1
|
García-Alonso CR, Almeda N, Salinas-Pérez JA, Gutiérrez-Colosía MR, Iruin-Sanz Á, Salvador-Carulla L. Use of a decision support system for benchmarking analysis and organizational improvement of regional mental health care: Efficiency, stability and entropy assessment of the mental health ecosystem of Gipuzkoa (Basque Country, Spain). PLoS One 2022; 17:e0265669. [PMID: 35316302 PMCID: PMC8939819 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265669] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2021] [Accepted: 03/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Decision support systems are appropriate tools for guiding policymaking processes, especially in mental health (MH), where care provision should be delivered in a balanced and integrated way. This study aims to develop an analytical process for (i) assessing the performance of an MH ecosystem and (ii) identifying benchmark and target-for-improvement catchment areas. MH provision (inpatient, day and outpatient types of care) was analysed in the Mental Health Network of Gipuzkoa (Osakidetza, Basque Country, Spain) using a decision support system that integrated data envelopment analysis, Monte Carlo simulation and artificial intelligence. The unit of analysis was the 13 catchment areas defined by a reference MH centre. MH ecosystem performance was assessed by the following indicators: relative technical efficiency, stability and entropy to guide organizational interventions. Globally, the MH system of Gipuzkoa showed high efficiency scores in each main type of care (inpatient, day and outpatient), but it can be considered unstable (small changes can have relevant impacts on MH provision and performance). Both benchmark and target-for-improvement areas were identified and described. This article provides a guide for evidence-informed decision-making and policy design to improve the continuity of MH care after inpatient discharges. The findings show that it is crucial to design interventions and strategies (i) considering the characteristics of the area to be improved and (ii) assessing the potential impact on the performance of the global MH care ecosystem. For performance improvement, it is recommended to reduce admissions and readmissions for inpatient care, increase workforce capacity and utilization of day care services and increase the availability of outpatient care services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Nerea Almeda
- Department of Psychology, Universidad Loyola Andalucía, Seville, Spain
- * E-mail:
| | | | | | - Álvaro Iruin-Sanz
- Instituto Biodonostia, Red de Salud Mental Extrahospitalaria de Gipuzkoa, Donostia-San Sebastián, Spain
| | - Luis Salvador-Carulla
- Health Research Institute, Faculty of Health, University of Canberra, Canberra, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Almeda N, García-Alonso CR, Killaspy H, Gutiérrez-Colosía MR, Salvador-Carulla L. The critical factor: The role of quality in the performance of supported accommodation services for complex mental illness in England. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0265319. [PMID: 35298512 PMCID: PMC8929565 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265319] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2021] [Accepted: 02/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Rehabilitation services have a key role in ensuring integrated and comprehensive mental health (MH) care in the community for people suffering from long-term and severe mental disorders. MH-supported accommodation services aim to promote service users’ autonomy and independence. Given the complexity associated with MH-supported accommodation services in England, a comparative evaluation of critical performance indicators, including service provision and quality of care, seems to be necessary in designing evidence-informed policies. This study aims to explore the influence of service quality indicators on the performance of MH-supported accommodation services in England. The analysed sample includes supported accommodation services from 14 nationally representative local authorities in England from the QuEST study grouped by three main types of care: residential care homes (divided into two subgroups: move-on and non-move-on oriented), supported housing and floating outreach. EDeS-MH (efficient decision support-mental health) was used to assess the performance indicators for the selected services by combining a Monte Carlo simulation engine, data envelopment analysis and a fuzzy inference engine for integrating expert knowledge. Depending on the type of care, six/seven quality domains were sequentially included after a baseline scenario (only technical) was analysed. Relative technical efficiency scores for the baseline scenarios revealed high performance in all the selected supported accommodation services, but the statistical variability was high. Quality domains significantly improved performance in every type of care. The inclusion of quality indicators has a positive impact on the global performance of each type of care. Remaining at the corresponding services more than expected for two years has a negative impact on performance. These findings can be considered from a planning perspective to facilitate the design of pathways of care with more realistic expectations about gaining autonomy in two years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nerea Almeda
- Department of Psychology, Universidad Loyola Andalucía, Seville, Spain
- * E-mail:
| | | | - Helen Killaspy
