Long-Term Quality of Life Following Head and Neck Radiation: A Study Using the Vanderbilt Head and Neck Symptom Survey

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

Head and neck (H&N) radiation (RT) is characterized by significant acute toxicity, but long-term quality of life (QoL) following H&N RT is not well defined. This study sought to prospectively characterize, by subsite, long-term QoL in patients who underwent H&N RT using the Vanderbilt Head and Neck Symptom Survey (VHNSS) version 2.0.

MATERIALS/METHODS

In patients treated with H&N RT between 2010 and 2021, the VHNSS was prospectively collected prior to beginning RT and at follow-up visits after completion of RT. Responses were broken down into symptom clusters for characterization of specific side effects and scored from 0 (asymptomatic) to 10 (severe symptoms). Patients were stratified by disease site and type of RT, with three main subgroups of interest: p16+ oropharynx (OPX) treated with definitive RT, nasopharynx (NPX) treated with definitive RT, and oral cavity (OC) treated with postoperative RT (PORT). To characterize long-term QoL, surveys collected 2 years (±3 months) after completion of RT were analyzed. Survey response distributions are reported as median and interquartile ranges. Comparisons between groups were made using the Mann-Whitney U test.

RESULTS

A total of 65 patients (33 OPX [50.8%], 19 NPX [29.2%], 13 OC [20.0%]) had survey responses at 2 years. Median age was 56 (range 20-86). 48 (73.8%) patients were male. Concurrent chemotherapy was administered to 52 patients (80.0%). At 2 years, among OPX patients, trouble hearing (1.5 [0-5]) represented the greatest symptom burden, though this was still less than NPX (4.0 [2.0-7.5]; p = 0.099) patients but greater than OC (0.0 [0.0-1.5]; p = 0.16) patients. OPX patients had significantly less difficulty swallowing solids (0.8 [0.1-2.0]) compared to NPX (2.5 [1.1-5.1]; p = 0.018) and OC (3.5 [1.9-5.1]; p = 0.002) patients. OPX patients also experienced less dry mouth (1.0 [0.2-3.3]) than NPX (3.2 [1.5-6.6]; p = 0.012) and OC (2.4 [1.8-5.4]; p = 0.056) patients. OPX patients reported less trismus (0.0 [0.0-0.2]) than NPX (4.0 [0.0-7.0]; p<0.001) and OC (1.0 [0.5-3]; p = 0.002) patients. OPX patients had less neck tightness (0.0 [0.0-2.0]) than NPX (2.0 [0.0-3.0]; p = 0.022) patients and less voice dysfunction (0.0 [0.0-0.7]) than OC (3.0 [1.2-3.5]; p = 0.011) patients. Lastly, OPX patients had better mental health (0.0 [0.0-1.2]) than NPX (2.0 [0.0-5.0]; p = 0.019) and OC (2.0 [0.0-3.2]; p = 0.086) patients. There was no difference in taste/smell among OPX (0.9 [0.0-2.7]), NPX (2.3 [0.7-5.1]; p = 0.100), and OC (1.5 [1.1-3.4]; p = 0.230) patients.

CONCLUSION

The VHNSS was able to characterize long-term QoL in patients treated with H&N RT. In general, patients with OPX treated with definitive RT have improved long-term QoL relative to patients with NPX or OC cancers, though at least a quarter of patients still report significant dry mouth, taste/smell, and hearing difficulties. Additional work should seek to identify, and, where possible through timely rehabilitation, proactively mitigate late symptoms in patients following H&N RT.

Cost-effectiveness of ultrasound before non-invasive prenatal screening for fetal aneuploidy

OBJECTIVE

To determine the cost-effectiveness of first-trimester ultrasound before fetal aneuploidy screening with cell-free DNA (cfDNA) compared with screening by cfDNA alone.

METHODS

A decision analytic model was constructed for 400 000 pregnant individuals with advanced maternal age who desired first-trimester aneuploidy screening with cfDNA in the USA, to compare two screening strategies: (1) cfDNA only and (2) ultrasound performed within 4 weeks before cfDNA. Input parameters included probability of fetal aneuploidy, cfDNA performance, desire for diagnostic testing, pregnancy outcomes, and pregnancy and lifetime costs and utilities. The primary outcome measure was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), in terms of cost in 2020 US dollars (USD) per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained. Secondary outcomes included procedure-related loss, pregnancy termination, live birth with aneuploidy, live birth with structural anomaly and stillbirth. Discounting was performed at 3% per year with an estimated maternal lifespan of 81 years starting at the age of 35 years. One-way, multiway and Monte Carlo probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed. All base-case estimates and ranges of uncertainty were derived from the literature. The willingness-to-pay threshold was set at 100 000 USD per QALY.

