A Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research-based process to develop theoretically-informed human papillomavirus vaccination educational materials for young adults

OBJECTIVE

To develop theory-informed human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine education materials that appeal to 18-26-year-olds.

METHODS

First, draft materials informed by Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) and Health Belief Model (HBM) were developed. Next, an initial set of Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR)-guided interviews were conducted with 18-26-year-old participants to receive feedback about content, format, appeal, implementation facilitators and barriers, and potential delivery modalities. Then, interviews were transcribed, coded, and analyzed using thematic analysis. Next, materials were modified based upon feedback. Finally, another set of interviews was conducted.

RESULTS

Most participants (n = 15) were female (93%), White (60%), and non-Hispanic (93%). All (100%) had heard of HPV and the HPV vaccine, and 80% reported having received the vaccine. Participant feedback on materials included emphasizing vaccine benefits and efficacy, rewording to enhance comprehension, and adding images represent diversity beyond race/ethnicity and sexual orientation. Suggested delivery methods included social media, print materials, and posters.

CONCLUSION

Qualitative interviews with young adults suggest that HPV education materials targeted to 18-26-year-olds should include health behavior theory-aligned messaging, inclusive imagery, and be disseminated through multiple modalities.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Providers should consider utilizing theory-based education materials that are relevant and appealing to young adults.

"I couldn't connect the wires in my brain." Young adult cancer survivors' experience with cognitive functioning

OBJECTIVE

There is a dearth of literature describing young adult (YA) cancer survivors' experiences with cancer-related cognitive impairment (CRCI). We aimed to elucidate CRCI among YA cancer survivors and identify potentially modifiable risk factors.

METHODS

We conducted individual qualitative interviews with YA cancer survivors aged 18-30 years at study enrollment and used applied thematic analysis to identify themes across three topics (i.e., affected cognitive abilities, risk and protective factors influencing the impact of CRCI, and strategies for coping with CRCI).

RESULTS

YA cancer survivors (N = 20) were, on average, 23 years old at diagnosis and 26 years old when interviewed. Diverse cancer types and treatments were represented; most participants (85%) had completed cancer treatment. Participants described experiences across three qualitative topics: (1) affected cognitive abilities (i.e., concentration and attention, prospective memory, and long-term memory), (2) Risk factors (i.e., fatigue, sleep problems, mood, stress/distractions, and social isolation) and protective factors (i.e., social support), and (3) coping strategies, including practical strategies that helped build self-efficacy (e.g., writing things down, reducing distractions), beneficial emotion-focused coping strategies (e.g., focus on health, faith/religion), strategies with mixed effects (i.e., apps/games, medications/supplements, and yoga), and "powering through" strategies that exacerbated stress.

CONCLUSIONS

YA cancer survivors experience enduring cognitive difficulties after treatment. Specific concerns highlight the importance of attention and executive functioning impairments, long-term memory recall, and sensitivity to distractions. Future work is needed to improve assessment and treatment of CRCI among YA cancer survivors.

Developing a novel patient reported outcomes measure for prostate cancer patients receiving radionuclide therapy

The field of radionuclide therapy (RNT) for prostate cancer (PC) is growing rapidly with recent FDA approval of the first Lutetium-177-PSMA-ligand. Current patient-reported outcomes (PRO) measures were designed to assess impacts of chemotherapy or surgery. We aimed to develop the first PRO measure for PC patients receiving RNT. Methods: First, we identified relevant symptoms/toxicities by reviewing published trials and interviews with PC patients receiving RNT (n = 29), caregivers (n = 14), and clinicians (n = 11). Second, we selected items for measure inclusion. Third, we refined the item list with input from experts in RNTs and PROs. Fourth, we finalized the FACT-RNT with patient input. Results: This multi-step process yielded a brief 15-item measure deemed by key stakeholders to be relevant and useful in the context of RNT for PC. Conclusion: The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Radionuclide Therapy (FACT-RNT) is a new standardized tool to monitor relevant symptoms/toxicities in RNT trials and real-world settings.