- Faculty of Brain Sciences, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Luis Salvador-Carulla
- Centre for Mental Health Research, Research School of Population Health, ANU College of Health and Medicine, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Resurrección DM, Navas-Campaña D, Gutiérrez-Colosía MR, Ibáñez-Alfonso JA, Ruiz-Aranda D. Psychotherapeutic Interventions to Improve Psychological Adjustment in Type 1 Diabetes: A Systematic Review. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2021; 18:ijerph182010940. [PMID: 34682687 PMCID: PMC8535719 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph182010940] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2021] [Revised: 09/29/2021] [Accepted: 10/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Background: International clinical practice guidelines highlight the importance of improving the psychological and mental health care of patients with Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). Psychological interventions can promote adherence to the demands of diabetes self-care, promoting high quality of life and wellbeing. Methods: A systematic review was carried out to determine whether psychological treatments with a specific focus on emotional management have an impact on glycemic control and variables related to psychological adjustment. Comprehensive literature searches of PubMed Medline, Psycinfo, Cochrane Database, Web of Science, and Open Grey Repository databases were conducted, from inception to November 2019 and were last updated in December 2020. Finally, eight articles met inclusion criteria. Results: Results showed that the management of emotions was effective in improving the psychological adjustment of patients with T1DM when carried out by psychologists. However, the evidence regarding the improvement of glycemic control was not entirely clear. When comparing adolescent and adult populations, findings yielded slightly better results in adolescents. Conclusions: More rigorous studies are needed to establish what emotional interventions might increase glycemic control in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Davinia M. Resurrección
- Department of Psychology, Universidad Loyola Andalucía, 41704 Seville, Spain; (D.M.R.); (D.N.-C.); (J.A.I.-A.); (D.R.-A.)
| | - Desirée Navas-Campaña
- Department of Psychology, Universidad Loyola Andalucía, 41704 Seville, Spain; (D.M.R.); (D.N.-C.); (J.A.I.-A.); (D.R.-A.)
| | - Mencía R. Gutiérrez-Colosía
- Department of Psychology, Universidad Loyola Andalucía, 41704 Seville, Spain; (D.M.R.); (D.N.-C.); (J.A.I.-A.); (D.R.-A.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +34-95564-1600
| | - Joaquín A. Ibáñez-Alfonso
- Department of Psychology, Universidad Loyola Andalucía, 41704 Seville, Spain; (D.M.R.); (D.N.-C.); (J.A.I.-A.); (D.R.-A.)
- Human Neuroscience Lab, Universidad Loyola Andalucía, 41704 Seville, Spain
| | - Desireé Ruiz-Aranda
- Department of Psychology, Universidad Loyola Andalucía, 41704 Seville, Spain; (D.M.R.); (D.N.-C.); (J.A.I.-A.); (D.R.-A.)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Romero-López-Alberca C, Gutiérrez-Colosía MR, Salinas-Pérez JA, Almeda N, Furst M, Johnson S, Salvador-Carulla L. Standardised description of health and social care: A systematic review of use of the ESMS/DESDE (European Service Mapping Schedule/Description and Evaluation of Services and DirectoriEs). Eur Psychiatry 2019; 61:97-110. [PMID: 31426008 DOI: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2019.07.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2019] [Revised: 06/27/2019] [Accepted: 07/26/2019] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Evidence-informed planning and interpretation of research results both require standardised description of local care delivery context. Such context analysis descriptions should be comparable across regions and countries to allow benchmarking and organizational learning, and for research findings to be interpreted in context. The European Service Mapping Schedule (ESMS) is a classification of adult mental health services that was later adapted for the assessment of health and social systems research (Description and Evaluation of Services and DirectoriEs - DESDE). The aim of the study was to review the diffusion and use of the ESMS/DESDE system in health and social care and its impact in health policy and decision-making. METHOD We conducted a systematic review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines (1997-2018). RESULTS Out of 155 papers mentioning ESMS/DESDE, 71 have used it for service research and planning. The classification has been translated into eight languages and has been used by seven international research networks. Since 2000, it has originated 11 instruments for health system research with extensive analysis of their metric properties. The ESMS/DESDE coding system has been used in 585 catchment areas in 34 countries for description of services delivery at local, regional and national levels. CONCLUSIONS The ESMS/DESDE system provides a common terminology, a classification of care services, and a set of tools allowing a variety of aims to be addressed in healthcare and health systems research. It facilitates comparisons across and within countries for evidence-informed planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - José A Salinas-Pérez
- Department of Quantitative Methods, Universidad Loyola Andalucía, Seville, Asociación Científica Psicost, Spain
| | - Nerea Almeda
- Department of Psychology, Universidad Loyola Andalucía, Seville, Spain
| | - Maryanne Furst