RESULTS

In the base-case analysis, ultrasound before cfDNA screening was more cost-effective than cfDNA screening without pretest ultrasound, with an ICER of 12 588 USD and higher net monetary benefit (24 241 vs 20 466). The strategy involving ultrasound before cfDNA was more costly by 544 USD but also more effective (by 0.04 QALY) compared with cfDNA alone. Base-case results were robust in sensitivity analyses with the strategy involving ultrasound before cfDNA always remaining the most cost-effective approach with the highest net monetary benefit.

CONCLUSION

First-trimester ultrasound before cfDNA is a more cost-effective strategy for non-invasive prenatal aneuploidy screening compared with cfDNA alone. © 2022 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Utility of ultrasound examination at 10-14 weeks prior to cell-free DNA screening for fetal aneuploidy

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the frequency of unexpected first-trimester ultrasound findings that would alter prenatal management in pregnant women eligible for cell-free (cf) DNA screening because of advanced maternal age (AMA).

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of all AMA women at a tertiary care center who had a 10-14-week ultrasound examination between 1 January 2012 and 27 April 2015. Information on pregnancy dating, obstetric ultrasound examination, prenatal screening and genetic testing were collected from a perinatal database. The primary outcome was an unexpected ultrasound finding in the first trimester that would alter the prenatal screening/testing strategy.

RESULTS

In total, 2337 women met the inclusion criteria, with a total of 2462 fetuses. Sixty-eight (2.9%) women had an anomalous fetus, of which 44 (64.7%) had diagnostic testing. In the entire cohort, a non-viable pregnancy was identified in 153 (6.5%) women. Multiple gestation was identified in 32 (1.4%) women; five had a cotwin demise. Gestational dating was revised for 126 (5.4%) women. Among those who opted for aneuploidy screening (n = 1806), 68.5% had cfDNA screening and 31.5% had first-trimester screening by analysis of maternal serum biomarkers and nuchal translucency thickness. Among those eligible for cfDNA screening, 16.1% (95% CI, 15.0-18.0%; 377/2337) had an ultrasound finding (anomaly, incorrect dating, multiple gestation, non-viable pregnancy) at the time of testing that would have altered the provider's counseling regarding the prenatal screening/testing strategy.

CONCLUSIONS

A substantial proportion of AMA women eligible for cfDNA screening have fetal ultrasound findings that could alter genetic testing strategy and clinical management. This study recommends ultrasound examination prior to cfDNA screening in AMA women. Copyright © 2016 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Importance of the mini-mental status examination in the treatment of patients with brain metastases: a report from the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group protocol 91-04

PURPOSE

Little information is available on the importance of pretreatment Mini-Mental Status Exam (MMSE) on long-term survival and neurologic function following treatment for unresectable brain metastases. This study examines the importance of the MMSE in predicting outcome in a group of patients treated with an accelerated fractionation regimen of 30 Gy in 10 daily fractions in 2 weeks.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) accrued 445 patients to a Phase III comparison of accelerated hyperfractionated (AH) radiotherapy (1.6 Gy b.i.d.) to a total dose of 54.4 Gy vs. an accelerated fractionation (AF) of 30 Gy in 10 daily fractions from 1991 through 1995. All patients had histologic proof of malignancy at the primary site. Brain metastases were measurable by CT or MRI scan and all patients had a Karnofsky performance score (KPS) of at least 70 and a neurologic function classification of 1 or 2. Two hundred twenty-four patients were entered on the accelerated fractionated arm, and 182 were eligible for analysis (7 patients were judged ineligible, no MMSE information in 29, no survival data in 1, no forms submitted in 1).

