1
|
McVeigh TP, Lalloo F, Frayling IM, Latchford A, Snape K, Durkie M, Monahan KJ, Hanson H. Challenges in developing and implementing international best practice guidance for intermediate-risk variants in cancer susceptibility genes: APC c.3920T>A p.(Ile1307Lys) as an exemplar. J Med Genet 2024:jmg-2024-109900. [PMID: 38697781 DOI: 10.1136/jmg-2024-109900] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2024] [Accepted: 04/11/2024] [Indexed: 05/05/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Terri Patricia McVeigh
- Cancer Genetics Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Fiona Lalloo
- Clinical Genetics Service, Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Ian M Frayling
- St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
- St Mark's the National Bowel Hospital and Academic Institute, London, UK
- Institute of Medical Genetics, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK
| | - Andrew Latchford
- St Mark's the National Bowel Hospital and Academic Institute, London, UK
| | - Katie Snape
- Clinical Genetics, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Miranda Durkie
- Sheffield Diagnostic Genetics Service, Sheffield Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
| | - Kevin J Monahan
- St Mark's the National Bowel Hospital and Academic Institute, London, UK
- Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Helen Hanson
- Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
- Peninsula Regional Genetics Service, Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
McDevitt T, Durkie M, Arnold N, Burghel GJ, Butler S, Claes KBM, Logan P, Robinson R, Sheils K, Wolstenholme N, Hanson H, Turnbull C, Hume S. EMQN best practice guidelines for genetic testing in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer. Eur J Hum Genet 2024; 32:479-488. [PMID: 38443545 PMCID: PMC11061103 DOI: 10.1038/s41431-023-01507-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2023] [Revised: 11/07/2023] [Accepted: 11/21/2023] [Indexed: 03/07/2024] Open
Abstract
Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer (HBOC) is a genetic condition associated with increased risk of cancers. The past decade has brought about significant changes to hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) diagnostic testing with new treatments, testing methods and strategies, and evolving information on genetic associations. These best practice guidelines have been produced to assist clinical laboratories in effectively addressing the complexities of HBOC testing, while taking into account advancements since the last guidelines were published in 2007. These guidelines summarise cancer risk data from recent studies for the most commonly tested high and moderate risk HBOC genes for laboratories to refer to as a guide. Furthermore, recommendations are provided for somatic and germline testing services with regards to clinical referral, laboratory analyses, variant interpretation, and reporting. The guidelines present recommendations where 'must' is assigned to advocate that the recommendation is essential; and 'should' is assigned to advocate that the recommendation is highly advised but may not be universally applicable. Recommendations are presented in the form of shaded italicised statements throughout the document, and in the form of a table in supplementary materials (Table S4). Finally, for the purposes of encouraging standardisation and aiding implementation of recommendations, example report wording covering the essential points to be included is provided for the most common HBOC referral and reporting scenarios. These guidelines are aimed primarily at genomic scientists working in diagnostic testing laboratories.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Trudi McDevitt
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Children's Health Ireland at Crumlin, Dublin, Ireland.
| | - Miranda Durkie
- Sheffield Diagnostic Genetics Service, North East and Yorkshire Genomic Laboratory Hub, Sheffield Children's NHS Foundation Trust Western Bank, Sheffield, UK
| | - Norbert Arnold
- UKSH Campus Kiel, Gynecology and Obstetrics, Institut of Clinical Chemistry, Institut of Clinical Molecular Biology, Kiel, Germany
| | - George J Burghel
- Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, North West Genomic Laboratory Hub, Manchester, UK
| | - Samantha Butler
- Central and South Genomic Laboratory Hub, West Midlands Regional Genetics Laboratory, Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | | | - Peter Logan
- HSCNI / Belfast Trust Laboratories, Regional Molecular Diagnostics Service, Belfast, Northern Ireland
| | - Rachel Robinson
- Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Genetics Department, Leeds, UK
| | | | | | - Helen Hanson
- St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Clinical Genetics, London, UK
| | | | - Stacey Hume
- University of British Columbia, Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Allen S, Loong L, Garrett A, Torr B, Durkie M, Drummond J, Callaway A, Robinson R, Burghel GJ, Hanson H, Field J, McDevitt T, McVeigh TP, Bedenham T, Bowles C, Bradshaw K, Brooks C, Butler S, Del Rey Jimenez JC, Hawkes L, Stinton V, MacMahon S, Owens M, Palmer-Smith S, Smith K, Tellez J, Valganon-Petrizan M, Waskiewicz E, Yau M, Eccles DM, Tischkowitz M, Goel S, McRonald F, Antoniou AC, Morris E, Hardy S, Turnbull C. Recommendations for laboratory workflow that better support centralised amalgamation of genomic variant data: findings from CanVIG-UK national molecular laboratory survey. J Med Genet 2024; 61:305-312. [PMID: 38154813 PMCID: PMC10982625 DOI: 10.1136/jmg-2023-109645] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2023] [Accepted: 10/28/2023] [Indexed: 12/30/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND National and international amalgamation of genomic data offers opportunity for research and audit, including analyses enabling improved classification of variants of uncertain significance. Review of individual-level data from National Health Service (NHS) testing of cancer susceptibility genes (2002-2023) submitted to the National Disease Registration Service revealed heterogeneity across participating laboratories regarding (1) the structure, quality and completeness of submitted data, and (2) the ease with which that data could be assembled locally for submission. METHODS In May 2023, we undertook a closed online survey of 51 clinical scientists who provided consensus responses representing all 17 of 17 NHS molecular genetic laboratories in England and Wales which undertake NHS diagnostic analyses of cancer susceptibility genes. The survey included 18 questions relating to 'next-generation sequencing workflow' (11), 'variant classification' (3) and 'phenotypical context' (4). RESULTS Widely differing processes were reported for transfer of variant data into their local LIMS (Laboratory Information Management System), for the formatting in which the variants are stored in the LIMS and which classes of variants are retained in the local LIMS. Differing local provisions and workflow for variant classifications were also reported, including the resources provided and the mechanisms by which classifications are stored. CONCLUSION The survey responses illustrate heterogeneous laboratory workflow for preparation of genomic variant data from local LIMS for centralised submission. Workflow is often labour-intensive and inefficient, involving multiple manual steps which introduce opportunities for error. These survey findings and adoption of the concomitant recommendations may support improvement in laboratory dataflows, better facilitating submission of data for central amalgamation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie Allen
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK
| | - Lucy Loong
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK
| | - Alice Garrett
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK
- Department of Clinical Genetics, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Bethany Torr
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK
| | - Miranda Durkie
- Sheffield Diagnostic Genetics Service, NEY Genomic Laboratory Hub, Sheffield Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
| | - James Drummond
- East Anglian Medical Genetics Service, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Alison Callaway
- Wessex Regional Genetics Laboratory, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Rachel Robinson
- Yorkshire Regional Genetics Service, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - George J Burghel
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine and NW Laboratory Genetics Hub, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Helen Hanson
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK
- Department of Clinical Genetics, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Joanne Field
- Genomics and Molecular Medicine Service, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - Trudi McDevitt
- Department of Clinical Genetics, CHI at Crumlin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Terri P McVeigh
- Cancer Genetics Unit, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Tina Bedenham
- West Midlands, Oxford and Wessex Genomic Laboratory Hub, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Christopher Bowles
- Department of Molecular Genetics, Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK
| | - Kirsty Bradshaw
- East Midlands and East of England Genomics Laboratory, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - Claire Brooks
