Pooled analysis of drug-related interstitial lung disease and/or pneumonitis in nine trastuzumab deruxtecan monotherapy studies

Introduction

This pooled analysis of nine phase I and II trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) monotherapy studies described drug-related interstitial lung disease (ILD)/pneumonitis in patients treated with T-DXd.

Methods

Patients who received T-DXd across nine studies were included. Investigator-assessed ILD/pneumonitis events were retrospectively reviewed by an independent adjudication committee; events adjudicated as drug-related ILD/pneumonitis are summarized.

Results

The analysis included 1150 patients (breast cancer, 44.3%; gastric cancer, 25.6%; lung cancer, 17.7%; colorectal cancer, 9.3%; other cancer, 3.0%). Median treatment duration was 5.8 (range, 0.7-56.3) months, with a median of 4 (range, 1-27) prior lines of therapy. The overall incidence of adjudicated drug-related ILD/pneumonitis was 15.4% (grade 5, 2.2%). Most patients with ILD/pneumonitis experienced low-grade events (grade 1 or 2, 77.4%); 87.0% had their first event within 12 months [median, 5.4 (range, <0.1-46.8) months] of their first dose of T-DXd. Based on data review, adjudicated ILD/pneumonitis onset occurred earlier than identified by investigators for 53.2% of events [median difference in onset date, 43 (range, 1-499) days]. Stepwise Cox regression identified several baseline factors potentially associated with increased risk of adjudicated drug-related ILD/pneumonitis: age <65 years, enrollment in Japan, T-DXd dose >6.4 mg/kg, oxygen saturation <95%, moderate/severe renal impairment, presence of lung comorbidities, and time since initial diagnosis >4 years.

Conclusions

In this pooled analysis of heavily treated patients, the incidence of ILD/pneumonitis was 15.4%, with most being low grade and occurring in the first 12 months of treatment. The benefit–risk of T-DXd treatment is positive; however, some patients may be at increased risk of developing ILD/pneumonitis, and further investigation is needed to confirm ILD/pneumonitis risk factors. Close monitoring and proactive management of ILD/pneumonitis are warranted for all.

•

Interstitial lung disease (ILD)/pneumonitis is a significant adverse event related to trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd).

•

This pooled analysis of nine T-DXd monotherapy studies evaluated ILD/pneumonitis risk in 1150 heavily pretreated patients.

•

Overall incidence of adjudicated T-DXd-related ILD/pneumonitis was 15.4% (grade 1 or 2, 77.4%; grade 5, 2.2%).

•

Within 12 months of their first T-DXd dose, 87.0% of patients had their first event [median, 5.4 (range, <0.1-46.8) months].

•

Proactive monitoring and prompt diagnosis and management are important to improving ILD/pneumonitis event outcomes.

Gene expression analysis in serial liver fine needle aspirates

No method with low morbidity presently exists for obtaining serial hepatic gene expression measurements in humans. While hepatic fine needle aspiration (FNA) has lower morbidity than core needle biopsy, applicability is limited due to blood contamination, which confounds quantification of gene expression changes. The aim of this study was to validate FNA for assessment of hepatic gene expression. Liver needle biopsies and FNA procedures were simultaneously performed on 17 patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection with an additional FNA procedure 1 week later. Nine patients had mild/moderate fibrosis and eight advanced fibrosis. Gene expression profiling was performed using Affymetrix microarrays and TaqMan qPCR; pathway analysis was performed using Ingenuity. We developed a novel strategy that applies liver-enriched normalization genes to determine the percentage of liver in the FNA sample, which enables accurate gene expression measurements overcoming biases derived from blood contamination. We obtained almost identical gene expression results (ρ = 0.99, P < 0.0001) comparing needle biopsy and FNA samples for 21 preselected genes. Gene expression results were also validated in dogs. These data suggest that liver FNA is a reliable method for serial hepatic tissue sampling with potential utility for a variety of preclinical and clinical applications.

The Importance of Clinical Parameters When Differentiating Cholestatic Hepatitis C Virus From Allograft Rejection

BACKGROUND

The exact cause and appropriate treatment for cholestasis following liver transplantation in recipients with hepatitis C virus recurrence (RHCV) are difficult to determine. Our objective was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of clinical and histological parameters in liver transplant recipients with RHCV and concurrent cholestasis.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis from June 1996 to May 2003 was performed on adult liver transplant (OLT) recipients with hepatitis C virus. Patients with cholestasis (bilirubin >5 mg/dL, 6 months after OLT) were selected. Demographics, etiology, immune suppression, clinical and histologic outcomes, and virologic features were evaluated. Patients were divided into two groups based on clinical and histological criteria: (1) patients with parameters suggestive of cholestatic HCV; and (2) patients with parameters consistent with acute cellular rejection.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven patients met study criteria (20 males). The average age was 54 years (range = 14-72), and time from transplant to jaundice was 769 days (range = 48-2981). The groups were comparable regarding HCV viral load, age, gender, time from transplant, and United Network of Organ Sharing status at time of transplant. Retransplantation was performed in two patients in group 1, neither of whom survived, and in three patients in group 2, all of whom survived. Clinical parameters correlated well with diagnosis of cholestasis (r = 0.85, P < .001) whereas histological evaluation did not (r = 0.11, P = .53). Mortality in group 1 was 78% (7 of 9) vs. 50% (13 of 26) in group 2. Median duration of survival following liver transplantation in group 1 was 132 days versus 435 days in group 2.

CONCLUSION

Clinical diagnosis parameters for RHCV with cholestasis appear more accurate than histology parameters and should be the primary consideration in directing therapy. Despite timely diagnosis, cholestatic RHCV LTx recipients have a poor prognosis.

The long-term effects of immune suppression on liver transplant recipients with recurrent hepatitis C viral infection

INTRODUCTION

Adequate immune suppression following liver transplantation in recipients with recurrence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) is not standardized. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between immune suppression protocol and the clinical/histological parameters in HCV transplant recipients with an HCV recurrence.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed on recipients of liver transplants from June 1998 to October 2003 who experienced HCV recurrence. Only patients with liver biopsies at 3 to 5 years following liver transplantation were included in the analysis. The data set included: patient demographics, immune suppression, antiviral therapies, as well as histology to evaluate ductopenia and chronic rejection. Patients divided into groups of high, medium, and low immune suppression were subdivided by treatment with versus without interferon. A control group with similar demographics suffering from cryptogenic cirrhosis was used for comparison.

RESULTS

During this period 45 patients had liver biopsies at 3 to 5 years posttransplantation. Their mean age was 56.5 years and mean time from transplant to biopsy was 1543 days. Their average posttransplant survival was 1964 days. There was no difference among the three groups with respect to HCV RNA levels (log(10) IU/mL), age, gender, time from transplant, donor age, and UNOS status. Median HCV RNA levels within the three groups were comparable at various time periods pre- and posttransplant.

CONCLUSION

The development of chronic allograft damage following transplantation in recipients with recurrent HCV tended to be worse among patients with low levels of immune suppression, suggesting the importance of therapy to maintain allograft function.