RESULTS

Average age was 60 years; 58% were male and 25% had a single intracranial lesion on their pretherapy evaluation. KPS was 70 in 32%, 80 in 31%, 90 in 29%, and 100 in 14%. The average MMSE was 26.5, which is the lower quartile for normal in the U.S. population. The range of the MMSE scores was 11-30 with 30 being the maximum. A score of less than 23 indicates possible dementia, which occurred in 16% of the patients prior to treatment. The median time from diagnosis to treatment was 5 days (range, 0-158 days). The median survival was 4.2 months with a 95% confidence interval of 3.7-5.1 months. Thirty-seven percent of the patients were alive at 6 months, and 17% were alive at 1 year. The following variables were examined in a Cox proportional-hazards model to determine their prognostic value for overall survival: age, gender, KPS, baseline MMSE, time until MMSE below 23, time since diagnosis, number of brain metastases, and radiosurgery eligibility. In all Cox model analyses, age, KPS, baseline MMSE, time until MMSE below 23, and time since diagnosis were treated as continuous variables. Statistically significant factors for survival were pretreatment MMSE (p = 0.0002), and KPS (p = 0.02). Age was of borderline significance (p = 0.065) as well as gender (p = 0.074). A poorer outcome is associated with an increasing age, male gender, lower MMSE, and shorter time until MMSE below 23. Improvement in MMSE over time was assessed; 62 patients died prior to obtaining follow-up MMSE, and 30 patients had a baseline MMSE of 30 (the maximum), and, therefore, no improvement could be expected. Of the remaining 88, 48 (54.5%) demonstrated an improvement in their MMSE at any follow-up visit. Lack of decline of MMSE below 23 was seen in long-term survivors, with 81% at 6 months and 66% at 1 year of patients maintaining a MMSE above 23. Analysis of time until death from brain metastases demonstrated that decreasing baseline MMSE (p = 0.003) and primary site (breast vs. lung vs. other p = 0.032) were highly associated with a terminal event.

CONCLUSION

While gender and perhaps age remain significant predictors for survival, MMSE is also an important way of assessing a patient's outcome. Accelerated fractionation used in the treatment of brain metastases (30 Gy in 10 fractions) appears to also be associated with an improvement in MMSE and a lack of decline of MMSE below 23 in long-term survivors.

A randomized phase III study of accelerated hyperfractionation versus standard in patients with unresected brain metastases: a report of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 9104

PURPOSE

To compare 1-year survival and acute toxicity rates between an accelerated hyperfractionated (AH) radiotherapy (1.6 Gy b.i.d.) to a total dose of 54.4 Gy vs. an accelerated fractionation (AF) of 30 Gy in 10 daily fractions in patients with unresected brain metastasis.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) accrued 445 patients to a Phase III comparison of accelerated hyperfractionation vs. standard fractionation from 1991 through 1995. All patients had histologic proof of malignancy at the primary site. Brain metastasis were measurable by CT or MRI scan and all patients had a Karnofsky performance score (KPS) of at least 70 and a neurologic function classification of 1 or 2. For AH, 32 Gy in 20 fractions over 10 treatment days (1.6 Gy twice daily) was delivered to the whole brain. A boost of 22.4 Gy in 14 fractions was delivered to each lesion with a 2-cm margin.

RESULTS

The average age in both groups was 60 years; nearly two-thirds of all patients had lung primaries. Of the 429 eligible and analyzable patients, the median survival time was 4.5 months in both arms. The 1-year survival rate was 19% in the AF arm vs. 16% in the AH arm. No difference in median or 1-year survival was observed among patients with solitary metastasis between treatment arms. Recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) classes have previously been identified and patients with a KPS of 70 or more, a controlled primary tumor, less than 65 years of age, and brain metastases only (RPA class I), had a 1-year survival of 35% in the AF arm vs. 25% in the AH arm (p = 0.95). In a multivariate model, only age, KPS, extent of metastatic disease (intracranial metastases only vs. intra- and extracranial metastases), and status of primary (controlled vs. uncontrolled) were statistically significant (at p < 0.05). Treatment assignment was not statistically significant. Overall Grade III or IV toxicity was equivalent in both arms, and one fatal toxicity at 44 days secondary to cerebral edema was seen in the AH arm.

CONCLUSION

Although a previous RTOG Phase I/II report had suggested a potential benefit in patients with limited metastatic disease, a good Karnofsky performance status, or neurologic function when treated with an AH regimen, this randomized comparison could not demonstrate any improvement in survival when compared to a conventional regimen of 30 Gy in 10 fractions. Therefore, this accelerated hyperfractionated regimen to 54.4 Gy cannot be recommended for patients with intracranial metastatic disease.