- North Thames Genomic Laboratory Hub, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Samantha Butler
- Central and South Genomic Laboratory Hub, Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | | | - Lorraine Hawkes
- South East Genomics Laboratory Hub, Guy's Hospital, London, UK
| | - Victoria Stinton
- North West Genomic Laboratory Hub, Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, Manchester, UK
| | - Suzanne MacMahon
- Centre for Molecular Pathology, Institute of Cancer Research Sutton, Sutton, UK
- Department of Molecular Diagnostics, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Martina Owens
- Department of Molecular Genetics, Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK
| | - Sheila Palmer-Smith
- Institute of Medical Genetics, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK
| | - Kenneth Smith
- South West Genomic Laboratory Hub, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - James Tellez
- North East and Yorkshire Genomic Laboratory Hub, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Mikel Valganon-Petrizan
- Centre for Molecular Pathology, Institute of Cancer Research Sutton, Sutton, UK
- Department of Molecular Diagnostics, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Erik Waskiewicz
- Institute of Medical Genetics, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK
| | - Michael Yau
- South East Genomics Laboratory Hub, Guy's Hospital, London, UK
| | - Diana M Eccles
- Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- Wessex Clinical Genetics Service, Princess Anne Hospital, Southampton, UK
| | - Marc Tischkowitz
- Department of Medical Genetics, National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Shilpi Goel
- NHS England, National Disease Registration Service, London, UK
- Health Data Insight CIC, Cambridge, UK
| | - Fiona McRonald
- NHS England, National Disease Registration Service, London, UK
| | - Antonis C Antoniou
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Cambridge, UK
| | - Eva Morris
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Steven Hardy
- NHS England, National Disease Registration Service, London, UK
| | - Clare Turnbull
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK
- Cancer Genetics Unit, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Chen EWC, Chong J, Valluru MK, Durkie M, Simms RJ, Harris PC, Ong ACM. Combining genotype with height-adjusted kidney length predicts rapid progression of ADPKD. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2024:gfad270. [PMID: 38224954 DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfad270] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/17/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Our main objective was to identify baseline prognostic factors predictive of rapid disease progression in a large unselected clinical ADPKD cohort. METHODS A cross-sectional analysis was performed in 618 consecutive ADPKD patients assessed and followed-up for over a decade. 123 patients (19.9%) had reached kidney failure by the study date. Data was available for the following: baseline eGFR (n= 501), genotype (n=549), baseline ultrasound mean kidney length (MKL, n=424), height adjusted baseline MKL (htMKL, n=377). Rapid disease progression was defined as an annualised eGFR decline (∆eGFR) of >2.5ml/min/year by linear regression over 5 years (n=158). Patients were further divided into slow, rapid and very rapid ∆eGFR classes for analysis. Genotyped patients were classified into several categories: PKD1 (T, truncating or NT, non-truncating), PKD2, other genes (non-PKD1 or PKD2), NMD (no mutation detected) or variants of uncertain significance (VUS). RESULTS A PKD1-T genotype had the strongest influence on the probability of reduced baseline kidney function by age. A multivariate logistic regression model identified PKD1-T genotype and htMKL (>9.5 cm/m) as independent predictors for rapid disease progression. The combination of both factors increased the positive predictive value (PPV) for rapid disease progression over age 40 years and of reaching kidney failure by age 60 years to 100%. Exploratory analysis in a subgroup with available total kidney volumes (TKV) showed higher PPV (100% v 80%) and NPV (42% v 33%) in predicting rapid disease progression compared to the Mayo Imaging Classification (1C-E). CONCLUSION Real-world longitudinal data confirms the importance of genotype and kidney length as independent variables determining ∆eGFR. Individuals with the highest risk of rapid disease progression can be positively selected for treatment based on this combination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eugene W C Chen
- Academic Nephrology Unit, Division of Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, Beech Hill Road, Sheffield, United Kingdom
- Sheffield Kidney Institute, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Herries Road, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | - Jiehan Chong
- Academic Nephrology Unit, Division of Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, Beech Hill Road, Sheffield, United Kingdom
- Sheffield Kidney Institute, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Herries Road, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | - Manoj K Valluru
- Academic Nephrology Unit, Division of Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, Beech Hill Road, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | - Miranda Durkie
- Sheffield Diagnostics Genetic Service, North East and Yorkshire Genomic Laboratory Hub, Sheffield Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
| | - Roslyn J Simms
- Academic Nephrology Unit, Division of Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, Beech Hill Road, Sheffield, United Kingdom
- Sheffield Kidney Institute, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Herries Road, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | - Peter C Harris
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Mayo Clinic and Foundation, Rochester, USA
| | - Albert C M Ong
- Academic Nephrology Unit, Division of Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, Beech Hill Road, Sheffield, United Kingdom
- Sheffield Kidney Institute, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Herries Road, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Loong L, Huntley C, McRonald F, Santaniello F, Pethick J, Torr B, Allen S, Tulloch O, Goel S, Shand B, Rahman T, Luchtenborg M, Garrett A, Barber R, Bedenham T, Bourn D, Bradshaw K, Brooks C, Bruty J, Burghel GJ, Butler S, Buxton C, Callaway A, Callaway J, Drummond J, Durkie M, Field J, Jenkins L, McVeigh TP, Mountford R, Nyanhete R, Petrides E, Robinson R, Scott T, Stinton V, Tellez J, Wallace AJ, Yarram-Smith L, Sahan K, Hallowell N, Eccles DM, Pharoah P, Tischkowitz M, Antoniou AC, Evans DG, Lalloo F, Norbury G, Morris E, Burn J, Hardy S, Turnbull C. Germline mismatch repair (MMR) gene analyses from English NHS regional molecular genomics laboratories 1996-2020: development of a national resource of patient-level genomics laboratory records. J Med Genet 2023; 60:669-678. [PMID: 36572524 PMCID: PMC10359571 DOI: 10.1136/jmg-2022-108800] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2022] [Accepted: 11/18/2022] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe national patterns of National Health Service (NHS) analysis of mismatch repair (MMR) genes in England using individual-level data submitted to the National Disease Registration Service (NDRS) by the NHS regional molecular genetics laboratories. DESIGN Laboratories submitted individual-level patient data to NDRS against a prescribed data model, including (1) patient identifiers, (2) test episode data, (3) per-gene results and (4) detected sequence variants. Individualised per-laboratory algorithms were designed and applied in NDRS to extract and map the data to the common data model. Laboratory-level MMR activity audit data from the Clinical Molecular Genetics Society/Association of Clinical Genomic Science were used to assess early years' missing data. RESULTS Individual-level data from patients undergoing NHS MMR germline genetic testing were submitted from all 13 English laboratories performing MMR analyses, comprising in total 16 722 patients (9649 full-gene, 7073 targeted), with the earliest submission from 2000. The NDRS dataset is estimated to comprise >60% of NHS MMR analyses performed since inception of NHS MMR analysis, with complete national data for full-gene analyses for 2016 onwards. Out of 9649 full-gene tests, 2724 had an abnormal result, approximately 70% of which were (likely) pathogenic. Data linkage to the National Cancer Registry demonstrated colorectal cancer was the most frequent cancer type in which full-gene analysis was performed. CONCLUSION The NDRS MMR dataset is a unique national pan-laboratory amalgamation of individual-level clinical and genomic patient data with pseudonymised identifiers enabling linkage to other national datasets. This growing resource will enable longitudinal research and can form the basis of a live national genomic disease registry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucy Loong
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK
| | - Catherine Huntley
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK
| | - Fiona McRonald
- NHS Digital, National Disease Registration Service, London, UK
| | - Francesco Santaniello
- NHS Digital, National Disease Registration Service, London, UK
- Health Data Insight CIC, Cambridge, UK
| | - Joanna Pethick
- NHS Digital, National Disease Registration Service, London, UK
| | - Bethany Torr
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK
