Long-term outcomes of pediatric liver transplantation in acute liver failure vs end-stage chronic liver disease: A retrospective observational study

BACKGROUND

Children with acute liver failure (ALF) who meet the criteria are eligible for super-urgent transplantation, whereas children with end-stage chronic liver disease (ESCLD) are usually transplanted electively. Pediatric liver transplantation (PLT) in ALF and ESCLD settings has been well described in the literature, but there are no studies comparing the outcomes in these two groups.

AIM

To determine if there is a difference in post-operative complications and survival outcomes between ALF and ESCLD in PLT.

METHODS

This was a retrospective observational study of all primary PLTs performed at a single center between 2000 and 2019. ALF and ESCLD groups were compared for pretransplant recipient, donor and operative parameters, and post-operative outcomes including graft and patient survival.

RESULTS

Over a 20-year study period, 232 primary PLTs were performed at our center; 195 were transplanted for ESCLD and 37 were transplanted for ALF. The ALF recipients were significantly older (median 8 years vs 5.4 years; P = 0.031) and heavier (31 kg vs 21 kg; P = 0.011). Living donor grafts were used more in the ESCLD group (34 vs 0; P = 0.006). There was no difference between the two groups concerning vascular complications and rejection, but there were more bile leaks in the ESCLD group. Post-transplant patient survival was significantly higher in the ESCLD group: 1-, 5-, and 10-year survival rates were 97.9%, 93.9%, and 89.4%, respectively, compared to 78.3%, 78.3%, and 78.3% in the ALF group (P = 0.007). However, there was no difference in 1-, 5-, and 10-year graft survival between the ESCLD and ALF groups (90.7%, 82.9%, 77.3% vs 75.6%, 72.4%, and 66.9%; P = 0.119).

CONCLUSION

Patient survival is inferior in ALF compared to ESCLD recipients; the main reason is death in the 1^st year post-PLT in ALF group. Once the ALF children overcome the 1^st year after transplant, their survival stabilizes, and they have good long-term outcomes.

Predictors of patient and graft survival following pediatric liver transplantation: Long-term analysis of more than 300 cases from single centre

BACKGROUND

Pediatric liver transplant (PLT) activity has flourished over time although with limited expansion in the graft pool. The study aims to identify pre-transplant factors that predict post-transplant patient and graft survival in the PLT population.

METHODS

Retrospective review of PLTs at a single tertiary transplant unit from 2000 to 2019. Univariate and multivariate analyses of pre-transplant factors were performed to identify predictors of patient and graft survival.

RESULTS

Two hundred and seventy-six patients received 320 PLTs. The most common cause of graft loss was hepatic artery thrombosis (n = 13, 29.6%). The most common cause of mortality was sepsis (n = 11, 29.7%). Univariate analysis showed that the following variables had a significant (p < .05) impact on patient survival: recipient age, weight, height, graft type (technical variant graft), transplant category (acute liver failure), the era of transplant, and invasive ventilation. The following variables had a significant (p < .05) impact on graft survival: recipient age, weight, height, transplant category (acute liver failure), and the era of transplant. Multivariate analysis precluded the era of transplant as the only significant factor for patient survival; patients transplanted after 2005 had significantly higher patient survival. No independent factor predicting graft survival was identified. For children transplanted after 2005, the only factor that predicted patient survival was pre-transplant invasive ventilation.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests that the learning curve and pre-transplant invasive ventilation in the recipient have a significant impact on patient survival. The traditional view of worse outcomes of smaller PLT candidates should be changed.