Late effects of hyperfractionated radiotherapy for advanced head and neck cancer: long-term follow-up results of RTOG 83-13

PURPOSE

The objective of this study was to examine the incidence of late effects of hyperfractionated radiotherapy for head and neck cancer as a function of the dose delivered, as well as the daily interfraction interval. In addition, we wished to examine the influence of other prognostic factors including age, gender, primary site, T- and N-stage, and overall stage on the late effects of hyperfractionated radiotherapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between 1983 and 1987, 479 patients with advanced head and neck cancer were entered on a Phase ILE/II dose escalation trial of hyperfractionated radiotherapy. They were randomly assigned to receive a dose of 67.2, 72.0, 76.8, or 81.6 Gy, delivered at 1.2 Gy/fraction, twice a day (BID), 5 days/week. Of the 451 analyzable patients, 399 patients who received > or = 64.8 Gy and had a follow-up > 90 days were eligible for this study. Acute and late effects were scored with the RTOG/EORTC late radiation morbidity scoring scheme. For this analysis, patients were subclassified by the actual doses delivered and by an average daily interfraction interval of < or = 4.5 h or > 4.5 h. The incidence of late effects was estimated using a cumulative incidence approach.

RESULTS

Fifty-nine patients received 67.2 +/- 2.4 Gy, 119 received 72.0 +/- 2.4 Gy, 98 received 76.8 +/- 2.4 Gy, and 123 received 81.6 +/- 2.4 Gy. The proportion of patients treated with a daily interfraction interval of > 4.5 h was 32, 50, 43, and 71%, respectively. The four treatment groups were well balanced with respect to pretreatment characteristics. The median follow-up was 1.71 years (range: 0.24-9.6) for all evaluable patients and 6.12 years for 85 alive patients. There was no significant difference in the incidence of late effects between the different dose levels. At 5 years, the cumulative incidence of late effects was 17, 14, 20, and 13% for grade 3, and 7, 3, 7, and 5% for grade 4. However, the incidence of late effects differed significantly with respect to daily interfraction interval. The cumulative incidence of grade 4 late effects increased from 6.3% at 2 years to 7.5% at 3 years to 8.0% at 4 years and 8.6% at 5 years with an interval of < or = 4.5 h, while it remained at a constant of 2.0% with an interval of > 4.5 h during the same period (p = 0.0036). Multivariate analysis showed that among the prognostic factors examined, daily interfraction interval of < or = 4.5 h was the only significant independent prognostic factor for the development of grade 3+ or grade 4 late effects (p = 0.0167 and p = 0.0013, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Results of this randomized Phase ILE/II trial of hyperfractionated radiotherapy in head and neck cancer showed no apparent dose-response relationship for late effects within the range of 67.2-81.6 Gy. Daily interfraction interval was a significant independent factor for the development of late effects in a multivariate analysis.

Factors affecting cosmetic outcome in breast-conserving cancer treatment--objective quantitative assessment

A battery of objective measurements of cosmetic outcome was performed on 114 patients who had been treated by breast-preservation techniques for breast cancer. Cosmetic breast retraction, as determined by Breast Retraction Assessment (BRA) measurements, was significantly greater in patients who underwent extensive primary tumor resection, were more than 60 years old, weighed more than 150 lbs, or had a primary tumor in an upper breast quadrant. While use of a local RT boost, per se, was not a significant factor, those patients with high dose and/or large volume local boosts more frequently had marked retraction. Breast telangiectasia and depigmentation (T/D) was related to use of a local RT boost, patient age greater than 60 years, and use of separate nodal RT fields. Breast T/D was significantly more frequent with use of electron beam local RT boost which delivered a boost skin dose exceeding 1600 cGy. Objective quantitative assessments, such as BRA and T/D area measurements, provide data to determine factors related to each type of cosmetic change and thus provide guidelines for optimizing cosmetic outcome. Limiting the extent of primary tumor resection may minimize the amount of breast retraction. Omitting the local RT boost, particularly large volume, high dose boosts, may reduce the frequency of marked cosmetic retraction and skin T/D.

The reverse hockey stick technique: postmastectomy radiation therapy for breast cancer patients with locally advanced tumor presentation or extensive loco-regional recurrence