| | - Sophie Allen
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK
| | - Oliver Tulloch
- NHS Digital, National Disease Registration Service, London, UK
- Health Data Insight CIC, Cambridge, UK
| | - Shilpi Goel
- NHS Digital, National Disease Registration Service, London, UK
- Health Data Insight CIC, Cambridge, UK
| | - Brian Shand
- NHS Digital, National Disease Registration Service, London, UK
- Health Data Insight CIC, Cambridge, UK
| | - Tameera Rahman
- NHS Digital, National Disease Registration Service, London, UK
- Health Data Insight CIC, Cambridge, UK
| | - Margreet Luchtenborg
- NHS Digital, National Disease Registration Service, London, UK
- Centre for Cancer, Society & Public Health, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Alice Garrett
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK
| | - Richard Barber
- Central and South Genomic Laboratory Hub, West Midlands Regional Genetics Laboratory, Birmingham, UK
| | - Tina Bedenham
- West Midlands, Oxford and Wessex Genomic Laboratory Hub, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - David Bourn
- North East and Yorkshire Genomic Laboratory Hub, Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | - Kirsty Bradshaw
- East Midlands and East of England Genomics Laboratory, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - Claire Brooks
- North Thames Genomic Laboratory Hub, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Jonathan Bruty
- East Genomic Laboratory Hub, Cambridge University Hospitals Genomic Laboratory, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - George J Burghel
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine and North West Genomic Laboratory Hub, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Samantha Butler
- Central and South Genomic Laboratory Hub, West Midlands Regional Genetics Laboratory, Birmingham, UK
| | - Chris Buxton
- Bristol Genetics Laboratory, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK
| | - Alison Callaway
- Wessex Regional Genetics Laboratory, Salisbury Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Salisbury, UK
| | - Jonathan Callaway
- Wessex Regional Genetics Laboratory, Salisbury Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Salisbury, UK
| | - James Drummond
- East Genomic Laboratory Hub, Cambridge University Hospitals Genomic Laboratory, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Miranda Durkie
- Sheffield Diagnostic Genetics Service, North East and Yorkshire Genomic Laboratory Hub, Sheffield Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
| | - Joanne Field
- East Midlands and East of England Genomics Laboratory, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - Lucy Jenkins
- North Thames Genomic Laboratory Hub, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Terri P McVeigh
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK
- Cancer Genetics Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Roger Mountford
- North West Genomic Laboratory Hub (Liverpool), Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, Liverpool, UK
| | - Rodney Nyanhete
- Sheffield Diagnostic Genetics Service, North East and Yorkshire Genomic Laboratory Hub, Sheffield Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
| | - Evgenia Petrides
- West Midlands, Oxford and Wessex Genomic Laboratory Hub, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Rachel Robinson
- Yorkshire and North East Genomic Laboratory Hub, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Tracy Scott
- Yorkshire and North East Genomic Laboratory Hub, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Victoria Stinton
- North West Genomic Laboratory Hub (Liverpool), Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, Liverpool, UK
| | - James Tellez
- North East and Yorkshire Genomic Laboratory Hub, Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | - Andrew J Wallace
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine and North West Genomic Laboratory Hub, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | | | - Kate Sahan
- The Ethox Centre and Wellcome Centre for Ethics and Humanities, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford Ethox Centre, Oxford, UK
| | - Nina Hallowell
- The Ethox Centre and Wellcome Centre for Ethics and Humanities, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford Ethox Centre, Oxford, UK
| | - Diana M Eccles
- Cancer Sciences, University of Southampton Faculty of Medicine, Southampton, UK
- Human Genetics and Genomic Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Paul Pharoah
- Department of Medical Genetics, NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge, UK
| | - Marc Tischkowitz
- Department of Medical Genetics, NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge, UK
| | - Antonis C Antoniou
- Department of Medical Genetics, NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge, UK
| | - D Gareth Evans
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine and North West Genomic Laboratory Hub, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
- Division of Evolution & Genomic Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Fiona Lalloo
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine and North West Genomic Laboratory Hub, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Gail Norbury
- South East Genomic Laboratory Hub, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospitals NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Eva Morris
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - John Burn
- Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Steven Hardy
- NHS Digital, National Disease Registration Service, London, UK
| | - Clare Turnbull
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK
- Cancer Genetics Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Hanson H, Durkie M, Lalloo F, Izatt L, McVeigh TP, Cook JA, Brewer C, Drummond J, Butler S, Cranston T, Casey R, Tan T, Morganstein D, Eccles DM, Tischkowitz M, Turnbull C, Woodward ER, Maher ER. UK recommendations for SDHA germline genetic testing and surveillance in clinical practice. J Med Genet 2023; 60:107-111. [PMID: 35260474 PMCID: PMC9887350 DOI: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2021-108355] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2021] [Accepted: 02/13/2022] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
SDHA pathogenic germline variants (PGVs) are identified in up to 10% of patients with paraganglioma and phaeochromocytoma and up to 30% with wild-type gastrointestinal stromal tumours. Most SDHA PGV carriers present with an apparently sporadic tumour, but often the pathogenic variant has been inherited from parent who has the variant, but has not developed any clinical features. Studies of SDHA PGV carriers suggest that lifetime penetrance for SDHA-associated tumours is low, particularly when identified outside the context of a family history. Current recommended surveillance for SDHA PGV carriers follows an intensive protocol. With increasing implementation of tumour and germline large panel and whole-genome sequencing, it is likely more SDHA PGV carriers will be identified in patients with tumours not strongly associated with SDHA, or outside the context of a strong family history. This creates a complex situation about what to recommend in clinical practice considering low penetrance for tumour development, surveillance burden and patient anxiety. An expert SDHA working group was formed to discuss and consider this situation. This paper outlines the recommendations from this working group for testing and management of SDHA PGV carriers in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helen Hanson
- South West Thames Regional Genetic Services, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Miranda Durkie
- Sheffield Diagnostic Genetics Service, Sheffield Children's NHS Foundation Trust, North East and Yorkshire Genomic Laboratory Hub, Sheffield, UK
| | - Fiona Lalloo
- Clinical Genetics Service, Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Louise Izatt
- Clinical Genetics, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Terri P McVeigh
- Cancer Genetics Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Jackie A Cook
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Sheffield Children's NHS FoundationTrust, Sheffield, UK
| | - Carole Brewer
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK
| | - James Drummond
- East NHS Genomic Laboratory Hub, Cambridge University Hospitals Genomic Laboratory, Cambridge University Hospital Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Samantha Butler
- Molecular Genetics, West Midlands Regional Genetics Laboratory, Birmingham, West Midlands, UK
| | - Treena Cranston
- Oxford Molecular Genetics Laboratory, Churchill Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | - Ruth Casey
- Department of Endocrinology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
- Department of Medical Genetics, University of Cambridge and Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Tricia Tan
- Section of Investigative Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | | | - Diana M Eccles
- Cancer Sciences Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Marc Tischkowitz
- Department of Medical Genetics, University of Cambridge and Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Clare Turnbull
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Emma Roisin Woodward
- Clinical Genetics Service, Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
- Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Eamonn R Maher
