Clinical Practice Guidelines for Liver Transplantation in Saudi Arabia

The demand for liver transplantation in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) is associated with the country’s high burden of liver disease. Trends in the epidemiology of liver transplantation indications among recipients in KSA have changed over 20 years. Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis has eclipsed the hepatitis C virus in the country due to the effective treatment strategies for HCV. Risk factors for NASH, like type 2 diabetes mellitus, obesity, and hyperlipidemia, are becoming a major concern and a leading indication for liver transplantation in the KSA. There is also a significantly increased prevalence and incidence of genetic adult familial liver diseases in KSA. New immunosuppressive agents and preservation solutions, improved surgical capabilities, and early disease recognition and management have increased the success rate of liver transplant outcome but concerns about the side effects of immunosuppressive therapy can jeopardise long-term survival outcomes. Despite this, indications for liver transplantation continue to increase, resulting in ongoing challenges to maximize the number of potential donors and reduce patient mortality rate while expecting to get transplanted. The Saudi Center of Organ Transplant is the recognized National Organ Donation Agency for transplantation, which renders important support for procurement and allocation of organs. This guidance document aims to help healthcare providers in managing patients in the liver transplant setting.

Effect of Downstaging and Bridging of Hepatocellular Carcinoma on Survival Following Liver Transplant: A Single Center Experience

OBJECTIVES

Hepatocellular carcinoma is among the leading causes of cancer death. The Milan criteria are the first and most widely used criteria for selecting patients with hepatocellular carcinoma for a good transplant outcome. Studies have shown that patients with hepatocellular carcinoma outside the Milan criteria have good outcomes if they are successfully downstaged before transplant. We report our experience with locoregional therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma, either for bridging or for downstaging prior to transplant.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the electronic charts and our institutional database for adult patients diagnosed with hepatocellular carcinoma between 2001 and 2016. We recorded patient demographics, the type of transplant (living donor or deceased donor), radiologic findings, the type of locoregional intervention, and overall survival.

RESULTS

A total of 642 adult liver transplants were performed during the study period (290 living donor and 352 deceased donor), of which 158 (24.6%) were conducted in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (104 men and 54 women). Hepatocellular carcinoma was associated with hepatitis C in 80 patients (51%), hepatitis B in 44 (28%), and was cryptogenic in 13 (8%). Patients were grouped based on their radiologic staging (within Milan, within and beyond University of California, San Francisco), and subsequently described by whether they received locoregional therapy. Median survival and mortality were noted. Kaplan-Meier survival curves showed no statistically significant difference for patients within the Milan criteria, with or without locoregional therapy (P = .5). When patients within the Milan criteria were combined with patients within the University of California, San Francisco criteria, those who were downstaged from outside the latter criteria had similar survival.

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrate that carefully selected patients beyond the Milan criteria and even beyond the University of California, San Francisco criteria can be bridged and downstaged successfully for liver transplant.