The association of clinical, treatment, and demographic characteristics with rearrest in a national dataset

INTRODUCTION

Following initial resuscitation from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, rearrest frequently occurs and has been associated with adverse outcomes. We aimed to identify clinical, treatment, and demographic characteristics associated with prehospital rearrest at the encounter and agency levels.

METHODS

Adult non-traumatic cardiac arrest patients who achieved ROSC following EMS resuscitation in the 2018-2021 ESO annual datasets were included in this study. Patients were excluded if they had a documented DNR/POLST or achieved ROSC after bystander CPR only. Rearrest was defined as post-ROSC CPR initiation, administration of ≥ 1 milligram of adrenaline, defibrillation, or a documented non-perfusing rhythm on arrival at the receiving hospital. Multivariable logistic regression modeling was used to evaluate the association between rearrest and case characteristics. Linear regression modeling was used to evaluate the association between agency-level factors (ROSC rate, scene time, and scene termination rate), and rearrest rate.

RESULTS

Among the 53,027 cases included, 16,116 (30.4%) experienced rearrest. Factors including longer response intervals, longer 'low-flow' intervals, unwitnessed OHCA, and a lack of bystander CPR were associated with rearrest. Among agencies that treated ≥ 30 patients with outcome data, the agency-level rate of rearrest was inversely associated with agency-level rate of survival to discharge to home (R2 = -0.393, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This multiagency retrospective study found that factors associated with increased ischaemic burden following OHCA were associated with rearrest. Agency-level rearrest frequency was inversely associated with agency-level survival to home. Interventions that decrease the burden of ischemia sustained by OHCA patients may decrease the rate of rearrest and increase survival.

Prehospital Use of Whole Blood for Ill and Injured Patients During Critical Care Transport

OBJECTIVE

Hemodynamic instability and hemorrhagic shock are frequently encountered by emergency medical services providers managing ill and injured patients during critical care transport. Although many critical care transport services commonly transfuse crystalloids and/or packed red blood cells (PRBCs), the administration of whole blood (WB) in prehospital care is currently limited. WB contains PRBCs, plasma, and platelets in a physiologic ratio to aid in oxygen delivery to tissue as well as hemostasis. This study describes a single critical care transport program's experience using WB for critically ill and injured patients and reports important clinical and safety outcomes.

METHODS

This study was a retrospective review of patients who were transported by a single rotor wing-based critical care transport service to 1 of 2 tertiary care receiving hospitals within a single health system. Patients who were transported between November 1, 2018, and November 30, 2019, and who received at least 1 unit of low-titer group O WB during critical care transport were included. The primary outcomes of interest included 24-hour mortality and the total 24-hour transfusion requirement. The safety outcomes included transfusion reactions, acute lung injury, acute kidney injury, and the incidence of venous thromboembolism.

RESULTS

During the study period, there were 3,084 total patients transported by our critical care transport service. There were 71 patients who received prehospital WB, 64 of whom met the inclusion criteria. The top 3 indications for WB administration included blunt trauma (n = 27, 42.2%), gastrointestinal hemorrhage (n = 15, 23.4%), and penetrating trauma (n = 11, 17.2%). The median total number of blood components transfused within 24 hours was 4.0 (interquartile range, 2.0-9.5), and the overall 24-hour mortality rate was 21.9%.

CONCLUSIONS

The administration of WB by emergency medical services providers to critically ill and injured patients in the prehospital setting is feasible and is associated with low incidences of adverse events and transfusion reactions. Further research is needed to elucidate the benefits of WB relative to current prehospital standards of care.