magnetic fields generated by the Z-gradient coil. We have also conducted free induction decay (FID) experiments of eddy fields using a nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) probe to verify our simulation results. The simulation results were found to be in good agreement with the experimental results. In this study we have also conducted simulations for transient and spatial responses of secondary magnetic field induced by X-gradient coil. Our approach is fast and has much less computational complexity than the conventional electromagnetic numerical simulation methods.