A combination of photon and electron radiation therapy (RT) fields was devised to treat patients with initial or recurrent breast cancer presentations which extensively involved the chest wall (CW) and/or the axilla. The ipsilateral supraclavicular, infraclavicular, axillary, and lateral CW regions are treated in continuity by anterior and posterior opposed photon beam "reverse hockey stick" fields. The internal mammary and medial chest wall regions are treated by an anterior electron beam field which is tightly junctioned to the photon beam fields. Electron beam energy and thickness of applied bolus are selected so that the electron beam 80% depth isodose curve matches the anterior pleural surface and/or deepest extent of tumor. The goal of treatment is to deliver 4400-5000 cGy to regions at risk of microscopic tumor with local boosts to 6000-7500 cGy to sites of gross disease. Between January 1977, and June 1985, this technique was selectively used in 46 patients, 31 patients with loco-regional tumor recurrence and 15 post-mastectomy patients who initially presented with locally advanced disease. A minimum tumor dose of 4400 cGy was delivered in all except five patients. A diffuse moist skin reaction developed in 31 of the 44 (70%) patients who received at least 3800 cGy. This healed in less than 1 month in all except seven. Frequency of CW diffuse moist skin reaction within the electron beam field was related to the daily applied RT dose. Diffuse moist skin reactions were also noted to be more frequent among patients who had received prior or concurrent Adriamycin. Significant complications included symptomatic arm lymphedema in seven; CW ulcer in two; and acute radiation pneumonitis; steroid-withdrawal radiation pneumonitis, pleuritis, and marked thrombocytopenia in one patient each. With a follow-up of 36-100 months, there was no evidence of loco-regional tumor relapse in 55% of patients treated for recurrent disease and in 73% treated following mastectomy for locally advanced presentations. In summary, we find the reverse hockey stick technique to be a simple, highly reproducible and effective RT approach for postmastectomy breast cancer patients with extensive initial presentation or recurrent disease.

Changes in heating patterns of interstitial microwave antenna arrays at different insertion depths

The changes in heating patterns of interstitial microwave antennas at different insertion depths were investigated in a static phantom at 915 MHz. Antennas for the Clini-Therm Mark VI system were inserted 5-15 cm into muscle-equivalent material, through nylon catheters. The phantom was heated with arrays of antennas at 2 cm spacings for 60 s at 15 W per antenna. Midplane and transverse heating patterns were determined thermographically with the antennas inserted parallel or perpendicular to the split of the phantom. Hot spots, independent of heating near the junction plane, were observed in the midplane of the 2 x 2 and 2 x 4 arrays at 2.8 cm from the insertion end. The magnitudes of these hot spots were reduced by 40-45 per cent as insertion depth was increased from 7 to 10.5 cm. With insertion depths of more than 11.5 cm the hot spots gradually diminished and heating occurred mostly near the junction plane. The observed heating patterns were caused by changes in impedance of the antenna arrays at different insertion depths. The impedance mismatch had resulted in different wave propagation within the tissue material which produced different radiation patterns. During treatments, because heating varies with insertion depth, great care must be exercised in monitoring temperatures.

Total skin electron irradiation for mycosis fungoides: relationship between acute toxicities and measured dose at different anatomic sites

From June 1978 to June 1986, 50 patients with primary and recurrent mycosis fungoides were treated with total skin electron irradiation (TSEI), using the Stanford technique, to a total dose of 3600 cGy. TSEI was used alone, or in combination with low dose total body photon irradiation, or MOPP. Thermoluminescent dosimeter (TLD) measurements of the prescribed skin dose were obtained on twenty patients. The dorsum of the foot was 24% higher. The axillae, the bottom, and the arch of the foot were significantly underdosed. Frequencies of acute toxicities noted at 2000 cGy were: Skin, Grade I-II (RTOG) 80%. Partial epilation: scalp, 100%; eyebrows and at eyelashes, 20%. Nail dystrophy, 48%. Edema: hands and feet, 44%. Bullae: dorsum of feet, 8%; hands, 4%; and 3600 cGy: Skin, grade III 22%. Total epilation: scalp, 66%; eyebrows and eyelashes, 56%. Nail loss, 38%. Edema: hands and feet, 76%. Bullae: dorsum of feet, 34%; hands, 12%. Conjunctivitis, 4%. Large bullae, were more significant on the dorsum of the feet. Severe moist desquamation occurred in eight patients who had ulcerated lesions on initial presentation. Three patients were hospitalized due to ulceration and skin infection. All patients completed treatment after a short to moderate break. No patient developed skin necrosis, or corneal ulceration. No correlation exists between dose level, degree and onset of toxicity with previous chemotherapy or TBI. We conclude that the overall toxicity of TSEI is well tolerated.