- Department of Medical Genetics, University of Cambridge and Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Loong L, Garrett A, Allen S, Choi S, Durkie M, Callaway A, Drummond J, Burghel GJ, Robinson R, Torr B, Berry IR, Wallace AJ, Eccles DM, Ellard S, Baple E, Evans DG, Woodward ER, Kulkarni A, Lalloo F, Tischkowitz M, Lucassen A, Hanson H, Turnbull C. Reclassification of clinically-detected sequence variants: Framework for genetic clinicians and clinical scientists by CanVIG-UK (Cancer Variant Interpretation Group UK). Genet Med 2022; 24:1867-1877. [PMID: 35657381 DOI: 10.1016/j.gim.2022.05.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2021] [Revised: 04/29/2022] [Accepted: 05/02/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Variant classifications may change over time, driven by emergence of fresh or contradictory evidence or evolution in weighing or combination of evidence items. For variant classifications above the actionability threshold, which is classification of likely pathogenic or pathogenic, clinical actions may be irreversible, such as risk-reducing surgery or prenatal interventions. Variant reclassification up or down across the actionability threshold can therefore have significant clinical consequences. Laboratory approaches to variant reinterpretation and reclassification vary widely. METHODS Cancer Variant Interpretation Group UK is a multidisciplinary network of clinical scientists and genetic clinicians from across the 24 Molecular Diagnostic Laboratories and Clinical Genetics Services of the United Kingdom (NHS) and Republic of Ireland. We undertook surveys, polls, and national meetings of Cancer Variant Interpretation Group UK to evaluate opinions about clinical and laboratory management regarding variant reclassification. RESULTS We generated a consensus framework on variant reclassification applicable to cancer susceptibility genes and other clinical areas, which provides explicit recommendations for clinical and laboratory management of variant reclassification scenarios on the basis of the nature of the new evidence, the magnitude of evidence shift, and the final classification score. CONCLUSION In this framework, clinical and laboratory resources are targeted for maximal clinical effect and minimal patient harm, as appropriate to all resource-constrained health care settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucy Loong
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, United Kingdom
| | - Alice Garrett
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, United Kingdom
| | - Sophie Allen
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, United Kingdom
| | - Subin Choi
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, United Kingdom
| | - Miranda Durkie
- Sheffield Diagnostic Genetics Service, NHS North East and Yorkshire Genomic Laboratory Hub, Sheffield Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | - Alison Callaway
- Wessex Regional Genetics Laboratory, Central and South Genomics Laboratory Hub, Salisbury NHS Foundation Trust, Salisbury District Hospital, Salisbury, Wiltshire, United Kingdom
| | - James Drummond
- Cambridge Genomic Laboratory, East Genomic Laboratory Hub, Cambridge University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - George J Burghel
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine and North West Genomic Laboratory Hub, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Rachel Robinson
- North East and Yorkshire Genomic Laboratory Hub, The Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Beth Torr
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, United Kingdom
| | - Ian R Berry
- Bristol Genetics Laboratory, Southmead Hospital, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Andrew J Wallace
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine and North West Genomic Laboratory Hub, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Diana M Eccles
- Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom; Human Genetics and Genomic Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Sian Ellard
- Exeter Genomics Laboratory, South West Genomic Laboratory Hub, Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, United Kingdom; University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, United Kingdom
| | - Emma Baple
- University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, United Kingdom; Genomics England, London, United Kingdom
| | - D Gareth Evans
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine and North West Genomic Laboratory Hub, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom; Division of Evolution & Genomic Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Emma R Woodward
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine and North West Genomic Laboratory Hub, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom; Division of Evolution & Genomic Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Anjana Kulkarni
- Southeast Thames Regional Genetics Service, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Fiona Lalloo
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine and North West Genomic Laboratory Hub, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Marc Tischkowitz
- Department of Medical Genetics, National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Anneke Lucassen
- Wellcome Centre for Human Genetics/Centre for Personalised Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; Clinical Ethics and Law, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Helen Hanson
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, United Kingdom; Department of Clinical Genetics, St. George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Clare Turnbull
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, United Kingdom; Cancer Genetics Unit, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Garrett A, Loveday C, King L, Butler S, Robinson R, Horton C, Yussuf A, Choi S, Torr B, Durkie M, Burghel GJ, Drummond J, Berry I, Wallace A, Callaway A, Eccles D, Tischkowitz M, Tatton-Brown K, Snape K, McVeigh T, Izatt L, Woodward ER, Burnichon N, Gimenez-Roqueplo AP, Mazzarotto F, Whiffin N, Ware J, Hanson H, Pesaran T, LaDuca H, Buffet A, Maher ER, Turnbull C. Quantifying evidence toward pathogenicity for rare phenotypes: The case of succinate dehydrogenase genes, SDHB and SDHD. Genet Med 2021; 24:41-50. [PMID: 34906457 PMCID: PMC8759765 DOI: 10.1016/j.gim.2021.08.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2021] [Revised: 03/26/2021] [Accepted: 08/10/2021] [Indexed: 10/25/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The weight of the evidence to attach to observation of a novel rare missense variant in SDHB or SDHD in individuals with the rare neuroendocrine tumors, pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas (PCC/PGL), is uncertain. METHODS We compared the frequency of SDHB and SDHD very rare missense variants (VRMVs) in 6328 and 5847 cases of PCC/PGL, respectively, with that of population controls to generate a pan-gene VRMV likelihood ratio (LR). Via windowing analysis, we measured regional enrichments of VRMVs to calculate the domain-specific VRMV-LR (DS-VRMV-LR). We also calculated subphenotypic LRs for variant pathogenicity for various clinical, histologic, and molecular features. RESULTS We estimated the pan-gene VRMV-LR to be 76.2 (54.8-105.9) for SDHB and 14.8 (8.7-25.0) for SDHD. Clustering analysis revealed an SDHB enriched region (ɑɑ 177-260, P = .001) for which the DS-VRMV-LR was 127.2 (64.9-249.4) and an SDHD enriched region (ɑɑ 70-114, P = .000003) for which the DS-VRMV-LR was 33.9 (14.8-77.8). Subphenotypic LRs exceeded 6 for invasive disease (SDHB), head-and-neck disease (SDHD), multiple tumors (SDHD), family history of PCC/PGL, loss of SDHB staining on immunohistochemistry, and succinate-to-fumarate ratio >97 (SDHB, SDHD). CONCLUSION Using methodology generalizable to other gene-phenotype dyads, the LRs relating to rarity and phenotypic specificity for a single observation in PCC/PGL of a SDHB/SDHD VRMV can afford substantial evidence toward pathogenicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alice Garrett
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, United Kingdom
| | - Chey Loveday
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, United Kingdom
| | - Laura King
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, United Kingdom
| | - Samantha Butler
- Central and South Genomic Laboratory Hub, Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Rachel Robinson
- North East and Yorkshire Genomic Laboratory Hub, Central Lab, The Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Subin Choi
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, United Kingdom
| | - Beth Torr
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, United Kingdom
| | - Miranda Durkie
- North East and Yorkshire Genomic Laboratory Hub, Sheffield Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | - George J Burghel
- The Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine and North West Genomic Laboratory Hub, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - James Drummond
- East Genomic Laboratory Hub, Cambridge University Hospitals Genomic Laboratory, Cambridge University Hospitals, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Ian Berry
- North East and Yorkshire Genomic Laboratory Hub, Central Lab, The Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Andrew Wallace
- The Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine and North West Genomic Laboratory Hub, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Alison Callaway
