1
|
di Pasquo E, Giannubilo SR, Valentini B, Salvi S, Rullo R, Fruci S, Filippi E, Ornaghi S, Zullino S, Rossi F, Farsetti D, Di Martino DD, Vasapollo B, Locatelli A, De Santis M, Ciavattini A, Lanzone A, Mecacci F, Ferrazzi E, Valensise H, Ghi T. The "Preeclampsia and Hypertension Target Treatment" study: a multicenter prospective study to evaluate the effectiveness of the antihypertensive therapy based on maternal hemodynamic findings. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM 2024; 6:101368. [PMID: 38574856 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2024.101368] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2023] [Revised: 03/20/2024] [Accepted: 04/01/2024] [Indexed: 04/06/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite major advances in the pharmacologic treatment of hypertension in the nonpregnant population, treatments for hypertension in pregnancy have remained largely unchanged over the years. There is recent evidence that a more adequate control of maternal blood pressure is achieved when the first given antihypertensive drug is able to correct the underlying hemodynamic disorder of the mother besides normalizing the blood pressure values. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to compare the blood pressure control in women receiving an appropriate or inappropriate antihypertensive therapy following the baseline hemodynamic findings. STUDY DESIGN This was a prospective multicenter study that included a population of women with de novo diagnosis of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. A noninvasive assessment of the following maternal parameters was performed on hospital admission via Ultrasound Cardiac Output Monitor before any antihypertensive therapy was given: cardiac output, heart rate, systemic vascular resistance, and stroke volume. The clinician who prescribed the antihypertensive therapy was blinded to the hemodynamic evaluation and used as first-line treatment a vasodilator (nifedipine or alpha methyldopa) or a beta-blocker (labetalol) based on his preferences or on the local protocols. The first-line pharmacologic treatment was retrospectively considered hemodynamically appropriate in either of the following circumstances: (1) women with a hypodynamic profile (defined as low cardiac output [≤5 L/min] and/or high systemic vascular resistance [≥1300 dynes/second/cm2]) who were administered oral nifedipine or alpha methyldopa and (2) women with a hyperdynamic profile (defined as normal or high cardiac output [>5 L/min] and/or low systemic vascular resistances [<1300 dynes/second/cm2]) who were administered oral labetalol. The primary outcome of the study was to compare the occurrence of severe hypertension between women treated with a hemodynamically appropriate therapy and women treated with an inappropriate therapy. RESULTS A total of 152 women with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy were included in the final analysis. Most women displayed a hypodynamic profile (114 [75.0%]) and received a hemodynamically appropriate treatment (116 [76.3%]). The occurrence of severe hypertension before delivery was significantly lower in the group receiving an appropriate therapy than in the group receiving an inappropriately treated (6.0% vs 19.4%, respectively; P=.02). Moreover, the number of women who achieved target values of blood pressure within 48 to 72 hours from the treatment start was higher in the group who received an appropriate treatment than in the group who received an inappropriate treatment (70.7% vs 50.0%, respectively; P=.02). CONCLUSION In pregnant individuals with de novo hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, a lower occurrence of severe hypertension was observed when the first-line antihypertensive agent was tailored to the correct maternal hemodynamic profile.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elvira di Pasquo
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy (Drs di Pasquo, Valentini, and Ghi)
| | - Stefano Raffaele Giannubilo
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy (Drs Giannubilo and Ciavattini)
| | - Beatrice Valentini
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy (Drs di Pasquo, Valentini, and Ghi)
| | - Silvia Salvi
- High-Risk Pregnancy Unit, Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Largo Agostino Gemelli, Rome, Italy (Drs Salvi, Rullo, Fruci, and Lanzone)
| | - Roberta Rullo
- High-Risk Pregnancy Unit, Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Largo Agostino Gemelli, Rome, Italy (Drs Salvi, Rullo, Fruci, and Lanzone)
| | - Stefano Fruci
- High-Risk Pregnancy Unit, Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Largo Agostino Gemelli, Rome, Italy (Drs Salvi, Rullo, Fruci, and Lanzone)
| | - Elisa Filippi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ospedale Ca Foncello, Treviso, Italy (Drs Filippi and Santis)
| | - Sara Ornaghi
- Department of Obstetrics, University of Milan-Bicocca, Foundation Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico San Gerardo dei Tintori, Milan, Italy (Drs Ornaghi, Rossi, and Locatelli)
| | - Sara Zullino
- High-Risk Pregnancy Unit, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Azienda Ospedaliera Careggi, Florence, Italy (Drs Zullino and Dr Mecacci)
| | - Francesca Rossi
- Department of Obstetrics, University of Milan-Bicocca, Foundation Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico San Gerardo dei Tintori, Milan, Italy (Drs Ornaghi, Rossi, and Locatelli)
| | - Daniele Farsetti
- Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Surgical Sciences, Policlinico Casilino, Tor Vergata University of Rome, Rome, Italy (Drs Farsetti, Vasapollo, and Valensise)
| | - Daniela Denis Di Martino
- Unit of Obstetrics, Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Woman, Child, and Newborn, Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy (Drs Di Martino and Ferrazzi)
| | - Barbara Vasapollo
- Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Surgical Sciences, Policlinico Casilino, Tor Vergata University of Rome, Rome, Italy (Drs Farsetti, Vasapollo, and Valensise)
| | - Anna Locatelli
- Department of Obstetrics, University of Milan-Bicocca, Foundation Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico San Gerardo dei Tintori, Milan, Italy (Drs Ornaghi, Rossi, and Locatelli)
| | - Michela De Santis
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ospedale Ca Foncello, Treviso, Italy (Drs Filippi and Santis)
| | - Andrea Ciavattini
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy (Drs Giannubilo and Ciavattini)
| | - Antonio Lanzone
- High-Risk Pregnancy Unit, Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Largo Agostino Gemelli, Rome, Italy (Drs Salvi, Rullo, Fruci, and Lanzone)
| | - Federico Mecacci
- High-Risk Pregnancy Unit, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Azienda Ospedaliera Careggi, Florence, Italy (Drs Zullino and Dr Mecacci)
| | - Enrico Ferrazzi
- Unit of Obstetrics, Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Woman, Child, and Newborn, Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy (Drs Di Martino and Ferrazzi)
| | - Hebert Valensise
- Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Surgical Sciences, Policlinico Casilino, Tor Vergata University of Rome, Rome, Italy (Drs Farsetti, Vasapollo, and Valensise)
| | - Tullio Ghi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy (Drs di Pasquo, Valentini, and Ghi); Obstetrics and Gynaecology Unit, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy (Dr Ghi).
