Correlation research demonstrates that an inflammatory diet is a risk factor for calcium oxalate renal stone formation

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Previous studies have demonstrated associations between the Dietary Inflammatory Index (DII®), an analytical tool which evaluates the inflammatory potential of the diet according to the pro- and anti-inflammatory properties of its components, and renal stone formation. However, these have not comprehensively addressed important parameters such as stone type, gender, DII scores in stone formers (SFs) and healthy controls (Cs) and associations of DII with urine and blood chemistries. These were adopted as the survey parameters for the present study, the purpose of which was to test whether the contributory role of an inflammatory diet on stone formation could be further confirmed.

METHODS

97 calcium oxalate (CaOx) SFs and 63 Cs, matched for age and gender each completed a semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire from which nutrient composition was computed. These data were used to calculate the DII® score. To control the effect of energy intake, energy-adjusted DII scores were calculated per 1000 kcal consumed (E-DII™). A single blood sample and two consecutive overnight (8h) urine samples were collected from a subset (n = 59 SFs and n = 54 Cs) of the overall number of particpants (n = 160). These were analysed for renal stone risk factors. Data were analysed using regression models fit in R software.

RESULTS

E-DII scores were found to fit the data better than DII, so they were used throughout. E-DII scores were significantly more positive (more pro-inflammatory) in SFs than in controls in the combined gender group (-0.34 vs. -1.73, p < 0.0001) and separately in males (-0.43 vs. -1.78, p = 0.01) and females (-0.26 vs. - 1.61, p = 0.05). In blood, a significant negative correlation was seen between E-DII and HDL cholesterol. In urine significant positive correlations were seen between E-DII and each of calcium (ρ = 0.25, p = 0.02), phosphate (ρ = 0.48, p < 0.001), magnesium (ρ = 0.33, p < 0.0001) and uric acid (ρ = 0.27, p = 0.004) concentrations. A significant negative correlation was seen between E-DII and urinary volume ρ = -0.27, p = 0.003). There was no correlation between E-DII scores and the relative supersaturations of urinary CaOx, calcium phosphate (brushite) and uric acid.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings provide hitherto unreported quantitative evidence in support of the notion that the diet of calcium oxalate renal stone patients is significantly more pro-inflammatory than that of healthy controls.

Stress-stones-stress-recurrent stones: a self-propagating cycle? Difficulties in solving this dichotomy

Numerous studies have reported an association between stress and urolithiasis. Although urinary risk factors have been measured in several of these, compelling evidence of a causal relationship has not been established. A shortcoming is that alterations in single urinary parameters rather than ratios and quotients, which provide a more synergistic risk evaluation, have been measured. Recently, we speculated about a possible association between chronic stress and stone recurrence. This presents an intriguing dichotomy of whether stress causes stones or vice versa, or whether they are linked in a self-propagating stress-stones-stress-recurrence cycle. We investigated the latter hypothesis in a retrospective case-control designed study in which we calculated urinary ratios and quotients which are regarded as diagnostic indicators of stone risk. These included Ca/Cr, Ox/Cr, Mg/Cr, Cit/Cr, urate/Cr and citrate-magnesium-calcium ratios, activity product quotient for calcium oxalate (CaOx) and relative supersaturation of CaOx, brushite and uric acid. Overnight urinary data from 128 participants comprising 31 first time (FS), 33 recurrent (RS) CaOx stone formers and 64 controls were used. All subjects had been previously assessed for chronic stress dimensions, as well as for stress caused by their stone episodes per se. Conditional and unconditional logistic regression (with a Bonferroni correction for multiple tests) and simple linear regression were used to analyse various components of the data. Although RS had more stressful life events, with greater intensity of perception than FS, there were no significant differences between the groups regarding any of the urinary risk factors. No significant association between stressful life events and any of the urinary ratios or quotients was observed. A direct causal link between stress and stone recurrence was not indicated. We believe that future studies should shift their focus from traditional urinary risk factors to other stone-forming mechanisms. However, we recognize that there is an inherent problem in attempting to solve the stress-stones dichotomy as it would be impossible to disentangle alterations in risk factors which arise from lifestyle stress and those arising from stone episodes themselves.