Spectrum of MR imaging findings in Wernicke encephalopathy: are atypical areas of involvement only present in nonalcoholic patients?

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Although MR imaging is considered the most effective method to confirm a diagnosis of WE, MR imaging studies designed to distinguish WE between NA and AL patients have yielded controversial results. The purpose of this study was to determine potential differences in MR imaging features between AL and NA patients with WE and to compare neurologic symptoms with MR imaging findings.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included 24 consecutive patients (male/female, 15:9; mean age, 54 years) diagnosed with WE in a university hospital (AL = 13, NA = 11). Clinical manifestations and MR imaging findings between AL and NA patients were evaluated. Classic WE symptom triad and consciousness level and MR imaging findings were scored and compared with each other. Statistical analyses were performed with χ(2), Fisher exact, and Spearman tests.

RESULTS

No differences were observed regarding the areas of hyperintense signal intensity on FLAIR imaging and enhancement of the mammillary bodies between AL and NA patients (P > .05). Frequent sites of involvement were the medial thalami (86%), dorsal medulla (82%), tectal plate (77%), and the periaqueductal gray matter (75%). A positive association was found between the consciousness levels of the patients and the involvement of atypical sites (P = .01). Only 4 of the 24 patients (17%) had all 3 symptoms of the classic WE symptom triad.

CONCLUSIONS

MR imaging features of WE may not be different between AL and NA patients. The medulla is 1 of the most frequently involved sites, and consciousness level is also associated with atypical site involvement.

Simultaneous occurrence of malignant fibrous histiocytoma and hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic liver: A case report

Primary hepatic malignant fibrous histiocytoma (MFH) is rarely encountered. There have been no reports to date of hepatic MFH associated with liver cirrhosis. The presence of liver cirrhosis is considered an adjunctive feature favoring sarcomatoid hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in the diagnosis of spindle cell tumors in liver. We describe here a 59-year-old man with liver cirrhosis due to hepatitis B virus infection 20 years ago. On abdominal computed tomography scanning, two distinct hepatic masses were identified in the background of cirrhosis, which had different radiological features from conventional HCC. He underwent segmentectomy for removal of the tumors. The pathological examination of surgically resected specimen revealed the large malignant spindle cell tumor and small conventional HCC. Additional tissue sampling and immunohistochemical stainings demonstrated that the spindle cell tumor was consistent with MFH. On the post-operative follow-up for 21 mo, a round mass showing similar radiological findings for the previous MFH was appeared on the surface of resection margin, suggesting the recurrence. Despite its rarity, hepatic MFH should be considered during differential diagnosis, even in cirrhotic patients, and extensive tissue sampling and immunohistochemical analyses are necessary in the diagnosis of hepatic spindle cell tumors.