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ricci G, Martinelli M, Luppi S, Lo Bello L, De Santis M, Skerk K, Zito G. Finasteride and fertility: case report and review of the literature. J Drugs Dermatol 2012; 11:1511-1513. [PMID: 23377525] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/01/2023]
Abstract
Although millions of men have taken or are taking finasteride, there are no documented cases of successful pregnancy in the literature after discontinuation of the drug. Early studies did not show significant influence of finasteride on semen parameters, whereas some recent observations have suggested that in subfertile patients, the effects of the drug might be amplified. Therefore, counseling is particularly difficult for men taking finasteride and planning pregnancy. We report the case of a couple whose male partner had used finasteride for approximately 10 years and who presented for primary infertility. The first semen analysis, carried out 3 months after finasteride cessation, revealed severe oligospermia. One month later, sperm concentration increased, and the following month, the couple spontaneously conceived. A healthy baby was delivered at full term. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case of successful full-term pregnancy and live birth after long-term use of finasteride, which suggests that treatment with finasteride, even after several years, does not prevent normal conception. However, caution should be advised with the use of finasteride in male partners of couples who are attempting to become pregnant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppe Ricci
- Assisted Reproduction Unit, Institute for Maternal and Child Health, IRCCS Burlo Garofalo, Trieste, Italy.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Fariselli L, Marras C, De Santis M, Marchetti M, Milanesi I, Broggi G. CYBERKNIFE RADIOSURGERY AS A FIRST TREATMENT FOR IDIOPATHIC TRIGEMINAL NEURALGIA. Neurosurgery 2009; 64:A96-101. [DOI: 10.1227/01.neu.0000341714.55023.8f] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
OBJECTIVE
To report the level of effectiveness and safety, in our experience, of CyberKnife (Accuray, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA) robotic radiosurgery as a first-line treatment against pharmacologically refractory trigeminal neuralgia.
METHODS
We treated 33 patients with the frameless CyberKnife system as a monotherapy. The retrogasserian portion of the trigeminal nerve (a length of 4 mm, 2–3 mm anterior to the root entry zone) was targeted. Doses of 55 to 75 Gy were prescribed to the 100% isodose line, according to a dose escalation protocol. The patients were evaluated for the level of pain control, time to pain relief, hypesthesia, and time to pain recurrence.
RESULTS
The median age was 74 years. All but 2 patients (94%) achieved a successful treatment outcome. The follow-up period was 9 to 37 months (mean, 23 months). The Barrow Neurological Institute Pain Intensity Scale (BPS) score before radiosurgery was III in 2 patients (6%), IV in 8 patients (24%), and V in 23 patients (70%). The time to pain relief was 1 to 180 days (median, 30 days). No facial numbness was observed. Only 1 patient developed a transitory dysesthesia of the tongue. After treatment, the BPS score was I, II, or III in 31 patients (97%). Pain recurred in 33% (11 patients) at a mean of 9 months (range, 1–43 months). Three patients with recurrences had low pain control by medication (BPS score, IV), and 1 patient (BPS score, V) needed a radiofrequency lesioning (BPS score, I at 12 months).
CONCLUSION
CyberKnife radiosurgery for trigeminal neuralgia allows pain relief at safe doses and is suggested for pharmacologically refractory trigeminal neuralgia. Higher prescribed doses were not associated with improvement in pain relief or recurrence rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Fariselli
- Division of Radiotherapy, Fondazione Istituto Neurologico C. Besta, and Centro Diagnostico Italiano, Milan, Italy
| | - Carlo Marras
- Department of Neurosurgery, Fondazione Istituto Neurologico C. Besta, Milan, Italy
| | - Michela De Santis
- Division of Radiotherapy, Fondazione Istituto Neurologico C. Besta, Milan, Italy
| | - Marcello Marchetti
- Department of Neurosurgery and Division of Radiotherapy, Fondazione Istituto Neurologico C. Besta, Milan, Italy
| | - Ida Milanesi
- Division of Radiotherapy, Fondazione Istituto Neurologico C. Besta, Milan, Italy
| | - Giovanni Broggi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Fondazione Istituto Neurologico C. Besta, and Centro Diagnostico Italiano, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|