- Centre for Mental Health Research, Research School of Population Health, ANU College of Health and Medicine, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
| | - Sonia Johnson
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Luis Salvador-Carulla
- Centre for Mental Health Research, Research School of Population Health, ANU College of Health and Medicine, Australian National University, Canberra. Menzies Centre for Health Policy, University of Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
García-Alonso CR, Almeda N, Salinas-Pérez JA, Gutiérrez-Colosía MR, Uriarte-Uriarte JJ, Salvador-Carulla L. A decision support system for assessing management interventions in a mental health ecosystem: The case of Bizkaia (Basque Country, Spain). PLoS One 2019; 14:e0212179. [PMID: 30763361 PMCID: PMC6375615 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0212179] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2018] [Accepted: 01/30/2019] [Indexed: 01/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Evidence-informed strategic planning is a top priority in Mental Health (MH) due to the burden associated with this group of disorders and its societal costs. However, MH systems are highly complex, and decision support tools should follow a systems thinking approach that incorporates expert knowledge. The aim of this paper is to introduce a new Decision Support System (DSS) to improve knowledge on the health ecosystem, resource allocation and management in regional MH planning. The Efficient Decision Support-Mental Health (EDeS-MH) is a DSS that integrates an operational model to assess the Relative Technical Efficiency (RTE) of small health areas, a Monte-Carlo simulation engine (that carries out the Monte-Carlo simulation technique), a fuzzy inference engine prototype and basic statistics as well as system stability and entropy indicators. The stability indicator assesses the sensitivity of the model results due to data variations (derived from structural changes). The entropy indicator assesses the inner uncertainty of the results. RTE is multidimensional, that is, it was evaluated by using 15 variable combinations called scenarios. Each scenario, designed by experts in MH planning, has its own meaning based on different types of care. Three management interventions on the MH system in Bizkaia were analysed using key performance indicators of the service availability, placement capacity in day care, health care workforce capacity, and resource utilisation data of hospital and community care. The potential impact of these interventions has been assessed at both local and system levels. The system reacts positively to the proposals by a slight increase in its efficiency and stability (and its corresponding decrease in the entropy). However, depending on the analysed scenario, RTE, stability and entropy statistics can have a positive, neutral or negative behaviour. Using this information, decision makers can design new specific interventions/policies. EDeS-MH has been tested and face-validated in a real management situation in the Bizkaia MH system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - José J Uriarte-Uriarte
- Bizkaia Mental Health Services, Osakidetza-Basque Health Service, Biocruces Health Research Institute, Bilbao, Spain
| | - Luis Salvador-Carulla
- ANU College of Health and Medicine, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Almeda N, García-Alonso CR, Salinas-Pérez JA, Gutiérrez-Colosía MR, Salvador-Carulla L. Causal Modelling for Supporting Planning and Management of Mental Health Services and Systems: A Systematic Review. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2019; 16:ijerph16030332. [PMID: 30691052 PMCID: PMC6388254 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16030332] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2018] [Revised: 01/19/2019] [Accepted: 01/19/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Mental health services and systems (MHSS) are characterized by their complexity. Causal modelling is a tool for decision-making based on identifying critical variables and their causal relationships. In the last two decades, great efforts have been made to provide integrated and balanced mental health care, but there is no a clear systematization of causal links among MHSS variables. This study aims to review the empirical background of causal modelling applications (Bayesian networks and structural equation modelling) for MHSS management. The study followed the PRISMA guidelines (PROSPERO: CRD42018102518). The quality of the studies was assessed by using a new checklist based on MHSS structure, target population, resources, outcomes, and methodology. Seven out of 1847 studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. After the review, the selected papers showed very different objectives and subjects of study. This finding seems to indicate that causal modelling has potential to be relevant for decision-making. The main findings provided information about the complexity of the analyzed systems, distinguishing whether they analyzed a single MHSS or a group of MHSSs. The discriminative power of the checklist for quality assessment was evaluated, with positive results. This review identified relevant strategies for policy-making. Causal modelling can be used for better understanding the MHSS behavior, identifying service performance factors, and improving evidence-informed policy-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nerea Almeda
- Universidad Loyola Andalucía, Department of Psychology, C/ Energía Solar 1, 41014 Seville, Spain.