Intracatheter hyperthermia and iridium-192 radiotherapy in the treatment of bile duct carcinoma

We report a case of a patient with locally advanced bile duct carcinoma treated with 4500 cGy external beam radiotherapy, followed 3 weeks later by intracatheter 915 MHz microwave hyperthermia and radiotherapy delivered through a biliary U-tube placed at the time of surgery. Heating was to 43-45 degrees C for 1 hour followed immediately by intracatheter Iridium-192 seeds to deliver 5000 cGy over a 72 hour period. Prior to treatment, a thermal dosimetry study in phanton was conducted, using the same type of U-tube catheter tubing as in the patient. Orthogonal X rays of the patient's porta hepatis region were used to reconstruct the catheter geometry in the phantom. Proper insertion depth was determined thermographically to obtain maximum heating at the center of the tumor. The maximum SAR was 8.8 watts per kilogram per watt input. During the treatment, the average power applied was 30 W. Six months after therapy, the patient is asymptomatic. Although alkaline phosphatase, SGOT and SGPT have remained elevated, bilirubin has returned to normal and computerized tomographic scans and cholangiograms remain stable. A duodenal ulcer developed after therapy and is healing well with conservative medical management. This case demonstrates that hyperthermia applied through biliary drainage catheters is technically feasible and clinically tolerated. We believe the use of intracatheter hyperthermia in conjunction with external and/or intracatheter radiotherapy in selected patients with unresectable bile duct carcinomas warrants further study.

Patient self-evaluation of cosmetic outcome of breast-preserving cancer treatment

Thirty-two patients with Stage I or II breast cancer who had completed conservative breast-preserving treatment were asked to rate their cosmetic outcomes. Within this group, extent of the surgical excision of the breast tumor varied, with biopsy scars ranging from 2 to 19.5 cm. All patients had received external beam radiotherapy, with local boost doses in 17 cases. The average interval between self-evaluation and the completion of radiotherapy was 19 months. Patients completed a questionnaire rating the appearance of the treated breast, the degree of difference between breasts and overall satisfaction with cosmesis. They were asked to describe differences between breasts and to make any additional comments. Appearance of the treated breast was rated good to excellent by 94%, although 88% noted a difference of slight to moderate degree between treated and untreated breasts. Overall, 78% of patients were very to extremely satisfied, while moderate satisfaction was reported by 19%. Reports of breast differences included reduced size of the treated breast (44%), increased firmness (31%), elevation (25%), and skin color changes (22%). Reasons for dissatisfaction included chronic breast pain in 3 patients, breast edema in one and arm edema in one. Two patients wanted the untreated breast reduced in size. Statistically significant inverse relationships were found between the length of the biopsy scar and patient ratings of both appearance of the treated breast and overall satisfaction. These results indicated that although most patients were satisfied with cosmetic results of breast-preserving treatments, they are quite discriminating in their evaluations of differences between breasts. Functional factors such as pain and edema had a negative impact on satisfaction with cosmesis.

Breast retraction assessment. Multiple variable analysis of factors responsible for cosmetic retraction in patients treated conservatively for stage I or II breast carcinoma

A method for objective evaluation of cosmetic outcome of patients treated conservatively for breast carcinoma allowed the location of the nipples on two coordinates. The method was applied in 41 patients, 5 to 41 months following the completion of radiation therapy. Multiple variable analysis revealed that extensiveness of resection of the primary breast tumor was the major factor associated with breast retraction. The only other factor of significance was patient age at diagnosis. Neither the radiation therapy parameters, the use of adjuvant chemotherapy, nor any other analyzed factor was found to be associated with cosmetic breast retraction.

Limited usefulness of observer-based cosmesis scales employed to evaluate patients treated conservatively for breast cancer

We evaluated the relative usefulness of two observer-based scales commonly employed to assess the cosmetic outcome of patients treated by breast-preserving techniques for breast cancer. We asked 44 volunteer observers to employ one or the other scale to assess cosmetic outcome in a series of 14 projected color photographs of frontal views of treated patients. Our results demonstrate that observer concensus with either scale is rarely attained, particularly for patients with T1 or T2 tumors. Experienced observers could reach a concensus more often, although still infrequently. Moreover, the reliability of both scales is poor, since approximately one-third of observers evaluating one photograph twice during the same test session changed their answer. We conclude that while observer-based cosmesis scales demonstrate that current surgical and radiation therapy techniques can provide a "good" cosmetic result in 66-90% of patients with Stage I or II breast cancer, they lack the sensitivity and reliability to evaluate factors affecting cosmetic outcome since all forms of cosmetic change are lumped together into one assessment. Each type of cosmetic change should be evaluated separately by objective measures to determine factors related to its development.