1
|
Bhagawati M, Paul S, Mantella L, Johri AM, Laird JR, Singh IM, Singh R, Garg D, Fouda MM, Khanna NN, Cau R, Abraham A, Al-Maini M, Isenovic ER, Sharma AM, Fernandes JFE, Chaturvedi S, Karla MK, Nicolaides A, Saba L, Suri JS. Deep learning approach for cardiovascular disease risk stratification and survival analysis on a Canadian cohort. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2024:10.1007/s10554-024-03100-3. [PMID: 38678144 DOI: 10.1007/s10554-024-03100-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2023] [Accepted: 04/02/2024] [Indexed: 04/29/2024]
Abstract
The quantification of carotid plaque has been routinely used to predict cardiovascular risk in cardiovascular disease (CVD) and coronary artery disease (CAD). To determine how well carotid plaque features predict the likelihood of CAD and cardiovascular (CV) events using deep learning (DL) and compare against the machine learning (ML) paradigm. The participants in this study consisted of 459 individuals who had undergone coronary angiography, contrast-enhanced ultrasonography, and focused carotid B-mode ultrasound. Each patient was tracked for thirty days. The measurements on these patients consisted of maximum plaque height (MPH), total plaque area (TPA), carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT), and intraplaque neovascularization (IPN). CAD risk and CV event stratification were performed by applying eight types of DL-based models. Univariate and multivariate analysis was also conducted to predict the most significant risk predictors. The DL's model effectiveness was evaluated by the area-under-the-curve measurement while the CV event prediction was evaluated using the Cox proportional hazard model (CPHM) and compared against the DL-based concordance index (c-index). IPN showed a substantial ability to predict CV events (p < 0.0001). The best DL system improved by 21% (0.929 vs. 0.762) over the best ML system. DL-based CV event prediction showed a ~ 17% increase in DL-based c-index compared to the CPHM (0.86 vs. 0.73). CAD and CV incidents were linked to IPN and carotid imaging characteristics. For survival analysis and CAD prediction, the DL-based system performs superior to ML-based models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mrinalini Bhagawati
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, North-Eastern Hill University, Shillong, India
| | - Sudip Paul
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, North-Eastern Hill University, Shillong, India
| | - Laura Mantella
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Amer M Johri
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada
| | - John R Laird
- Heart and Vascular Institute, Adventist Health St. Helena, St Helena, CA, 94574, USA
| | - Inder M Singh
- Stroke Diagnostic and Monitoring Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA, 95661, USA
| | - Rajesh Singh
- Division of Research and Innovation, UTI, Uttaranchal University, Dehradun, India
| | - Deepak Garg
- School of Cowereter Science and Artificial Intelligence, SR University, Warangal, Telangana, 506371, India
| | - Mostafa M Fouda
- Department of ECE, Idaho State University, Pocatello, ID, 83209, USA
| | | | - Riccardo Cau
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria, 40138, Cagliari, Italy
| | | | - Mostafa Al-Maini
- Allergy, Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Esma R Isenovic
- Department of Radiobiology and Molecular Genetics, National Institute of The Republic of Serbia, University of Belgrade, 11001, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Aditya M Sharma
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, 22904, USA
| | | | - Seemant Chaturvedi
- Department of Neurology & Stroke Program, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Mannudeep K Karla
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Andrew Nicolaides
- Vascular Screening and Diagnostic Centre, University of Nicosia Medical School, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - Luca Saba
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria, 40138, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Jasjit S Suri
- Stroke Diagnostic and Monitoring Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA, 95661, USA.
- Department of ECE, Idaho State University, Pocatello, ID, 83209, USA.