- Central and South Genomics Laboratory Hub, Wessex Regional Genetics Laboratory, Salisbury Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Salisbury District Hospital, Salisbury, United Kingdom
| | - Diana Eccles
- Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom; Human Genetics and Genomic Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Marc Tischkowitz
- Department of Medical Genetics, University of Cambridge and Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom; East Anglian Medical Genetics Unit, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Katrina Tatton-Brown
- St. George's University, London, United Kingdom; Department of Clinical Genetics, St. George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Katie Snape
- St. George's University, London, United Kingdom; Department of Clinical Genetics, St. George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Terri McVeigh
- Cancer Genetics Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Louise Izatt
- Clinical Genetics, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Emma R Woodward
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre (MAHSC), Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom; Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre (MAHSC), University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Nelly Burnichon
- University of Paris, PARCC, INSERM, Equipe Labellisée par la Ligue contre le Cancer, Paris, France; Genetics Department, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Paris, France
| | - Anne-Paule Gimenez-Roqueplo
- University of Paris, PARCC, INSERM, Equipe Labellisée par la Ligue contre le Cancer, Paris, France; Genetics Department, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Paris, France
| | - Francesco Mazzarotto
- National Heart and Lung Institute and MRC London Institute of Medical Sciences, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom; Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospitals, London, United Kingdom
| | - Nicola Whiffin
- The Wellcome Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; The Centre for Personalised Medicine, St Anne's College, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - James Ware
- National Heart and Lung Institute and MRC London Institute of Medical Sciences, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom; Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospitals, London, United Kingdom
| | - Helen Hanson
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, United Kingdom; Department of Clinical Genetics, St. George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Alexandre Buffet
- University of Paris, PARCC, INSERM, Equipe Labellisée par la Ligue contre le Cancer, Paris, France; Genetics Department, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Paris, France
| | - Eamonn R Maher
- Department of Medical Genetics, University of Cambridge and Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Clare Turnbull
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, United Kingdom; Cancer Genetics Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Loong L, Cubuk C, Choi S, Allen S, Torr B, Garrett A, Loveday C, Durkie M, Callaway A, Burghel GJ, Drummond J, Robinson R, Berry IR, Wallace A, Eccles DM, Tischkowitz M, Ellard S, Ware JS, Hanson H, Turnbull C. Quantifying prediction of pathogenicity for within-codon concordance (PM5) using 7541 functional classifications of BRCA1 and MSH2 missense variants. Genet Med 2021; 24:552-563. [PMID: 34906453 PMCID: PMC8896276 DOI: 10.1016/j.gim.2021.11.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2021] [Revised: 10/21/2021] [Accepted: 11/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Conditions and thresholds applied for evidence weighting of within-codon concordance (PM5) for pathogenicity vary widely between laboratories and expert groups. Because of the sparseness of available clinical classifications, there is little evidence for variation in practice. METHODS We used as a truthset 7541 dichotomous functional classifications of BRCA1 and MSH2, spanning 311 codons of BRCA1 and 918 codons of MSH2, generated from large-scale functional assays that have been shown to correlate excellently with clinical classifications. We assessed PM5 at 5 stringencies with incorporation of 8 in silico tools. For each analysis, we quantified a positive likelihood ratio (pLR, true positive rate/false positive rate), the predictive value of PM5-lookup in ClinVar compared with the functional truthset. RESULTS pLR was 16.3 (10.6-24.9) for variants for which there was exactly 1 additional colocated deleterious variant on ClinVar, and the variant under examination was equally or more damaging when analyzed using BLOSUM62. pLR was 71.5 (37.8-135.3) for variants for which there were 2 or more colocated deleterious ClinVar variants, and the variant under examination was equally or more damaging than at least 1 colocated variant when analyzed using BLOSUM62. CONCLUSION These analyses support the graded use of PM5, with potential to use it at higher evidence weighting where more stringent criteria are met.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucy Loong
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, United Kingdom
| | - Cankut Cubuk
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, United Kingdom
| | - Subin Choi
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, United Kingdom
| | - Sophie Allen
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, United Kingdom
| | - Beth Torr
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, United Kingdom
| | - Alice Garrett
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, United Kingdom
| | - Chey Loveday
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, United Kingdom
| | - Miranda Durkie
- Sheffield Diagnostic Genetics Service, NHS North East and Yorkshire Genomic Laboratory Hub, Sheffield Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | - Alison Callaway
- Wessex Regional Genetics Laboratory, Salisbury NHS Foundation Trust, Salisbury, United Kingdom; Human Genetics and Genomic Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - George J Burghel
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine and North West Genomic Laboratory Hub, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - James Drummond
- East Genomic Laboratory Hub, Cambridge University Hospitals Genomic Laboratory, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Rachel Robinson
- North East and Yorkshire Genomic Laboratory Hub, The Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Ian R Berry
- Bristol Genetics Laboratory, Pathology Sciences, Southmead Hospital, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Andrew Wallace
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine and North West Genomic Laboratory Hub, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Diana M Eccles
- Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Marc Tischkowitz
- Department of Medical Genetics, NIHR Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Sian Ellard
- Department of Molecular Genetics, Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, United Kingdom
| | - James S Ware
- National Heart and Lung Institute, Faculty of Medicine, and MRC London Institute of Medical Sciences, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom; NIHR Royal Brompton Cardiovascular Research Centre, Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Helen Hanson
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, United Kingdom; Department of Clinical Genetics, St. George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Clare Turnbull
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, United Kingdom; Cancer Genetics Unit, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Durkie M, Chong J, Valluru MK, Harris PC, Ong ACM. Biallelic inheritance of hypomorphic PKD1 variants is highly prevalent in very early onset polycystic kidney disease. Genet Med 2021; 23:689-697. [PMID: 33168999 PMCID: PMC9782736 DOI: 10.1038/s41436-020-01026-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2020] [Revised: 10/13/2020] [Accepted: 10/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the prevalence of biallelic PKD1 and PKD2 variants underlying very early onset (VEO) polycystic kidney disease (PKD) in a large international pediatric cohort referred for clinical indications over a 10-year period (2010-2020). METHODS All samples were tested by Sanger sequencing and multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) of PKD1 and PKD2 genes and/or a next-generation sequencing panel of 15 additional cystic genes including PKHD1 and HNF1B. Two patients underwent exome or genome sequencing. RESULTS Likely causative PKD1 or PKD2 variants were detected in 30 infants with PKD-VEO, 16 of whom presented in utero. Twenty-one of 30 (70%) had two variants with biallelic in trans inheritance confirmed in 16/21, 1 infant had biallelic PKD2 variants, and 2 infants had digenic PKD1/PKD2 variants. There was no known family history of ADPKD in 13 families (43%) and a de novo pathogenic variant was confirmed in 6 families (23%). CONCLUSION We report a high prevalence of hypomorphic PKD1 variants and likely biallelic disease in infants presenting with PKD-VEO with major implications for reproductive counseling. The diagnostic interpretation and reporting of these variants however remains challenging using current American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics/Association for Molecular Pathology (ACMG/AMP) and Association of Clinical Genetic Science (ACGS) variant classification guidelines in PKD-VEO and other diseases affected by similar variants with incomplete penetrance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miranda Durkie