| | - Carlos R García-Alonso
- Universidad Loyola Andalucía, Department of Quantitative Methods, C/ Energía Solar 1, 41014 Seville, Spain.
| | - José A Salinas-Pérez
- Universidad Loyola Andalucía, Department of Quantitative Methods, C/ Energía Solar 1, 41014 Seville, Spain.
| | | | - Luis Salvador-Carulla
- Centre for Mental Health Research, Research School of Population Health, Australian National University, 63 Eggleston Rd, Acton ACT 2601, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Sadeniemi M, Almeda N, Salinas-Pérez JA, Gutiérrez-Colosía MR, García-Alonso C, Ala-Nikkola T, Joffe G, Pirkola S, Wahlbeck K, Cid J, Salvador-Carulla L. A Comparison of Mental Health Care Systems in Northern and Southern Europe: A Service Mapping Study. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2018; 15:E1133. [PMID: 29857556 PMCID: PMC6024953 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph15061133] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2018] [Revised: 05/21/2018] [Accepted: 05/30/2018] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Mental health services (MHS) have gone through vast changes during the last decades, shifting from hospital to community-based care. Developing the optimal balance and use of resources requires standard comparisons of mental health care systems across countries. This study aimed to compare the structure, personnel resource allocation, and the productivity of the MHS in two benchmark health districts in a Nordic welfare state and a southern European, family-centered country. The study is part of the REFINEMENT (Research on Financing Systems' Effect on the Quality of Mental Health Care) project. The study areas were the Helsinki and Uusimaa region in Finland and the Girona region in Spain. The MHS were mapped by using the DESDE-LTC (Description and Evaluation of Services and Directories for Long Term Care) tool. There were 6.7 times more personnel resources in the MHS in Helsinki and Uusimaa than in Girona. The resource allocation was more residential-service-oriented in Helsinki and Uusimaa. The difference in mental health personnel resources is not explained by the respective differences in the need for MHS among the population. It is important to make a standard comparison of the MHS for supporting policymaking and to ensure equal access to care across European countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Minna Sadeniemi
- Department of Social Services and Health Care, City of Helsinki, Southern Psychiatric Outpatient Clinic, Työpajankatu 14, FI-00099 Helsinki, Finland.
- University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Välskärinkatu 12, Helsinki FI-00029, Finland.
- Unit for Mental Health, National Institute for Health and Welfare (THL); Mannerheimintie 168, Helsinki FI-00270, Finland.
| | - Nerea Almeda
- PSICOST Research Association, Department of Psychology, Universidad Loyola Andalucía, C/Energía Solar 1, 41014 Sevilla, España.
| | - Jose A Salinas-Pérez
- PSICOST Research Association, Department of Quantitative Methods, Universidad Loyola Andalucía, C/Energía Solar 1, 41014 Sevilla, España.
| | - Mencía R Gutiérrez-Colosía
- PSICOST Research Association, Department of Psychology, Universidad Loyola Andalucía, C/Energía Solar 1, 41014 Sevilla, España.
| | - Carlos García-Alonso
- PSICOST Research Association, Department of Quantitative Methods, Universidad Loyola Andalucía, C/Energía Solar 1, 41014 Sevilla, España.
| | - Taina Ala-Nikkola
- University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Välskärinkatu 12, Helsinki FI-00029, Finland.
- Unit for Mental Health, National Institute for Health and Welfare (THL); Mannerheimintie 168, Helsinki FI-00270, Finland.
| | - Grigori Joffe
- University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Välskärinkatu 12, Helsinki FI-00029, Finland.
| | - Sami Pirkola
- University of Tampere School of Health Sciences, and Tampere University Hospital, Lääkärinkatu 1, Tampere FI-33014, Finland.
| | - Kristian Wahlbeck
- Unit for Mental Health, National Institute for Health and Welfare (THL); Mannerheimintie 168, Helsinki FI-00270, Finland.
| | - Jordi Cid
- Mental Health & Addiction Research Group, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques de Girona (IdibGI)-Institut d'Assistència Sanitària, 17190 Salt Girona, Spain.
| | - Luis Salvador-Carulla
- VIDEA Lab, Centre for Mental Health Research, Australian National University, 63 Eggleston Rd, Acton ACT 2601, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|