- Department of CE, Graphic Era Deemed to be University, 248002, Dehradun, India.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Khanna NN, Singh M, Maindarkar M, Kumar A, Johri AM, Mentella L, Laird JR, Paraskevas KI, Ruzsa Z, Singh N, Kalra MK, Fernandes JFE, Chaturvedi S, Nicolaides A, Rathore V, Singh I, Teji JS, Al-Maini M, Isenovic ER, Viswanathan V, Khanna P, Fouda MM, Saba L, Suri JS. Polygenic Risk Score for Cardiovascular Diseases in Artificial Intelligence Paradigm: A Review. J Korean Med Sci 2023; 38:e395. [PMID: 38013648 PMCID: PMC10681845 DOI: 10.3346/jkms.2023.38.e395] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2023] [Accepted: 10/15/2023] [Indexed: 11/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) related mortality and morbidity heavily strain society. The relationship between external risk factors and our genetics have not been well established. It is widely acknowledged that environmental influence and individual behaviours play a significant role in CVD vulnerability, leading to the development of polygenic risk scores (PRS). We employed the PRISMA search method to locate pertinent research and literature to extensively review artificial intelligence (AI)-based PRS models for CVD risk prediction. Furthermore, we analyzed and compared conventional vs. AI-based solutions for PRS. We summarized the recent advances in our understanding of the use of AI-based PRS for risk prediction of CVD. Our study proposes three hypotheses: i) Multiple genetic variations and risk factors can be incorporated into AI-based PRS to improve the accuracy of CVD risk predicting. ii) AI-based PRS for CVD circumvents the drawbacks of conventional PRS calculators by incorporating a larger variety of genetic and non-genetic components, allowing for more precise and individualised risk estimations. iii) Using AI approaches, it is possible to significantly reduce the dimensionality of huge genomic datasets, resulting in more accurate and effective disease risk prediction models. Our study highlighted that the AI-PRS model outperformed traditional PRS calculators in predicting CVD risk. Furthermore, using AI-based methods to calculate PRS may increase the precision of risk predictions for CVD and have significant ramifications for individualized prevention and treatment plans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Narendra N Khanna
- Department of Cardiology, Indraprastha APOLLO Hospitals, New Delhi, India
- Asia Pacific Vascular Society, New Delhi, India
| | - Manasvi Singh
- Stroke Monitoring and Diagnostic Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA, USA
- Bennett University, Greater Noida, India
| | - Mahesh Maindarkar
- Asia Pacific Vascular Society, New Delhi, India
- Stroke Monitoring and Diagnostic Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA, USA
- School of Bioengineering Sciences and Research, Maharashtra Institute of Technology's Art, Design and Technology University, Pune, India
| | | | - Amer M Johri
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada
| | - Laura Mentella
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - John R Laird
- Heart and Vascular Institute, Adventist Health St. Helena, St. Helena, CA, USA
| | | | - Zoltan Ruzsa
- Invasive Cardiology Division, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| | - Narpinder Singh
- Department of Food Science and Technology, Graphic Era Deemed to be University, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India
| | | | | | - Seemant Chaturvedi
- Department of Neurology & Stroke Program, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Andrew Nicolaides
- Vascular Screening and Diagnostic Centre and University of Nicosia Medical School, Cyprus
| | - Vijay Rathore
- Nephrology Department, Kaiser Permanente, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | - Inder Singh
- Stroke Monitoring and Diagnostic Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA, USA
| | - Jagjit S Teji
- Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Mostafa Al-Maini
- Allergy, Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Esma R Isenovic
- Department of Radiobiology and Molecular Genetics, National Institute of The Republic of Serbia, University of Belgrade, Beograd, Serbia
| | | | - Puneet Khanna
- Department of Anaesthesiology, AIIMS, New Delhi, India
| | - Mostafa M Fouda
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Idaho State University, Pocatello, ID, USA
| | - Luca Saba
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Jasjit S Suri
- Asia Pacific Vascular Society, New Delhi, India
- Stroke Monitoring and Diagnostic Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA, USA
- Department of Computer Engineering, Graphic Era Deemed to be University, Dehradun, India.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Pavelka K, Akkoç N, Al-Maini M, Zerbini C, Bao C, Karateev D, Nasonov E, Pedersen R, Dinh A, Shen Q, Vasilescu R, Mahgoub E, Vlahos B. AB0422 Impact of Combination Etanercept-Dmard Induction Therapy in Active Rheumatoid Arthritis: Interim Results of an International Treat-to-Target Study Conducted in Regions with Limited Biologic Access: Table 1. Ann Rheum Dis 2015. [DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-eular.1689] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
|