- Sheffield Diagnostics Genetic Service, Sheffield Children’s NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
| | - Jiehan Chong
- Kidney Genetics Group, Academic Nephrology Unit, Department of Infection, Immunity and Cardiovascular Disease, University of Sheffield Medical School, Sheffield, UK
| | - Manoj K. Valluru
- Kidney Genetics Group, Academic Nephrology Unit, Department of Infection, Immunity and Cardiovascular Disease, University of Sheffield Medical School, Sheffield, UK
| | - Peter C. Harris
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Mayo Clinic and Foundation, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Albert C. M. Ong
- Kidney Genetics Group, Academic Nephrology Unit, Department of Infection, Immunity and Cardiovascular Disease, University of Sheffield Medical School, Sheffield, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Garrett A, Durkie M, Callaway A, Burghel GJ, Robinson R, Drummond J, Torr B, Cubuk C, Berry IR, Wallace AJ, Ellard S, Eccles DM, Tischkowitz M, Hanson H, Turnbull C. Combining evidence for and against pathogenicity for variants in cancer susceptibility genes: CanVIG-UK consensus recommendations. J Med Genet 2020; 58:297-304. [PMID: 33208383 PMCID: PMC8086256 DOI: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2020-107248] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2020] [Revised: 08/07/2020] [Accepted: 08/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Accurate classification of variants in cancer susceptibility genes (CSGs) is key for correct estimation of cancer risk and management of patients. Consistency in the weighting assigned to individual elements of evidence has been much improved by the American College of Medical Genetics (ACMG) 2015 framework for variant classification, UK Association for Clinical Genomic Science (UK-ACGS) Best Practice Guidelines and subsequent Cancer Variant Interpretation Group UK (CanVIG-UK) consensus specification for CSGs. However, considerable inconsistency persists regarding practice in the combination of evidence elements. CanVIG-UK is a national subspecialist multidisciplinary network for cancer susceptibility genomic variant interpretation, comprising clinical scientist and clinical geneticist representation from each of the 25 diagnostic laboratories/clinical genetic units across the UK and Republic of Ireland. Here, we summarise the aggregated evidence elements and combinations possible within different variant classification schemata currently employed for CSGs (ACMG, UK-ACGS, CanVIG-UK and ClinGen gene-specific guidance for PTEN, TP53 and CDH1). We present consensus recommendations from CanVIG-UK regarding (1) consistent scoring for combinations of evidence elements using a validated numerical 'exponent score' (2) new combinations of evidence elements constituting likely pathogenic' and 'pathogenic' classification categories, (3) which evidence elements can and cannot be used in combination for specific variant types and (4) classification of variants for which there are evidence elements for both pathogenicity and benignity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alice Garrett
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, London, UK
| | - Miranda Durkie
- Sheffield Diagnostic Genetics Service, Sheffield Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
| | - Alison Callaway
- Wessex Regional Genetics Laboratory, Salisbury Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Salisbury, Wiltshire, UK.,Human Genetics and Genomic Medicine, University of Southampton Faculty of Medicine, Southampton, UK
| | - George J Burghel
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine and NW Laboratory Genetics Hub, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Rachel Robinson
- Yorkshire Regional Genetics Service, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - James Drummond
- East Anglian Medical Genetics Service, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, UK
| | - Bethany Torr
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, London, UK
| | - Cankut Cubuk
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, London, UK
| | - Ian R Berry
- Yorkshire Regional Genetics Service, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Andrew J Wallace
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine and NW Laboratory Genetics Hub, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Sian Ellard
- Department of Molecular Genetics, Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, Devon, UK
| | - Diana M Eccles
- Cancer Sciences Research Group, University of Southampton Faculty of Medicine, Southampton, UK
| | - Marc Tischkowitz
- Department of Medical Genetics and National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, UK
| | - Helen Hanson
- Department of Clinical Genetics, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Clare Turnbull
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, London, UK .,Cancer Genetics Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Garrett A, Callaway A, Durkie M, Cubuk C, Alikian M, Burghel GJ, Robinson R, Izatt L, Talukdar S, Side L, Cranston T, Palmer-Smith S, Baralle D, Berry IR, Drummond J, Wallace AJ, Norbury G, Eccles DM, Ellard S, Lalloo F, Evans DG, Woodward E, Tischkowitz M, Hanson H, Turnbull C. Cancer Variant Interpretation Group UK (CanVIG-UK): an exemplar national subspecialty multidisciplinary network. J Med Genet 2020; 57:829-834. [PMID: 32170000 PMCID: PMC7691806 DOI: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2019-106759] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2019] [Revised: 02/06/2020] [Accepted: 02/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Advances in technology have led to a massive expansion in the capacity for genomic analysis, with a commensurate fall in costs. The clinical indications for genomic testing have evolved markedly; the volume of clinical sequencing has increased dramatically; and the range of clinical professionals involved in the process has broadened. There is general acceptance that our early dichotomous paradigms of variants being pathogenic–high risk and benign–no risk are overly simplistic. There is increasing recognition that the clinical interpretation of genomic data requires significant expertise in disease–gene-variant associations specific to each disease area. Inaccurate interpretation can lead to clinical mismanagement, inconsistent information within families and misdirection of resources. It is for this reason that ‘national subspecialist multidisciplinary meetings’ (MDMs) for genomic interpretation have been articulated as key for the new NHS Genomic Medicine Service, of which Cancer Variant Interpretation Group UK (CanVIG-UK) is an early exemplar. CanVIG-UK was established in 2017 and now has >100 UK members, including at least one clinical diagnostic scientist and one clinical cancer geneticist from each of the 25 regional molecular genetics laboratories of the UK and Ireland. Through CanVIG-UK, we have established national consensus around variant interpretation for cancer susceptibility genes via monthly national teleconferenced MDMs and collaborative data sharing using a secure online portal. We describe here the activities of CanVIG-UK, including exemplar outputs and feedback from the membership.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alice Garrett
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK
| | - Alison Callaway
- Wessex Regional Genetics Laboratory, Salisbury Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Salisbury, UK.,Human Genetics and Genomic Medicin, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Miranda Durkie
- Sheffield Diagnostic Genetics Service, Sheffield Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
| | - Cankut Cubuk
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK.,William Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Mary Alikian
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK
| | - George J Burghel
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine and NW Laboratory Genetics Hub, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Rachel Robinson
- Yorkshire Regional Genetics Service, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Louise Izatt
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Guy's and Saint Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Sabrina Talukdar
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Saint George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Lucy Side
- Wessex Clinical Genetics Service, Princess Anne Hospital, Southampton, UK
| | - Treena Cranston
- Oxford Molecular Genetics Laboratory, Churchill Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Diana Baralle
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Ian R Berry
- Yorkshire Regional Genetics Service, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - James Drummond
- East Anglian Medical Genetics Service, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Andrew J Wallace
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine and NW Laboratory Genetics Hub, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Gail Norbury
- Regional Genetics Service, Guy's and Saint Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Diana M Eccles
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Sian Ellard
- Department of Molecular Genetics, Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK
| | - Fiona Lalloo
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine and NW Laboratory Genetics Hub, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - D Gareth Evans
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine and NW Laboratory Genetics Hub, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.,Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Emma Woodward
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine and NW Laboratory Genetics Hub, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.,Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Marc Tischkowitz
- Department of Medical Genetics, National Institute for Health, Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Helen Hanson
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK.,Department of Clinical Genetics, Saint George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Clare Turnbull
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK .,Cancer Genetics Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Durkie M, Chong J, Ong A. SAT-334 GENETIC TESTING OF FAMILIES WITH VERY EARLY ONSET POLYCYSTIC KIDNEY DISEASE REVEALS THE FUNCTIONAL SIGNIFICANCE OF HYPOMORPHIC VARIANTS. Kidney Int Rep 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ekir.2019.05.380] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
|
14
|
Chong J, Durkie M, Dalton A, Ong A. TO033VERY EARLY-ONSET AUTOSOMAL DOMINANT POLYCYSTIC KIDNEY DISEASE DUE TO BI-ALLELIC MUTATIONS IN PKD1 AND PKD2. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2017. [DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfx133.to033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
15
|
Watson MB, Clouston HJ, Snowden JA, Wilson G, Durkie M, Ward R, Kaur H, Travis D, Barnett D. Lineage-specific chimerism monitoring after allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation: do we really know what we are measuring? Br J Haematol 2016; 176:139-141. [PMID: 26848116 DOI: 10.1111/bjh.13935] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Mark B Watson
- Sheffield Diagnostic Genetics Service, Sheffield Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK.,Haemato-oncology Diagnostic Service (HODS), Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
| | - Hazel J Clouston
- Sheffield Diagnostic Genetics Service, Sheffield Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK.,Haemato-oncology Diagnostic Service (HODS), Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
| | - John A Snowden
- Department of Haematology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK.,UKNEQAS for Leucocyte Immunophenotyping, Sheffield, UK.,Haemato-oncology Diagnostic Service (HODS), Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
| | - Gill Wilson
- Sheffield Diagnostic Genetics Service, Sheffield Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK.,Haemato-oncology Diagnostic Service (HODS), Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
| | - Miranda Durkie
- Sheffield Diagnostic Genetics Service, Sheffield Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK.,Haemato-oncology Diagnostic Service (HODS), Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
| | - Rosalie Ward
- Department of Haematology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK.,Haemato-oncology Diagnostic Service (HODS), Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK.,Department of Haematology, Laboratory Medicine Directorate, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
| | - Harpreet Kaur
- Department of Haematology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK.,Haemato-oncology Diagnostic Service (HODS), Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
| | - Debbie Travis
- UKNEQAS for Leucocyte Immunophenotyping, Sheffield, UK.,Haemato-oncology Diagnostic Service (HODS), Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
| | - David Barnett
- Department of Haematology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK.,UKNEQAS for Leucocyte Immunophenotyping, Sheffield, UK.,Haemato-oncology Diagnostic Service (HODS), Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK.,Department of Haematology, Laboratory Medicine Directorate, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Coffey AJ, Durkie M, Hague S, McLay K, Emmerson J, Lo C, Klaffke S, Joyce CJ, Dhawan A, Hadzic N, Mieli-Vergani G, Kirk R, Elizabeth Allen K, Nicholl D, Wong S, Griffiths W, Smithson S, Giffin N, Taha A, Connolly S, Gillett GT, Tanner S, Bonham J, Sharrack B, Palotie A, Rattray M, Dalton A, Bandmann O. A genetic study of Wilson's disease in the United Kingdom. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2013; 136:1476-87. [PMID: 23518715 DOI: 10.1093/brain/awt035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 207] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Previous studies have failed to identify mutations in the Wilson's disease gene ATP7B in a significant number of clinically diagnosed cases. This has led to concerns about genetic heterogeneity for this condition but also suggested the presence of unusual mutational mechanisms. We now present our findings in 181 patients from the United Kingdom with clinically and biochemically confirmed Wilson's disease. A total of 116 different ATP7B mutations were detected, 32 of which are novel. The overall mutation detection frequency was 98%. The likelihood of mutations in genes other than ATP7B causing a Wilson's disease phenotype is therefore very low. We report the first cases with Wilson's disease due to segmental uniparental isodisomy as well as three patients with three ATP7B mutations and three families with Wilson's disease in two consecutive generations. We determined the genetic prevalence of Wilson's disease in the United Kingdom by sequencing the entire coding region and adjacent splice sites of ATP7B in 1000 control subjects. The frequency of all single nucleotide variants with in silico evidence of pathogenicity (Class 1 variant) was 0.056 or 0.040 if only those single nucleotide variants that had previously been reported as mutations in patients with Wilson's disease were included in the analysis (Class 2 variant). The frequency of heterozygote, putative or definite disease-associated ATP7B mutations was therefore considerably higher than the previously reported occurrence of 1:90 (or 0.011) for heterozygote ATP7B mutation carriers in the general population (P < 2.2 × 10(-16) for Class 1 variants or P < 5 × 10(-11) for Class 2 variants only). Subsequent exclusion of four Class 2 variants without additional in silico evidence of pathogenicity led to a further reduction of the mutation frequency to 0.024. Using this most conservative approach, the calculated frequency of individuals predicted to carry two mutant pathogenic ATP7B alleles is 1:7026 and thus still considerably higher than the typically reported prevalence of Wilson's disease of 1:30 000 (P = 0.00093). Our study provides strong evidence for monogenic inheritance of Wilson's disease. It also has major implications for ATP7B analysis in clinical practice, namely the need to consider unusual genetic mechanisms such as uniparental disomy or the possible presence of three ATP7B mutations. The marked discrepancy between the genetic prevalence and the number of clinically diagnosed cases of Wilson's disease may be due to both reduced penetrance of ATP7B mutations and failure to diagnose patients with this eminently treatable disorder.
Collapse
|
17
|
Das T, Durkie M, Woll P, Hatton M, Mohanamurali J, Lee C, Fisher P, Danson S. 38 Testing for epidermal growth factor receptor mutations in non-small cell lung cancer: a population-based analysis in North Trent. Lung Cancer 2011. [DOI: 10.1016/s0169-5002(11)70038-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
18
|
Butler R, Clark C, Deans Z, Durkie M, Gonzalez D, Taniere P, Wallace A. 35 The first 12 months of UK diagnostic services for EGFR gene mutations in NSCLC patients. Lung Cancer 2011. [DOI: 10.1016/s0169-5002(11)70035-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
19
|
Crushell E, Treacy EP, Dawe J, Durkie M, Beauchamp NJ. Glycogen storage disease type III in the Irish population. J Inherit Metab Dis 2010; 33 Suppl 3:S215-8. [PMID: 20490926 DOI: 10.1007/s10545-010-9096-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2009] [Revised: 03/04/2010] [Accepted: 03/31/2010] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
Glycogen storage disease type III (GSD III) results from mutations of the AGL gene encoding the glycogen debrancher enzyme. The disease has clinical and biochemical heterogeneity reflecting the severity of the AGL mutations. We sought to characterise the molecular defects in our cohort of Irish patients with GSD III. Fifteen patients from eight unrelated Irish families were identified: six males and nine females. The age ranged from 2-39 years old, and all presented in the first 3 years of life. Four patients (of three families) had mild disease with hepatomegaly, mild hypoglycaemia and normal creatine kinase (CK) levels. Five families had more severe disease, with liver and skeletal muscle involvement and elevated CK. Eleven different mutations were identified amongst the eight families. Of the 11, six were novel: p.T512fs, p.S736fs, p.A1400fs, p.K1407fs, p.Y519X and p.D627Y. The family homozygous for p.A1400fs had the most severe phenotype (early-onset hypoglycaemia, massive hepatomegaly, myopathy and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy before age 2 years), which was not halted by aggressive carbohydrate and protein supplementation. Conversely, the only missense mutation identified in the cohort, p.D627Y, was associated with a mild phenotype. The phenotypic diversity in our GSD III cohort is mirrored by the allelic heterogeneity. We describe two novel null mutations in exon 32 in two families with severe GSD III resistant to current treatment modalities. Knowledge of the specific mutations segregating in this cohort may allow for the development of new therapeutic interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ellen Crushell
