Cardiovascular Outcomes Associated With Exposure To Radiation Therapy In Thoracic Malignancies: An Insight Study Using the National Inpatient Database

Background Thoracic irradiation is a widely used therapeutic and palliative treatment option for thoracic neoplasms. However, short- and long-term cardiovascular adverse effects of radiation exposure remain a major concern. The short-term adverse effects are observed within months of exposure such as pericardial diseases; meanwhile, the long-term complications are usually insidious and manifest over decades, such as congestive heart failure, coronary artery disease, cardiomyopathy, conduction disorders, constrictive pericarditis, and valvular heart disease. Hence, long-term cardiovascular adverse effects are challenging to predict, and the association with radiation exposure remains difficult to establish. Methodology This retrospective, observational study was conducted using data from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database from 2016 to 2019. Adult patients with primary thoracic malignancies who underwent radiation therapy (RT) were defined using principal and secondary International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision codes. Other malignancies that can be treated with RT and all secondary malignancies were excluded from the primary comparison group. Cardiac outcomes were defined as the prevalence of congestive heart failure, coronary artery disease, cardiomyopathy, conduction disorders, pericardial diseases, and valvular heart diseases in the primary group. The multivariate logistic and the linear regression analyses were used to adjust for confounders. Results When compared to the general population, adults with thoracic malignancies exposed to RT had higher odds of developing chronic pericarditis (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 2, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.9-2.2, p < 0.001), acute pericarditis (aOR = 2.3, 95% CI = 1.9-2.9, p < 0.001), constrictive pericarditis (aOR = 2.8, 95% CI = 2.1-3.7, p < 0.001), conduction disorders (aOR = 1.3, 95% CI = 1.2-1.35, p < 0.001), coronary artery disease (aOR = 1.24, 95% CI = 1.2-1.27, p < 0.001), heart failure (aOR = 1.44, 95% CI = 1.4-1.5, p < 0.001), and valvular heart disease (aOR = 1.37, 95% CI = 1.3-1.4, p < 0.001). There was no difference in the odds of developing cardiac arrest (aOR = 1, 95% CI = 0.9-1.10, p = 0.6) or acute myocardial infarction (aOR = 1.1, 95% CI = 1-1.15, p < 0.001). When compared to adults with thoracic malignancies not exposed to RT, adults with thoracic malignancies who were exposed to RT had higher odds of developing acute myocardial infarction (aOR = 1.14, 95% CI = 1.1-1.18, p < 0.001), chronic pericarditis (aOR = 1.3, 95% CI = 1.2-1.3, p < 0.001), acute pericarditis (aOR = 1.6, 95% CI = 1.2-2.1, p < 0.001), constrictive pericarditis (aOR = 2.2, 95% CI = 1.5-3.2, p < 0.001), conduction disorders (aOR = 1.1, 95% CI = 1.08-1.13, p < 0.001), coronary artery disease (aOR = 1.14, 95% CI = 1.12-1.16, p < 0.001), heart failure (aOR = 1.2, 95% CI = 1.17-1.23, p < 0.001), and valvular heart disease (aOR = 1.3, 95% CI = 1.2-1.35, p < 0.001). The odds were similar between the two groups for developing cardiac arrest (aOR = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.8-0.98, p = 0.05). Conclusions Adults with thoracic malignancies who were treated with RT have higher odds of developing chronic pericarditis, acute pericarditis, constrictive pericarditis, conduction disorders, coronary artery disease, heart failure, and valvular heart disease while similar odds of developing cardiac arrest or acute myocardial infarction compared to the general adult population.

Speckle tracking echocardiography in patients with systemic sclerosis: a meta-analysis

Background

Myocardial dysfunction is well established in systemic sclerosis (SSc). The utility of standard echocardiography is limited to detect the onset of myocardial dysfunction. Speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) and strain imaging has emerged as a useful technique to quantify left ventricle hemodynamics and myocardial function in early stages of myocardial dysfunction. We aimed to systematically analyze the existing literature on the application of STE and strain analysis in identifying SSc associated myocardial dysfunction

Methods

PubMed, Cochrane, and Google Scholar were queried for studies from the inception of the databases to 2022. Case control studies that used 2D STE for assessment of strain in SSc patients and controls, were included for the analysis. PRISMA guidelines were followed for selections of studies. Two independent reviewers extracted data. Analysis was done using Cochrane Review Manager 5.0.

Results

Total of 19 studies were included in the analysis that compared strain analysis in SSc patient's vs healthy controls. Of the 16 studies that reported left ventricular (LV) global longitudinal strain, we found significantly lower LV global longitudinal strain in SSc patients (mean difference 1.92; 95% CI 0.98–2.87). Six studies reported LV circumferential strain which was noted to be lower in SSc patients compared to healthy controls (mean difference 3.55; 95% CI 1.60–5.51). Five studies reported LV global radial strain with a similar decrease in radial strain among SSc patients compared to controls (mean difference 4.39; 95% CI −6.95 to −1.83). 10 studies reported right ventricular longitudinal strain with a decrease in longitudinal strain in SSc patient's vs controls (mean difference 2.57; 95% CI 2.03–3.12).

Conclusions

SSc patients have lower strain values compared to controls, which is suggestive of an impaired myocardial function in left and right ventricle. Strain analysis by STE could help with early detection of myocardial dysfunction.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: None.

How strong is the evidence that it is possible to get SARS-CoV-2 twice? A systematic review

With a large number of coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) patients being discharged from hospital with negative test results for SARS-CoV-2, it has been reported that several recovered cases tested positive after discharge (re-positive, RP). This finding has raised several important questions for this novel coronavirus and Covid-19 disease. In this review, we have discussed several important questions, including: (1) Can the virus re-infect recovered individuals? (2) What are the possible causes of the re-positive reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test in recovered patients? (3) What are the implications of these re-positive cases concerning the spread of the virus? Understanding how recovery from Covid-19 confers immunity to decrease the risk of re-infection is needed to inform current efforts to safely scale back population-based interventions, such as physical distancing. We have also described what is currently known about the immune response to Covid-19, highlighted key gaps in knowledge, and identified opportunities for future research. Overall, the quality of the evidence is poor and we describe the features that should be described for future cases.

Role of Radiofrequency Ablation in the Management of Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer

Pancreatic cancer is one of the most aggressive malignancies of the digestive tract and carries a poor prognosis. The majority of patients have advanced disease at the time of diagnosis. Surgical resection offers the only curative treatment, but only a small proportion of patients can undergo surgical resection. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a well-known modality in the management of solid organ tumors, however, its utility in the management of pancreatic cancer is under investigation. Since the past decade, there is increasing use of RFA as it provides a feasible palliation treatment in the management of unresectable pancreatic cancer. RFA causes tumor cytoreduction through multiple mechanisms such as coagulative necrosis, protein denaturation, and activation of anticancer immunity. The safety profile of RFA is controversial because of the high risk for complications, however, small prospective and retrospective studies have shown promising results in its applicability for palliative management of unresectable pancreatic malignancies. In this review, we discuss different approaches of RFA, their indications, technical accessibility, safety, and major complications in the management of unresectable pancreatic cancer.