- National Centre for Inherited Metabolic Disorders, Children's University Hospital, Temple St, Dublin 1, Ireland.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Chopra M, Jackson R, Durkie M, Beauchamp NJ, Kirk EP. Glycogen storage disease type 1b: Mild phenotype associated with a novel splice site mutation. Mol Genet Metab 2009; 97:315. [PMID: 19454374 DOI: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2009.04.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2009] [Accepted: 04/20/2009] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
21
|
Thomas NS, Durkie M, Potts G, Sandford R, Van Zyl B, Youings S, Dennis NR, Jacobs PA. Parental and chromosomal origins of microdeletion and duplication syndromes involving 7q11.23, 15q11-q13 and 22q11. Eur J Hum Genet 2006; 14:831-7. [PMID: 16617304 DOI: 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201617] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Non-allelic homologous recombination between chromosome-specific LCRs is the most common mechanism leading to recurrent microdeletions and duplications. To look for locus-specific differences, we have used microsatellites to determine the parental and chromosomal origins of a large series of patients with de novo deletions of chromosome 7q11.23 (Williams syndrome), 15q11-q13 (Angelman syndrome, Prader-Willi syndrome) and 22q11 (Di George syndrome) and duplications of 15q11-q13. Overall the majority of rearrangements were interchromosomal, so arising from unequal meiotic exchange, and there were approximately equal numbers of maternal and paternal deletions. Duplications and deletions of 15q11-q13 appear to be reciprocal products that arise by the same mechanisms. The proportion arising from interchromosomal exchanges varied among deletions with 22q11 the highest and 15q11-q13 the lowest. However, parental and chromosomal origins were not always independent. For 15q11-q13, maternal deletions tended to be interchromosomal while paternal deletions tended to be intrachromosomal; for 22q11 there was a possible excess of maternal cases among intrachromosomal deletions. Several factors are likely to be involved in the formation of recurrent rearrangements and the relative importance of these appear to be locus-specific.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Simon Thomas
- Wessex Regional Genetics Laboratory, Salisbury District Hospital, Salisbury, UK.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Thomas NS, Durkie M, Van Zyl B, Sanford R, Potts G, Youings S, Dennis N, Jacobs P. Parental and chromosomal origin of unbalanced de novo structural chromosome abnormalities in man. Hum Genet 2006; 119:444-50. [PMID: 16493556 DOI: 10.1007/s00439-006-0157-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2005] [Accepted: 02/06/2006] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
We report the parental origin, and where possible the chromosomal origin of 115 de novo unbalanced structural chromosome abnormalities detectable by light microscopy. These consisted of 39 terminal deletions, 35 interstitial deletions, 8 rings, 12 duplications and 21 unbalanced translocations. In all categories the majority of abnormalities were of paternal origin, although the proportions varied from a high of 84% in the interstitial deletions and rings to a low of 58% in the duplications. Among the interstitial deletions and duplications, there were approximately equal numbers of intra- and interchromosomal abnormalities, while the majority of unbalanced translocations were isodisomic for the duplicated chromosome. The examination of the parental ages in the four main classes of abnormality showed terminal deletions of maternal origin to be associated with a significantly reduced maternal age. Thus, there is a clear propensity for structural chromosome abnormalities to occur in male germ cells, although the chromosomal origin seems similar irrespective of the parental origin.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Simon Thomas
- Wessex Regional Genetics Laboratory, Salisbury District Hospital, SP2 8BJ, Salisbury, Wiltshire, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Thomas NS, Ennis S, Sharp AJ, Durkie M, Hassold TJ, Collins AR, Jacobs PA. Maternal sex chromosome non-disjunction: evidence for X chromosome-specific risk factors. Hum Mol Genet 2001; 10:243-50. [PMID: 11159943 DOI: 10.1093/hmg/10.3.243] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Human trisomy is attributable to many different mechanisms and the relative importance of each mechanism is highly chromosome specific. The association between altered recombination and maternal non-disjunction is well documented: reductions in recombination have been reported for maternal meiosis I (MI) errors involving chromosomes 15, 16, 18 and 21 and increased recombination has been reported for meiosis II (MII) errors involving chromosome 21. We therefore investigated maternal X chromosome non-disjunction, to determine whether the effects of recombination are unique to the X chromosome or similar to any of the autosomes thus far studied. We genotyped 45 47,XXX females and 95 47,XXY males of maternal origin. Our results demonstrate that 49% arose during MI, 29% during MII and 16% were postzygotic events; a further 7% were meiotic but could not be assigned as either MI or MII because of recombination at the centromere. Among the MI cases, a majority (56%) had no detectable transitions and so absent recombination is an important factor for X chromosome non-disjunction. However, similar to trisomy 15 and unlike trisomy 21, we observed a significant increase in the mean maternal age of transitional MI errors compared with nullitransitional cases. In our studies of MII errors, recombination appeared normal and there was no obvious effect of maternal age, distinguishing our results from MII non-disjunction of chromosomes 18 or 21. Thus, surprisingly, the risk factors associated with both MI and MII non-disjunction appear to be different for virtually every chromosome that has been adequately studied.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N S Thomas
- Wessex Regional Genetics Laboratory, Salisbury District Hospital, Salisbury, Wiltshire SP2 8BJ, UK.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Abstract
Wilson disease (WD) is an autosomal recessive disease of copper transport. The disease is caused by a large number of mutations in the ATP7B gene, some of which appear to be population specific, whereas others are found in probands from a variety of different ethnic backgrounds. This study presents the results of screening the ATP7B gene by SSCP and sequencing in order to define the spectrum of mutations seen in British referrals for WD. The 52 patients screened included 10 with a non-British mixed ethnicity origin. This study identified 19 novel mutations and 18 mutations that had been previously described. The novel mutations included seven nonconservative missense mutations, eight small insertions, or deletions causing frameshift, two nonsense mutations, and two splice-site mutations. Seven of the 10 mixed ethnicity patients harboured homozygous mutations, whereas only four of the larger British group were homozygotes. The detection rate by SSCP analysis in the British group of 42 consecutive unrelated WD probands was 70%. However, SSCP screening of just three exons (exons 8, 14, and 18) is predicted to identify 60% of mutations present in WD referrals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Curtis
- Centre for Human Genetics, Sheffield, UK.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Abstract
Wilson disease (WD) is an autosomal recessive disease of copper transport. The disease is caused by a large number of mutations in the ATP7B gene, some of which appear to be population specific, whereas others are found in probands from a variety of different ethnic backgrounds. This study presents the results of screening the ATP7B gene by SSCP and sequencing in order to define the spectrum of mutations seen in British referrals for WD. The 52 patients screened included 10 with a non-British mixed ethnicity origin. This study identified 19 novel mutations and 18 mutations that had been previously described. The novel mutations included seven nonconservative missense mutations, eight small insertions, or deletions causing frameshift, two nonsense mutations, and two splice-site mutations. Seven of the 10 mixed ethnicity patients harboured homozygous mutations, whereas only four of the larger British group were homozygotes. The detection rate by SSCP analysis in the British group of 42 consecutive unrelated WD probands was 70%. However, SSCP screening of just three exons (exons 8, 14, and 18) is predicted to identify 60% of mutations present in WD referrals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Curtis
- Centre for Human Genetics, Sheffield, UK.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Sharrard MJ, Durkie M, Tanner MS. Genetic hemochromatosis in alpha1-antitrypsin-deficient liver disease. Hepatology 1997; 26:1366. [PMID: 9362386 DOI: 10.1002/hep.510260542] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
|